WestCanMan

Because Obama and his wife were actual supporters of rioting, looting, arson, the murders of innocent civilians and the assassinations of police officers. They did it for almost 3 years and you supported all of those felonies and capital crimes along with them. They never spoke against the riots when they were in a position to stop them, and you don't care. It's the absolute height of hypocrisy for you to wig out about a little riot involving less than 200 people for less than 2 hours, and for you to act like it wasn't enough for Trump to send 1 message per half hour when Obama sent zero per year. Do you get it? I bring up Obama to point out your blatant hypocrisy, lying or stupidity. I'll let you choose which one of the three you are, but it's definitely one, if not all three. Are you a liar, a hypocrite and/or an idiot godzilla? You've had plenty of time to wrap your head around these things and you keep reasserting your false narrative.

I should say more than slightly. Bill Clinton was an actual violent rapist and Hillary helped to cover his tracks. Hillary was also caught cheating on the 2016 election in 3 different ways. Trump didn't cheat on that election at all. Truth hurts. Suck it down Argus.

CNN & the Dems: "Murders? We don't see any excess murders of innocent civilians or police officers! These riots are mostly peaceful." I think that lying is natural for humans. Every little kid will do it, you have to teach them the value of being honest. The leftist media lies, therefor leftists feel like they're doing their civic duty by propagating and defending those lies.

That's a lot in a 90-minute riot. Especially when you can't find any examples at all of Obama telling people to stop rioting over the course of 3 years.

No doubt they also think that Trump started a bunch of wars.

Keep in mind, every single thing that I said was true and verifiable, you just chose to ignore it and go with another ad hominem attack as usual. Stick to the topic at hand Petros, just take your beating like a man ffs.

That just means that something went over your head and I didn't want to take the time to explain it to you on a Friday night.

*Whoosh*

You just told a bunch more lies, but it's possible that you thought that it was all true, on account of your blatant lack o' figgerin' ability. 1) Obama was a world-class dog-whistler. He said many things in many different ways to support the cause of rioters, while his appeals for peace & togetherness, and his stern condemnation of murder, was sorely lacking. 2) People who don't like riots and murders care that Michelle Obama was fostering hatred at the height of the carnage, that's who. 3) Trump denouncing riots is an established fact whether you like it or not kiddo. In GZ's own post, which was no doubt supposed to be a harsh condemnation of Trump's wicked ways, contained no less than 3 instances of Trump directly denouncing the rioting over the 95 minutes that it lasted. That's an actual lie, and I don't care if you are just repeating what CNN said because you're an idiot. That's no excuse, you still told a lie. Trump said that 'there were good people on both sides of the statue debate'. That's not the same as saying that the members of the democrat-founded militia (KKK) were good people. He also said that both sides came to fight, no one was 'attacked', which was true. Cite? No? Ooh that's a shocker. Petros lied again. You'd literally have to be one of the dumbest people on earth in order to believe that what you just said was true Petros. Are you going to admit that you're dumber than a sack full of libtards or do you wanna try explaining how you came to that mother of all stupid comments? Given your loose relationship with facts, that's enough to make my head swell by a few hat-sizes.

People who regurgitate leftist drivel are leftits. Most people who can read and write can figure that much out for themselves. Sadly, you need to have that explained to you. Lemme guess, you still don't get it...........

FYI Dems and liberals are still rubbing salt in those wounds to get votes. Eg, Obama talked about slavery during a eulogy to partially justify the assassination of 5 police officers. Trudeau said that Canadians are engaged in genocide against FN women. What's in the trunk of your car, Petros? You obviously don't know much about religion, history and geography. So? Was I talking to you? What makes you think that I care about what MLW posters you may or may not know?

Obama is guilty of white privilege.

