Jump to content

CITIZEN_2015

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by CITIZEN_2015

  1. Immigration is meant to serve Canada not the other way round. I can see some people being admitted to Canada if they can prove that they will be persecuted in their home countries but opening the gate will be wrong. We must not allow certain culture or cultures dominate this country by more than a few percentage point as otherwise our democratic free way of life may be badly disturbed by a mass flow (considering that most of those persecuted are from certain region).
  2. Another dumb comment. Israel maybe geographically located in middle east but most of its citizens are from Europe or their ancestors are. When I said Iran has the most pro-American, pro-Western populations in middle east I meant among the Muslim nations and you knew it but you tried to avoid the question and refused to accept that you are wrong by a manipulative response including Israel in the analysis. So bush_cheney, among all the muslim counties in Mid east do you accept or deny that Iran has the most pro-American population?????. Answer this at least. Yes the US is a sovereign country and apparently they do what they want (including staging a military coup in Iran in 1953 overthrowing a democratically elected government and killing democracy in Iran forever) but so is Iran and Iran has banned US citizens from entering Iran in response. Trump is no better than Russian dictators who built the Berlin wall. He is building many walls. America will be disgraced in the world during his presidency.They always say Fascism and Communism are the same points on a circle. They are correct.
  3. A dumb comment and it comes as a no surprise to me (No offense intended but you must be American). Those terrorist attacks were conducted by the governments not by the people of Iran (they are well known to be state sponsored terrorism but the 2001 attack was not state sponsored by say Saudi government)). The two (the nations and the self imposed governments ruling by massive imprisonments, torture, executions) are two SEPARATE entities. In those countries people have no choice as who is in the government or what form of government they have. Unlike the US there is no democratic election. Whereas in US the people are responsible for the actions of their government because they are elected democratically. Just to clarify something. Are you denying that Iran has the most pro-US or pro-Western population in the middle east? and they were chosen to be banned. If you do then you know nothing about politics,
  4. Though I can understand the sediments and the reasons for ban but Countries selected by Trump were stupid and chosen based on politics. Iran for example among the 7 countries chosen has the most pro-American population and is the least religious in middle east, whereas Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and Egypt and UAE NOT among the 7 countries have the most anti-American and most religious fanatics. In fact the 2001 World Trade Center attack (and terrorist attacks thereafter) was carried out by nationals of those countries. There has been no terrorist attack by any Iranian against US targets. The countries were selected not as a safety measure but based on politics. If their government was friendly to US then they escape a ban and if the government was unfriendly than a ban was imposed and we all know in those dictatorships governments don't represent the people. Idiot Trump is punishing his friends and awarding his enemies. There are many scientists now barred from entering the US. As they said politics is dirty and Trump's way is the dirtiest of all. It shows how stupid and dumb average Americans are when their top politician is so stupid.
  5. Sorry commented in the wrong place, My apology.
  6. No they have no right to do so because Republican party under Trump was elected democratically with all these clear agenda in a democratic manner. They said they are going to do all these if they are elected and the American people elected them in a fair manner knowing clearly what they are going to do. I see these demonstrations as undemocratic.
  7. I don't understand what the fuss s all about. Trump was democratically elected by the American people as the President of the United States of America. So why all these demonstrations them!!!!!! So why there is an election if its results is going to be undermined? He said what he stands for clearly and he was elected so any demonstration is against the democracy.
  8. I am interested to see Trump's foreign policies and in particular how he addresses issues in Middle East Whether he addresses the source of all the problems militarily and root out the cancer cells or like Obama he sleeps with the enemy. Remains to be seen if he is all talks or a man of action.
  9. Russia has been a bloodthirsty country exploiting the whole world even being brutal to its own people in all its black (or I should say red) history. They deserve what is coming to them. They have caused a lot of suffering on the world in particular their neighbors and Eastern Europe. They sleep with the devil himself if that serves their exploitative bloodthirsty policies. Down with Russia. I hope I see the collapse of Russia empire under Putin or whoever else devil it may be in power in my lifetime same way that I saw the fall of Soviet empire. Down with Russia.
