WestCanMan

Not sure. I've heard them they say things like "seniors and people with low incomes can defer the tax until they sell", which leads me to believe that it might be annual, but I also heard them say that it was just a tax that is paid when a property is sold.

Jagmuppet agrees to everything.

https://globalnews.ca/news/8492260/annual-surtax-homes-housing-inequality-report/ Homes over $1M will be taxed now "to help stall price increases" because the gov't says that they want to make home ownership easier for new/young Canadians. This is just a bullshit tax which will be a drain on the middle class, but will only cost Trudeau's wealthy buddies a pittance. Almost every single home in BC from West Vancouver to Abbotsford will be affected by this tax, but investors, who tie up affordable housing which young families could be purchasing, won't pay a single cent. If the gov't really wants to make home ownership a possibility then they need to put a premium on second, third, fourth, fifth dwelling units, etc. The way that this tax is set up, I can have two $900K condos, side by side, and 600 condos all across the country worth $500K each, and the new tax won't cost me a single penny, ever. I'd have over $300M in real estate, I'd be earning rent from 600 working families, and I could use my income from those 600 homes to buy several new condos every month, which just puts upward pressure on the cost of those homes. Trudeau's idiot fanbase will be sucked in by this. All of his welfare toadies will lap it up, thinking that it's a legitimate tax to help them out, in reality it doesn't do a thing for entry-level buyers.

After reading thousands of your posts, proving you wrong thousands of times, and even catching you lying, I've come to think of you as a person who doesn't understand things very well, even with the benefit of hindsight. Sorry dude, that's just life. In this instance, if you want to try to find some stats that show that the number of heart attacks and 'strokes' that children suffered within a week of vaxxing was normal, then go ahead. I'd love to be proven wrong on this issue because if that's the case then I can safely vaccinate my son and he'll be able to cross the border to play his sports. He already missed a chance to go to Vegas last year. I'm not doing this to be an ass, I actually have a vested interest here. The pro-vax declarations of absolute safety and efficacy from before the vaccines even went through their drug trials gave me cause for concern. The anti-everything-but-vaxx push from before the vaxxes were approved was cause for concern. The decisive guarantees and harsh attacks against skeptics of vaxx safety, after there were a lot of anecdotes about side effects, was cause for concern. The fact that Astrazenica and J&J suddenly got pulled after we were already told that they were safe was cause for concern. The fact that the CDC is saying that all of those blood clots and strokes and heart attacks and 6 undisclosed deaths among children is obviously cause for concern for right now. Big Pharma is a very generous master. Canadian doctors get 'kickbacks' (call it what you want, but pharma gives doctors millions of dollars for sitting on boards, being part of trials, etc) and we aren't allowed to know who gets how much. Your Realtor and your lawyer would lose their jobs for getting money the way that doctors do all the time. Just so ya know.

What you expect and what you doubt is hardly a cause for reflection.

The title and the vast majority of the main body of that article just goes on about "some very elderly, often bedridden people with covid get breakthrough cases and end up in hospital", and then incorrectly states that "the unvaccinated COVID patients we see are young, healthy, working people and their condition deteriorates rapidly,” she said. “Suddenly they’re being put on oxygen or on a respirator". In your case, you might want to say that you were aware that dbl-vaxxed people still die, but the conversation that you barged into was between me and Aristedes, and he was incorrectly stating that dbl-vaxxed people only get mildly ill. It mentioned that at the very bottom of the article, but anyone with any brains stopped reading the article long before that, and 99% of the mouth-breathers that read Global would take two weeks to get to the bottom of that page. Yes. You do understand that a breakthrough case doesn't always result in death, right? Even just being asymptomatic and testing positive, 14 days after the second dose, is called a breakthrough case. It is almost meaningless because we know that everyone with the vaxx can still get covid. Around you I am infallible. At the very best you may have proven that you were aware that dbl-vaxxed people die, but that just puts you at the top 1% of liberals, which is the bottom 50% of the heap.

