WestCanMan

You guys are all so stupid. It's hilarious to see you guys try to make bogus claims that contradict each other in the same thread. So far in this thread, Mike the id10t is trying to pretend that we don't have enough 'anecdotes' to prove a pattern here, while at the same time, you're peddling a couple of low-lvl anecdotes as an insane pattern of violence. Here's thing: the difference between 1) talking about violence and 2) going to the extreme level to strap a bomb to yourself and blow yourself up at an Ariana Grande concert is orders of magnitude apart. You're also limited to finding two examples of "talking about violence" from a population of 300M, we're talking about 29 people from Canada's muslim population of 1.5M people who went full-terrorist. If you're keeping score, that's: 2 low-level threats from 300M people, vs 29 extremists from 1.5M people. Which is worse, dummy? And FYI, muslims who just wanna talk about genocide didn't even get counted here. They're the 3rd tier in that crowd, the second tier being people that help gather weapons, and scheme with them, and keep their secrets... But FWIW they have hate rallies in Ottawa that people like you attend. And if you haven't attended yet, guess what, you still count as a person who supports hate rallies and who supports terrorist attacks, but just didn't go yet. FYI you're one of the people tracked by this stat: it's well understood, through decades of surveys and compiling statistics, that when companies receive phone/mail/email complaints, the people making them represent only about 4% of all the people who share that same issue, the rest of them just didn't get off their ass. IOW, for every single person that complains, there are about 25 others who are similarly upset. Now think about something as extreme as going out and shooting a bunch of women and children. What percent of people actually get that mad? For each person who goes to that extreme, how many people do you think share the same level of religious bigotry, but are unwilling to go die in a blaze of glory to satisfy allah? Is it just 25? Nah. I think that it's far less than 1/25 that wanna actually murder children. But whatever that ratio is, you're one of them. You're sitting there at your keyboard proudly telling the world that you support terrorism, and that the real number of terrorists isn't limited to the few who commit the attacks... Each attack also represents, not just 25 other violent bigots, but most likely thousands of other violent bigots, exactly like yourself. You are living proof of this stat. Congrats! You just did some math. I bet that's a first.

Why are you such a liar and weasel, dude? There's literally no topic in this forum where I've ever seen you make an intelligent, legitimate point. What is your background? Were you born in Canada or what country did you move here from? What is your religion?

No way would I let that guy go while there were other shooters active in that area. How did that dimwit who let him just walk away know that they guy didn't have grenades in that man-purse, or a handgun? Or even a remote detonator? Or that he wasn't gonna go to a nearby car and get something else? Easy decision for me: at the very least that guy gets one in the stomach. He would have about a two percent chance of surviving. That's good enough.

Here's something for you to remember tonight when you're going to sleep: Gaetan and Radiorum are gonna masturbate to that video 😉 Also, you would be going to jail for posting that bit of truth in England. I honestly wanna start a FB account now and pretend that I'm from London, just so that I can post that video and have the British Gestapo come and try to arrest me 🤣 It will be the second war they lose on this continent.

Do you understand what you're even saying, you terrorist piece of shit? You're saying that the Australian shooting was justified by the Arab-Israeli situation, ten thousand km away. Don't get this wrong, f-nut: "partial or semi-justification" is still justification. Not only do you have NO UNDERSTANDING WHATSOEVER OF THE ARAB-ISRAELI SITUATION, you think that somehow mass-murdering Jews in Australia is kinda understandable because of what's happening 5,000 km away. Here are some dots that can not be connected, using your own logic: You think that it's understandable that muslims kill Jews in Australia You think that we can import tens of thousands of muslims here and they won't commit terrorist attacks against Jews here. Look, dumbass... By your own explanation of what's justifiable/understandable, people should be committing mass-murders against Jews all over the world. You can never sever the connection between the meaning of your own words in that post and your open acceptance of terrorist killings as a proper public statement.

