WestCanMan

1) So you're admitting that you called him a hypocrite for what he did years ago, but you don't actually have any proof whatsoever that he actually did it, so you're acknowledging that you slandered him. Do you know that slander is the worst form of lying? You also called me a liar, which you never proved: all you proved is that your reading comprehension sucks. 2) Don't care about your account, I just didn't want to outright accuse you of lying/slander until I knew for certain, and now I'm certain. Childish petulance/hideous beliefs lol. I don't care about your opinion, I know what it's worth. FYISotomayor is a complete dolt and there's literally no excuse for what she did. A SCJ should not weigh in on a topic and make such grand claims when they are so completely uninformed, period. It undermines the people's trust in the judicial system because it makes people wonder how many times she, a SCJ no less, has made a ruling based on the same level of ignorance that she made those declarative/wildly incorrect statements. Case closed colin.

Ohhhhh Colin, Colin, Colin. 1) Trump didn't ask anyone for violence either, so by your ultra-low standard (probably normal to you) you need to STFU about Trump on Jan 6th. 2) On the one day of rioting by people who could in any way be considered to be GOP supporters, Trump sent tweets and videos asking for peace, starting within 30 minutes of the first gate being breached. 3) By contrast, Dems never asked for peace during years of protest. They only provided vocal support and downplayed the carnage from the rioters. If you think that they did ask for peace and condemn the rioting then provide some links. 4) I can show you proof that Trump sent out messages to stop the riots on Jan 6th, but you know that, so you're going to steer clear of that, aren't you? I'll put it here anyways, to emphasize your stupidity, lying and hypocrisy: First rioter entered Capitol at 2:12, Trump sent out a tweet at 2:38, [that's 26 minutes later, put your socks back on] saying "Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!" 26 minutes, not "hours", as members of the lamestream media are reporting. FWIW, the first gate was breached at 12:53, Trump's first tweet for peace was 1hr 45 mins after the very first temporary fence was breached. Trump also sent out a tweet saying this: "I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!" So you can plainly see that Trump both condemns violence and asks for peace. This is important in a healthy democracy. 5) It's absolutely certain that Kamala's message did support rioting, looting and arson because she showed nothing less than 100% blanket approval and support for everyone involved in her cherished demonstrations. By contrast, Trump sent out messages and videos clearly showing support for peace only, and against criminal activity. That is probably quite nuanced for you, so I'll repeat it thusly, for you only: "Trump sayed good things about peace, bad things about riots".There's not a single rioter, looter, arsonist or violent attacker who watched Kamala's message and felt like they weren't loved and appreciated. Similarly, Michelle Obama focused her speech on anger, and staying angry, which, during riot season, is a clear dog whistle to people who are actually quite less than dogs. E.g., the kinds of people that Rittenhouse shot: a pedo, a woman beater and one other Dem-type felon but I can't remember what his rap sheet included. Awww. Wipe that stuff off your top lip and apologize now. Gross.

@Colin Norris Hey Colin, remember when you said that I was a liar for suggesting that the Dems supported rioting? Are you a man or a mouse, Colin? C'mon, squeak up! Is Kamala a Dem? Was the woman who called CHAZ "The Summer of Love" a Dem? ....... crickets

I'll have this battle of wits with you Colin. I'm not too sporting to accept a challenge from an unarmed man. Oh look^, there's a post in this very thread, from this very day, where I called you out for lying and you didn't have an answer so you "shift[ed] the emphasis onto the usual subjects like how you are mentally superior". Sound familiar? So do tell colin, how do you know that nationalist was being a hypocrite? Is this a new account for you because you got sick of being busted for lying/being wrong so much on an old account? I've been here a long time, and I'll be posting with this account long after you've been banned or humiliated into creating something new.

That's what you actually said, I quoted you directly with the 'quote' feature here, and I'm glad you finally spoke honestly because it seems like there's something that you need to get off of your chest. I actually said this: and while I didn't craft that brilliant prose for one so unworthy as yourself, the shoe definitely fits. Grow up.

I already made you look stupid in the posts where you replied to me directly, now I'm just making you look stupid in posts that you directed at other people. And yeah, I guess I'm already there but it's so much fun.

Lots of reasons. 1 Vaccines are really the only safe recommendation, because the vaccines' makers can't be sued. 2 Big Pharma is one of the biggest, most generous lobbyists in the world, and it's legal for them to offer compensation to Drs for services rendered. Not a real conflict of interest though, right? The guy who's putting a serum into your arm, receiving money from the people who made it, and they don't have to tell you about it? [If you look up the definition of 'conflict of interest', that's pretty much the epitome of it.] 3 Did you ever wonder why our 'leaders' are opting for the 'entire country, thrice/year' demi-vaxxes instead of using therapeutics on a case by case basis? Which one do you think is more cost effective for taxpayers? Which one is more lucrative for vaxx companies? Which one frees us from injecting children with a serum that offers no benefits to them? 4 It does seem like a whole lot of lying and conniving, but it also coincides with a lot of gov't/MSM/Big Tech disinformation and slander. Why do those three continually lie to us all, and punish skeptcs for non-conformity, only to move the goalpasts back and admit that the skeptics were right? Did covid come from a pangolin? Are the vaccines safe? Do they stop people from dying? Did HCQ kill people? How long did they know about the lab leak? Why do they refuse to investigate the lab leak or talk about why/how it happened? This #4 is gonna be tough for you, because you have no answers and you're afraid to think about it. The best reason for getting vaccinated is this: We all know now that covid is a bio-weapon, and it's possible that our bodies actually do need some kind of a countermeasure from our own BSL4 labs to combat it. The best reason for not getting vaccinated is this: the people who were somehow promoting the vaccines' safety and efficacy with great certainty long in advance of their trials are the same people who were lying and slandering therapeutics and other possible remedies that whole time, and they were also complicit in covering up the source of the outbreak long after common sense and science had compiled a rock-solid case against them. "My level of distrust for the people that I have known to be liars for a very long time is fairly high." - WestCanMan

