Shady

They say the sky is falling.

Today is a day for turning off the radio and listening to Spotify.

It's worth reading the whole article of this one:

Why Was News of India’s Success With Ivermectin Suppressed?

but I'll give you a clip:

In 2015, Ōmura and his partner William Campbell were awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine for their discovery of Ivermectin and its anti-parasitic properties. In 2012, Dr. Kylie Wagstaff discovered that Ivermectin also possessed antiviral properties. Early in the pandemic, Wagstaff and a team of researchers at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia conducted cell culture experiments to see if Ivermectin might be a useful therapy in the war on COVID. Their findings blew away all expectations.

Ivermectin halted the replication of the virus and completely eradicated it from the cell culture in under 48 hours. Their findings were released on April 3, 2020. Since then the findings have been replicated in over 60 trials and natural experiments, including 31 randomized control trials. Most of the suffering could have been avoided, but the bureaucrats who run our public health establishments condemned hundreds of thousands of Americans to death.

India’s surge was over in a matter of weeks. India’s doctors and public health authorities responded much more effectively and intelligently than our own. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare revised its guidelines on April 28 to include a recommendation that asymptomatic and mild cases be treated with Ivermectin. Along with the government, the Indian Council of Medical Research and AIIMS, Delhi (India’s premier medical college and hospital), and many state government and health authorities also bucked World Health Organization recommendations and urged the use of Ivermectin. Since then, case counts have declined in Delhi by 99 percent, in Uttar Pradesh by 98 percent, in Uttarakhand by 97 percent, and in Goa by 90 percent.

Why would this information be suppressed by our media outlets? Well, under the FDA’s rules, an emergency use authorization (EUA) like the ones given for the three main experimental gene therapy vaccines can only remain in force so long as there is not a superior alternative therapy available. When you consider that the absolute risk reduction from taking Ivermectin as a COVID prophylaxis is far superior to that of the products from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, the justification for administering these experimental treatments disappears.

Billions of dollars are at stake, not just for the mRNA injections, but for efforts to develop new antiviral drugs, ones that can be patented and sold at a significant markup. Who would want to risk a heart attack when you could take a safe and effective pill once a week? Follow the money.

Your source ignores the fact that that vaccination has also proceeded in India and they were subject to a strict lockdown. 

Things that also worked in Canada and the US. 

But continue to peddle Snake oil. 

India began its COVID-19 vaccination rollout on January 16. The surge of cases began 3 months later in early April.

And I wasn't going to bother posting the whole article but since you ask:

The April COVID surge in India is an interesting microcosm of what went wrong in this pandemic—and what went right.

As cases and deaths began to mount exponentially, a new wave of terrifying headlines and images also began to ripple across the West, accompanied by footage reminiscent of those first videos out of Wuhan and Iran in the early days of the pandemic.

A BBC report from outside of a hospital in Delhi was nothing short of gut-wrenching. Sick people on stretchers outside of the hospital, drawing their last labored breaths before a doctor or nurse could even see them. Frantic and traumatized family members begging for someone to come see their mother, their father, their sister, their brother. No one was coming. The people outside on the stretchers slipped quietly away into eternity.

That’s how it is with this virus. In most cases, it’s like a head cold or a bad case of the flu. But in some cases, if not properly treated, what seems like a banal infection rapidly spirals into a nightmare. Given the infectivity of the virus, it can spread faster than we can respond to it. And for India, this became the case at a national level. For much of the pandemic, COVID was so mild there relative to other countries that scientists were trying to figure out why they were doing so well.

Then came the April elections, which in India are carried out in phases rather than all in one go. There were huge rallies with politicians where hundreds of thousands of people gathered, a near perfect storm for the highly infectious Delta variant. India soon became the new global hotspot for COVID. The media maelstrom fed fears that a new wave would soon arrive in the West.

But seemingly overnight, stories about India’s COVID surge disappeared from Western media. Why?

