WWWTT

Therefore the pings do not indicate that the plane ran out of fuel then the plane crashed. Thank you WWWTT

Forgot the most important thing to add to this debate that everyone has ignored! When you build a structure (God knows I have) you have to start with a dream or a vision of what you want to build! Construction is not an easy task! And the right minds/power/recourses/know how has to be applied. This is Saudi's project and like BC, I wish them the best in this historical landmark signature monument!!! WWWTT

Without doing a search on it I can not say. From the tone of your question I would assume you're implying that no other country helped? What about the statue of Liberty? But the Saudi's are the one funding the project, so ultimately they own it! Same thing with NASA accomplishments. Lots of former nazi scientists helped out there to! But the USA was flipping the bill. WWWTT

So in other words there is no evidence that the engines were or were not manually shut down as opposed to being starved of fuel or any other means of shutting down. WWWTT

No, that does not answer my question. Is there evidence to distinguish how the engines were shut down, yes or no!? WWWTT

Is there evidence that the engines quit or were shut down? WWWTT

You somewhat described a normal flight! WWWTT

Doesn't support the theory that the plane crashed. Sounds like the plane did exactly what it was designed to do! Fly! WWWTT

Yes there is! The plane was designed to take off, fly and land. What more evidence do you want? Since this plane vanished, this make of plane has probably made thousands of flights without any significant incident. Like I said before, if those who think that this plane was destroyed, the burden of proof is on them! Very simple! WWWTT

Don't think any kind of structure of this magnitude can be entirely designed and built by one nation. WWWTT

This comment is taken from the link provided: “At this point in time we can build a tower that is one kilometer, maybe two kilometers. Any higher than that and we will have to do a lot of homework,” he said. I would have thought that just a 1KM tower would take a lot of "Homework". But hey what do I know? If I had 1.3B to blow, it wouldn't be on one building that's for sure! Sounds like a big waste of money to me! WWWTT

Nope sorry! No evidence that this plane crashed, therefore a crash at this point is neither a likely scenario. Like I said before, it would be easier to safely land a plane (after tracking devices disabled) and hide it as opposed to a plane with tracking devices active crashing and then to never be found. This can all change if the plane is found. Till then, I'll let the evidence speak for itself. WWWTT

If you feel so strongly about the issue, than do a high profile protest. Find an event that will have a significant attendant, then use your cause to steal the limelight away from them and hope the cameras are rolling! After all that's what this thread is/was about. The media coverage of an event successfully hijacked by a protestor. Not the topic of the protest, but the protest itself. Last couple of pages here are actually all thread drift if anyone cares. WWWTT

Nope sorry but you're wrong! And here's the quote: Was this topic posted to generate discussion, or is it just spam? The above quote is a clear shot at the poster, intended to belittle the topic. Granted it is borderline, but still not acceptable. WWWTT

Canada's temporary foreign workers program that the conservatives are giving to the demands of corporations. Excellent text book example of selective memory! WWWTT

And she has the nickname of the "secret weapon" because she just smiles and nods and waves and chats about things?????? What a load of BS I ever heard!!! Once again, I don't know if I should freekin laugh or be freekin angry! You're the one that's making this a political issue, which sais a lot about those who make conservative political donators! WWWTT

It would be helpful to provide the link where you found this. I searched and couldn't. And if she does help out other charities good for her! And helping out cats is a good charity as well that I proudly support! I am careful about the charities that I support. World Vision is one I will stay away from. I gave them money after the Haiti quake, but later found out that so little of each dollar contributed goes to the victims. Usually natural disasters and quakes that are huge and on poorer countries seem to be the common theme for my contributions. Locally it's cat welfare. WWWTT

Oh ya but she openly campaigns for her husband and the conservative party???? I even provided the link and quote where she is referred to as Harper's secret weapon (or something like that). If YOU think that fighting for women's rights regardless of their heritage or profession (prostitution) is a political issue, than that says a lot about where you stand on the political spectrum! Human rights have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with politics! But for some reason that is not the case is it???? WWWTT

I think WCR should have made her comment in the TO election thread. WWWTT

So far it seems all in line to the forum rules(from what I have read). But I wouldn't be surprised if a few comments latter it starts getting more vicious and going down hill! Charles A. at that point will step in and shut this thread down. Taking a break from this isn't bad advise. WWWTT

This link qualifies to be in this thread! http://thelapine.ca/canadian-jets-terrify-putin/ More updates coming soon! WWWTT

I guess that's why the police apologized and paid out millions in this case hey? http://ri.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEVvU3ylNTPjUAY0cXFwx.;_ylu=X3oDMTBybnV2cXQwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMgRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw--/RV=2/RE=1398028984/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.edmontonjournal.com%2fnews%2fRCMP%2bapologize%2bvictims%2bRobert%2bPickton%2bdoing%2bmore%2f6062816%2fstory.html%3fid%3d6062816%26fb_xd_fragment/RK=0/RS=Q_0cvgMm2xJ_Wy3WT_.Vr.KLUb4- WWWTT

Wouldn't think that from all the "Heritage" rhetoric coming from the former reform party hey? WWWTT

I couldn't find anything significant beyond animals or cats. WWWTT

Sounds like a good reasonable point in staying away from controversy. Ironic that the controversy is now that she is shallow in the limited charities she helps. As far as the protester goes, you live by the sword, you die by the sword! Since assuming her role in 2006, as spouse of the Prime Minister she has played an active role in campaigning alongside her husband. She is frequently seen at the podium on behalf of and with her husband. Within the Conservative Party of Canada, she is nicknamed the "secret weapon".[2] Above quote taken from link I previously provided. If she wants to get right in there and campaign, then she too is open for criticism! She is not "off limits" to scrutiny! The protester did a good job in her selection of events to stage her focus on awareness! WWWTT