Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    117

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. What's your wager?
  2. First off, I'd love it if someone could translate this to English for me. Second, the wars are 'defensive' from the POV of helping other nations stop guys like Hitler from taking over Europe, stopping the Taliban, the North Koreans, etc. Canadians died in those places and there was never any chance that the people who served there were going to bring home slaves, war booty, etc.
  3. He. Walked. Into. A. Superspreader. Event. To. Fear. Monger. Police. That's exactly what he did. And he did at while he was saying that basically everything else was forbidden. Period. On Nov 11 people were basically doing everything else as normal, aside from attending Remembrance Day ceremonies. Malls were open, grocery stores, schools, etc, but he was discouraging people from Remembrance Day ceremonies. Full stop. So, he's not a hypocrite when he does it. He's not acting like he's far superior to everyone else re: covid (although he was far better than the Dems and Trudeau) and he's not stopping people from going to church or any other legal gathering place. 1) We both know that you're the liar here, that's been proven probably a dozen times now so just own it. 2) They actually do have to disperse, the POTUS was coming and they actually do have to disperse to make way for him. The "peaceful protestors" from the day before turned out to be quite destructive, didn't they? That's a fact. You don't like it. Suck it up. You just have a pathetic understanding of events beave. Obama mischaracterized police incidents as racist and murderous when he either had no clue wtf happened (Treyvon Martin) or when it was well-known what happened (M Brown) but he just kept on running with CNN's false narrative. He turned a peaceful country into a violent, racist shithole. "Should". They "should". If they wanted to risk it they still "could". It has nothing to do with whether I want to go there. Understand this - the weasel didn't discourage cop-hating at all, even though it's not . He went out and promoted it. The weasel did discourage Canadians from attending Remembrance Day ceremonies.
  4. Of course it's a freedom being taken away when not everyone can go. People even have to RSVP in a lot of cases. Just like people in the US fear being disenfranchised if they need ID to vote, not everyone uses computers. It wasn't Trudeau's rally, but he still went to fear monger in a way that was completely unacceptable given the C19 restrictions at the time. It was a super-spreader event. Look up the difference between the words should and must. You're such an illiterate. He attended a super-spreader event and he did not keep a distance at all. Look at the photos. No, I make it sound like he went to a super-spreader event to fear monger police when the rest of Canada wasn't allowed to do anything. Because that's what he did. It's the opposite of "discouraging large, close gatherings". Who cares if rioters were tear-gassed when they wouldn't disperse? Do you really think I give a rip? FYI Trump stood up to rioting and looting, Obama fanned the flames of racial division when people were being killed and businesses destroyed. Who's the loser? Clearly you don't play the role of 'adult' in your household.
  5. You're changing the topic now. You said that no freedoms went away, I told you some freedoms that went away (for people who aren't fear mongering against the police) and now you're making the case for stripping away some freedoms while allowing others. Kids weren't even allowed to play baseball. People couldn't walk outside in provincial parks. But Trudeau had his hate cops rally. Police brutality is such a big problem that you're willing to risk spreading covid to hold a hate rally against police? That's just stupid. How many people die from police brutality in Canada every year, and how many Canadians died from Trudeau's stupidity re: the 'fight' against C19? Of course octogenarians should stay home. No one else needs to. Nice straw man argument kid. Grow up. He was at an outdoor fear-mongering event with thousands of people who weren't more than a foot apart back at a time when you couldn't have kids out in the sun at a baseball park and people weren't allowed to walk in provincial parks. It was the epitome of hypocrisy and his stupid sycophant horde didn't understand that. Apparently some of them still don't, but I'll give credit where it's due. Trudeau does know how to inspire loyalty in the bottom 50% of the gene pool.
  6. I'm not brushing off the rest of the content of your post, it was worthy of comment but I just clicked like on it. I just needed to comment on the fact that I'm blown away that anyone would actually read the whole budget. Did you like, read it read it, or skim it? IS THERE ANYTHING IN THERE ABOUT INTERNMENT CAMPS!!!!!!!! Lol, j/k. ignore that last part.