Ask yourself this: "If my kid dies from a vaccine that I put in their arm can I live with that? If my kid winds up being the only healthy child in Canada & the US to die of covid will I feel bad for not vaxxing them?" I'd hate to watch my kid die from something that I forced into their body with a needle. If the gov't wants me to vaxx my kid then they need to do a better job of explaining away all of the neo-vax child deaths than just: "We unilaterally declared that the vaxx wasn't to blame and you don't get any of the details, peon." Were the kids who died from covid extremely unhealthy? What about the kids who died recently after vaxxing? I'm assuming that they were very unhealthy if they died from blood clots in their lungs, etc, but why can't we know? It's kind of weird that they just say "The kids who died within a week of vaxxing from blood clots, non-traumatic brain hemorrhaging, heart failure, and 6 other reasons (that medical health professionals assumed to be vax-related but we won't divulge) were just randos. Kids just keel over from shit like that, and it's usually at about 5% of that pace, but we think they were just unlucky." Nah. It's not for me, but I'm not a medical professional. I'd recommend that you talk to a Dr. that you really really trust.

That's 12 deaths from those seemingly vax-related causes within that 7-day reporting period. Statistically speaking, that would never have happened to 8.9M kids who weren't vaxxed. The 8.9M kids vaxxed in the US is about the same as the total number of kids in Canada. They had 12 deaths in that one week of exposure to the recent jab, at that rate they'd have 1,200 deaths on the 100 weeks since COVID started. We only had 18 deaths in that 100 weeks of exposure to COVID. To say that the week after vaxxing is a very dangerous week is an understatement. But it's just 'random'.

I hear ya, but it will take way more than "an argument" or even a new law for health authorities to mandate child-vaxxing.

My kid won't be vaxxed unless some new stats come out showing that covid is a danger to healthy kids. Bank on it.

That makes so much sense lol. 1) FYI if they have it, they can't over-catch it, 2) If the 100% vaxxed staff is rampant with covid then the vaxxes obviously don't work 3) if people can still work while they have covid how bad is it? Are they dragging around their intubators? 4) You still can't say that vaccines are safe, or why kids should be vaxxed.

BC: https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/covid-19-update-for-jan-3-2022-heres-the-latest-on-coronavirus-in-b-c 9,332 new cases, 9 more hospitalizations... OMG LET'S THROW THE UNVAXXED OFF A CLIFF! How about stop watching Global ffs.

You're way off on a tangent now. Why would I mention that? Is the problem that people are so sick that they need to be in the hospital or are they there because of MSM paranoia? No, that's not a good enough reason for vaccination when the vaccines aren't safe. All of the vaccines were supposedly safe before we got them and a lot of people died or had extremely serious side effects from vaxxing. People get to choose their own risk. If the gov't wanted us all to vax then they shouldn't have lied to us about how safe the vaxxes supposedly were. Do you honestly want young people to take a risk of dying from the vaccine just so that people's elective surgeries don't get postponed? Maybe vaccinated people shouldn't have been flying to South Africa during a pandemic. Did you ever think of that? Maybe they shouldn't have been going to restaurants. This isn't a "pandemic the unvaccinated". It's just covid, and vaccinated people are dying from it and taking up hospital beds too.

Leftists: "We don't think for ourselves, all we do is repeat what we see/hear in the MSM. Until CTV or CNN responds to your post, we're completely unable to comment. It's like the words just don't exist inside of our heads." AKA, you're a bunch of worthless cowards who are OK with risking the lives of children just to increase your own chance of survival by a tiny smidgeon. Go to hell.

