WestCanMan

For sure some are in it for the right reasons, but they have ben misled by the alt-left media. Just remember, M Brown wasn't a gentle giant, at all. "Very few" people managed to cause billions of dollars in property damage, they killed a couple dozen people, and assaulted thousands of police officers. Those "very few" people were very busy. That's more MSM deception. The riots were mostly peaceful, right? More MSM deception. Maybe "peaceful until 9:00 pm". More MSM deception. You're pushing all of their buttons. See a pattern?

I didn't see that part of the article. Can you paste it here? Do you think it would be fair to let kids grow up in a stone age society in 1965? Can you describe some ways in which native culture had evolved beyond the stone age by 1950? Keep in mind that leftists nowadays are suggesting that if your grade 8 year old wants to transition from being a boy to being a girl, the parents shouldn't have a say in it. Why should the parents of FN kids have a say in whether or not they learn English, or math, or physics? Is it safe to say that in the perfect leftist world, FN people would still live in the stone age and 8 yr olds would be getting sex changes on a whim? Of course not, but that's not the narrative that we hear, is it? Just remember that this article is written from a far-left point of view. Asking for some important truths out of people is important. Just because something bad happened to someone doesn't mean that they get to lie about everything. If you ask any pampered Canadian kid what their life is like they'll almost all list a string of injustices that would partially curl one of your hairs. It's what people do. People who are speaking for the public record should be honest and tell the whole truth. I copy and paste your posts when I reply to them, that doesn't mean that I'm supporting them: I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't describe me as one who "flatters leftists and propagates their narratives". You can't have the whole conversation without dispelling the worst of rumours, and you can't address them if you don't bring them to light. Only a total idiot would completely refuse to consider why there were residential schools in the first place. This isn't the Yucatan Peninsula, where stone age civilizations could still live in comparative comfort with space age cultures. It's Canada, where humans can't even survive overnight without a sturdy shelter or modern winter equipment. Sentencing your future generation to living in the stone age here would be sentencing them to thousands of years of unnecessary cruelty.

Potato/something completely retarded. If he had pardoned her then there could at least be the assumption that 'maybe he knew that she didn't really do it, or she was given a harsher sentence than she deserved'. Nope. She's still considered to be every bit the terrorist that she was convicted of being, Bill Clinton just doesn't think that she belongs in jail. How many people are there in the US do you think, that committed less serious crimes than she did, and will serve more than 16 years in prison? 100,000? I dunno, but it's in the tens of thousands for sure.

Oh, good to know that she's still in jail for her various terrorism convictions..... I say potato, you say something completely retarded.

Honest to god, the fact that leftists can't show disgust at the rioting, looting, arson, the murders of innocent civilians and the assassinations of police officers over the past 6 years then you really need to stfu about 1 hour of rioting at one building. (No, that's not an actual quote, that is an exact summary of their opinions and I have hundreds of pages and videos that I can link for anyone who was living under a rock for the last 6 years and doesn't know this.) You guys do know that one of BLM's founders was found guilty of participating in the actual bombing of the Senate back in 1983, right? You know that Bill Clinton actually pardoned that person, right? You leftists can't even complain about an attack against the Senate building because Demmies already bombed the Senate, and a Dem president already pardoned a criminal for an actual terrorist attack on the Senate.

There was one tiny, localized bit of vandalism of one single building in the whole country, which conveniently creates the illusion that there's some separation between the Dems and Antifa. And it happened AFTER the Dems suddenly started caring about crime. "Oh look, Antifa doesn't like us." Did the Dems even say at that point that Antifa was a terrorist organization? No? Why not?

There are people like Nadler who deny that Antifa is a real organized group, people like Kamala Harris that bail BLM/Antifa rioters out of jail, Dem AGs who don't let seek convictions against rioters, people in the Democrat party and on CNN who applaud the actions of BLM and Afntifa regularly, people in the Dem party who called the armed takeover of a police precinct and 7 blocks of sovereign American soil "a summer of love", etc. Honestly, when a terrorist group takes over American soil, the Dems should call that a crime. Period. Definitely not the summer of love. They had a duty to protect their citizens within that area and they left the criminals there to rule over them. If the Proud Boys took over 7 square blocks, including the area where you live, and shops were being smashed in and looted, people were being assaulted, what would you think if your mayor and governor/premier called it "the summer of love" instead of sending the police to save local residents and businesses? How could you not be offended by that? Wouldn't you consider that mayor a criminal? Can you show me an example of where the GOP actively supported crimes like that or do you want this topic to go away now?

