Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    117

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. If T Friedman was so brilliant then he'd recognize that the actual problem at the heart of this is complete dishonesty in the mass media. They're nt just dishonest, it's to the point where they are liars and fabricators. CNN has been caught lying so many times in the last 6 years that it's utterly pathetic that they're still allowed to have the middle N in their name. You can talk about Fox's partisan bias, and I agree that it's there 100% and it shouldn't be, but they aren't outright liars like CNN. Fox at least covered the Russian collusion fiasco, they showed all of Schiff's comments and weighed the merits of their talking points, CNN and NBC won't even say the name "Bobolinski" and they barely mentioned the names of high-ranking FBI officials who were either fired or criminally charged for their misconduct in the Russian Witch Hunt. That's extreme, communist-style journalism.
  2. "A few blocks...." where there was billions in damages, nearly 20people were killed, etc. Hmmmmm...... And that's not a huge deal? Like, massive?
  3. Don't kid yourself. Canada is just as divided as the US. Maybe more. We have a lot of separatists in Quebec and in the prairie provinces as well. There are still a lot of people who would vote for Trudeau today, and our MSM is as protective of Trudeau as the US MSM is protective of Biden. I wouldn't date a liberal voter if I was single, and not just because I hate Trudeau so much, but because I couldn't trust or respect anyone dumb enough to be sucked in to that extent.
  4. If you watched the video.... it was a flash drive, and it was backed up before they sent it. There were probably things on the flash drive that Tucker wanted to talk to Bobolinski about so that he could verify them, expand on what they meant or flesh out the stories around them, etc.
  5. The thing I found the most questionable is that they threw the envelope away. Honestly UPS had a chance to be honest, professional & helpful and they blew it by being dodgy, lying and then hiding the evidence of what happened.
  6. I'm the moron here? 1) FYI not everyone gets morning sickness. My wife never got it once through 3 pregnancies, and 2) at 6 months pregnant women are just starting to get big. You'd have to be carrying some baby Shaq to get big enough to have stretch marks after just 6 months.
  7. 1) As I've told you before, my position has never been "Trump hasn't been convicted so it's no big deal". YOU ARE LYING. My position is that the bar that has yet to have been crossed is still so low that earthworms can't get under it. This is an issue of "No one on earth has been convicted of collusion or anything related to collusion, aside from an FBI agent who falsified evidence to get warrants to spy on Trump's associates". You put up a post claiming that Americans have been convicted of collusion, or issues relayed to collusion. That was YOU LYING again. YOU HAVE STILL NEVER CITED AN INSTANCE WHERE ANYONE WAS EVER CONVICTED OF ANYTHING RELATED TO COLLUSION. FYI that's not a meltdown, that's me calling you out for being a liar, and not having the facts to back up your earlier misleading post. When you cite an example of an American who has already arrested for colluding with Russia or something even remotely similar then you can shed the LIAR label. 2) You clearly don't know what convoluted means, and FYI when someone is arrested for tax fraud from 1995 that's not considered "directly related to collusion" lol. That's just an incredibly stupid claim, and I don't even know how to sugarcoat my description of it. Mueller did not find actual evidence of collusion, period, and that's what he was charged with doing. They carried out a smear campaign disguised as an investigation. Trump's team were subjected to 100s of interrogations, submitted millions of pages of documents, and there were thousands of subpoenas. By any stretch of the imagination Trump and his associates were more than accommodating enough with the proven criminals at the FBI. They had an actual job to do, they weren't just chasing windmills. Biden is actually guilty of a crime, based on all that we know to be true.
  8. Late-term abortion is not a humanity issue, unless it's for health reasons. It's a matter of convenience.
  9. That's not what that is at all. IE, you can say "allegedly" and still be correct, even if you end up being wrong.
  10. Tucker Carlson's show has set the record for the highest viewership ever in a single month on cable news. He's always been good himself, but he used to be really bad at managing his guest speakers. He'd let people yell for 3 minutes and never get a single answer out of them.
  11. In fairness, or in a fit of brilliance, Tucker was careful not to mention the name of the company that was shipping the documents during his show last night. UPS had very good reason to do everything within their power to get that information back. If they lost such a high-profile item, their reputation would be lower than CNN's. People's documents are worth the world to them. A company that loses docs, loses everything.
