WestCanMan

Funny story... Like you said, lots of people do it, and one of the jobs that he put on his UI form that he was theoretically looking for work in was the Coast Guard, because nobody ever gets it, but they got him a job in the coast guard. He was on the upper deck chopping ice off of everything to prevent the boats from getting top-heavy and tipping over. He quit that job and lost his UI 🤣

I don't know many adults who don't pay attention to what's happening, and I don't know many people who trust the CBC or CNN. They're not primary sources at all, no, but if you have 700 FB friends and something happens, someone will always find useful info about it somewhere. That doesn't mean that I run around telling everyone it's true, it's just something to file away as a possibility, or not. The point is that you'll see thing that you'd never see on CBC, They're in a different class from the rest. Even Dems watch Fox News. In some population demos, they have the highest viewership among Dems. I'd almost swear that the women on The View are trying to kill ABC's credibility entirely with the things that they say. Ditto for Joy Reid on MSNBC, she's just a vile racist pig and it's hard to believe she's still got a show. CNN finally got around to firing Cuomo, etc, but they did a lot of damage before they left. CNN let him air footage of his "coming out of covid quarantine" moment, but he was caught on video getting into an altercation with a jogger just a few days earlier. He wasn't coming out of quarantine at all and millions of people knew it. It was bizarre. The fact that you don't know that the FBI were caught lying to the FISA court, Kevin Clinesmith was convicted of falsifying evidence and providing it to the FISA court the FBI was told to make a list of protocols that they would put in place to ensure that their agents would act with integrity in the future... is a massive indictment of the MSM that you're defending. That info was wide out in the open, they just thought that people shouldn't know about it. How many stories have come up in the past twenty years that were more significant than "An FBI agent was convicted for falsifying evidence in an investigation into the president? Isn't that something that Americans should know about? Isn't that something that we should know about? If Obama was president and the FBI did that, don't you think you'd know? The story that you're referencing came out in March 2019, all they did was edit it a month before the election. That doesn't mean that it went to the front of their home page it doesn't mean that they said anything about it during their primetime news hour for all we know it could have been an edit that the PMO asked or even told them to make. Maybe they had info in the original article about SNC's crimes in Canada and they edited that out at Trudeau's request. Do you have access to the original article? CBC basically let all of Trudeau's scandals die on the vine. They gave them the exact minimum amount of coverage possible, then they let him have the final word and dropped the stories for good. Honestly the last thing I ever saw about the WE scandal on CBC was Trudeau saying "I merely should have recused myself from the decision to use WE." That's it. https://globalnews.ca/video/7171014/trudeau-says-he-deeply-regrets-involving-his-mother-in-ongoing-controversy-with-we-charity Can you find video of Trudeau acknowledging that his mom made $250K + expenses from WE? A quarter of a million, plus expenses... Can you find a video where a reporter said how much Margaret made from WE and then Justin Trudeau responded that he now knows how much she made there? He basically put his own spin on it, and the story went away quite conveniently. There's a lot more to the WE scandal, I just won't bore you with the details because I know you have more important things to talk about here than the width and breadth of Trudeau's scandals.

About ten years ago I recall there being a terrorist attack by muslims in China. IIRC about ten people were chopped up at a subway station. At the time I laughed at the people who did it, knowing how much of a mistake it was to try to wield power over the Chinese gov't by wantonly murdering Chinese civilians. I knew that they'd get their comeuppance from the Chinese gov't, and the Chinese gov't, secular as they are, went biblical. This is old-testament style retaliation, and I don't think that the Chinese are facing several decades of terrorist attacks, like they have in the Philippines and other places. The Chinese gov't has solved the problem of terrorist attacks against their people. It's telling that the muslims all over the world who want to freak out on tiny Israel, all just stare at their belly buttons when the topic of China comes up. When was the last time you saw a protest at an American university about what's happening in China? 😂 When was the last time you saw a protest at a Chinese university about what's happening in China? 😂🤣 When was the last time you saw a protest at a Chinese embassy about what's happening in China? 🧐 It ain't happening. These protesters are just bullies. They will pick on 14M Jews, but they won't say "boo" about China.

