WestCanMan

No. They were peacefully chanting "Pigs in a blanket. Fry em like bacon". That's an important distinction. They wouldn't be considered Nobel-worthy if they were rudely advocating for the cruel murders of police officers. What were you thinking?

We come here to argue, not to get smrtr

What an idiot. Didn't he know that Wiki was going to label 'fascism' a right-wing ideology? That's like if Lou Gehrig didn't know that he was going to get Lou Gehrig's disease. DUUHH!!!!!!!

Get up to speed Christy. That's not even a point that's up for debate.

The term "Antifa" is a misnomer. They actually named themselves after an old communist militia, but they epitomize fascism: they use violence and intimidation to suppress free speech. Antifa and BLM were co-conspirators with the Dems in chasing windmills to create racial division, and capitalizing on the ensuing chaos to get some free TVs. The Dems and their media wing spun the rioting into political power, apparently virtue-signalling is like crack for the most naive & stupid portion of the population Remember, Michael Brown was not a "gentle giant". He was caught on video committing a violent robbery against a much smaller business owner just moments before he was shot for trying to steal an officer's gun. The video of Brown's robbery was out the day after Brown was shot but CNN refused to show it because it would have taken the wind out of BLM's sails. Why did the US erupt into violence on behalf of a violent criminal? Why were so many people assaulted, killed or tortured just for M Brown? Can you justify that Christy? Holy word soup Batman, I've never seen so much punctuation used so poorly but I'll address this anyways. Stop being such a racist harpy and shove your idiotic critical race theory crap back where it came from.

Sadly, I just have the answer. I'm sitting on it, along with the Grinch, who's got the cure for world hunger. We be chillin'.

Because they selectively edit videos of interactions between blacks and police officers to make cops look bad, and then they ignore deaths of white people at the hands of police. It's forbidden to say the names of white people who were killed by police at a BLM rally. It's forbidden to say all lives matter. They're racist scum.

BS. If you weren't a blind devotee of the D's then you'd be grossly offended by all of their obvious lying and their open support of rioting. Her message is simple. Get angry, go outside and let loose. What makes you think that girl is not white? Her hands look pretty white to me. If she's got any black in her it's not more than 1/8th or so. That is an absolute lie. BLM doesn't give a crap about white people who get killed or abused by the police. It's actually verboten to mention the names of white people at a BLM rally. Tony Timpa was killed in 2016. Cops kneeled on him for 14 minutes. They cracked jokes. He was actually already dead and they were still cracking jokes. Then they hid the evidence for months. There were already crowds of BLM supporters rioting all over the place and when the news and video of Tony Timpa's death came out, they never said a damned thing about it. It makes G Floyd's death seem respectful and quick. When did you ever see a mention of Zach Hammond or Daniel Shavers at a BLM rally? BLM are racists, period. Go to a rally and say all lives matter if you don't believe me. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8522933/BLM-supporters-post-hateful-messages-Facebook-mom-shot-dead-saying-lives-matter.html It's completely despicable for you to act like BLM is anything but a racist hate group.

It was modified to show the quote coming from a more generic source, instead of just paraphrasing a specific person who actually conveys the exact same message over and over anyways. I thought that I was actually doing them a favour by illustrating their point quite succinctly. You'd think that people who consider a severed-head effigy to be freedom of speech could see the value of it, but I have no qualms with my post coming down if it violated forum rules (which it most certainly did). Is there something in that quote that you would personally disagree with? It went like this: You can use that quote and claim it for your own if you like. Maybe get it printed on a T-shirt. No royalties need be paid, it's my gift to you.

The 45 yr old definition of a meme is no longer the sole definition of the word Argus. The internet wasn't a thing back then for commoners like us. Dozens of new words have been invented of the past 45 years, for obvious reasons. What was the definition of "selfie" 45 years ago? Didn't exist. A perfectly acceptable usage of the word "meme" now includes: "A funny picture with a caption". Go show any kid the "Picture with the funny caption" of Karen and the cat, and ask them what it is. It's a "meme". You need to replace your old red Thorndike Barnhart.

Everything that's false is BS, ins't it Petros? Except of course, it fits your far left narrative. "Killing people during riots was considered mostly peaceful for 3 years, but for 95 minutes it was illegal and immoral! The tens of thousands of Democrat murderers and arsonists and looters and rioters, plus the millions of Democrats and all the members of the gov't who fully supported them, do not represent the Democrats or their voters in any way! The 200 people (some of them leftist activists) who rioted at the capitol represent all conservatives, especially the ones who instantly denounced their violence!" - Extreme Leftist Dolt Do you understand why some people might find the opinions of extreme leftist dolts utterly worthless? Do you understand why it seems as though you are in lock step with the above?

TBH, they are required (or at least should be required) to get a seatbelt on a minor who is riding in their car.

I don't need evidence when I'm referring to things that are common knowledge, get a grip. No, I educate people on the proper usage of words that they use incorrectly, and I provide the definition for them. That's just stupidity on your part. I never said that all LWs are fascists. I said that fascism has come to mean.... extreme governmental control over the media, police, judiciary, speech and literature without regard to which side of the political spectrum they are on. The Dems operate as fascists from top to bottom. They use the FBI like the KGB, they appoint AGs & judges who disregard the constitution and rule in favour of Dem party policies, they are against freedom of speech, etc.