It depends on your circumstances. You have a really small risk of dying in your car today. Your seatbelt won't kill you all by itself. Should you wear your seatbelt while you're driving in your car? Yeah. Should you wear your seatbelt at your kitchen table? No. If there was a 1/10,000,000 chance that your seatbelt would kill you all by itself is it still worth the risk? Maybe. Is it worth the risk if you're a really shitty driver and you're going through the mountains in winter? Of course. Should a 5 yr old wear it in the sandbox? Of course not. Right now the stats say that a 5 yr old needs a pseudovax to stay safe as much as they need a seatbelt in the sandbox. People who ARE NOT AT RISK from covid shouldn't take the shot. There are tens of millions of people who ARE NOT AT RISK from covid. They all have decades of life in front of them. Why take a small chance at death? And that doesn't even take into account any long term effects that we're still unaware of. There are thousands of things that were initially thought to be safe which eventually turned out to be serious health hazards.

Given what we know about COVID mortality demographics, they had at least one really unhealthy person in the control group. Go figger.

A lot of people who swear that vaxxing children is 'really important' or even just 'ok' need to chime in here. Unless you guys have a source that says "intracranial hemorrhage" is a twice-daily occurrence among 5-18 yr olds in the US then you have some explaining to do. (That's when you just have bleeding inside of your skull for no apparent reason) Unless you guys have a source that says "pulmonary embolism" is a twice-daily occurrence among 5-18 yr olds in the US then you have some explaining to do. (That's when you get a blood clot that blocks an artery in your heart) Unless you guys have a source that says "heart failure" is a daily occurrence among 5-18 yr olds in the US then you have some explaining to do. (This is 'heart failure', as in your heart stops beating just because it's weak. It's a completely different cause of death from a congenital condition, myocarditis or a whole host of other reasons why the heart stops. The most common causes were high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, and diabetes, but maybe kiddie pseudo-vaxxes need to be added to the list)

You've chosen to go off-topic I see. Shocker. FWIW I fact check everyone. When I watch Fox, or when my family or friends or FB contacts send me a meme or a link I check into them all the time. FWIW I think that a lot of stuff that gets sent to me sounds like BS at first, but it happens quite a bit that the things that I see or hear which sound unlikely actually do come to pass. E.g., in 2017-2020 Sean Hannity was constantly saying things like "Andrew McCabe is going to be fired before the end of the week" or "the FBI was lying to the FISA court" or "Hillary colluded with Russians" which sounded quite ludicrous at the time. In the end his record for accuracy regarding Russian collusion was hovering around 99% while CNN has ended up at less than 1% accuracy. McCabe was fired. Members of the FBI were demoted, fired and/or criminally charged for their illicit actions during the collusion witch hunt. Hillary actually did arrange for money to be secretly transferred to a British spy who got bogus intel from Russian sources and they used it to interfere in the election. Those were big PREDICTIONS which all came to pass. CNN is constantly wrong about things that already happened. Usually it's lying but occasionally it can probably be passed off as stupidity. In either instance you believe it all anyways so what difference does it really make? Back on topic- you said that dbl-vaxxed only 'get a bit sick' but they actually get hospitalized, end up in ICU, they die, and they also bring new variants back home from distant continents. You were 100% wrong. Are you going to own it or what?

Your link didn't mention vaxxed deaths, just breakthrough cases. Breakthrough cases include people who "just get a bit sick", like Aristedes said. Your post was not on point, at all. I said that you guys didn't have an f'n clue and I was 100% right, as usual. You look particularly stupid when you type things on the internet. Nope. I'd get vaccinated because I don't feel like I'd be at risk of harm from the vaxx, but I wouldn't want to help pump up the vaxxed numbers because that puts more pressure on the % of the pop that's unvaxxed, and IMO people under 40 SHOULD NOT VAX.

I never got info for vaxxed Canadian deaths from Fox ffs. Are you joking right now? You said that "people only get a bit sick if they're vaxxed". The truth is that 1,000 people died. I cited the source of that stat. Do you ever admit it when you're just 100% wrong? You couldn't possibly be any more wrong here. Your quote was stupid and absurd.