  12. If you think that Trump colluded with Russians, then write the name of a person down, and write the name of a criminal conviction beside his name that has to do with C.O.L.L.U.S.I.O.N.N.N.N.N.N.N. Not tax fraud or a NDA to a hooker. Collusionnnnnnnnn. Until you do that you have UTTERLY FAILED. You are still at the exact point of UTTER FAILURE. Don't make a generic claim that "some people were criminally charged and I'm pretty sure it's because they colluded, but they're technically in jail for something else". Do you have a chart at home with a bunch of string and some newspaper cutouts that you can paste here, to show the world how what you just described is somehow proof that Trump enlisted the help of Russian agents to win the election? Because FYI, as it stands, it's not. Furthermore, the FBI, and Robert Mueller specifically said that "They never uncovered ANY evidence that Trump colluded with Russia." How do you think it's possible that on a planet where there is zero evidence that Trump colluded with Russia, that somehow Americans are in jail for colluding with Russia? It's not. That's why you are failing so utterly. Just because you refuse to acknowledge it, doesn't mean that it's not evidence. The complete lack of integrity at CNN, WashPo et al was never in question. The fact that they're ignoring a story isn't newsworthy. Here's the entirety of CNN's video coverage of the fact that an FBI lawyer was caught tampering with evidence to get a FISA warrant renewal. https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2020/08/14/fbi-russia-probe-clinesmith-mueller-trump-sot-vpx-nr.cnn Look at how much attention the FBI's firing of Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok got on CNN. Isn't it a big deal when 3 members of the FBI had to be fired for their misconduct in an investigation int the President? How is that not a story? The fact that CNN turns a blind eye to something doesn't mean that it's not newsworthy. That's a lie. My defence of Trump is based on a lot of things, including 1) the fact that the only person who was known to have colluded with Russians to affect the outcome of the 2016 election was Hillary Clinton - she bought her dossier from Russians - that's actual collusion and 2) the only person who has been found guilty of committing a crime related to the Russian collusion investigation was Kevin Clinesmith, and FBI lawyer. If you had proof that Trump paid some Russians for a dossier on Hillary Clinton then you would have actual proof that Trump colluded with Russia, wouldn't you? That would be the exact essence of "proof". There is a star witness with intimate knowledge of Hunter & Joe's seedy business dealings in the Ukraine and China who is making the claims that Hunter Biden was selling access to his father. There is a treasure trove of evidence that's verified by members of the Senate Intel Committee that indicates that Biden is guilty. Hunter is on video admitting that he only got on the board of Burisma and other companies because of who his dad is. There is video of Biden stating emphatically, several times on several different occasions, that he never had any knowledge whatsoever of Hunter's business dealings, and there is also video of Joe Biden admitting that he lied about that for some reason. Why did Joe pretend he didn't know? Why did Joe only admit to it when he was shown the photo of Hunter with other Burisma board members golfing? Why did Joe meet with Vadym Pozharskyi? Why did Joe do the infamous quid pro quo? https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
  13. https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-historic-ratings-1542602 Tucker Carlson just set the all-time record for the most-watched cable tv news program over the course of a month. Still no credible sources reporting on any inaccuracies in that whole period of time.
  14. 1) Do you understand that a 3-yr long witch hunt into Russian collusion is over? It found no evidence? Do you know that you have still utterly failed to name a single person who was convicted of a collusion-related offence. Do you understand that actual evidence of Biden's crime is all over the place? Do you realise that there still hasn't been an investigation into Biden's crimes yet? Does that make sense to you? 2) My defence of the convicted Trump associates is that they were guilty of totally different and completely unrelated crimes, for the most part crimes that largely go unpunished. You have still utterly failed to name a single person who was convicted of a collusion-related offence. Wow you sure showed the whole world something Beaver. You just don't want to know what it is. 3) Could you make several fake videos of Joe Biden denying any knowledge of Hunter's work at Burisma, and then of him subsequently admitting that he was lying? Can you make a fake video of Biden's closest business partner describing in detail for an hour how all the evidence is real, and exactly how the Biden family sold access to the VP for money? Can you get the Senate Intel Committee to verify thousands of emails and text messages? Just remember that after 3 years the Dems couldn't get anyone to verify a singe slightly-incriminating text message from Trump. If they had, they would have claimed total victory. Obviously Russian collusion was fake otherwise someone would be in jail for actual collusion with Russia. In case you missed this earlier: you have still utterly failed to name a single person who was convicted of a collusion-related offence. I can name some people who were offered reduced sentences for fake testimony against Trump though.