That's entirely false, and based on your own extremely poor understanding of how meaningful statistics are derived and how they are used. FYI the sub-group of "people willing to commit mass atrocities" within each group of people is usually minuscule. Ie, they are massive outliers. Ie, they occur in about the 6th or 7th standard deviation. Think, "way less than one in 10 million." Aside from the Canadian who retaliated against the muslim terrorist attacks, and some "non-muslims from muslim families" lol, can you think of a Canadian terrorist that killed a bunch of people indiscriminately since 1990? Was Polytechnique the only one? MH: we don't have ten million muslims here, but we've had way more than one muslim terrorist attack since 2000. Get it? That means that terrorists aren't 1 per 10M. They're not from the 6th or 7th standard of deviation. That's math, MH, and math is what we use to determine patterns among groups of people. We've actually had 29 muslims that committed or attempted terrorist attacks since then, plus how many other people knew about them but said nothing? How many people were invited to participate with the gang of 18? If it's just 21 more, then the number of actual terrorists is 40 per 1.5M, that's 1 per 40,000. That's 4th standard of deviation territory. If white people were committing terrorist attacks at the same rate we'd have had about ten terrorist attacks in each city of 500,000, since 1990. How many memorable terrorist attacks did white people commit here since 1990? Sikhs: half as many people, one terrorist attack since confederation. Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists, Jews, and other minority religions: zero. 20+Million Christians: A couple of small, one-shot terrorist attacks with no fatalities (anti-abortion), a retaliatory attack at a mosque, and possibly one car that hit 4 pedestrians. You know what the deal is MH, you're just a liar. No they do not, because if they did, they'd be stoning them to death, dropping them off of buildings, lynching them, burning them to death, chopping them up with machetes, etc. You're talking about Canada, a Christian majority country, where gays are not killed at all. Like, zero in my lifetime. Compare that to muslim-majority countries, not a country like this where they can't get away with it. In Afghanistan gays are killed horribly, but men who are open about the fact that the have sex with boys hold prominent positions. Stop pretending MH. We aren't as dumb as you're pretending to be, you evil POS.

This is what happens when muslims get to 1% of the population - they commit enough acts of violent religious bigotry that other religions no longer feel safe to gather and celebrate. For example, in German they have so many muslims that they can't afford the cost of security to hold all of their Christmas festivals. If I ran this country, the cost of security for Christmas festivals would be zero dollars, but the cost of committing a terrorist attack at one would be incalculable. Think "so high for the entire group that was responsible for committing the murder that it would be impossible to share the idea of committing a terrorist attack among 2 people without getting turned in to the authorities." If that sounds insane, just remember that we had a group of 18 terrorists here involved in one plot. IOW, there is a community in this country that's so F'd up that you can share the idea of something insane as a wave of terrorist attacks among either: several dozen of them without feeling like someone's gonna rat you out, or 18 of them and know that you will get 100% support from all of them. I mean, what happened? Did they have to ask 100 people in order to find a group of 18 that wanted to massacre Canadians indiscriminately, without fear of being ratted out, or did they just ask 18, knowing that they'd all say yes? Now, in the end, they got so many people involved that someone finally did turn them in, but that was A LOT OF F'ING PEOPLE. How many people do you know that you could approach with a plan like "Let's just murder as many people as we can" who would say yes, or at least would keep your secret while you carried it out? I can't imagine there is a group of There is not a group of non-muslim Canadians where one would feel comfortable talking about mass-murder without thinking "One of these 50 people might turn me in".