I think it was because India was too good of a case study in how the virus can be defeated without experimental gene therapy vaccines. All it takes is a cheap, safe, widely used drug called Ivermectin.

Now we know why he appointed her.

I recall him ripping your argument to shreds and you leaving in a panicky tantrum. Now you try to pretend the opposite happened. But he's still there and you have cowered away to lick your wounds and pretend you weren't humiliated. Fun to watch.

Sure, you "kicked his teeth in" before you ran away. Sure you did.

How can you blame deaths caused by Fauci telling people not to wear masks on Trump?

Wow was this bad advice!

I wonder how many lives that Democrat cost with that disinformation.

Quote

On 2 April 1792, abolitionist William Wilberforce sponsored a motion in the House of Commons "that the trade carried on by British subjects, for the purpose of obtaining slaves on the coast of Africa, ought to be abolished." He had introduced a similar motion in 1791, which was soundly defeated by MPs, with a vote of 163 opposed, 88 in favour.^[12] Dundas was not present for that vote, but when it was again before MPs in 1792, Dundas tabled a petition from Edinburgh residents who supported abolition.^[13] He then went on to affirm his agreement in principle with Wilberforce's motion: "My opinion has been always against the Slave Trade." He argued, however, that a vote for immediate abolition would be ineffective, as it would drive the slave trade underground. He anticipated, in particular, that merchants from other countries would step in to fill the gap left by the British. He stated: "this trade must be ultimately abolished, but by moderate measures".^[14] He suggested that eventually slavery and the slave trade should be abolished but that this should not apply to the current generation of enslaved people who, he claimed would not benefit from immediate emancipation.^[13] He then introduced an amendment that would add the word "gradual" to the Wilberforce motion. The amendment was adopted, 192 in favour, 125 opposed. The motion as amended then passed 230 in favour, 85 opposed.^[15] For the first time, Parliament voted to end the slave trade.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Dundas,_1st_Viscount_Melville#Opposing_the_immediate_abolition_of_slave_trading

That's all he's talking about.

Dundas agreed with Wilberforce that slavery needed to be abolished. He thought it would fail if it was done abruptly and pushed for gradual abolition. 

Apparently Dundas and Wilberforce shook hands the day before Wilberforce's death and Dundas was pleased. By that time slavery had been abolished in the UK.

Mohawk leader Joseph Brant has tons of stuff named after him included Wayne Gretzky's hometown of Brantford. He owned Slaves. 

Up next: Yonge street.

How about Al Qaeda?

Go for it.  That’s not what critical race theory is.  The holocaust isn’t a theory.

Its effects are. 

Teaching the underlying effects of historical events are always up for debate. 

The fact that banks wouldn't approve mortgages in Black neighbourhoods certainly effected the wealth of the population into the future. Ditto with Jim Crow. 

AND history is repeating itself with voter restriction laws after the last election. 

Parents are showing up protesting that.  They’re protesting against the racism they’ve seen taught to their children.

So you're saying the Canadian Left wants Canada Day, or are you confused about what's going on but formed an opinion anyway?

At least they didn't read retarded misinformation like "the virus can't spread in Winnipeg" and "anti-herd immunity is the new anti-vax". That would be unforgivable. 

Sure thing Beijing Bubber.  Say hi to your buddy Wuhan Waldo for me.  Is he still busy defending China?

I see you won’t address the issue.  Instead you continue lie about cops killed while avoiding actual cops killed by Democrats in BLM and Antifa.

Sicknick just died spontaneously after getting attacked by you shitstains? I guess making up bullshit about Antifa is all you fascist cowards can do, now that you are neutered and a laughing stock.

Um, he died of a stroke 2 days later.  Have you read the medical report?  Keep lying.

You're just being a dog-faced pony soldier, now.

There wont be any stories like that coming from the bought media.

You mean Ashli Babbitt?

Yes, you instigators are responsible for her death too. She was too stupid to tell reality from alt-blog fiction. Sound familiar? 

I’m pretty sure she was the only death.