WestCanMan

In all honesty, that's almost every city in America right now. I'd love to see how the crime and murder rates there compare with the rest of the country though, on a per capita basis. This whole CHOP thing might be a valuable lesson for the "DEFUND POLICE" crowd if they do a good job of analyzing the final stats for that "Summer of Love".

Would you get a pass in Philosophy at Berkeley if you just scribbled down "I hate pigs, all wimin must be beleved, whit men are gilty of slavory, impeach the orange satin"? It wouldn't surprise me if you could.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-chop-shooting-protest Not only did the dirty Chop Cops kill a 16 yr old (17 yrs old according to CNN) black kid and critically injure a 14 yr-old, they tampered with the scene of the crime and removed evidence without cataloguing it. What is BLM saying about this murder? Are they going to organize riots, looting, arson and call for some CHOP-Cop killings because of this? "Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon". Nope. Crickets. The Dems and our lamestream media are totally to blame for this. They've endorsed, legitimized, supported and attempted to justify all of the rioting & looting for the last month, they downplayed the seriousness of the riots ($1B in Minnesota alone) and downplayed the murders of police and citizens that happened during the riots and they downplayed the assaults of police officers and business owners and they're ignoring the rash of violent assaults by the black people that they riled up all across the country, all they've been critical of is people who refuse to let themselves be victimized. Apparently the lives of the little kids who were shot in CHOP don't matter at all, here's what CNN is talking about today: BLMers, Antifa, the divisive alt-left media and all of their god-damned toady morons can all go to hell where they belong. We've all seen what happens in the absence of professional policing, it's time for leftist losers to 'fess up for how stupid they have been for the last 6 years.

...it was the Chop police that did it, so his life didn't actually matter. https://toofab.com/2020/06/29/16-year-old-shot-killed-chop-seattle/ Getting rid of the police has been fairly successful. There have only been 4 shooting incidents in the whole country of Chop, and only two people killed. Two murders in 3 weeks, in an area with a population of what? I'd love to know, so that we could figure out how many people would be killed in a whole city the size of NY or LA if their population was as well-behaves as the model citizens of CHOP.

The liberal MSM is always pushing the envelope further left. They do this by considering things that are so far left that anything that used to be normal is now considered verboten. An example is accepting a conversation around the BLM's assertion that discriminating against white people is important and the only right thing to do. Of course that's not their end goal, but you throw out an option that's super stupid just so that people are happy to accept 'ridiculous'.

I agree. Espousing a political platform that's fiscally conservative is going to win about as many votes as wearing blackface. People hear "austerity - they want to throw grandma off a cliff."

To be honest, failing philosophy in this day and age might just mean tat you're not a sycophant.

I liked O'Toole too. At this point I'd vote for Lucifer if I thought that he could beat Trudeau, and I think that a candidate from the GTA might have a strong shot. The Bloc will take away most of Quebec from Trudeau, I think that Ontario is the key battleground for the next election. O'Toole would be a tough opponent for Trudeau. I really like the things that Dr Lewis says, and I love the fact that she could shut Trudeau's holier-than-thou yap like no other, and put the BLM terrorists down where they belong, but she's an over-emoter and it's so hard to watch after the last 700 years of Trudeau. She's also the conservative that could win over a lot of minority voters, who right now mostly believe the liberal MSM narrative that the Conservatives are all racist. Sloan just looks like the guy that Trudeau could make immigrants fear. I'd be happy with either of those two. Leslyn first, but once she's elected she needs to just start talking like the intelligent, strong, sensible person that she is and not the drama queen. Mackay is my third choice. Meh. Sloan is a good conservative but he's like Bernier imo. Too conservative to draw support away from the middle. They could be the smartest person in the room with all the best answers, but they'll always say one thing a year that gives the MSM a chance to twist their words into a racist attack.