A poster here that we'd all agree leans to the left, and supports everything that's covid vaxx-related, pasted this link to prove that the vaccines are safe for children: https://fullfact.org/health/pfizer-teens-myocarditis/ In it you'll find this information: and this: and this: Cole's Notes: 8.9M kids, 12 deaths which were considered to be due to vaccination by medical professionals, and the window for these things to be considered vax-related is 7 days. If these adverse reactions really have nothing to do with the jab, then this number of deaths must be somewhat normal, right? Let's do some math. [Note: 9M kids is 1/8th of the kids in the US. These adverse effects are from 1 week, or 1/52nd of a year.] if 12 deaths is normal out of 8.9M kids in 1 week, then we can multiply that number by 8 to see how many there would be in one week in the whole US. 12 x 8 = 96. How many in a year? 96 x 52. Do 4,992 kids die of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots in the heart, immune system flare-ups, and six other [secret] symptoms in the US each year? Are there 1,248 heart attack deaths among 5-17 yr olds every year? [3 x 8 x 52] From the CDC's website, where they track mortality among 5-14 yr olds, I dug up theses stats: PULMONARY EMBOLISM: 1 kid died from pulmonary embolism in the entire year of 2019: https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D76;jsessionid=CF2F57D8063A1840E7FB67E2B899 2 kids died from pulmonary embolism in the first week after their vaccination. Does that seem like a lot? If all 73M kids were vaccinated that would be 8x as many kids vaxxed. If that one week was 'normal' then there would be 51 more 'normal' weeks left in the year. 2 x 8 x 52 = 832 kids. About 832 kids would die from pulmonary embolism every year if that first week after the jab was just a normal week. HEART FAILURE: In 2019 8 kids died from "heart failure" in the entire year. They're pretty specific about the causes of death: https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D76;jsessionid=CF2F57D8063A1840E7FB67E2B899 One died of heart failure from the 8.9M in the first week. If there were 8x as many kids [so... 8], and this was a normal week, there would 52 more weeks. Seems like this was 52x the expected rate for "heart failure". INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE: 4 kids died from intracranial hemorrhage in the entire year of 2019: https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D76;jsessionid=CF2F57D8063A1840E7FB67E2B899 2 in this VAERS report x 8 x 52 = 832 kids. So if all 73M kids in the US were jabbed [8x as many], and the week after the jab was 'just normal' [52x as many of these normal weeks], there'd be 832 deaths, not 4. MYOCARDITIS: 14 kids died from myocarditis in the entire year of 2019: The CDC doesn't mention 'myocarditis' as a cause of death here, but Jacob Clynick died in his sleep with "an enlarged heart and fluid around his heart', 3 days after the jab) 8x as many Jacobs, 120x as may days [3 days after jab x 120 = 360], 960 kids/yr. The CDC says that they don't think that the vaxx caused these deaths, but kids 'randomly' died at an incredible rate from the things I mentioned above, right after vaxxing. Whatever the 6 "mystery" causes of death were, they were reported to VAERS by medical professionals who had reason to suspect that the vaccine might be to blame. When covid is cited as a cause of death the CDC never questions it, they just question every single one of these deaths. Makes sense in a way, 'cause kids die a lot and octogenarians almost never die, right?

I didn't even know that I had Fox News on my TV until the Michael Brown shooting happened, but I'm glad that I started watching it on that day. FYI this is quite OT, so you gotta watch it. Going OT is a big no-no in this forum.

You wouldn't have a f'n clue from watching alt left news. Aristedes was here saying that vaxxed people 'only get a little sick' just two weeks ago. I had to break the news to him that almost 1,000 dbl vaxxed people have died in Canada alone. You wouldn't have known any better either. Leftist dolts still want kids to vaccinate. That's the product of a mixture of cowardice, ignorance and stupidity. You guys don't really have a clue what's going on, you just belch platitudes like a bunch of barking seals. It's absurd.

Blah, blah, blah.

They make fun of CNN quite a bit if that's what you mean. Whatever floats your boat, dude. But in all honesty, you'd be better off just listening to us than just regurgitating CNN platitudes.