I never said "ALL". Your lack of reading comprehension just failed you again. Hamas has had ENOUGH support to do whatever the hell they wanted in Gaza. There was no one who dared stand up to them. Their replacement is was not imminent. I have all the 'premis' in the world to say that, because it was 100% true. I'd like to see you try to find me some examples of other prominent groups from within Gaza who were trying to get them to negotiate peace... There are civilians there, but there are not groups of civilians there who could stand up to Hamas. Does that make sense to you? The will of Hamas was a life or death decree within the borers of Gaza. They don't just kill Gazans for acting against the Hamas will, they torture them. The Trudeau gov't is bad, but they don't torture or kill opposition party members yet. Stop saying "Palestinians" as if they are all women and children, or civilians. It's a non-starter for actual discussion. 😂 Sure. "Free elections" will change things over there. Do you know how much external influence there is on Palestinians from places like Iran, which give them vast gobs of money, and who refuse to bring in Palestinian "refugees"? Do you even know what the Khartoum resolution is? There are over 200M muslims in India, EF. Worldwide there are well over a billion. Are there a million muslims who oppose genocide in Israel? I doubt it. Palestinians HAVE a country, just like Israel. Gaza was 100% under Gazan control for the last 15 years. Israel had no soldiers or police there. Palestinians also had all of Gaza and all of the West Bank all to themselves in 1948. They had the backing of several countries to ensure their sovereignty. Those countries opted for a war of extermination against Israel instead of a two-state solition, and they lost. That was the beginning of Israeli expansion. And again, read up on the Khartoum resolution. Those Arab states all agreed on The Three Noes... No negotiations, No Peace, No Recognition... Their whole strategy was to remain in a warlike stance against Israel until the day they manage to wipe them all out.... The Iranians call it "Quds Day". It's what the Quds Force is dedicated to. 30 years 😂 Those baconally challenged dipshits hold grudges from 1,400 years ago and they're on pace to go 140,000 more. Your "30 years" falls well short of the statute of limitations on religious bigotry. TBH, your plan of moving everyone out and turning it into glass was probably the most peaceful solution in the long run.

😂 BUDDY, YOU JUST PROVED THAT YOU HAVE NO F'ING CLUE ABOUT THE STATE OF RELIGION IN THOSE COUNTRIES, OR THE GEOPOLITICS OF THAT REGION! Do you know what the penalty for apostasy is? Do you know how much sway "secular Palestinians" have in Gaza? The ants in Mike Tyson's back yard have more say in what girls he brings home than secular Palestinians do in Gaza ffs.

How so? Who's misbehaving, eyeball? FYI Hamas spends all of their time plotting genocide. FYI Hamas spends all of their money on weapons to commit genocide, and as a result the people of Palestine live in a shithole of their own making. FYI a large portion of the ME has been actively trying to commit genocide against the Jews since long before 1900, and there have been many attempts to kill everyone in Israel going right back to their first day of existence, including two all-out wars with 5 armies attacking them. When Hamas launches a terrorist attack, and goes on a child-burning, rape/murder spree, launching 20,000 rockets at Israeli citizens, does Israel really "misbehave"? What does proper behaviour look like to you in that scenario, eyeball? And just remember, I'm well aware of the fact that you're still mad about a "massacre" of 30 people over 300 years ago. I'm not gonna buy some BS comment about "forgive and forget" from you. If 1,400 MacDonalds were killed on Oct 7th, you'd be up for retaliation on a biblical scale. Were any MacDonald children burned to death in 1692? Do you think that the corpses of any MacDonald rape-murder victims were paraded through the streets of Scotland to be spit on by Scots children? Israel isn't "misbehaving". Think about what you're saying, eyeball. Muslims are all a-ok with what happened in Pakistan in 1947. I'd love to see you try to find one muslim who's upset about the fact that the Pakistanis drove 8M Sikhs and Hindus from their homes, and massacred 800,000 of them... If they were mad about it, they have a weird way of showing it, because 8 months after the massacre in Pakistan, the combined armies of 5 countries tried to do that exact thing in Israel, but it backfired. They tried again in 1967, and again it backfired. FYI the "4th Gazan war", all initiated by Gazans themselves, is at least the 6th attempt by muslim countries to kill everyone in Israel. It's easy for you to say what Israel should do from the comfort of your own kitchen, but if entire countries were trying to commit genocide against you and your family, your behaviour would be a lot less passive than you are now.

Be that as it may, enough Palestinians are Hamas supporters that they were able to seize power quite easily, and maintain it all this time, with no challengers in sight. That's a great measure of where those people stand morally, as a culture. Is there a way to get rid of Hamas in Gaza, do you figger? Should they be allowed to stay there indefinitely, continually shelling Israel with rocket fire? Getting better, deadlier rockets all the time, so that eventually they can succeed in their constant attempts to commit genocide against Jews? What's your way out, EF?