In our naiveté, most of us looked at universities as purely being institutes of higher learning for all these years. Most of us never paid much attention to the fact that young, impressionable kids were leaving their homes to live in relative isolation from their families, where they could easily be indoctrinated by deceitful scumbags whom we had actually taught those kids to look up to. There are people with masters degrees and doctorates, who are at an age where they should have been able to accumulate a lifetime worth of wisdom, who were shrieking that Dr Ford just had to be believed despite the mountain of evidence against her, the extreme lack of specificity in her accusations, and the fact that she was caught lying at several points in her testimony. My favourite part of that whole fiasco was how many people believed the girl who HERO AVANATTI trotted out that said that she had been to TEN Kavanaugh-gang-rape parties lol. Because going to one gang rape part is just never enough for a 19 year old girl, they just keep going, and going, and going.... And hero Avanatti lol. At one point he was hailed as a strong candidate for the Dem nomination. Dems and their toadies are and endless source of humour. Sorry Newfies & blondes, but there's a new gang on the block that makes you look like sages. I got off on a tangent there, but honestly - getting a doctorate and being 60 years old should mean that a person's opinion is actually worth something. It's almost the opposite. In fact, if you got that PhD at Berkeley or some such, it's actually like a proof of idiocy. Pathetic hapless Dolt.

The Seth Rich 'conspiracy theory', your own words, isn't a 'lie'. It wasn't a 3 yr long lie disguised as a conspiracy theory either. Just a conspiracy theory which, truthfully, hasn't been de-bunked. You can be at a drive thru without being in the drive thru lane though, can't you? You don't even need to be in a car. If he was just parked at a drive thru restaurant he could be sleeping in the parking lot. He wasn't even necessarily driving. When you say 'in the drive-thru lane' it specifically means that he was in control of the vehicle when he went to sleep. To be honest my lie wasn't really much of a lie. It was actually far more accurate than CTV's version. But it's a lie in that Rayshard didn't just attack the officers, he tried to escape an they tackled him. Omission is a form of lying, if that's what you're asking about. For your edification: https://www.quickbase.com/blog/know-when-someone-is-lying-7-types-of-lies LMAO. You're saying here that you know for a fact that Hannity started that conspiracy theory? That's either a lie or your idiocy is rearing it's ugly head again. The second that a body hits the floor that had crossed paths with Hillary at any point in time there are simultaneously 117,000 conspiracy theories started. The de-bunking of "Hannity's conspiracy theory" re: Seth Rich included 'the fact that 13 Russians had been indicted for hacking the emails' lol. It has since come out that crowdstrike at no point has ever found any evidence that Russians hacked the server. That was all just a red herring. The emails came out shortly after it was revealed that the Dems had conspired against Bernie, and at that point it was highly likely that the source of the emails was a disgruntled Dem insider. Further to that, Assange himself has hinted that Seth Rich did leak the emails: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/will-julian-assange-and-wikileaks-finally-tell-the-truth-about-seth-rich-918946/ You're making things worse each time you reply. Ooh let's plumb the depths of your most recent idiotic comment. FYI Sean Hannity predicted in advance that McCabe was going to be fired. CNN barely covered it, if at all. Hannity also correctly predicted the trouble that other high-level FBI agents like Strzok were going to be in. Did CNN even do much coverage of all those high-level FBI agents being fired and demoted for their indiscretions? At the end of the day, those were the only crimes committed by Americans in that whole fiasco..... Weren't they really interested in finding some bigtime malfeasance to report on? Hannity reported well in advance that the FBI was using deceit to get FISA warrants. The IG report cited "17 serious errors and omissions" by the FBI to the FISA court to obtain warrants to spy on Americans. (Do you remember earlier when I explained to you that omission can be a form of lying? Is 17 errors and omissions, all mysteriously aligned with the desire to get a warrant where the truth would have prevented it, sound like a pattern of deceit to you?) At the end of the whole Russian collusion fiasco, Hannity was right and the whole liberal MSM that you love, on both sides of the border, were exposed for LYING, and/or being stupid. You'll not that the date on this video was 2017. That's way back before the Dems, the FBI and the idiot MSM ever let go of the Russian collusion theory: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/339867-okeefe-video-shows-cnns-van-jones-calling-russia-story-a-nothingburger If Hannity is so dumb then how did he manage to run circles around MSNBC, CTV, CBC, NBC, ABC, NPR, CNN, WashPo, the NYT and global News for 3 straight years Moonbox? The fact that you think Hannity is the dumbest news personality around makes you a flat-earther on the topic of media.

Moonbox, if you want to take stock of the situation here you'll now realize that in order to defend your media sources: 1) you're advocating for outright deceit in media, under the cover of 'editorial bias', and 2) you're completely refusing to watch something which you now know you can't refute just because it will cause you a bit of cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is your friend dude. You'll never really learn if you protect your brain from a bit of necessary stress. Right now you're the victim in the old adage: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." Honest to god, just don't let yourself be lied to. It's a really bad habit. Who cares if it gives you a bit of license to (fake) look down on people? Most of those people know that you're just an idiot when you're belching CNN-isms. The truth is that you already know what's up, but you've got your little hill to die on now. That's why you and all the other libs here will never come out and admit to what your most trusted news source is. Instead you'll just cower and hurl sandbox insults and unsubstantiated allegations against big, bad Fox.

