WestCanMan

Idiocy. ‘Laundering’ is a poor choice of words here, which points to an agenda. IE it’s equating campaign over-spending with illicit drug activity and the two are nothing alike. By the same token I could call Soros’s brick and riot campaign ‘laundering’ and overspending too. Ditto for BLM donations.

I already told you exactly how the NFAC were evil. I don’t know who the 3%ers are or where they demonstrated. I don’t know what their ‘agenda’ is but I do know that it’s the opposite of whatever you heard on CNN or The Psychic Hotline.

1)America is the co-morbidity capital of the world. C19 was almost tailor-made to kill Americans 2)Just because the majority of Americans are hoodwinked by this issue doesn’t mean thst Canadians should be as well. That’s not what it shows. It shows that C19 completely made the rounds and almost everyone was unaffected. It also shows that we didn’t protect our most vulnerable. We know for an absolute fact that we didn’t contain C19 because our government took every effort to ensure that it could spread: they kept busy airports jam-packed with Canadians and people from covid hotspots for almost two months and they told Canadians not to wear masks. The exact opposite of Japan. I’m not Pelosiing here - I wasn’t out giving the wrong advice at the beginning and then acting like I was right all along. I said the mask rule here was stupid and I said we should close off travel from covid hotspots all along. Just like Japan.

We focus way too much on C19 here. At it's peak C19 killed less BC residents than Fentanyl did, and now it's at less than 1/3. Fentanyl deaths are, on average, people who have 40+ years worth of life expectancy. On average the vast majority of C19 deaths are mostly robbing people of 1 year or less here, because over 80% of our C19 deaths come from care homes. Covid is bad, and at-risk people should protect themselves, but it's completely dominating our society and it shouldn't be. Even in the US, C19 kills less people than medical mistakes, which kill between 250,000 & 440,000 Americans per year, according to Johns Hopkins.

OMG, this sounds serious. *yawn*

Funny that Trudeau did LITERALLY every single thing wrong re: covid for two months, including getting his own family infected, but Canadians give him a shining star re: covid lol. Also funny that Idris Alba got covid and Justin didn't. Things that make ya go hmmmmmmm.

Wow. This is just basic human communication that you're lacking now. You had a picture of some black guys with guns and some white guys with guns. It wasn't Mike Tyson & Eddie Murphy in one pic and Stallone & Gretzky in the other. We were left to guess who they were. So, exactly, who are the groups, where and when were the pictures taken, and what kinds of things were they doing when the pictures were taken? By the time you answer those questions I should hope that you know the answer anyways but I'll give it to you if you must really need it.

Grow up eyeball. Be more specific if you don't want people to guess wtf you're talking about. I actually tried to make it look like what you were saying was somehow true.

Just one on my phone now, from 27 mins ago, saying when Trudeau is testifying. That was impossible to skip though. lying about Yeah that's a hot topic on Fox but why not? They don't even report on them all.

Even our own holier-than-thou PM, who likes nothing more than pontificating about bigotry and jumping on every bandwagon that rolls along, outright refuses to condemn public hate rallies against Jews. What's even worse is that the bigotry stats against Jews are conveniently assumed to come from right-wing and/or white-Canadians, and anyone who's seen a quds-day hate rally knows where the actual bigotry against Jews comes from in this country. We also have an outspoken bigot (yusra khogali) LEADING our BLM cult in Canada, is she banned from Twitter? She has also posted vile, bigoted comments on FB and I doubt that she's banned there either.

I looked on CBC’s site on my phone, there were 8 stories about covid and 2 about police brutality out of the 25 stories on the front page. 40% of their coverage is directly on those two ‘issues’. Not a single direct or indirect mention of We. Not even a single mention of Trudeau.

I was too busy to watch the news this weekend but my son and I met up with a friend and his kid for a late lunch Sunday and CBC was on one of the TVs there with no volume. I could tell what stories they were covering but I couldn’t hear it. As usual, covid dominated. There was also a lot of talk of the NS shooter. I didn’t see a single mention of We in that hour or see Trudeau’s face. Is We already a dead issue to CBC?

Like I said before, the evil ones are out intimidating citizens, the kooks are ‘defending America from covid stupidity’.

Polling is left-wing garbage/propaganda, plain and simple. The last elections in Canada and the US proved that. "Polling shows that Canadians don't care about Trudeau's minor failure to recuse himself". FWIW I personally never use the word 'progressive' to describe leftists because they aren't 'progressive'.

