WestCanMan

Stop with the truth already. Leftists can only handle so much in one day.

CNN is the flagship for lying alt-left news. They're the ones in the airports, lobbies, etc, and they set the tone for the Dems. MSNBC ramps up the histrionics and tries to be edgier, NPR, CBS etc try to maintain the illusion of being more cultured, but they all follow CNN's lead. Propagating lies and twisting narratives is their raison d'être. The last thing on earth that they want is for you to be fully informed. Our Canadian news is no better, and we don't even have an alternative here. Canada is screwed.

Every angle that you would have witnessed on CNN would be chosen to make it look bad. Just like the Dems chose to hide footage of G Floyd's arrest, and CNN chose not to show it when it came out, to control the narrative and make police look bad, CNN is choosing to show the worst possible footage at capitol hill and completely ignore any peaceful protest on that day. Just remember that you don't get "the news" at all on CNN. You get a distorted perversion of events with important truths omitted, and a smattering of lies which will later be retracted in the most obscure manner possible.

One thing that I like about MLW is that, there aren't so many people here that leftists can flood the zone and make unwanted truths disappear. If you point out someone's lies on forums like twitter or FB, you get so many people just regurgitating CNN's moronic talking points that salient points get lost in the shuffle. It's annoying AF.

CNN was one of the MSM outlets that started propagating the 'beaten to death with a fire extinguisher' lie. You were still going along with the 'beaten to death by an angry mob' story 5 minutes ago. I never claimed to be in the army. I was in the military, more specifically, the navy.

You're just regurgitating CNN's lies. They actually walked back that one, there just isn't a law on the books that says that they have to retract statements as publicly as they trumpet their lies.

Everything I say is absolute fact, you just choose to remain ignorant of anything that's not on CNN. When Vic Toews committed his morally repugnant act, our age of consent was actually 14 if you can believe it. Jr high school. It wasn't raised to 16 until 2008. Everything you state is sick and wrong.

Your political affiliations and lack of knowledge makes you say things that are not true.

Well, so far, an autopsy has concluded that he didn’t suffer any blunt force trauma. That means that he wasn’t beaten around the head with a fire extinguisher, that means that CNN lied again, as usual. It also means “no homicide”. Just because you run your mouth and make baseless accusations doesn’t mean anything here Kristy. You don’t have a track record of honesty and glowing insight. The people who actually appreciate law and order, and who noticed that riots were bad this whole time, don’t think that Trump incited riots. The only people who think that Trump committed a crime are the same morons who believed that the 2016 election was stolen by Russia, Dr Ford was a credible witness, Biden is fit for office, etc. IE, the dumbest of the dumb. The cream of the crap.

You don’t have a clue wtf is going on anywhere. Liberals are Canada’s “soft on crime” party, period.

Resigned because why Petros? Why do you think he resigned? What he did wasn’t a crime in Canada because our age of consent is abysmally low. Vic Toews had as much chance of staying on the PCs as you have of winning an argument.

Now you sound even crazier.

Now that you know they did it, why aren't you angry? You just sound insane now.

This thread is awesome. WCM = Brady godzilla = Kaepernick lol.

Two tweets and one video in just 95 minutes. Can you find obama's two tweets and one video from the last [nearly] 3 years of dem-inspired violence? Because I can find video of kamala harris and michelle obama glorifying 'protests' when the protests were known to turn into riots, and people were known to be killed there.

godzilla your posts are weak and rife with lies. You still need to acknowledge that: -the Dems supported/incited rioting for almost 3 years -the Dems let rioters out of jail or paid their bail -the Dems called for defunding the police for the wee folk and then complained that there weren't enough police protecting the glorious Demonrats -Trump did more to denounce rioting during the 95 minute riot at the capitol than the Dems did during the 3 years of murderous riots and vicious assaults that they incited -At no point did Republicans ever flip-flop on their position against rioting, it was always considered bad. The Dems however did a complete 180 on the topic when their terrorist squads weren't in the majority Can you find me an example of Fox News calling a known insurgent, who has a website devoted to insurgency, an 'activist'? I defy you to find a video of a known insurgent yelling to an angry mob to "take senators and congressmen out" who then got a national platform to speak on Fox News. I can provide an example of that from CNN if you'd like. Do you doubt me godzilla? Do you wanna call me out big guy? I can trade facts all day, while you are in the familiar position of once again having to lie to defend the Dems'/MSM narratives.