Of course what you're saying came from the CBC first, so I just gotta ask you if you're aware how "abrasive and confrontational" Trudeau was while Harper was PM? Trudeau had nothing good to say about the gov't at all while leading the LPoC as a member of the opposition, and he didn't support the conservative gov't in any way. In fact, Trudeau was most revered by CBC for his incessant shrieking about $90K duffygate, they led the headline news hour with it for 3 years and then called the 2015 election "a referendum on Duffygate". I'm not exaggerating, Spanky. Negativity was CBC's absolute favourite thing in 2014. So, my question to you is: "How did you go from wholehearted support of angry & hostile negativity for 3 full years in the early 2010's to being 100% intolerant of civil and reasonable critiques of the gov't for part of one year in 2025?" Why do we face hostility from India, Spanky? They used to be our friends, and then Trudeau insulted the Indian gov't on national TV a bunch of times, played the clown in their traditional clothing, invited a terrorist to inner there, protects Khalistani terrorists, etc. Why is America eating our lunch, Spanky? We elected the guy that Trump told us to elect, and the confetti hadn't even hit the ground before Trump put a ball-gag in Carney's mouth. Did you think that Trump really wanted an LPoC PM elected after Trudeau was so insulting towards him? Why is China in a trade war with us, Spanky? Because Trudeau was a clown, and then we elected weak, worthless, lying Mark Carney. Remember when Trudeau said: "We can't interfere in the judicial process on behalf of Meng Wanzhou because in Canada the gov't doesn't interfere in matters of the court"? That was both an insult to the Chinese gov't (however correct) and a blatant lie... He had just fired his own AG for not doing his bidding during the SNC Lavalin scandal. FYI it doesn't get any worse than that. Firing the AG to get your way is at the absolute peak of "judicial meddling". THE NATIONAL CRISIS THAT WE FACE IS THE 100% A DIRECT RESULT OF LPOC: TERRIBLE LPOC FOREIGN AFFAIRS POLICY, INCLUDING TRUDEAU'S HISTORY OF DIRECTLY INSULTING THE POTUS, AND HIS INSULTS TOWARDS INDIA AND CHINA DEBT ISSUES: EVERY LPOC GOV'T OF THE PAST 10 YEARS HAS RUN ATROCIOUS DEFICITS, AND THAT'S COMING ON THE HEELS OF THEIR SUCCESSFUL OBLITERATION OF OUR ENERGY SECTOR SECURITY AND DRUG ENFORCEMENT MISMANAGEMENT. NO ONE ELSE TAKES IN PALESTINIAN REFUGEES. NO ONE ELSE TAKES IN iSLAMIC STATE TERRORISTS AND LETS THEM WALK FREE. NO OTHER COUNTRY SUPPORTS AND CONDONES TERRORISM LIKE THE LPOC SUPPORTS THE TALIBAN AND KHALISTANI TERRORISTS. WE ARE NOW A N ACTUAL SECURITY TREAT TO THE US AND INDIA. No even suspects the LPoC is actually working for Canadians (I forgot to mention that the LPOC randomly accused Canadians of a massive genocide against small 1st Nations children and then didn't even bother to check, and forced millions of Canadians to take a dangerous experimental jab that they did not need). When our own gov't is against us, why shouldn't foreign countries take advantage? What makes you think that the Liberal gov't hasn't just sold us out again, while they're just pretending to care? Have Carney's elbows ever really been up, aside from when he was biting Trump's pillow?

Go look up hypocritical in the dictionary, "non-loser", and then tell us how it applies here...

That's right. You should be getting all of your info from Al Jazeera, CBC, and the LPoC. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 Oh, and Hamas. Right?

Ok, I shoulda said that "only conservatives guessed it correctly, as usual": Guy shoots up a bunch of Jews at a beach un Australia, and left4rds would guess that it was a conservative who did it because that's what their "pulled outta arse stats" tell them, but they'd be wrong for the 99th time out of the last 100 mass-shootings, riot-killings and assassinations. The shooter was a muslim from Pakistan, who allegedly had an Australian gun license lol. I didn't think anyone in commie Australia could even get those anymore. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/ckgk391yzm7t

I don't know how much of that is true, but Michael Ma doesn't have a FB account right now. I don't know for sure if he had one before he betrayed his voters, but AFAIK all of the conservative MPs have FB accounts. If it's true that a petition for him to resign has 30,000 voters, and they're all from that riding, it's a big deal because only 50,000 people voted for CPC and LPOC there during the last election. Is it weird that between the CBC, CTV and the Libs , they almost all either 1) don't have FB accounts or 2) don't allow comments. Canadians can't discuss what they're saying.

1) When MPs were quitting the Liberal caucus, the MSM wasn't talking abut whether or not Trudeau's leadership was in question, an dthat's when he was mired in his 3rd, 4th, or maybe 5th scandal. I can't even keep track. 4 MPs eft during one term for Trudeau 2) You have to wonder what the party of bribery, or at least the people who bribe the libs, is offering these guys. When you consider how much crime and grift the LPOC are involved in, it's normal to expect that there us something underhanded going on here. 3) If the MP that I elected did this, there would be a huge f'ing problem.

A fat Canadian is considered fit south of the 49th Stop fantasizing about us in Speedos, Jersey Shore Black socks on beaches must be an American thing. I've never seen it up here.