  7. Another anecdote. Do you really need me to explain the difference between 50 and the number of people allowed by the fire code in a church to you? Do you think that they make enough seating room for ten times what's allowed by the fire code? Do you think there were 50 people at Trudeau's rally, or that they were even 2 feet apart? Actions speak louder than words beaver. You don't think that Trudeau's presence there furthered the notion that police racism and brutality against minorities is a significant problem? You don't think it gave Canadians the notion that they should go gather in massive groups to protest? He spoke out against gathering in groups to honour our war dead beaver. I'm not making any of this up. Massive groups out fear-mongering police with absolutely no social-distancing while the whole country is locked down.... TWO THUMBS UP!!!!!!! Massive groups out showing respect at Remembrance Day while the country is mostly open.... OFFICIALLY DISCOURAGED!!!!!! Facts are on my side buddy, again. You asked for specific examples and now you're choking on them.
  8. Maybe you're too young to remember it, but before the M Brown and T Martin incidents the US wasn't a shithole country. You could go there on a vacation with no concerns whatsoever about violent protests. Cite? This doesn't make any sense. When Obama was elected in 2008 he had a large majority in both the House and Senate. If McConnell was bragging about obstruction in '08 that would be like Peewee Herman challenging Mike Tyson to a boxing match. If you're talking about 2012, the House was stacked against Obama so he actually did need to play nice with the House Republicans, but McConnell still didn't have the jam to do anything obstructionist.
  9. Maybe I was wrong about Google. It still only takes them a femtosecond to prove you wrong 298,000 times: https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/07/09/bc-malls-gathering-cap-churches/ These social distancing champions were out fear-mongering police back when large gatherings were strictly verboten: http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202006/06/WS5edad9a6a310834817251309.html Kids couldn't even play baseball and our PM was out chasing windmills with his fellow race-baiting morons. Now Xinhua uses our PM's protest as a tool for their propaganda. Stay tuned for more facts that you hate.
  10. and it has been ever since CNN and the Dems used the Michael Brown shooting to promote hatred and mistrust of the police. They rode that fear mongering campaign all the way to the point where "defund police" became a popular slogan among their idiotic sycophant horde. What did he attempt to reconcile? Beyonce's lyrics with grace and sophistication? Yeah that failed, sorry. Singing "When he fucks me good I take his ass to Red Lobster" has yet to become the new "The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plains." Obama attempted to incite rioting and looting. Under his presidency anthem-kneeling and cop-killing became the stuff of folk-heroes.
  11. The freedom to go to a Remembrance Day ceremony, or a church for an example...? Do you live under a rock? Do you not have access to this new thing called "THE INTERNET"? Or NEWSPAPERS? Or TV? The idiot who runs things here says that you need to gather outside in large groups to protest against all the police violence that has resulted in the murders of [maybe zero?????] black men in Canada but you shouldn't show respect for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers that died or were hideously wounded fighting for this country.
  12. TBH it's the hard-core leftists here that leave, or start new accounts, after they get busted for lying, terrorist sympathizing, being outed for their stupidity too many times, etc. Some of them have even been banned for their lies & threats. If you're looking for an echo chamber to bloviate about Trudeau's dreamy eyes or his puritanical ways it's here: https://dolt.com
  13. Now your post makes sense.
  14. I don't think 'boring' is the word that leaps to anyone's mind. In order to be boring you'd have to be on or very near the fence. You're so far in left field that you have to set your clocks back 2 hours when you go to the dugout. In all honesty, from a leftist's POV you're probably seen as 'dogmatic and unwavering', from the right POV you're a 'propagandist' at the very best.
  15. What do you think it means when he lectured us about the fact that we're too intolerant towards muslims, both before and after the hijab hoax was exposed? You don't remember him taking a knee to protest how racist our police are towards black people? Or how he said that Canadians were committing genocide against 1st Nations women? He killed about $130 Billion in investment in Alberta. He didn't do sweet FA by buying a pipeline. His scandals are epic and disqualifying and the media that he bought with our taxpayer money are protecting him. No, I know for a fact that they're stupid. The whole C19 saga has proved that over and over. Anyone who thought that "don't wear masks and let the virus pour in unchecked" was a good idea actually IS an idiot, period. There's no room to manoeuvre on that one. Thank you for the kind sentiment. It's not fun feeling like this about someone, but I have never seen any indiction that my feelings are unwarranted. The only thing that Trudeau has ever done since the second that he was elected is vindicate my harsh feelings towards him.