And yet it's in lock-step with our own PM's line of thinking.... They take up some space? WTF does that even mean? I know that it's translated from French, so maybe it's a rough translation, but it sounds a lot like "We'd all be better off if they were at the bottom of a lake". He said: "This leads us, as a leader and a country, to make a choice: Do we tolerate these people?" Does that sound like a call to action to you? As long as our own PM is fanning the flames of ignorance & bigotry, this is just going to keep getting worse. Buckle up.

He's fresh from the deepest, darkest echo chamber in the land. Leftist platitudes are his cites. The things people who watch the news knew of in advance for years, he's still yet to hear to hear about. If he googles Clinesmith or Sussman his head will explode.

Sotomayor makes AOC look overqualified.

Agreed. This is such an alarming level of stupidity that it should be disqualifying for a person in her position. COVID isn't a topic that most people are completely unaware of. She wasn't just a bit wrong, and she wasn't commenting on down quarks, toroids, the cells lining inside of an iguanas colon or the core of a black hole, she was commenting on the most commonly discussed issue of the last two years, and it's like she just came out of a time capsule from 1984. "Like, what's with this corvid thing? Is that like, a plant or an animal or like, [pops gum loudly] that hot guy from the Ramones?" The fact that one of the very key people in the world's foremost democracy is also one of the stupidest people on the planet is really hard to wrap one's head around.

? Is English your second language? Do you know what idioms are? [Hint: they're not your cousins/siblings]

You have 40 posts here Colin Norris. Nationalist has 178. How do you know what Nationalist was saying back when Trump was appointing SCJs?

You had to call me names just to support your own lies, so pathetic. Kamala Harris's rioter/looter bail fund. Nice. Revolving door for felons.

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/michelle-obama-commencement-speech-transcript-2020 You obviously don't know the meaning of grossly misinformed. Here's Kamala Harris gushing about how the riots need to continue, and Michelle Obama at the height of the rioting telling high school kids to be angry and to stay angry. Why don't you try to find some videos of Republicans encouraging rioters to stay angry on Jan 6th? Or some videos of those high-profile Dem bimbos telling people to stop rioting? There were violent riots on hundreds of days in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2020. It's weird that they felt like they had to fan the flames, but they did.

Here's Tony Timpa being killed by officers while in custody. I don't know how much time Timpa had already spent on his stomach before this video started, but the video is super-hard to watch. It's eerily similar to Floyd's death in that they were both complaining like they were dying during the moments when no one was even touching them, which no doubt contributed to officers believing that they weren't really harming when they were actually killing them. In Timpa's case it's understood that he was having an anxiety attack, he was actually the one who called 911, and he called for that reason alone. Floyd seems the same to me but I have no medical or psychiatric training to speak of.

Somehow the people who mystically knew in advance that the vaccines would be perfectly safe and 100% effective also knew in advance that every other possible treatment was anti-science and therefor not worth looking into. I actually saw the leader of a leftist mob kick a dude in the chest, knocking him down into a deep well, shouting "FAUCI. IS. SCIEEEEENNNNNNNNCE!"

I didn't know anything about that 'til I saw your post.

They actually are quite different according to the poll, did you look at it? Do you need me to hold your hand and explain it all to you? They're also quite different according to recent and historical knowledge: Republicans don't support rioting, looting, arson and assaults against cops. Only Dems do that, and they lie to their peons to rile them up for those riots.

This is just proof of your own lack of reading comprehension. There's a huge difference between "not necessarily illegal hyuk hyuk" and "there's lots of room for fraud in 23,000 ballots that were mailed to people's former addresses".

Find some actual, accurate criticism from one of your leftist sources then. Not something that says: "Aw shucks, this wasn't perfect but it was mostly Trump's fault." Like I said before, if you knew that something there was bullshit you'd be on cloud nine right now crowing about it, you wouldn't be making your usual unsubstantiated accusations. Go fish Beave.

I had a cite about the ballots, where's your cite that says it's bullshit? FFS you're dull.

There's plenty of room left on the Repolitics server for you to name some specific instances where I was bullshitting, and we both know for a fact that if you had something you'd crow about it all day. Thanks for comin' out buddy. Wow. Can you find a leftist news source that says as much?

Thanks eyeball, this is a perfect example where your original post might just been really stupid, but in the second post it's 100% certain that you're lying. To say that 55,000 is 25x as bad as 2200 would only make sense in two places with the same number of people, the same amount of hospital capacity, etc. A smart person would understand that, a really dumb person might not. But after it was explained to you, and you still got it wrong, now I know you're lying.

Cite