That honestly sounds like something Britain would do. I stopped going to the US in 2014, and didn't start again until 2017, then couldn't go during covid, started going again in summer 2021, then mostly stopped this year. Honestly, that graph that you showed with all the sharp peaks and valleys looks about right from my POV.

Your m0r0nic BS doesn't "go over anyone's head". The things that you say are just so stupid that it requires no thought to dismiss them entirely. Eg: Yeah, and here's another fact for you - much research shows that the right is more inclined to politically-motivated violence than the left. FYI left4rds in the US committed more "politically motivated violent acts" between April 2014 and Sept 2020 than conservatives all over the world have committed since 1900. The Dems have controlled no less than 3 hyper-violent militias: The KKK, BLM, and Antifa. Two of the Dems' militias are responsible for murders. Pardon my informational interjection. You can carry on with your childish drivel now.

Crockett Was Tricked Into Running Nope. She failed an IQ test so badly that she was automatically placed on the Dems' ballot. Her situation wasn't all that different from Kamala in 2024: if the dumbest guy on earth picks you as his partner, you don't need to win the party's nomination, you're automatically their presidential candidate.

It wouldn't be the dumbest thing he ever did, but it would crack the top 20 million.

First you tried to apply the word cultist incorrectly, now you're aiming it in the wrong direction. Yer ofer two, Bub. I'm just gonna go with: "If you don't like it, then it's good, by definition". Oh, I understood what you were trying to say, you just didn't say it, and the reason why is clearly over your head. No, you urge me to watch the Cultist News Network and just regurgitate everything I see there, like you do.

Wrong. It's perfectly normal to make a reasonable or even an optimistic assumption, especially when there's nothing at stake. We didn't bet $50 grand on this. What's not normal, to the point of being considered cultist activity, is to flatly cling to ridiculous beliefs in the face of all evidence. You couldn't even name 1 thing Trump did that wasn't in America's best interests, Radio. I challenged you to name 1 thing to go along with your serious accusation and you refused to try. I could just make the exact same generic accusation that you just made, and swap your name in for Trump's, and both of our statements stand as equally accurate, because they both have the same amount of evidence. Look: That is because so much of what Trump is doing cannot be justified as "in the best interests of the country." That is because so much of what Radiorum is doing is "for the sake of legalizing pedophilia." My statement takes the exact same form as yours does: it's just a very serious criticism without even a hint of proof. Don't you think think that what I wrote on the second line needs a bit of proof to go along with it, now that the criticism is levelled against you instead of Trump? If I wrote that there in earnest wouldn't you demand that the mods take it down? Or that I get some sort of ban? Does a reasonable person look at what I wrote on the second line and jump to the conclusion that it is some kind of verifiable fact? So, again, where's your proof that "so much of what Trump does is not in the best interests of America"? Just say 1 thing, dude. Try to write down a factual supporting argument that I can't contradict. If you do, then you can at least say "Trump has done at least one thing as president that was not done with America's best interests in mind." I'm a guy who just requires some facts to go along with serious accusations, Radiorum, and apparently you aren't. So, do you suddenly just believe what was written about you there, or are you starting to see why people say "serious accusations come with a burden of proof"? No shit, Sherlock. It's about Trump. But it's also about "citing examples of presidents doing things that directly harm the country", so I used Obama as a prime example of that, while you were unable to do the same for Trump. You're not even 1% towards making that argument. You can't even make the claim that 1 of the alleged "319 Proj 2025 items that were put into action by Trump went against America's best interests." If Project 2025 had 319 great ideas in it, who's to say that he shouldn't do those things? If it has 11,269.5 great ideas in it, and he pushes through 319 of them, does that mean he must have gotten them from there? Isn't it possible that several different people could come up with the same great idea simultaneously? Or soon after each other? Would you expect Americans to say: "Dang, them's 319 swell ideas, cuz. It's too bad thayr in P2025, because I reckon they'd mek 'Murica a heckuva lot better." Lady: "OMG, there's a hole in the boat!" Conservative" "Let's patch the hole. I'll use this boat-hole patching kit!" Three minutes later, Leftist: "Maybe we should do something to stop water from coming through the hole, so the boat doesn't sink, and then we have to swim all the way to the far side of the lake. Let's put some butter in the hole." Two minutes later, Radiorum: "Wait. The conservative also wanted to fill the hole. Are you a Nazi too?"