Obama insinuated that Treyvon was killed because he was black. Do cops really kill kids for their skin colour? BLM, the Dems and their MSM lackeys called cop-on-black violence 'genocidal'. What does genocidal mean to you? Does it require urgent, violent, action? Is genocide worse than a Demonrat government? (Yes, but not by as much as you think.)

You are just a complete and total liar godzilla. Trump denounced the rioting 3 times during the 95 minutes that it lasted.

Who yelled at people to storm the capitol?

It's a good video, but very brief. Honestly, they could do a ten-hour version of this, and go mont-by-month showing all the deaths and serious assaults that occurred, along with all the different ways that the Dems supported the rioting. It was constant.

Because the BLM riots are a nearly three year example of the Dems actively & overtly supporting rioting, looting, arson, vicious assaults against innocent civilians, violent assaults against thousands of police officers, the murders of innocent civilians, the assassinations of police officers and the violent takeover of sovereign American soil. Do you understand that much? The rioting, which the Dems enthusiastically supported, cost billions of dollars in property damage, people's businesses were destroyed, communities were destroyed, and dozens of people were murdered. Then the Dems capped it off by saying that the answer was to "defund the police". Did you see how the Dems complained about a lack of protection for themselves when they were faced with a bit of danger? That's just another layer of the Demonrats' blatant hypocrisy which you're pretending not to see. "Cops for me but none for thee!" The Dems are in no position to claim that 95 minutes of rioting was a serious crime after inciting rioting AND MURDER for 3 years. And don't forget, now that it's known that Sicknick didn't die from any kind of assault, there were no murders in the mostly peaceful protest at DC (unless you count the cop who murdered the unarmed girl). The damage done by Dem-incited riots is larger than the damage done by the brief capitol riots by several orders of magnitude, and yet the cops didn't fire a single bullet at BLM and Antifa terrorists. They didn't have to defend themselves! Their Dem politicians let them off the hook where they could, and bailed them out everywhere else. Kamala was right at the forefront. "OUR RIOTERS DO NOT BELONG IN JAIL!" Where do you see trials for people who assaulted police officers? 2,000 cops were injured. Who's on the hook for $2B in property damage? How many people have stood trial for murdering people during the riots? Is that publicized? Why not? People do what they have to do in order to get back to their lives. What do you think would happen to someone who stood there and said: "The election was stolen!"? Hillary and the Dems did that for four years, but any conservative who says the same thing for one month is a terrorist!!!!! The fact is that Trump told people to march peacefully. He wasn't some Obama/Harris type out doing his best to incite violence. Did you see Trump, at the height of the rioting, gleefully proclaiming: "The protests will not let up. They SHOULD NOT let up!" No, you did not. You saw him denounce the rioting on 3 separate occasions in just 95 minutes, not justifying and encouraging it. And yes godzilla, that it the absolute truth, right from your own link, so don't lie now. I keep illustrating for you, over and over, how Republicans have always said that rioting and looting is bad. Even when some of them were GOP supporters. I keep illustrating for you, over and over, how Demonrats have always said that rioting and looting is a beautiful thing, even when it includes assaults on police officers and murder. There was just one brief, 95 minute exception the their golden rule. I ask you godzilla, should the laws change for 95 minutes, or should they stay the same?

Vic Toews was a hypocrite and the conservative party got rid of him. Conservative voters wouldn't have anything to do with him. Done deal. It's not a comp. You're comparing conservative voters, who cast out Toews, to a group of people who elected his equal. Do you honestly not see the difference between: - we want nothing to do with that scumbag, and - that guy is fit to be our leader? That actually explains a lot.

Take solace in knowing that conservative voters won't put up with that. He'll have to join the Libs if he wants to get re-elected.

The Dems were ignoring billions of dollars in property damage, assaults on thousands of police officers (2,000 police officers were actually injured, many more were assaulted), attacks against civilians, the murders of innocents, the assassinations of police officers.... All because the Dems had nothing to gain from getting in the way of that. Their official party policy was "Party on, Garth!" That's where I came up with that. It's official. It's on the books. It's a matter of the public record. The Dems aren't even willing to stand against pedophilia now because it goes against their "Virtue signal or die!" credo. On what grounds would you call it BS?

Not "pedohilia", but extremely gross. Still, If I was to have sex with a grade 11 at 56 years old, that should be the kind of thing that turns off 99% of voters. Anyone who cast a ballot for that guy is a worthless scumbag. It's like voting for the end of morality and decency. Yeah, 18 is a whole different ball game. I'm not saying it's cool, and if a 56 year old came to take my 18 yr old daughter on a date I'd say "She's waiting for you behind the woodshed, I'll take you back there", but no one can really attach the word 'crime' to it.