There's another interesting cost to taxpayers associated with that tax structure... One of my best friends is a Cape Bretoner, and his dad was a lobster fisherman with his own boat. He'd rake in gobs of money during the season, and rather than bear the brunt of all those taxes himself, he'd claim the wife as a cook, and give her a big salary, and pay a bunch to his kids as deck hands, etc. Even when they didn't set foot on the boat. The tax structure that you're talking about saved them a lot of money in taxes, and then they'd all be eligible for EI (UI at that time), and in the maritimes EI doesn't just last a few months. I don't know if our gov't even made a dollar from that family at the end of the year. They might have paid out more money than they got in taxes.

They're failing because no one trusts them. No one trusts them because they're liars. Their lying got them $1.4 billion of our tax dollars. Their business model would be a failure in a functioning democracy, but it's fairly lucrative here, and that's if they don't get any big pharma money. I don't know why they wouldn't have gotten any money from big pharma. My circle of FB friends, along with some of the posters here, is far more reliable than any media outlet on TV in this country. Why would I ditch sources I trust now in favour of known liars? Of course you'll laugh at that, because derision is the quickest defence and lends the impression of intellectual superiority and social standing, but I've been watching the MSM make complete jokes of themselves over the past ten years now, while I've been finding truth on the internet and Fox. Sean Hannity was predicting a lot of things that actually happened back when CNN and CBC were pimping collusion bombshells. While the entire leftard media was slandering and the FBI were committing crimes, Sean Hannity was predicting it all with metronome consistency. I'm sure that you were surprised when you found out that a member of the FBI was convicted of lying to the FISA court, I was just as shocked when Hannity accused the FBI of doing that stuff. That was a monumental accusation at the time, a possible career-ender and lawsuit magnet, but Hannity is sitting pretty and the FBI had to go hat-in-hand to the FISA court with a list of 40 improvements to ensure a greater level of credibility in the future. When was the last time that CBC was that right abut anything? The MSM was always bad, MH, and I put up with it for whatever reason, but the blind push of covid jabs on young people and children came through our MSM, and there's no coming back from that. The false accusations of overt racism and destructive behaviour of the Freedom Convoy came from the MSM, and there's no coming back from that. The MSM protected Justin Trudeau after he engaged in hate mongering, and after all of his scandals, and there's no coming back from that. . The MSM didn't just lose their integrity, they gave it a Viking funeral and got boatloads of taxpayer dollars in return. I don't care what happens to them, and I definitely don't want to give them any more taxpayer money just to get some more lies back. I might just as well go out and buy a bridge.

That's what they do to anyone who tells the truth. All the knives come out. If you go back to the beginning of covid, Dems and Libs were barely talking about it, and everything that they were saying and doing was wrong. They called Trump a racist for blocking flights from covid in late Jan 2020, on about Feb 9 DeBlasio told NYers to "ride the subway and go to restaurants like normal", Pelosi had her hugathon on Feb 23rd which was the most non-social-distanced event imaginable, Trudeau was giving away our PPE to China and saying "I don't think covid will affect Canadians very seriously", leftists in general were saying "don't wear masks" and the whole leftist world was relatively calm on the topic of covid. Their messages were wrong, disjointed, and mostly apathetic. Then Dr Didier Raoult theorized that maybe HCQ would help fight covid and it was like someone kicked a hornet's nest at the alt-left MSM central. He was ridiculed by everyone in the world with a keyboard and an IQ under 90. The MSM had a field day with him. He was nothing but a quack, and that was that. The Lancet and The NEJoM put out a hasty study that was considered the Holy Grail of medical studies, proclaiming HCQ actually made matters worse, and when the notion of HCQ was firmly erased from everyone's consciousness, the study was retracted. I dunno what Raoult's standing is in the medical community these days, but he was persona non grata for the first half of 2020. And I'll say it again, TNI was there at the heart of it, co-ordinating their massive disinformation campaign, just like they did with the 2020 election.

You clearly never read my old post. Why would I answer all that again?