@ Shady - I think when he says that "neither of the groups have broken any laws" he's referring specifically to that group on Stone [?] Mountain that marched with all the guns, on that day, at that time. There's virtually no doubt that they collectively rioted together at some point in time at a different location, but at that time, on Stone Mountain, they didn't commit acts of violence. The case could be made that they terrorized some families, which is a serious enough crime of it's own, but they won't be prosecuted for it now because of the current political climate.

LOOK AT THE TRAGEDY THAT'S UNFOLDING IN MICHIGAN!!!!! NPR IS REPORTING THAT THE DEMOCRACY IN MICHIGAN WAS ALMOST PUT ON HOLD, PEOPLE HAD TO WEAR VESTS!!!!!!! Let's contrast NPR's reporting of 3 days of peaceful (but armed) protests in Michigan with the 59 days of riots in Portland. Look for their concern about the fact that the federal employees in Portland haven't been able to work for 59 days because of actual violent rioters: https://www.npr.org/2020/07/25/895329257/portland-protests-continue-for-59th-consecutive-day Well, they're not really concerned about the democracy in Portland, at all. In fact, check out these idiots just failing to even notice an actual newsworty story: How does "Fadel" not clue into the story that the city has ordered their police to stand down and not stop criminals from destroying buildings within the City limits? That's like a news reporter covering a story about riots and someone ends with "there was an M1 Abrams tank cruising through the schoolyard firing live rounds at those houses over there last night. See the smoking piles of rubble? Those used to be houses" and they reply with: "That's NPR's Kirk Siegler in downtown Portland, Ore. Kirk, thank you so much." LMAO. NPR is as bad as CBC.

All I can comment on what I saw them do, I never heard the same media narrative that you did and I never saw them reading from their manifesto. Are you 100% certain that their motive for rallying was the liberation of 3 entire states via civil war or did you just hear that CNN or one of their toady outlets? You gotta admit, that sounds like 100.6% bullshit.

One of those groups was strictly a racist entity with a propaganda arm that’s into fear-mongering and division. It’s entirely bad and the people who are sucked in by their bigoted screed are attacking and even killing people when they think they can get away with it. One of those groups was a bunch of kooks protesting government overreach who made a bizarre spectacle of themselves by threatening to stand up to the Michigan government because of it’s aggressive (sometimes farcical) C19 lockdown policies. Their demonstration was entirely stupid, juvenile and dangerous but not inherently evil and they have never conveyed a message of hatred/division or harmed anyone. There are no “good guys” there. There’s a group of mainly-evil people and a group of idiots who created a very dangerous situation.

The Dems lack decent candidates because their entire party is as inherently ugly as their message of "defame, divide, discriminate, demonstrate (pronounced destroy), and de-fund". The cities that they control reflect that ugliness in their murder rates. Note to Demmies: Apparently strict gun control doesn't work when you tell the police not to bother checking anyone for guns. "It's too racist to ask black people if they have guns, just let them kill each other."

I'm a huge fan of Dr Lewis. She's a bit of an over-emoter at times, and I'm not a fan of that aspect of her persona, but she's very intelligent, insightful, and she's in a position where she can tell serious truths which 'old white guys' can't. The Twitter campaign of "crackas is gilty of slavery n sisstemik rasism #imonlyaloserbecauseoftheGOP" shtick, mainly based in the US, has effectively been a pre-emptive strike on factual, pertinent & intelligent dialogue coming from the mouths of white people. "A cracka said it, thats alla proof ya need ta no that its a lowdown dirty lie!!!! #givememoney". FWIW I don't believe that we need to put a black woman in charge to balance out the 'white guy' thing. Most of the black women in US politics are disgusting & foolish and I'd sell my house to aid in a campaign against Maxine Watters. I believe that Dr Lewis (like Candace Owens) is a person who can stand with anyone on her own merits though, and that she would be a good leader in any day and age.

