Goddess

I wasn't the one who said any deaths are irrelevant to me. You were. Again, see above. I was offended that you deemed Islamic terrorism deaths in Canada irrelevant to yourself. My answer was in response to your statement, so it's weird that you're accusing me of not caring when you were the one who said they were Irrelevant. I agree with your statement above. I was disagreeing with your statement that Islamic terrorism is irrelevant in Canada. You're so determined to paint me as an Islamophobe that your hatred is blinding you to what is being said.

Unfortunately, Muslims screaming and physically attacking Canadians rarely makes the news. The one that attacked me and left me with a big scar - didn't make the news. What makes the news now is Muslims as victims - rarely the perpetrators. When Muslim violence and harassment is reported - it's ignored and poo-poo'ed and excused. It's not just the deaths either - the young woman who was run down in Edmonton is permanently disabled. She was a single mother. But, irrelevant to you, as you stated. I was in downtown Edmonton for the other attack, only a block away and got caught up in the dragnet. That was pretty relevant for me. Also, Canadians have been killed abroad in world-wide Islamic terrorism. Again - irrelevant to you. I guess it's only relevant if it affects you personally?

It is very ironic. The irony is that the obligation to wear headcoverings is not in the Quran, so therefore is not an infringement on anyone's rights. French Laicitie is necessary because France refuses to let the French state be the conduit of religious demands and it has been primarily Islam who has demanded the state segregate swimming pools, ban pork from schools, and ban alcohol in predominantly Muslim areas, etc.

Good job! What would we do without apologists to "correct the wording" of radical Islamists and explain what they "really" mean?

Good gawd. Please read a science book or visit a farm. That is completely false. That's the problem.

This is what you do. Someone says something like, "There's a lot of violence amongst XYZ population." MH: No there isn't. Others: Here's an example of what's going on and why we're talking about it. MH: You can't use an individual case to prove anything. Others: Here's 47 more examples. Now can we talk about it? MH: Now you're a racist/Islamophobe/ bigot/*insert any label* !!!

I think it's a discussion that needs to be had. This person is just the catalyst for that discussion. http://www.gettheloutuk.com/attachments/LesbiansAtGroundZeroFindings.pdf

I wouldn't mind seeing that film.

That's Marocc's hero - the Peace TV guy. (Peace TV - the irony makes my brain hurt.)

Well, here's one thing we can do with Muslims: Rule against misogynistic traditions like this https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/victory-for-b-c-sisters-whose-parents-willed-them-tiny-share-of-9m-estate-1.5218792

I think teaching this to children that young is wrong. You have to teach children about sexuality gradually, according to their age and level of understanding. At this age, it would have better to teach that certain characteristics are not exclusive to boys to girls. ie: boys can like playing with dolls, girls can like sports for example. Teach them to respect and get along with everyone. 6 is too young to be presenting this concept to children. IMO.

That's too bad. The town I work in has a church that rings the hour and it's kind of helpful and nice sounding.

Exactly. I don't agree with blocking public streets for prayers or slaughtering of animals or blaring loudspeakers of religious mumbo-jumbo.

You likely will see me here again. I'm not one of the ones who "claims" to speak out against radical Islam and then......doesn't. But you've made your beliefs clear so I have no need to engage you further. I will continue to refute your recruiting efforts here, though.

You'd be surprised what I know about psychology and history. And radical religions. Anyways, you are exactly like almost every other Muslim I've met - same beliefs. I don't subscribe to your beliefs of wife-beating, rape, misogyny, killing of homosexuals and adulterers or jihad. Same weasel-y answers, too. Done with you.

Underage Yazidi war bride, anyone? Anyone?

Yes, it's a pretty extreme religion, which lends itself open to even further extremism. That's the problem. Yes, because sooooo many women beg to have sex with their captors. Get real.

Probably because you don't read those kinds of things. I've heard of him quite a few times, usually grouped in with other Islamists who try to recruit through youtube.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/controversial-muslim-televangelist-zakir-naik-banned-from-toronto-conference Article also confirms his "teachings" as I listed above. http://cjlab.memri.org/uncategorized/islamist-preacher-zakir-naik-barred-from-u-k-and-canada-an-ideological-profile/

As I said, the comments are from his videos - which you have watched - but I don't care to listen to radical Islamists. Sorry.

Ummmmm,.......because he's been in the news as a radical Islamist who is banned from many countries, including our own?

Would it matter to you? He's already your hero. Also, I know his comments about Bin Laden/terrorism are in his youtube videos. I imagine you know this too, as you are a fan, and are just being obtuse about this guy's beliefs.

It's not hard. He's been banned in Canada. He also engages in a lot of double-speak - as you do also. On the one hand saying he condemns terrorism, on the other hand, advocating it.

The scary part is that even though he is a radical Islamist and banned in a lot of countries, he still has 200 million viewers. Including Marocc,

It's not. But religiously motivated killing feels worse to most people because it more often involves killing innocent people that the killer doesn't even know and religion can be the catalyst that drives people to kill when they otherwise would not.