There's a video making the rounds on social media where RFK Jr unequivocally states that the NIH owns 50% of the patent on the covid jabs. That's a pretty strong accusation coming from a presidential candidate, and a Kennedy no less. It's also insanely worrisome. Fauci was the head of the NIH, he used NIH money to fund research that made a coronavirus in the Wuhan lab more transmissible among humans, then he told the world that covid came from a bat-pangolin-human combination, people got kicked off of social media for talking about the BSL4 lab right beside that wetmarket, then Fauci pimped the vax as our only hope, promised herd immunity, said that they'd be safe and effective, said that they actually were safe and effective after they were in use, told people that they didn't need to worry about covid if they were jabbed which was a lie, told people that they didn't have to worry about giving covid to grandma if they were jabbed which was a lie, then said that there was a "pandemic of the vaccinated" which was a lie, etc, etc. If Fauci or his NIH received a single dollar related to the sale of the covid vaccines, or if they got so much as some cotton from the inside of a bottle of Pfizer/Moderna ibuprofen, or a trip across the street where they received some free McDonald's at a 'seminar' or something, there needs to be an old-skoole investigation, with fingernails ripped out, etc.

And it's nothing like it appears to be, based on how and where AC chose to situate himself. He's beside the road, standing in a ditch: look at the plants behind him.

I'm not sure what you mean by your post. We all know that the arabic countries are mostly muslim. It's a religion that, once in the majority, uses intimidation, violence, violence against women, and legalized discrimination the strangle other religions out of existence. If you go to a normal part of a muslim country (not a tourist haven like Dubai) with your wife, and she doesn't wear a hijab, verbal harassment and threats are a given. Violence is highly likely, and even raping a woman without a hijab is fine. The police won't do anything about it. They talk a good game when they're here, but muslim countries are shithole countries by definition.

A sitting PM gave over $1.3B to media corporations, and regularly has the police go after Rebel news. They regularly get shoved and thrown on the ground, they're not allowed to get within 100M of Trudeau or they get the beats. There was even a cop who ran into a Rebel news reporter and then pretended that the reporter assaulted him. He was caught on camera doing it all: Those filthy God-damned pigs are a disgrace to our country. So we have some media orgs that are failing, and getting lavished with billions of dollars from our PM, and other media outlets that regularly face violence from our police. Does that look like something that happens in a free western country?

I like these ones too: AC 'describing' flooding: (Not CNN below, it's the Weather Network)

I make it my business to know what the CBC is saying. I don't watch it expecting to see the truth. Do you understand the difference? You "follow" CBC, blindly. What's said there instantly becomes your new opinion. I literally never need wonder "what does Aristedes think about this?" because I know it as soon as I see what CBC is saying, or CNN, just like I know where the train is gonna go when I hear the whistle: straight down the tracks. Did you ever hear a train and expect it to come down the back alley? Me neither. I get news from a variety of sources, including Fox News, and I verify what's important to me, to what extent I can. As business owners, we can't be unaware of what CBC, and especially Global BC are saying. Most people in BC watch Global, or at least they're quoted the most often imo, so we can't be caught unaware of what's on "the news".

What about a network that's funded by Xinhua, NoKo News, TASS, or Al Jazeera? They're "news" outlets, right?

I, for one, stopped "following it" a long time ago. That doesn't mean that I'm unaware of every single thing they've said in the past ten years...

You were unaware that Trudeau gave $675M to CBC right after they helped him get elected lol. That's just hard to believe. Were you also unaware that he gave $600M to "select media outlets" right before the 2019 election, and another $30M or so to media outlets in private before the 2021 election? No one was allowed to know who got that money in 2021... Isn't that weird in a "democracy"? Isn't it a bit disconcerting that Trudeau has a habit of giving media outlets vast sums of money right before and after elections? And that he's so adamant that the gov't should have a lead role in internet censorship? Meh, what's the worst that could come of all that, hey? It's just not very important to Canadians... 1. Like I said, it's weird that you were unaware. You seem very keen on media matters compared to everything else. Almost as if you have some vested interest. 2. You said this: "I can accept the assertion of bias but not exaggerated claims" That comes off as pretty high and mighty, imo. It's also non-sensical tbh... If they assert bias then obviously exaggeration would be a normal part of their bias-peddling arsenal, right? Aside from exaggeration and omission, what other way could their bias manifest itself? All that's left is fabrication, which is a step above the others. 3. This was "respectful" in your opinion? You're letting your personal feelings get in the way of analysis Your version of respectful is what I'd call condescending (that's "talking down to people"). I usually know when I'm being lied to, especially when it's as blatant as the CBC's 'news'. I have noticed our media keeping the truth from Canadians. Of course I have feelings about that, but that doesn't make it false. Also, you've seen the CBC's admission now. They just got pinned to that one because it happened to a Canadian of some importance, who had incontrovertible evidence in black and white, but the CBC is well-known for kissing up to Trudeau, covering up his scandals, dissing his political opponents, etc. The CBC's news division is pure crap. You'd be better off digging through tea leaves. At least you wouldn't have any ridiculous expectations about the accuracy or validity of what you're seeing. But you denied the existence of exaggeration, and like I said, how can they have one without the other? Do you think that omission is somehow better than exaggeration? I'd contend that it's worse... I rate the seriousness of lies thusly: 1 (worst) slander 2 fabrication 3 omission 4 exaggeration With omission, you don't even know that something happened, so you have no idea what to look for and where, and you will never have the chance to form an opinion on it. At least with exaggeration you've been made aware of something, which you can then check out for yourself, if you care about it. Exaggeration is the baby version of lying, imo. I'm making serious accusations, and serious accusations come with a burden of proof imo. That means full, concise replies, not brief, vague ones.