I ignore your childish and unfounded allegations. Nice try kid. You made an accusation that you've never supported at all. I've made accusations that I've supported by citing everything from Kavanaugh/ford, Biden-Ukraine, Biden-China, Russian collusion, Sandman, etc. CNN was even successfully sued for their lying by a high school kid. Your one little cite was "Hannity addressed the possibility that Seth Rich wasn't just robbed (and had nothing stolen from him), he was murdered". Boohoo. That was entirely appropriate. If Trump's old layer is 'robbed', but nothing was ever stolen from him, and Don Lemon wants to raise the question of whether or not he was murdered does that make him a fake? You lose 10,000 - 0.3 and you're claiming that you don't have anything to prove? LMFAO That's not editorial bias, that's lying. He wasn't "at a drive-thru" he was "in the drive-thru lane passed out drunk", and he wasn't shot after that, he was shot "after firing a taser at an officer from less than 15". You're doing backflips to make that look rational. Could a news channel say, in their opening monologue, that Brooks attacked an officer, shot at the officer, and was killed in return fire, and that would be ok with you as long as the story fleshed out the details a bit better? Editorial bias is not a license to lie FYI. Sean Hannity asking questions about a 'robbery' that doesn't look like a 'robbery' at all is not lying. This is too easy.

On the worldmeter site they're saying that Canada does 72,000 tests per million. That's just a bit under 1/10 people. I know a lot more than 10 people and I don't know anyone who has been tested, aside from my father-in-law, and he just got tested because he died. Does anyone here know people who were tested?

Yeah I saw your childish insults there moonbox, I just ignored them. You're talking about an inability to engage in intelligent debate but what you're actually doing is blathering until your back is against the wall and then running from the actual proof of the matter. You don't have to watch 4 hours. According to you childish accusations this should take you a few minutes, at most. It takes me ten seconds to catch CTV lying. They do it in their opening monologue. "Killed after falling asleep at a drive-thru". "A black man was killed while running from police." Done.

You're making very serious claims against the integrity of Fox News. They should be really to prove unless you're just a total liar. I make very serious claims about the liberal MSM. I cite the links to their lies all the time. Take the challenge, or just roll over and admit defeat moonbox. Choice is yours. Don't put your pathetic spin on it to dodge the challenge. I gave you a huge advantage. You have about 30 programs to choose from over 6 networks. I gave your choice of all of the main programming on Fox.

When was Jussie Smollett ever truly 'roasted' by CNN? https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/12/us/jussie-smollett-indictment-case-unfold/index.html What he actually did was fake a hate crime try to stir up hatred and division. They refer to it as 'headline-grabbing" etc, but they never say how divisive his story truly was. His quote from the alleged 'attackers' who committed the crime was: This is a direct attempt to smear Trump/GOP supporters, and to create division. CNN is completely ignoring the elephant in the room. There's a big difference between "He just did it because he wanted attention" and "He was intentionally sowing fear and division in the entire country". One is pathetic, the other is sinister. The reference to MAGA hats makes this sinister and there's no way around that. He didn't just make a sob story, he made a sob story with an extremely defamatory accusation against a specific group of people as a fundamental part of it. He committed an actual hate crime himself, not just a dirty trick that was just a waste of the police's time. Sure Jussie. Why would we take the word of a huge liar like yourself, when your accusation goes too far and is too specific against a certain group of people? When has he ever apologized to the MAGA community? Can you show me where CNN "roasted him" for his own hateful bigotry and fear-mongering? Let's be honest, that's what it was.

Dude I can catch CTV and CBC lying every day. I can catch them lending credibiity to groups like Anifa and OBLM every day. I can catch them downplaying the effects of Trudeau's disastrous failure against covid every day. Pick your mainstream media source that you trust out of NBC, CTV, CBC, Global, MSNBC and CNN. Pick whatever show you want from their whole lineup. I'll PVR the show of your choosing, and you can PVR Tucker Carlson (opinion show), Brett Baier (News), Hannity or the Five (discussion). Let's play spot the lies moonbox. You should have the advantage, you get to choose any show you want from 6 major networks. I gave you 4 shows to choose from on a single network. You can even watch all 4 if you want and I'll just watch one show of your choosing.