  10. Though I agree (as I said clearly before) that many aspects of prostitution when exploitation and pimping is involved should remain illegal with even harsher penalties as they destroy lives however I beg to differ on some aspects of pay for sex when sex is consensual between adults (no one is forced or pimped or coerced) just because some material benefit is involved and I see it no differently than what the remaining 90-95% of men do in general (like talking a girlfriend to dinner or buying drinks in a bar for strangers or buying wives/girlfriends expensive gifts and many other examples). The law enforcement should use its limited resources in combating those aspects of prostitution where lives are destroyed rather than arresting people who engage in consensual sex and tie up our court systems. That is what I am saying. Many sex workers are in this profession by CHOICE and regard themselves as professional workers who pay for their living or education some on temporary basis and they deserve equal protection as any other workers with equal rights and criminalization of their profession only makes it dangerous for them and takes away their rights to protection and insurances others enjoy. They also become tax payers as like others. It is not for us to decide for them what it correct or incorrect. As for better alternatives sex workers are advocating strongly the New Zealand model however Harper was blinded by religious fanaticism to hear them out and they were shut out of consultation as it was usual with Harper regime. The new laws are called Pickton's laws for good reason.
  11. Wow Geez I am banging my head on the wall. I just say EDUCATE yourself a bit more before making such grossly false statements and making a mockery of yourself!!!!!
  12. First off there are no states in UK and the laws are exactly what the old laws were in Canada as I described them so it is you who has no clue about UK laws. As in US it is true about each state having their own laws and in Nevada it is decriminalized which goes against your earlier statement that laws in UK and US are harsher than Canada, Seriously!!!!!! Can we go back to the topic of the thread (which you started!!!!).
  13. You asked the question!!!!! Another FALSE statement. Please educate yourself before making statements. I don't know about drugs but prostitution laws are much more severe now in Canada than US and UK thanks to Harper regime who against all expert advice pushed it through parliament and made it law. In addition to laws in US and UK (public solicitation, being found in a bawdy house....) in Canada thousands of people who engage in consensual sex with adults are now charged criminally (since December 2014) and send to courts for criminal prosecution.
  14. You are back to making FALSE statements as before. In most countries prostitution is decriminalized. Yes there are laws against pimping, violence, exploitation, minors as there must be but paying for sex to engage in consensual sex with adults is decriminalized in most of countries or it is illegal only on paper(like Thailand and Russia where you only pay fines so courts will not be tied up). Only in a third of countries it is criminalized and Canada is one of them thanks to Harper and people like you and religious fanatics.
  15. Trafficking drugs or selling to minors must be illegal. Prostitution too when it involves exploitation (by Johns or pimps) or violence against sex workers or underage workers must also be illegal and hardly punishable. I am all for it. However, when it comes to consensual sex between adults where material benefits may be involved then that aspect of sex work should be decriminalized in a civilized manner as in majority of countries in the world (except may be middle east and English speaking countries and Nordic ones) who have come to this realization that the old profession will never go away and hence they have to deal with it in the best way they could to protect the workers. If you feel people should be charged criminally for consensual sex with adults and tie up our courts so that criminals set free because of that then you are as bad as Harper and also a religious fanatic and have no rights to complain about criminals being set free and start this thread.
  16. I have told you why. I focus on these laws because it best demonstrates the fanaticism and dictatorship of Harper regime for which his regime and his injustice minister manipulated facts and created fictions and data in order to push through laws out of his religious fanaticism against all expert advice against the laws and clearly endangers the lives of most vulnerable people, the sex workers who now have to see criminals and those who may be dangerous offenders without the ability of being able to screen them out and be treated likely badly or violently because clients cannot be traced anymore as they block their phones or use burner phones. I also use it as an example that new laws result in non-criminals who simply engage in consensual sex with adults being criminally charged and hence tie up the court system and thus real criminals get away with real crimes like murder as YOU yourself pointed out in this thread. I have no issue with good old laws in which pimps and those who forced and exploited were criminally charged. But you have a agenda behind your post and trying to offend me by trying to give the wrong impression about my motives. This is low even for you to go there. I have told you before but you have a weak memory. Sweden is not a land of religious fanaticism but rather a land of extreme feminism the kind which I call it feminazism, where females rule. The Swedish model of this laws (first introduced in Sweden) arrest men as criminals and the other side who equally takes part in consensual sex is considered victim and free from any prosecution. I believe in equality of everyone regardless of race, color, religion or gender and cannot accept if any one claims superiority over another or demand differential treatments based on race or gender or religion or the laws treat them differently based on gender or race or for whatever reason. In Sweden it is as bad as middle east that you are so opposed where women are treated as inferiors and in Sweden it is as bad for opposite reason as Harper just copied from them. Shame.