Are you f'ing kidding me right now? Schiff's bi-weekly bombshell announcement were an exaggeration Aristedes. You should hold him to a far higher standard than any anonymous internet poster. Are you saying "His lies were actually bi-monthly", or that he didn't lie? Did CNN not completely fall for the Jussie story, and then shout down criticisms of it, and then deny evidence up 'til the last possible second, and then ignore the racial division angle of the story completely? Man up. Pick a subject I made there and try to tell me how "exaggerated" it is, stop sticking up for CNN's lies. Their biases aren't small. They're not normal. They're not healthy... no healthy person talks like the liars at CTV and CNN. Wrong. "Lying by omission" is an actual thing. "Lying by exaggeration" is an actual thing. Bias, at the extreme level at which it's evident and CTV, CBC and CNN reporting is "lying". Omission is still lying, just without the colour commentary. What Tucker says isn't gospel, but it's sensible. Morning Joe is a toxic liar and nothing that he says is based on anything that's happening here on earth. At the time, his story sounded far-fetched and ridiculous, just like our own hijab hoax story in Canada. It never deserved serious consideration or widespread coverage, but most importantly, when the story unraveled, the alt-left media still portrayed him as a victim, and completely neglected to even consider it as an attempt to create racial division, which it clearly was. Let's be clear - Jussie was in no way a victim here. Jussie Smollett actually was a race-baiter and a hate monger and liar - those are all basic, indisputable facts. CNN referred to it as a "crash". There was no "crash". By contrast, when a car in N Carolina killed 1 person, it was a car attack. At no point has CNN ever considered Waukesha a car attack, but 6 times as many people were killed, twice as many people were injured, and the person who did that had used the exact same vehicle to run over his baby momma just a couple months earlier. CNN always downplayed the extent of the rioting, lied about all of the circumstances surrounding the Brown and Floyd incidents, mischaracterized the level of police brutality, assumed racism based on no evidence at all from either incident, and condoned all of the violence and chaos. At no point was it ever too much, it was always just viewed as "a reaction to police racism". I saw rioters that day, but somehow CNN saw "seditious mobs" in action on that day. FYI there's literally no such thing as a seditious mob. The absolute fact of the matter is that CNN did not see seditious mobs - NO ONE EVER HAS, in the whole history of the earth by definition - they saw a riot and used words to describe which they thought would implicate the rioters in something that they weren't necessarily guilty of. That was lying and bias at its worst. No, only one was charged criminally, and even when he was found guilty he wasn't disbarred. Alt-left media did not report on the FBI's guilty plea. Caswell Thomas lives in the US, he claims to have gone to law school, and he didn't even know about it. Most leftists here didn't know about it until I told them. Go ask any leftist you know if any FBI members were convicted of crimes and I guarantee you that 80% of them don't know. You tell me, is it a big story when an FBI agent is convicted of a crime against the president? Was it really given the coverage it deserved? Oh waaaaa. Canadians were forced to take a jab that killed them. By our gov't. That's why the protest was there. They had every right to be there. Stealing almost every crime from the Nazi playbook was overkill... The gesunheitspass was overkill, as was freezing bank accounts of dissenters, forcing people to take the jab, stealing gas from the truckers, beating protesters who had surrendered peacefully, the PM hate-mongering Canadians on TV, the media covering up his hate mongering but lying about the decorum at the event and pretending that there were hate symbols everywhere, CBC lying about the connection between co-morbidites and covid deaths, social media outlets banning the truth from FB and Twitter... I think the media absolutely should report what he says, like for example when he calls the unvaxed "racists and misogynists", and asks if Canadians "should tolerate them"? Let's not tolerate each other to the max. I'm down. CBC admitted to lying. The gig is up.