Stop with the idiocy already moonbox. You know what my criticism of our PM's ridiculous boner for shutting down the oil sands was. You must surely understand how devastating that would be for Canada's economy yet you pretend that we'll be fine because we have "a super GDP" and the nail tech & hair-cutting sector of our economy is so solid. FYI we will NOT be a world leader in the manufacture of any green technology, at all, ever. There's no replacement on the horizon for the exports that we are shutting down, at all. Trudeau, May, Singh and Blanchet are truly retarded and its sad that they are able to suck so many people in. We'll be importing cheap clothing and household items from everywhere, tech from everywhere, cars from everywhere, toys from everywhere, and our net exports will be down by 25% under your awesome plan, but you think that we're not gonna miss a beat. Time will tell, but just remember that you already heard it here first. Oh cry me a river moonbox.How much talk did we ever hear about investigating the Seth Rich murder? If it was completely unverified and made up, shouldn't it go on for 3 years like Russia, Russia, Russia did? Shouldn't they have been able to get some FISA warrants issued for that, and lock some Dems up for kiddie porn but say that they're in jail because of the "Seth Rich assassination"? I get that you're upset that anyone would think that Hillary should be investigated for anything. Ditto for Biden in Ukraine. Ditto for Biden in China. Ditto for the WHO. At the same time you think that the Russian collusion and Ukrainian collusion and Kavanaugh investigations were all super-legit and no doubt de-fund police is the next big thing. That's why your opinion is completely worthless. You're talking about mental gymnastics, it takes some world-class backtard flips to be hoodwinked by all the clown shows that CNN is running and yet be completely apoplectic about a brief discussion involving why Seth Rich died at such an opportune time in such a weird way. That's some next-level hypocrisy. I wish I could laugh moonbox, but the depths of leftist stupidity is no laughing matter.

You're not the first person to learn through rote, check the right boxes on some tests, and come away without a true understanding of anything. Your "nail technicians do just as much for the economy as any industry that's producing export commodities" theory is the stuff of legends. That lane is wide open for you. Maybe you can be the next Art Laffer. Your curve will look like a doughnut. Don't put words in my mouth kid. You lack the intellectual capacity to understand topics that you studied for years in school. You definitely aren't capable of understanding what's in my posts. The Seth Rich murder was worthy of a proper investigation. It didn't fit the MO of a robbery at all because, for example, the robbers didn't steal anything. You're just a parrot for the Dems always scream "THAT DOESN"T NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED!!!!! ARE YOU A FREAKING MORON???????" Just like it's hilarious that anyone would think that Hunter and Joe need to be investigated, right? Why wouldn't he just randomly strike up a couple of new careers in 'random' foreign countries? His career path is pretty normal, right? 100% of all the world's biggest idiots agree so it must be normal. You're talking about other people's ignorance, that's a lark. When your Nail Tech theory gets published I'll eat a whole crow for you.

I really felt bad for the people of Manu Original when they had to watch Trump give their President that big tit-twister by the statue of El Manu. Oh the shame. The Bubonic Wedgie that he gave to the President of Manu Extra-Spicy was even worse. I think about it every time I take a dump. Now you will too.

I agree with all the aspects of this, but I still think that CNN should have taken one right on the chin for this, publicly. Sandman has 3 libel suits, maybe he needed money from one lawsuit so that he could really stick to his guns and get the other two, to the point where there's a major public apology. Hopefully that's where this is going, because media treachery is out of hand.