Your "challenge" was silly. 1) I've seen Trump do a lot of things, try a lot of things, and promise a lot of things, all of them with America's best interests in mind. I'm perfectly happy to say that those 319 things were beneficial for America(ns), sight unseen. You can disagree with me if you want, but I'm not painting you a picture. 2) I don't really care about your challenge, you're not going acknowledge any truth in anything anyways. No, it's an example of what I challenged you to do. Like I said, it's pretty ludicrous to pretend that the actions of a sovereign were intentionally against their own country, so making that level of an accusation comes with a burden of proof that you haven't addressed. I've always said that Obama acted against his country, and I just backed up my statement. You're alleging that "Project 2025" was bad, and that Trump had a hand in it, and that these 319 things that Trump did are proof that Trump is doing the Bad project 2025 "stuff": the burden of proof goes to the accuser. You're the one accusing him of fulfilling the bad 2025 agenda. How bad was Proj 2025? How bad are these 319 things? How unlikely is it that those were just 319 good ideas that Trump of any other phenomenal leader would have acted on, whether they ever heard of Proj 2025 or not? Can you cite any real bad policies at all from P2025? Or any bad policies out of the alleged 319? Dude, you just made a serious and completely vague accusation.

And TBH, this is the portion of a president's career where they don't have to be all that popular, because it's neither election time nor mid-terms time, and what's more, he can't even run again. This is the part of his career where he could be letting terrorists out of jail, like Clinton did. Just wait until it's election time and Trump turns on the charm: Robo's panties are gonna hit the floor. SpaLOOSH!

It's ridiculous for you to take the position that I have to prove why a president's policy/action doesn't benefit the country. The only realistic assumption is that would be the case. A better idea, why don't you give me an example of one of those Trump policies or actions that doesn't benefit the country? I'll do Obama as an example: When only 2 people on earth really knew why Trayvon Martin was shot, Obama decided to create the narrative that the only reason Martin was shot was because his skin was black: nothing else. He completely disregarded every detail of the story of the only person on earth who had any first-hand knowledge at all of what happened. Then photos of a 12-yr-old Trayvon were circulated, to make it seems as though he was a really cute little child, but Martin was over 17 yrs old at the time, and Obama smiled. (My son just turned 16 and he is over 6 feet tall right now, and he doesn't look like a 12-yr-old in any recent photos). Then, during all of the resulting violence, and the violence stemming from the false narrative surrounding the M Brown shooting, and the complete disregard of the videos showing Brown's rage attack from moments earlier, Obama just cheered on the rioting. So tell me, which of Trump's policies is bad? You have 319 to choose from.

Fixed it for ya. "Warren took $822,573 between 2019 and 2020 from employees or PACs affiliated with pharmaceutical and health product companies, though not from the companies themselves, according to Open Secrets." That's anywhere from 1 to 2 years, max, from her political career that spans decades, and that's just what they caught her on, it's not necessarily all the ill-gotten gains that she and her family have received over those 2 years. We can only guess how much money they've lavished on her family members that Open Secrets didn't manage to detect or prove. Eg, there's no law saying that her vastly underqualified daughter can't get hired as a secretary or consultant for Pfizer and make $400K/yr, or get $90K plus a huge pension, full medical and dental benefits, university scholarships for their kids, ample vacation time, work from home with no real expectations of work performed, access to corporate getaways and vacations for free, etc. It's like when Trudeau was offering WE millions of taxpayer dollars to host events, and in turn Trudeau's mom was paid $350K for speaking engagements there plus she received $150K in expenses, yet Morneau was the one deemed to have a conflict of interest because his daughter worked there 40 hrs a week for $30k/yr 🤣 Apparently working full-time for $30k/yr = proof of a scam, but getting paid $350K plus $150k in expenses for a few speaking engagements is entirely legit 🤣. You know that CBC never questioned how many times she spoke, and for how many hours, to make all that money? They never questioned how she racked up $150,000 in expenses? How mush does orange juice cost on her flights? Does she drink water that's distilled from virgin tears? Eyeball, hodad and the other cultists here are either completely ignorant or willing participants in basic evil.