Goddess

Actually that sounds a lot like you. Emotionally insecure people go on discussion forums to tell people off and blow off steam. Which you admitted to. And NOBODY disregards facts like you do. That is a FACT. 🤣

You owe me $10.

Some rules are stupid.

I haven't had a traffic violation in 45 years. This is what's going on in Canada since the Liberals have been in and at this point, you're truly stoopid if you don't see it.

🤣 "Progressiveness" Like letting rapists and pedos loose on the streets. Like mass immigrating so many people that our economy, jobs, healthcare, education system, housing collapses. Like no vetting of refugees and now we have foreign drug cartels and terrorists on the streets. Like massive deficits, more than in the history of Canada combined, that our grandchildren won't be able to pay off. Like letting our own infrastructure crumble while giving away $35 billion to other countries for "gender equity". Like "Free drugs for drug addicts". And then electing the ones who did it - 4 times! Yesssssssssssss. So enlightened. Much progress. 🙄

I feel like the collapse of Canada is inevitable at this point - we've cornered the world market on m0r0ns. There's no way any of these id10ts are going to wake up at this point. They're dug into their stupidity like a tick. But I'm going out fighting.

It was about policies that give government more power and take power away from people and you thought it was about me and traffic lights.🤪

I have children & grandchildren I care about. I don't give a sh!T about orangemanbad. And certainly not at the expense of their futures. Grow the fuque up. Wake up, you m0r0n. You thought it was about traffic lights because you're a m0r0n.

Learn to spell, dumba$$

Don't you? LOLLLLLL LOOOOOSSWSEERRR LOL LOL LLOOOOOLLLLLL LOOOOOSERERRRRRRRRRR LOLL LOL LOOOOSOSWOERRRR LOOLLL LLOOOLL LLOL LLOL LOLL LOOOOSOEWERREERER PEDOPHILE PEDOPHILE PEDOPHHHHIILLLLLEEEE LLLLOOO LLOOLLL LOOOOOSSSSEERRRRRR

Via Lionel Talbot: (Nice to see some boomers "get" it.) I wrote a piece yesterday (in French) addressing the reasons that motivated Carney to become Prime Minister of Canada. They were mostly personal (Brookfield). This was one of the comments I received: “I don’t care why, but just the fact that he stands up to Trump and that this orange madman is angry with Carney, I’m satisfied.” Unfortunately, this is how the majority of Canadians feel. If Trump was the evil person the media depicted him to be, how did he win a convincing majority even though 90% of media coverage on him was negative while 85% on Kamala was positive? Don’t give me the “Americans are stupid” bullshit. Libtards still haven’t figured this out, proof that TDS actually exists. People need to stop blaming Trump. The day Canadians realize Trump isn’t the villain he’s portrayed as will mark the beginning of the end for Carney and the Liberals. Canada’s emotional rage toward Trump and his allies isn’t good for the country, but it has benefited the Liberal Party. The Liberals knew they couldn’t campaign on a decade of failures, corruption, and economic decline. With the help of subsidized media, they focused instead on Trump and his team. The country is plunging into recession, but that doesn’t matter. Canadians would follow Carney off a cliff if they thought it would give Trump the finger. The Liberals have made hatred of Donald Trump their entire personality. Canadians are easily manipulated and haven’t yet woken up to reality. If they devoted even a fraction of their rage against Trump to demanding competence from their own government, this country would be in far better shape. I’m most concerned about the bill that future generations—my children and grandchildren—will have to pay for the legacy we boomers are leaving them. ☝️ Stalin's chicken ☝️ You think this is about traffic lights? Seriously?

Attendees: Finance Minister Champagne Bank of Canada Governor Macklin Bay Street corporate executives All the big banks And: Local executives from BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT.