  16. No, I really hate him. He's killing the energy sector in Alberta while he is racking up monumental debt, and was also protecting jobs in Mtl by creating new laws for them and then shoving them down the AG's throat. Then he fired the her for standing up to him. Then his bought-and-paid-for media hides the fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing CANADIAN politicians. He constantly denigrates Canadians, saying that we are all racist, we enjoy 'white privilege', or that we're participating in a genocide against female natives, etc. For an example, the little bitch jumps on board with a thing like the hijab hoax, called all Canadians racist because of something that a 12 yr old girl said, then when she was caught lying he doubled-down on his anti-Canadian comments. Then there's his constant stream of attacks on the dastardly Duffygate 'scandal' (a $90K non-scandal), his constant ethics breaches and the cover-ups (too many to mention here), his payout to the CBC for their favourable coverage, his buyout of other 'select' media outlets with another $600M of our money, the way he intentionally spread covid across our country by allowing flights to keep coming in from China, not quarantining passengers and telling Canadians not to wear masks, etc. For leftists the anti-fight against C-19 might not seem like a big deal because apparently they were all too stupid to know what they should do to avoid a viral outbreak, but those of us who know that not letting infected people waltz around the country was a bad idea, Trudeau's handling of covid was an unacceptable failure. He literally fails us in every regard, all the time, and then he comes out the next day and talks down to us all again. I don't just hate him, I really hate him.
  17. Is that why you don't deal with it?
  18. Don't worry, your democracy is safe with those guys. One of them has a little name badge on his shirt, and there's an official-ish looking piece of paper taped on the door of his van. What more could you possibly want?
  19. You're admitting to either intentionally having your head in the sand, or outright lying about one of the largest problems that our society faces - big tech censorship and fake news media. Whichever one it is there's no excuse, and for you to pop off with such a hostile response when you obviously don't have a clue wth you're talking about is utterly pathetic. Big tech actually does unilaterally decide what we see and what we can't see, shadow bans etc are very real, and that's a big problem (which you're actively a part of) and when they get inevitably busted from time to time they just laugh it off like it was an minor accident and the fake news just backs them up. If Trump owned FB you'd care, but your handlers own it and you're happy as a pig in demspeak to see freedom of speech go down in flames as long as your fake narrative is amplified. Bogus stories about Conservatives are blasted loud and long on CNN and social media and the tech giants love it, like the story: "totally anonymous sources say that Trump called all fallen soldiers and veterans losers", but when a story about Hunter Biden is verified by his own videotaped admissions, his own emails, his father's boasts & confessions, and his closest business associate on the planet spells it all out in an hour long interview that's nationally broadcast it's "FAKE NEWS - GOTTA CENSOR THE CRAP OUTTA THAT!!!!!". I get that you're here to help boost the morale of the resident sjw's on this site who have failed utterly in their attempt to drive home CNN's fake narratives, and you're a notch above the rest here I'll give you credit for that, but you're still just in over your head buddy. There are still a lot of people on this site who are just smarter than you and you're never going to be able to get us to step in line and gobble up CNN's BS. Your drivel will work really swell on apps like twitter, where intelligent counter-points are buried and never to be seen, but in a forum like this where your idiocy gets equal visibility with the common-sense/factual rebuttals you're hopelessly outgunned and outmanoeuvred. You'll give up eventually beaver. Your ego is taking to much of a beating.
  20. Invasion of the body snatchers. CLASSIC!
  21. What's idiotic is that you didn't see this coming in advance from a group who got caught cheating on elections so many times in the past 2 elections, and that pushes voter-fraud-friendly changes every year. What's also idiotic is that you dismiss all the signed affidavits and video evidence going around, and act like you some how know that nothing happened anywhere. Your anecdote is also idiotic. You're on a roll and it started the second you got here.
  22. Don't put words in my mouth kid. I'm not promising that there will be enough of a retraction to keep Biden out of the WH. I'm saying that there was widespread voter fraud that needs to be investigated. I doubt that the Dems had enough votes to win, and I think that a lot of Trump votes were dumped, but I also doubt that they will uncover enough of the fraud to make things right. The problem here is that people like you act as if you had 100% proof all along that there was absolutely no fraud whatsoever. It's idiotic.
  23. More like they're another 'loosely-affiliated' paramilitary wing of the Dem party, like the KKK and BLM.
  24. Look through the list of things I mentioned there and let me know what you question. I can even show you video of Nadler and Biden saying that Antifa is just an idea and not an actual group of people. It's freaking absurd. Are religious groups fake too?
×
×
  • Create New...