I guess I just made this part up then: Her whole speech was a mix of fear & hate mongering, appeals to pathos, convoluting covid fear with racial discrimination, and it peaks with a message to go join the rioters. For anyone who doesn't know what not-so-subtle dog-whistling looks like, this was it. 1) It wasn't BLM. Anyone who said that was mistaken, but iirc some people were chanting BLM slogans. 2) It would be a huge compliment to BLM to say that their supporters would show up to show support for a white girl who suffered at the hands of police. The subject of police sometimes crossng a line when dealing with white people is verboten to BLMers. 3) You are the useful idiot who blindly supports the party that is actively doing harm to the black community in the US. Telling black people that they don't have hope to get a good job, or that they might get killed by police is telling them to drop out of school and sell drugs. No one on earth would pay a business or life coach to tell them that they have no hope or opportunity. The Tony Robbins's of the world give the exact opposite message of what the Dems give their followers.

No, but she didn't get to be that much of an idiot by instinct, she learned it from her white trash parents, and if she saw anything on TV about politics she would have seen M. Obama's message of hate and anger.

If my son acted like that and got peppered sprayed he'd be in trouble when he came home and that would be the end of it.

How many stores did they loot "peacefully"? Dunno. 500? 1,000? 5,000? It's a lot. How many of those business owners were completely destroyed financially? Probably less than 1,000 small business owners. No big deal, right Petros? How many stores and low-income housing units did they burn down "peacefully"? Just a couple hundred I guess. The number of cops they assaulted "peacefully"? No idea. Maybe 3,000? Maybe just 200, I dunno. Don't care. The number of retarded people that they tortured "peacefully"? Maybe just one, I dunno, but one's a lot. Islamic state and the Nazis killed some retarded people but I dunno if even those filthy pieces of shit just tortured any. How many people did they hold hostage in their cars, and threaten them, or pull them out and beat them up "peacefully"? They held up thousands. They probably beat up less than 100 of those people, but they did kill at least one. Is that too much to be considered "peaceful". I'm not even done here, the list goes on, I just don't care to talk to you anymore, it's making me sick. I just need to know why you think that destroying those families who lost their businesses or lost a loved one is so much better than inconveniencing some Senators. Honestly, the Dems revelled in all the BLM violence that killed so many people, why do you care if they hid in the Senate basement for 95 minutes? How is it that all the murders were peaceful but what happened to the Senators is so bad? Is killing regular folk better than inconveniencing Senators?

Lol. Good one. You still know what I meant, but I'll give you a point nonetheless. "March on" has only one interpretation only, and it's 100% militant.

That's an interesting take, to say the least. Do you also think that Hitler's speeches were mostly about love and understanding? The girl either has a serious mental condition or her parents are Obaminations - aka leftist trash. It's completely honest, and that girl is about as black as Tucker Carlson. I have never seen her face, but her hands would be light coloured for a Mexican.

1) Tucker is a smart man and I don't mind being compared to him. 2) Like me, Tucker could have easily predicted how senseless it was to have 25,000 NG at the capitol. 3) My predictions about "alt-right terror attacks" have always come true. I don't have egg on my face after saying "alt-right terrorists are the biggest threat this nation faces" for the past 6 years, and then nothing happens. How much egg is on your face now? Pelosi's? You guys look like a young Kamala harris, working her way up in Cali.

Snopes is 'reliable' to people who want to believe what they see there, but it's BS. If you try to look up whether or not Elizabeth Warren lied about her native heritage they'll dance around the topic 7 ways from Sunday, but the fact is that she made the claim that she was a native and it was a lie. Snopes will not say that. If Trump claimed to be a native to get into Harvard or wherever and it was found that he had an ancestor 6-10 generations back it would be a big fat LIAR!!!!!!!!! Snopes says that it's "Unproven" that Kamala Harris's recent ancestor owned slaves. That's bogus. Her dad said that they did, and his dad is one generation removed from that ancestor, so he of all people should know. Birth records weren't kept back then in Jamaica, it can't be conclusivelyy proven either way. He's not just some random dude either, he's a man of serious social standing. The onus isn't on anyone to prove what her dad said, the onus is on someone to disprove it. The official status of that could be no lower than "Not Disproven". Basically every story that you look up on Snopes, you can guess what their 'answer' will be: the most heavily spun concoction imaginable.

BLM rioting killed a lot more than 1 person every 523 days.

Look, here's an example: If someone says, "I'm gonna off the president on the plane", or they say "I'm gonna help the president get off the plane" those sentences sound similar because they use almost all the same words, but they have wildly different meanings, and almost everyone in North America knows the difference. If you accuse someone of saying one of those things, when they said the other, it's a lie. If you say those sentences basically mean the same thing, that's also a lie. When I quoted the dictionary to show you how what the terminology that you used meant, you coulda just said "my bad". FYI the amount of lying and disinformation about this president is legendary. Ukrainian collusion is a perfect example of the President's words being right there in black and white, meaning one exact thing, and CNN and their trolls here try to make it sound as if he said something completely different. This of "march on Washington" was the exact same thing. If he didn't say that, and you accuse him of saying that, it's not just a minor faux pas. It's a huge lie, and it's the kind of lie that leftists love to tell. Why do you find yourself in the position of having to lie so often? Don't you get sick of it? Don't you think that there's something wrong if you're always in a position where you need to lie? Believe it or not I don't actually like pointing out the fact that people are lying all the time, but it's really important to point out when people are lying or being hypocritical. I'd much rather have a more polite, factual exchange but that seems to be a thing of the past.

Ted Bundy was actually peaceful too, by Dem standards. He lived 43 years and only killed 30 women (1 for every 523 days he was alive). That's actually far more peaceful than the BLM riots. Should Ted Bundy be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/black-lives-matter-nominated-nobel-peace-prize-n1256322

The Dems are actually using the impeachment as a reason to keep the 25,000 guardsmen at the capitol, and the guardsmen are at the capitol to incite fear of the alt-right bogeyman. The Dems are just itching for something, anything to happen, which will seemingly legitimize large-scale actions against civilians including (but not limited to) the seizure of their guns.