Via L Wayne Matheson: Freedom in Canada doesn’t collapse with tanks. It fades more quietly. A new rule here. A “temporary” program there. Another national strategy. After a while, you wake up and realize the space to decide for yourself has been quietly fenced in. That’s the shift. The old tyrannies demanded obedience. The modern version asks for compliance in the name of compassion. Sounds nicer. Same direction. This is where the Liberal Party of Canada approach fits perfectly. Every problem gets a centralized solution. Housing shortages? Federal coordination. Energy costs? Federal planning. Industrial decline? Government picking winners. Speech tensions? Social pressure to fall in line. Each piece sounds reasonable. Stack them together and choice shrinks. Enter Mark Carney, the polished manager of this worldview. Banker calm. Global language. Net-zero frameworks. Industrial policy talk. It’s presented as sophisticated governance. What it really does is move decisions upward. Citizens become clients. Businesses become compliance departments. Regions become case studies. The irony is predictable. The loudest supporters are often insulated from the consequences. Consultants, academics, policy professionals. People who don’t lose jobs when projects are cancelled. People who don’t close shops when compliance costs rise. They design the system. Others live inside it. No single policy looks authoritarian. That’s why it works. A subsidy here. A mandate there. A regulation layered on top. Individually compassionate. Collectively constraining. Freedom doesn’t get crushed. It gets managed. The media helps. A crisis appears. A simple solution gets amplified. Critics get framed as heartless. Another lever gets pulled. Few step back and ask what the total adds up to. History already ran this experiment. Fascism promised order. Communism promised equality. Both concentrated power and crushed dissent. Today’s version promises sustainability, fairness, and coordination. Different tone. Same structural risk. Power flows upward. Accountability thins out. Canada’s danger isn’t an obvious dictator. It’s the slow accumulation of well-meaning control under leaders who believe they know best. That’s the direction the Liberals and Carney point toward. Not dramatic. Not loud. Just steady tightening. This isn’t leadership. It’s management of your life dressed up as progress. Stop judging each promise in isolation. Ask what happens when you add twenty of them together.

You can use this website to look at Global Affairs spending, by country, by year, by cause. Some highlights: Govt data files will show a recipient as Simon Fraser University in BC However, if SFU is spending the money on a project in China, its actually money destined for China There is 1,192 spending records of our taxes being spent in China, totaling $93 million dollars One of the largest entries is Refugee spending, but its a bit dishonest Global Affairs details all its spending on Refugees, except they are inside Canada In 8 years there has been $6.4 billion tax dollars spent on refugees INSIDE Canada, but shown as foreign affairs spending You can search for specific organizations to see how Canada is helping fund terrorist connected organizations like UNRWA A quick look shows $211 million in tax dollars given to UNRWA, to be spent in places like Syria for reason like Gender equality Government lists many programs under Gender Equality You can search for those too - in 8 years Canada gave away $35 billion tax dollars to foreign countries around the world under the guise of "Gender"

Why Carney won't say anything about forced labor. Canada has been flagged by international organizations for not just participation in forced labor, via the TFW program and mass immigration, but for actually setting up the system to make it so. He did the same thing in Brazil. Receipts in the thread:

STFU You're as stoopid as Stalin's chicken.

That's crappy. I'm sorry.

FFS, under Harper Canada had the richest middle class in the world even AFTER the 2008-9 financial crisis, and then the Liberals got in and everything started going to sh!t immediately, before the pandemic, before anything else in the world affected anything. And all the Liberal pom-pom wavers can say is "OhHHHHHHH, it was no better under Harper!" You bunch of fuquing LIARS. "Ohhhhh, there's always been inflation!" "Ohhhh, there's always been high food prices!" You fuqing bunch of m0r0ns.

How stoopid are you that you even ask this question? Seriously.

Of course he is. Nothing is the Liberals fault and anyways, it's all because of Harper (and Trump), and Carney says affordability is now the best it's been in over a decade.

This isn't a "nation building" project. It's a vanity project that will service only a small amount of people. It's to curry votes in ON and Quebec before the by-elections. 90% of these projects go WAAAAAAY over budget. Look at California, look at Spain. Canada has too many real problems that need $100 billion. We could eliminate poverty and stop 25% of the population of starving, with a fraction of that money. Build energy projects, which is what Carney campaigned on. When we get back on our feet economically, then ya - high speed rail would be great.

Blanchet is against it too. But you won't hear that on CBC, only Poilievre's view.

Really good interview with Poilievre on the Diary of a CEO podcast (which is an excellent podcast, BTW). Very different from the Rogan interview. Less talk about MMA 🤣. More focus on who he is as a person and his views on governing. Baloney. Even Carney admitted he wanted into government so he could affect policies that would make investors rich off taxpayer dollars.

Receipts here:

Here's what I think is going on with this weird situation. Brookfield invested heavily in "biofuel" for airplanes. While in the UK, Carney pressured the Uk to adopt legislation that forced airlines to buy a percentage of this biofuel. (I think it's called SAF.) The SAF is 2-10X more expensive than regular jet fuel. Then he did an interview where he was asked if he was thinking about getting into politics. He said he was, because then you can force policies that will make tons of money for investors. Air Canada signed a "sorta" agreement that they would go along with the biofuel thing, but the CEO added addendums to the agreement stating that they would do it, but only if it didn't interfere with business and profits. The CEO also publicly stated that he expected to have "his reputation ruined" if he didn't go along with the biofuel thing. Then Carney gets in as Canada's PM. Leads the charge to fire the Air Canada CEO. Now he can get a CEO in there that will agree to the biofuel thing. And put in legislation to force it. Voila! Carney makes a metric f*%kton of money. And Canadians can no longer afford to fly.