It's the other way around. Antifa is basically a militia for the Dems.

If you did a google search of Antifa, when the Antifa's site came up you got fwded to a site for donations to Joe Biden's campaign. Antifa might have vandalized a building in Oregon to create the illusion that they don't work for the Dems, but they follow the Dems' marching orders.

Fascism is beating people up or killing them for saying "all lives matter", forcing people to propagate their dogma, terrorizing people in restaurants, burning city blocks, etc. Those two groups are the Dems' new militias now that they can't openly associate with the KKK.

That all sounds pretty compelling, but: 1) the media should be working for the people and they're not, because they lie so much. Doing things like - calling M Brown "The Gentle Giant" when they knew he committed a violent robbery and then wrestled with a cop to steal his gun, actually IS effectively being the ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE. That turn of phrase/fake narrative helped to rile a lot of people, which translated into a lot of extra violence and deaths 2) Trump could block media just like Trudeau blocks media. He didn't have to answer to Jim Acosta even once, just like Trudeau won't let Rebel Media members stand on the sidewalk near his events. 3) Trump wasn't lying about CNN. I hve proven CNN to be liars here dozens of times. No one here will even admit to trusting CNN, or watching them regularly. Why is that? They all know how fake it is.

I wish I could say "no one would do that if what you said is true" but out of 75M voters for sure there would be more than 1.

It's a really huge problem that you don't actually recognize sewer-talk when you see it. During the height of the rioting and violence, when Michelle Obama addressed America's high school grads and she told them to stay angry & focus their anger, that was the epitome of sewer-talk. She was basically saying that the angriest kids in your school are actually the heroes, and the kids who mind their own business are basically the enemies of the free world. Her sick attempt at creating a society full of angry, mindless trolls who destroy cities at CNN's beck and call was utterly disgusting. People like you don't actually understand how millions of kids will interpret her words. You have no clue what message resonates within the kids whose parents and cousins were already at the riots, stealing tvs, lighting buildings on fire, beating up innocent people and spitting on police. "Yay, my family is heroic! I wanna be just like them!!! I will be the person that Michelle Obama wants me to be!!!!!" You're just a really naive person who hates the people that CNN tells you to hate and you love the people that CNN tells you to love and there's no grey area with you. "CNN SAID IT! I WILL REGURGITATE THEIR WORDS AND ACT ON THEM!"

FYI it is BLM and Antifa who are going around the country terrorizing neighbourhoods, propagating a false narrative, attacking the police and destroying free speech.

This isn't the only example of Dems chumming around with Farrakhan, and Farrakhan is as bad a racist and anti-Semite as you'll find anywhere. This pic isn't from the '80s either. Farrakhan was a well-known racist and anti-Semite for a really long time before this picture was taken. The timing of this photo is like if you had your picture taken with Epstein the day before he went to jail. The cat was waayyyyyyy outta the bag. Keep in mind that Derek Sloan is just on the hook for receiving a $131 donation from a racist, and he's been thrown out by O'Toole. Being in this photo is nothing like just accepting money and not noticing who it came from. Obama absolutely knew who he was with. I've known about Farrakhan's vile bigotry for a long time and I obviously don't follow US politics as closely as Obama. This is an example of Obama giving one of the biggest racists and anti-Semites in America an ear, and a big boost in popularity. The last thing on earth that Obama should be doing is supporting Farrakhan. It's inexcusable and disgusting. There's a reason this photo was hidden for so long. If this doesn't bug you then you must be an anti-Semite yourself, but to decent people this is an Obamination.

Are you talking about Ivanka's mother, Ivana? She was a Czech, but Ivanka was born in the USA. Ivanka would have a hard time becoming President though because she's Jewish. The Dems and their supporters are too bigoted against Jews to let that happen.

All quiet on the leftern front today. There must be something bad that happened that we don't know about yet.

CNN is shit. They keep saying "5 people were killed" but 2 old farts there died of getting in a tizzy: one had a heart attack and one had a stroke. Then there was a girl that the cops killed for..... basically nothing. Apparently "she was climbing through a window in a life-threatening manner" or something. Let's face it, if the cops had killed a black girl during the BLM riots for going through a window then there would have been another 6 months of rioting and the cop would have been charged criminally. The two 'murders' were the girl that was crushed in a stampede at some point, plus whatever happened to sicknick. If it happened because of the riots then whoever did it needs to get the chair, but it's weird that they "don't know" a full month later. It seems like they might be wanting to just let the initial claim go unchallenged.