I hate that the MSM allows them to give fake apologies for minor things that they didn't really do and then they just leave it to stand as if it's the apology that Canadians deserve and that there's nothing left to see here now. Trudeau basically says: 1) "I merely failed to recuse myself from the choice to select We, which was an obvious choice anyways. I apologize for not recusing myself.2) I also apologize to my mom for getting her caught up in this. I'm such a great guy, look at me taking the heat for my dear mother." 1) There's no mere 'failure to recuse' here: https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/trudeau-government-contributed-1-18-million-to-we-day-event-in-2017-during-which-pms-mother-was-likely-paid-to-speak The way this article is framed, Trudeau solicited We to host an event, gave them federal money, his mom spoke at that event, and we know that We gave her over $200K for her speaking engagements. Whether or not she made gobs of money at that exact event isn't made clear by the article, but just because they may have found a roundabout way of lining her pockets, she made an average amount for speaking at We and that amount applies to this appearance because the fact is that Margaret Trudeau doesn't appear to have done this for charity's sake. 2) Trudeau didn't bring his mom into this at all if his story is true. She's the one who raked in gobs of money and then didn't tell her son about it. She apparently kept this a secret from him and left him exposed to a direct scandal involving federal money, allotted directly from the PM's own seal, going through a 'charity' to his own family members. His mom submarined him. She couldn't have done him any dirtier if she was an agent of the Conservative party. 3) Did he apologize for giving federal money to a 'charity' that's (buying up large tracts of land and) making propaganda videos that would make Kim Jong-Un blush for the PM personally? I don't remember that being part of his apology. That reeks of 'taxpayer money for campaign donations'. Because it is. Just like the $695M to CBC was, and just like the $600M to 'select' media outlets was. This new part about the $900M drew attention to his real scandals which we just didn't know about. Even if this $900M fiasco never happened, Trudeau already did enough to disqualify himself from ever being in a position where he could be trusted to hold a public office again. The question is, did he already know that he was screwed and this was just his last hurrah, to get We one last massive payment before he was finally caught? How much did his mom and brother and wife stand to make from this gigantic golden egg? Will Trudeau just make another fake apology and resign now, so that he can keep his rep and keep doing speaking engagements until he can weasel himself into the UN or something?

So how do you stop people from bullying others into voting for whoever they're told to vote for if they fill them out at home? How do you stop people from just spamming ballots for registered voters? How do you register illegal immigrants to vote, and how hard is it for them to scam the system so that they can vote more than once? If I was an illegal immigrant what's stopping me from going to different counties and registering to vote with different names? You don't understand how hard it is to keep track of citizens with no immigration papers and no gov't issued ID. You only think that this is ok because you think that most of the hard-core cheaters are on the Dem side. People without jobs and without real assets have nothing to lose, they can scam all day and still get their gov't handouts and they'll still get paid to attend riots. Citizens who have houses and who have jobs worth keeping have too much to lose by getting caught in a voting scam.

It's what the Dems are proposing, not me. Mail-in ballots plus illegals voting. The 'long lines' is just an excuse from the party of: https://www.axios.com/16-things-hillary-clinton-blames-for-her-election-loss-1513305545-cf6505a6-76a8-49a0-989a-1be67190d4ed.html Who cares how long the lines are? If you want to vote, vote. If you live in an area where the lines are too long because no one wants to volunteer then it sucks to be you. What if someone just requests ballots for their spouse and kids, who are too lazy or just don't want to vote? How do you know that a 265 lb guy doesn't tell his wife and kids who they have to vote for? How do you know that Antifa or BLM won't force hundreds of people to give them their ballots? How do you stop dead people from casting their mail-in ballots? It's much harder for dead people to show up with ID and vote. How do you really know that there are 17 illegal immigrants living in a house who all get to vote? If you had to guess, what percentage of the votes cast inside of polling stations, after presenting 2 pieces of id, do you think would be fraudulent? How hard would it be to commit a massive fraud? If you had to guess, what percentage of mail-in ballots do you think would be fraudulent? How hard would it be to commit a massive fraud, compared to actually showing up at polling stations with ID? You know all these things. They've been explained to you before. You're just trying to convince people that it's "the best thing for democracy" because you're backing the scammers.

1) Absentee voting is legit. Actual Americans, like soldiers abroad, shouldn't have to fly all the way back to the States to vote and it's ridiculous to take the votes away from those people, especially when they're serving their country. 2) Saying that "tens of millions of Americans and undocumented immigrants want to vote from home just because they're too scared to go to a polling station" is idiotic bullshit. The two issues can't be compared. It's like "I can't come to work today because I just lost my foot in a car accident" vs "I have to go home because I think I left my milk on the counter".

OMG am I ad-Libbing? Lmao. 1) Mail-in ballots is a TOTAL scamfest. No one wants mail-in ballots to protect the rights of 1% of the voters - that's a joke. Mail-ins are purely for scammers, just like allowing illegal immigrants to vote is a scam. 2) The Dems platform is a mixture of stupidity, riots, forced vaccinations, and the politics of division.