  17. Really? So you are saying that we have autonomous governments within the main government who can decide on their own whether or not to obey the Federal government and can legally disobey the Federal government right?So based on what you say the opposite is true too if the current Federal government find the courage to do the right thing and repeal the bill provinces still can continue charge and arrest people and jailed them? Even if true if it wasn't for Federal Harper we wouldn't be in this situations
  18. It is in criminal code of Canada and the reason that the law enforcement in TWO cites only have declared that they will not enforce it (in Vancouver and Montreal and you are not telling the truth when you claim most don't enforce it) is because the new laws are stupid and very backward unsuitable in a democracy so they enforce it only when there is a harm to someone like pimping or underage or forced prostitution (in other words the good old laws) as they have NO TIME to enforce Harper's stupid laws in those two cities though Ontario premier has said Ontario WILL enforce it. In addition the two cities are not the entire country. In many other cities many people have been charged for consensual sex since the former injustice minister pushed it through parliament in spite of many concerns and expert advice against the bill under Harper's order.
  19. Do you read the link you are adding before adding it? Likely no because statistics in your link is only available up to the end of 2013 whereas the new ridiculous bill which became law in a manipulative manner by former Harper regime became law in December 2014 after which no data is yet available and certainly NOT in your link. The bill criminalized purchase of sex which was legal in Canada before that and hence many thousands who might have engaged in that activity and arrested are waiting for their court day as it is criminal since above date. In addition to many other related acts became criminal. What I am referring is the criminalization of sex between consenting adults as even before forced prostitution and underage and pimping was illegal so no new laws were needed. Also the link that YOU have added has this article in it if you had read it. For police, Bill C-36 may put further strains on their resources and budgets. A further consequence may be of that placed on the court systems around the country. The Canadian Bar Association has already warned of backlog issues around Canada’s justice system.
  20. I have already given an example in my post. Perhaps you could go back and read it.
  21. Yes when I read about this last week I was disgusted that something like this could happen in Canada. But I partially blamed Harper and his injustice minister Peter MacKay who brought in stupid laws based on their own religious beliefs and hence tied up the courts with stupid cases with non-criminals while real criminals getting away with murder and rape. Damn Harper regime for which we will be paying heavy prices for years. Stupid laws like bill C36 who criminalizes and jails those engaging in consensual sex with adults up to 5 years (or at least those people charged will have to line up for courts) as one example which was introduced in 2014 against all expert advice in a manipulative manner based on personal beliefs and Trudeau government is too acting too cowardly to repeal this stupid bill at least so.far.
  22. As per title of this thread religious fanaticism is not a new concept in Canada. Harper who was elected to becoming a Prime Minister of Canada many times was a religious fanatic himself and as an evidence (and many other similar actions) he criminalized consensual sex between adults whenever money was exchanged in a manipulative dictatorial manner in 2014 in spite of expert advice against the bill (C36) and many assertions that it would jeopardize workers' lives and well being but as it is common for religious fanatics to impose their beliefs upon others he pushed it through and made it a law. So my point is that OP's attempts on this forum to represent that middle east or Muslims have a monopoly on religious fanaticism or being a threat t Canada and its values (threat to democracy is from within by people like Harper and his supporters and I am sure Muslims are not among them) or it being unCanadian is not correct and is a misrepresentation. Also Being a Muslim does not necessarily mean being a religious fanatic since some likely most of these people at least come here so that they get away from fanaticism and lack of freedom especially those who come from oil rich countries they have no economic reason to immigrate other than getting away from religious oppression. That said the numbers above are terrifying at worse and of grave concern at best and the elected government must act NOW and respond to the will of the nation by curbing immigration and selectivity of immigrant based on Canadian values and this should not be limited only to Muslim fanatics but also other religious fanatics including orthodox Jews and Christians and Nazis and criminals and those who do not believe in equality. .
  23. In response to thread title yes some Trump supporters are ugly fat faced pigs who are hateful losers because of their own ugliness and inferiority and insult at others who are facially and otherwise superior to cover up their own inferiority. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3930596/Trump-deport-Woman-launches-racist-abuse-Iranian-born-citizen-train-calling-Middle-Eastern-terrorist-evil-little-pig-shocking-viral-video.html#readerCommentsCommand-message-field
  24. And they voted for Bush TWICE (though the first time it was rigged thanks to his brother) who destroyed the US by war, economic mismanagement, many Americans killed, out of work, ..... Yes it tells much about Americans and their intelligent.
×
×
  • Create New...