1) Just like I told you, that article doesn't reference SNC Lavalin's bribery in Mtl, but they wrote a story about it so they were 100% aware of it. Michel Fournier pleaded guilty to accepting $2.3M in bribes from SNC Lavalin in exchange for helping them win a contract to work on the Jacques Cartier bridge. That article only talks about SNC's overseas crimes, but they're criminals here too. 2) That article was CREATED AND RELEASED in March, 8 months before the election, and what you just posted was a link which proves that they merely edited it a month before the election. That doesn't mean it was released at that time, it was just a 7 month old story languishing in the depths of the internet. Do you even know what edits they made to it? Do you have a copy of the article in its original form? For all we know it was edited at the PM's orders to make it look better.

Buddy, are you pretending not to know that Trudeau gave CBC all that money? https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/liberals-pledge-675-million-in-cbc-funding/article29354285/ Just a few months after the 2015 election, March 2016: Whoa, sorry your Lordship, I forgot that you make all the rules and you're the judge and jury.... 😂 FYI there's no one on this forum that doesn't know about CBCs bias and lies, including you. Here's a snippet from the Ott Sun... https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lilley-lets-talk-about-cbc-and-their-very-obvious-bias In the case of the CBC admission, [you know what an "admission" is, right?] their ombudsman released a report into a complaint by Alberta Conservative MP Rachel Harder. She had shared a column Furey wrote last year about Alberta statistics of comorbidities and the role they have played in COVID-19 deaths. CBC manufactured a story [you know what "manufactured a story" means, right?] made up of people opposed to Harder who were outraged she had shared a story based on facts from Alberta Health Services. CBC’s ombudsman said that story didn’t meet their standards. Why did the CBC go after a conservative MP like that, when they were busy telling the truth? Not just 'the truth', they told the truth about something that the CBC was already busy lying about... CBC's ombudsman said "that story didn’t meet their standards" 😂 1) That was all perfectly in line with CBC's standards 2) A proper admission/statement would sound more like: "We would like to offer our most sincere apologies to MP Rachel Harder, for slandering her, and to Canadians, for lying to you about one of the largest stories in the last 50 years, which directly concerns your own personal health choices, and there is no excuse. The people responsible have all been fired, and a review of the CBC's integrity and biases will be done by a panel of members selected jointly by the PCs and LPOC." "That story didn't meet our standards" 😂 That was literally the opposite of an apology. It basically reads like "We're usually awesome, but this one time we weren't quite as great as usual". Well, you have some cites now. 1) Trudeau gave the CBC $675M right after they helped him win the 2015 election, and 2) The CBC admitted to fabricating a story to slander a conservative MP and to lie about covid. Where is this gonna go, Michael? Are you gonna start considering that CBC "news" is a based farce?

No, I'm saying that the CBC stopped talking about WE and SNC long before the elections. Fill your boots.

So Russian collusion bombshells landed every second weekend for 2 years, and Trump's whole team is in jail for collusion? Jussie was lynched? Sandman was a racist who flexed on an elderly native fellow? There was a 50-person car crash in Waukesha? M Brown was a gentle giant? G Floyd was a gentle giant? BLM protests were mostly peaceful, with just a few billion dollars in damages and a couple thousand injured cops, some dead folks, overrun police stations and part of Seattle taken over? There were 'seditious mobs' at the capitol, where some unarmed troglodytes almost managed to "overthrow" the gov't? There was a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated'? Trump referred to immigrants as 'animals'? It's not that big of a deal when members of the FBI commit crimes? Trudeau's hate-mongering against the unvaxed wasn't worth reporting on? The Freedom Convoy was really an unruly, destructive mob, flying Nazi and confederate flags everywhere? Kids needed a covid jab? No one was forced to take the jab? LMAO Aristedes. Maybe you were dumb enough to believe this stuff when it was being reported - I certainly wasn't - but with the benefit of hindsight, you need to be man enough to admit that they were all wrong about all of that. CNN and CTV are a joke, right from top to bottom. Regurgitating their id10tic narratives is inexcusable at this point.