Obama was a very pro-rioting president. FYI that's bad. At the height of the rioting in 2020, when the most people were being killed, Michelle Obama made a commencement address to 2020's grads saying: "Stay angry. Focus your anger. Never let anyone tell you not to be angry." She's a hateful, seditious bitch and that's not an opinion it's a fact. Suck it down. By contrast, Trump has denounced every single act of rioting and murder that happened in the country while he was POTUS, just like he's supposed to. During the 1hr 35mins of riots that you like to think he supported, he sent out two tweets and video telling people to stop rioting. 1 message per 30 minutes. That's in contrast with Obama's zero messages over nearly 3 years. You lose again bub.

BUT....! BUT....! BUT....! They're really angry about slavery from 1865.....! You know, the slavery that every race on earth was guilty of taking part in from the beginning of recorded history? The slavery that white people abolished. The slavery that, oddly enough, only white people are guilty of now lol. There are people who are still butthurt over battles from biblical times. It's a sickness. Some people just wanna stay angry. The poster who went by eyeball here a while back said that he could identify with people who were victims of racism & genocide because he has the same last name as the people massacred at Glenncoe. IE, the thirty people massacred 328 years ago lol.

Do you ever see me bragging about Bill Clinton? Or Dubya? Do you think the day will ever come when I have something positive to say about our own crime boss, one Mr. Trudeau? Those guys are about as white as you could get, Dubya was even a Republican. You're just an angry, butt-hurt Demmie with no intelligent counterpoints to make, so you're backed into an untenable little cage like a little poop-flinging monkey. Go ahead and make your baseless little allegations buddy. No one gives a rip.

LOL. This was a great page.

Correct. Blatant stupidity.

A riot is an out of control protest, and it was that. Storm is to move off angrily, or to attack with actual armed troops. There were no troops there. Just angry buttheads. For your edification, here's the proper usage of the word 'stormed' in a sentence: "Heavily armed BLM terrorists stormed a police precinct and then set up a fortified defensive perimeter around a 7-block radius, claiming sovereignty over what was formerly US soil. The Democrats fully supported their treasonous actions." Yeah, but it's not, by definition, so there's that. Wiki is not an official historical account by the final authority on the planet. You can upload info to wiki, or be a fact-checker there if you want. Because when a person in Nancy Pelosi's position uses words like sedition, treason, etc that can usually be considered to carry a lot of weight. Ditto for Kamala Harris, a former first lady like Skank Obama, Congressmen, etc. It's important to make note of the fact that the people who are making these accusation have absolutely no credibility whatsoever re: the topic of sedition or treason. All of those people committed sedition and treason themselves. Verbally supporting the violent overtaking of sovereign US soil in Chaz was sedition, failure to act was treason. The Dems committed those crimes like they were throwing out candies from a parade float. I dunno if you're lying or if you're really this ignorant after all this time, but Trump lacks the authority to send the National Guard into any of the states. Mayors and Governors have to request it. When rioting, looting, arson, racial violence, assaults against police, and the murders of police and innocent civilians alike was occurring, it was up to mayors and governors to stop it. This is blatant stupidity GZ. Just like Trump was the only person who could tell the people at the capitol to call it off, the Obamas were the only ones who could call off the BLM violence. They never did that. Your account, although sounding official, is without first-hand accounts. IE, witnesses. "Senior WH officials told Sasse", etc. I'm concerned that Biden may be shitting his pants on a regular basis. Does that make me a witness to the 'fact'? Or is that just a clever way of trying to make something sound like it's more than it really is. Where's the beef gz? 1) So here we have a timeline of bad things starting to happen, and Trump at the same time tweeting for people to stop doing those bad things. That's awesome gz, thanks for pointing that out. 2) WashPo is famous for their lies and slander. They were successfully sued by a high school kid for that. They said that "Trump did not want to" and I have absolutely no reason to believe that Trump didn't intend to type those words. In any event, he did type them. Obama did not type words to that effect even when people were being killed and police officers were being assassinated. Meaningless. Tripe. A second tweet, 38 minutes later. Thanks for the info gz. You need to brush up on your disinformation or you will be kicked out of the leftist mob. So by 3:40 the VP also called for the rioting to stop immediately. Other prominent members of the GOP were also calling for calm. Good to know. Just an hour and 13 minutes in there have already been two tweets from the POTUS and 1 from the VP. This little tidbit is just thrown in here, but there's no time stamp on this blurb. Did this happen at 1100 am? Noon? You didn't say. At the point in the timeline where you threw this in, Trump has already tweeted twice and Pence once. Gee golly gosh gz. So now, between 2:47 and 4:22 we're up to two tweets and a video from Trump, and a tweet and a video from Pence. 1hr 35 mins - 5 calls for peace. How many calls for peace did the Obamas make in almost 3 years of rioting gz? They're quite a bit more famous for inciting riots than for asking for peace. Even during actual treason and the overtaking of sovereign US soil the Obamas supported every bit of it. You're from the team that ardently supports murderous rioting. Now you're trying to act like Trump is the pro-riot politician when he denounced it almost instantly. You understand why I consider your opinion on this topic quite worthless now, right?