  15. It makes sense that actual racists who were/are in the Dem party, like Sen Byrd, came up with a plan for a new type of plantation. Instead of putting people into actual shackles, they create a prison/plantation within the minds of those people. "The police are committing genocide against you. Systemic racism will never allow you to succeed even if you do go to college and do all the right things. Stay angry! There's no room for positivity in your world, just anger and strife!" Honest to god, have you ever heard Tony Robbins' speech about "Hey Jack everyone hates you. They're coming to kill you. You don't need to be positive or optimistic, and you definitely shouldn't bother getting a university education - you need to watch your own back bruh. Society is out to get you." Literally every business/life coach on the planet will blow sunshine up your arse if they want to help you succeed. They'll focus on the positive, and the opportunities that exist. Your religion will tell you "if you pray to _______ for it hard enough, it will happen, and you will live for eternity/be reborn to a fortunate existence" and that's what makes religion popular. The only people who tell you to look on the dark side are the people who want to see you fail. The dems preach to black people about a life that's destined to fail.
  16. Those "screenshots" alone are far more evidence than anyone has ever seen of Russian collusion. Bobolinski was an actual business partner of the Bidens and he did an hour long video, telling the American people directly what the Bidens did. It's not even up for debate whether or not the Bidens were influence peddling. It just hasn't been proven in court yet. CNN and their drooling idiot followers got all up in arms about Russia for 3 years (some of them are into year 4 now lol) and they never, in all that time, saw a single shred of evidence proving that Trump somehow colluded with Russia. The evidence that the Bidens were influence peddling is everywhere, from Biden's boastful confession, to how many times he was caught lying about whether he knew about Hunter's lucrative deals, now there are leaked emails, there are phone call logs, text messages, photos, Hunter's admission that all the boards he sat on was because of his family connection, and their own business partner has laid out all of the evidence in plain sight. There's a zero percent chance that the Bidens aren't guilty of influence peddling. Now it's just a matter of figuring out what the Bidens gave up to foreign individuals and possibly even the Chinese government in return for their lucrative returns. It's not like people gave them money for nothing.
  17. HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA OMFG! SOMEONE IS STILL DRINKING THAT KOOL-AID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can you name which one of those people was found guilty of anything to do with Russian collusion? There's absolutely zero evidence anywhere that Trump colluded with Russia. There's actually zero evidence that any of his associates colluded with Russia. What you just put there isn't proof of collusion, it's like the FBI wall of shame. They arrested those people and got them put in jail for things that had absolutely nothing to do with Russian collusion, and then they offered them reduced sentencing for fake testimony about Russian collusion. The FBI has known since Jan of 2017 that Trump didn't collude with Russia. Like I said Beaver, name one single person who is in jail for somehow colluding with Russia.......... Cue the crickets..... One last thing - The only person in the world who is actually proven to be guilty of any crime related to Russian collusion is Kevin Clinesemith - the FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering Russian collusion evidence which he provided to the FISA court in order to renew warrants to spy on Trump, long after the FBI already knew that the whole thing was a farce. Dude, the entire rest of the world knows that Russian collusion was entirely a farce, dredged up by Hillary when she colluded with Russians for a false dossier.
  18. "Conan, what is the meaning of life?" "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the Liberals."
  19. Qanon is probably like global warming. A really fun topic for leftists, but not an actual topic worth discussing. What leftists should actually be discussing is the fake news trolls that they're idolizing.
  20. CBC and CNN are rabbit holes now. Russian collusion, don't look at Biden, an anonymous source at the WH said that Trump said ____________, Trudeau saved us all from C19 by leaving travel from China open, SNC and We weren't scandals, Trump referred to immigrants as animals, Kavanaugh was a serial rapist when he was in high school, Greta Thunberg is an expert on climate control and race relations but don't listen to Bobolinski - he knows nothing, etc. It's pure garbage. Whatever qanon is, it can't possibly be worse than CBC and CNN.
  21. Im not religious at all and I'm not a fan of late-term abortion. It's a humanity issue, not a religious one.
  22. I think it's possible that you over-summarized your post this Beaver. You edited most of the content out of it. But thanks for that. Maybe I'll summarize some of my posts the same way. Instead of going through the long-winded version and actually taking the time to fill my posts with greatness I'll just write things like "Awesome" or "Brilliant".
  23. It's like if Graham James and Clifford Olson are sitting in a room and you say "That Graham James would be the worst babysitter ever." You shouldn't just make an accusation against her and her religion when it's completely unfounded and ignorant, that's all.
  24. I don't really know anything what qanon is but I do know that there are some FB sites like capforcanada, and I can't recall the other ones, that just come out with the most whacked bs imaginable. I think that some of them are actually putting out blatant idiocy just to make fools of the people who propagate it.
×
×
  • Create New...