1) From what I see, the vast majority of people who talk about qanon are leftists. It's probably another alt-left disinformation site because god knows that leftists never get sick of disinformation. 2) Why do you watch CNN if you already know how bad they are? 3) What makes you think that if CNN is so dishonest, the online fact-checkers are any better? How much does it cost to get an online fact-checking site up and running? When that original site gets to the point of being totally discredited, how hard is it to migrate most of their disinformation to another URL? Compare that cost to the cost of shutting down CNN and rebranding it as something else? "Fact-checkers" are no better than CNN, and CNN is a worthless, steaming pile of disinformation. CNN totally bullshitted you on every major story since at least mid-2014. You now know that Michael Brown was not a gentle giant at all, he violently robbed a store and then wrestled with a cop and threatened to kill him. Why was there so much destruction in the name of a violent criminal? Why didn't CNN show the video of his violent robbery and stop calling him the gentle giant when they knew that was a lie? Dr Ford was the exact opposite of a credible witness. The Jussie Smollett incident was an extreme example of racist hate mongering and he belongs in jail, he's not a victim of anything. They tried to make Nick Sandman look like a really awkward racist when he was just a kid, protesting very peacefully, against the murder of fetuses. They tried to make a terrorist van attack into a gun control issue, ditto for an attack by muslim, loudly praising allah, who gunned down gays with a weapon that has been illegal since it was invented. How could that possibly have anything to do with Republicans and gun control? Etc, etc. How many times will you sit back and let their twisted narratives enter your cranium before you banish them from your brainbox entirely? They are pure shit dude, without a side of anything. They are not there to inform you. They are there to manipulate you.

Are you implying that it's a bad thing if this guy was informing against human smugglers? WTF is wrong with you? Seems more like an upstanding citizen to me. A bigger question is, why would V. S. Johannes release this info to the public: "Geez, I wonder if I should become an informant for the federal government. I won't get much for it, and if I ever go to jail for anything in the future they will probably expose me as a rat." What do you think he's going to jail for anyways? Burning an isis/BLM banner? Hardly. Kamala Harris was bailing out criminals from the riots. Possession of a couple of high-capacity magazines? In the US? Seems unlikely. This has the appearance of a whole lot of bluster. Let'd do a simple comparison, shall we? Proud Boys leader - informant against human smugglers and drug dealers. BLM Leader - (Susan Rosenberg) far-left revolutionary terrorist in the 'May 19th Communists' arrested for possession of a large cache of explosives and automatic weapons. Also charged for her role in the bombing of the Senate in 1983. Interestingly enough, the terrorist was pardoned by a Democrat POTUS, Bill Clinton. So, the Dems, who are against legal gun ownership, are in the business of pardoning criminals with illegal weapons, just like they're in the business of making sure that police don't confiscate guns from all the black men who are killing other black men. AAnnnnnd, they're in the business of pardoning rioters and looters, and they're not bothered by the assaults of police officers at riots either. Dude, everywhere I look the Dems are pardoning actual criminals, promoting rioting & violence, and cozying up to terrorist activity. What was the point of starting this thread again godzilla? Were you trying to point out how stupid, repugnant and worthless the Dems and their supporters are? GJ, godzilla, you NAILED IT!

What are you trying to say here? They aren't whining? They aren't winning? They aren't drinking wine?

I don't follow q, never have, so you can shove that snotty little quip up where the rest of your opinions & 'facts' come from. Keep on CNNing.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/02/health/covid-19-vaccination-kit-record-card/index.html The Dems' propagandists are saying that vaccination cards are a thing and I have no reason not to believe the lapdogs in this instance. They're saying that this isn't to be considered as some sort of 'vaccination passport', but it's not just up to the countries that issue the passports to determine whether or not their citizens can visit other countries: even if the airlines don't discriminate against the unvaccinated, sovereign states still have the absolute right to deny any would-be visitors entry based on their vaccination status. I'm gonna go ahead and guess that places like the Cayman Islands and other elite tourist destinations will start implementing a vaccination-2-visit policy (I'll just call it V2V for short), it's just a matter of how far down this vaccination elitism is going to trickle. Is the existence of vaccination cards the start of something? Will this become the new normal? Get injected or be rejected? If the Dems are so against voter ID then why are they starting us down this road with vaxx ID? Surely they must know where it will lead. How are they going to manage to blame this new form of discrimination against Republicans?

I don't really care about your stupid question Aristedes. I don't consider it a big deal if I'm not aware who is on the education committee in a foreign country or I would have googled it.