LMAO. Obama said it would take 5 years to get rid of islamic state. Trump crushed in 1/10 of that. Administrations spun their wheels on Arab Israeli relations for years. Trump made more headway in 4 years than the rest of them did since 1949. Biden just gave Russia everything that they wanted. There's no trick to that. It's just the Paris deal and the Iran deal all over again. "Here ya go guys. Everything you want. Just let me know when you need my pen again." Off to China to get some real work done now. Baby needs a new pair of diamond-soled shoes!

In a country of 340M people, where 75M people voted for Trump, only 200 people "entered" those buildings. And FYI they didn't "storm" that building at all. Also, he didn't just watch it on TV, he did make a speech for the lunacy to end, and he didn't pull any punches in that speech either (like Obama did when his speech about the dead cops in Dallas included partial justification: "Centuries of racism, slavery and Jim Crowe laws"). Two speeches actually, all for a riot that lasted just a couple hours. This riot is no different from the one in Seattle which was universally supported by Demonrats. If you recall, sovereign US soil was overtaken by force, and people's homes and businesses were subjected to the rule of a hostile autocrat. Can you provide a cite for this dictatorial delusion?

Questions? We don't answer no stinking questions... C'mon man!

And thus, "historyonics" was invented. "Democracy was subverted". Sounds like a good title for nerd porn, but again, that's not real history.

1) Just be glad it's not Greta. 2) Finally we'll know the answer to the ages-old question: "Are down quarks racist?"

The 2014-2017 riots were all on Obama. When he didn't have a clue what transpired between Zimmerman and T Martin he went with "Trayvon was just a great kid, off to the store to buy some Skittles. He was shot just because he was black and Zimmerman was a white-supremacist Mexican. That could have been me, or my son" shtick. That was patently untrue. At some point Trayvon did something to end up getting shot, and that something was completely unnecessary. Obama took the position that "black people should argue and fight with cops in complete safety". He supported the "gentle giant" narrative, which was 100% false, and everyone knew that because the video of his violent robbery, from moments before he was shot, was being broadcast on a major cable news network. Obama didn't say: "Respect the police and none of this has to happen. Have your day in court, and our justice system will take care of you. I promise." His message to the black community was: "If you don't like what the police say to you, yell at them & assault them, it's your right." The first thing that Michelle "the bitch" Obama did in 2020 when there was rioting, looting, arson, racial violence, attacks on innocent civilians, wide-scale assaults on police officers, the murders of innocent civilians, and the assassinations of police officers, was: "Stay angry. Focus your anger. Never let anyone tell you to stop being angry." Obama was an excellent president up until 2014. He ended up being the worst president in US history.

Manafort worked with other presidents, and was found guilty of things he did in the '90s. Trump is slightly better than B or H Clinton were as a people, and he was a much better president than Obama.