The subjective opinion that G Floyd's killing had something to do with race has been treated like it was scientifically proven or that Cahuvin was making racist comments when he killed him. You know as well as I do that the topic of slavery in North America is handled as if in the whole history of the world it has only ever been a whites-owning-blacks phenomenon. Don't try to use such a weak and disingenuous statement to try to derail what you know to be a perfectly accurate & relevant topic in this day and age. This is getting to be insulting Rue. You know god-damned well that everything I said in that OP was accurate and true. The topic of slavery in North America is discussed as though only white Anglo-Saxons owned slaves, in the whole history of the world. It's not looked upon as something that was normal throughout the entire history of the world. There's no discussion of wealthy black men who owned slaves. If you asked most people in north America if there were even any blacks who weren't slaves in America during that period I bet that you'd get about 80% of all people saying "all blacks were slaves back in the 1800s. Maybe 1% of people in North America are aware that there were wealthy black men who owned a lot of slaves. The whole topic, as it is presented to Americans and the world, is a huge exercise in dishonesty and deceit. If you think that anything I said here is inaccurate then go ask around Rue. See how many people that you know are aware that there were any free black men in the US in 1860. See how many of those enlightened few are aware of black slave owners in America. The original statement of: "The new narrative going around the world today is that whites are the slaver drivers of the human race and blacks are the sole victims." IS ENTIRELY TRUE. You know it's true in Canada, it's true in the US, and in the UK even Sadiq Khan is talking about how important it is to get rid of the statues of people who owned slaves. I don't think he has ever heard of Mohammed. Honestly, you're calling my OP too subjective and then right out of the blue you're equating my statement with white pride? FYI white pride has nothing to do with any altruistic endeavours. If you said that I was advancing the concept of white pride to my face that would be the immediate end of dialogue. Saying that white people should be proud of their anti-Slavery legacy is not an advancement of white pride at all. Here's one of your quotes that's incorrect as it could be: The truth is that "white people have been singled out as the history's biggest slavers". That is a myth and couldn't be any further from the truth. Dispelling that myth doesn't make me a member of the white pride movement and the accusation is repugnant. You of all people should be aware that you have no right to tell people what they feel. You don't know how many times I have seen "white people" being blamed for slavery while no other race or creed of people gets mentioned. I'd like to take the opportunity to apologize to absolutely nobody. If you want an apology from me for slavery you can straight to fucking hell. My ancestors didn't own slaves. My ancestors fought in wars and worked in coal mines. We don't own anything we didn't earn. If you feel compelled to take something from me, come heavy and don't leave any loose strings behind. It's not a racist statement to say that "white people abolished slavery" because it's an accurate reply to the ignorant comment from the intentionally uninformed. By the same token it's also non-racist and even more accurate to say that "white men from Britain and America abolished slavery", because they were the powers-that-be behind the worldwide abolitionist movement. They could have easily remained in the slave owning business, there was no one who had the power to force them to end it and no one even tried. The people who were involved in the decision-making process and the voters behind them were white majority by a vast margin (and sadly no one else was allowed to vote because they were still a bit racist at the time, not even women). There's nothing inaccurate at all in this post. This is Full "gfys if you don't understand any of it" Disclosure.

If they all got all the same answers you think they could have all just made the same crazy guesses? Sure eyeball.

Here's a quick summary of your post eyeball, with a level of accuracy that I know you'll find to your liking.

I only posted 1 video. You have to watch 3 commercials every time you go to CTV's lie vault, so I posted the first one I found. It's CTV, you can't really go wrong if you're looking for misinformation. In that video they said "Killed after falling asleep at a drive-thru." He was actually killed after **passing out drunk in the actual drive-thru lane, being initially unresponsive (he didn't wake up from tapping on the window, they had to open the door and shake him), blowing .108, punching a cop, stealing a taser, running from the cops and shooting the stolen taser at a cop.** So they got the "falling asleep" part wrong and missed all the key (incriminating) parts that led to the shooting. Re: saying "He was shot while running away from cops", that's a lie too. Police returned fire when he shot the taser at them. It's Georgia law that shooting a taser at someone is treated the same way as if they shoot a gun at you. Your ignorance of their law is no excuse. Don't weigh in if you have no clue wtf you're talking about. The idiot DA who charged the cop with murder for killing Brooks had actually just charged a cop named willie Sauls with aggravated assault for merely point a taser at a girl. No, it's a pattern that is too long, too unbroken, and their conclusions are all so wild and so wrong that it can't be dismissed as coincidence. If there are fifty questions on a math test and a whole bunch of kids all get the exact same 50 answers, 40 of which don't make any sense, it's not that they're 'probably' cheating off the same source. It's definitely cheating. I should probably have qualified that sentence to say: "The truth is rare 'when there's good reason to politicize it'." It was accurate enough as it stands. The truth is rare. You just watched MSM on both sides of the border characterize 'the protests' as majority 'peaceful'. Many innocent people were killed, or suffered extreme damage from physical attacks and/or being shot. There was property damage in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Businesses were destroyed and closed for good. Stop acting like the fucking mainstream media is worth watching. It's pathetic.