poochy

Its just entertainment, and the awards are in a way purchased by lobbyists, anyway i have only seen The Theory of Everything out of the alleged best films from last year and i thought it was good and well acted.

The Idea that someone as ridiculous as you beleives that they should control every detail of what any child is taught is enough to make me doubt that anyone but a parent should be teaching children about sexuality, but of course I don't actually beleive your persona exists in the real world, so thank goodness for that. In any case I don't have a problem with sex ed in schools, though i spoke to my children very frankly about the subject and taught them what any child reasonably needs to know, they were 10 at the time. Of course long before then they knew the basics. Anyway, i read that quote again and again i am so thankfull that you aren't really a teacher.

Yes it's true, the normals don't take you seriously, you don't have to care, but then you wouldn't.

You have moved well into troll territory.

Vague, evasive non answers whenever cornered, same pattern, every thread, you have all of the answers, and then none. "language in law is extremely important" No! Really? Wow. thank goodness that every other law is already so perfectly written that no one could ever find reason to take offense, wow, i mean, at least now we only have to worry about this one set of new laws, phew.

Why? Do you want more women because you think you are representative of women and are hoping for support in what are your invariably failed arguments? Because if all you want is an echo chamber Rabble has that in spades, it isn't the gender of the members that matters, it's their opinions and their ability to defend them. Why isn't it enough that women join the forum for what it is? There are many forums with many female members, if they don't join this one that is their choice, nice word that, choice.

The internet is clearly to much for you, luckily with this new anti terror bill and the absolute control it will give the government over all of us there is hope that a strongly worded complaint will get you removed from the internet permanently, for your own safety of course.

At an earlier time? last i checked we all exist in this time, let me guess, you had more than one point to make with that article?

What world is it you live in? The, I wish i could formulate a cogent argument world?

O look, in this world irrelevant, in a perfect world...but that doesn't exist.

You might want to read back through some of the posts before you include yourself in the "us" group.

Of course none of us are living in fear, but this is your way of deflecting from the real argument, one which you can't debate, you're a child and your broken ideology won't allow you to call things as they truly are, you might as well argue for no law as much as argue against new ones in the face of a new threat. You don't know any better than I do if new laws are absolutely required, but i am not so arrogant or stupid as to believe they might not be. Nor do i believe that the sky is falling in terms of our freedoms. Most of these changes are incremental and look at that, i haven't been arrested for terrorism or anything else since 9/11, i guess im not much of a threat.

So from what i gather, you don't think it's possible for another attack of that scale, or frankly, one much worse to occur, that isn't possible, or lets be generous, more likely to occur because of you know, the actual evidence. I can only assume then that you don't believe that, for example, some people wanted to derail a passenger train as an act of terrorism, competent or not the point is that there are people who might want to do those things and someday, they might be successful, and they aren't just random acts. If the government created this new law without any reason then you would be right. But that is not what has happened, I know, you're wishing so hard for it to be true, you're wishing so hard that a lifetime of brainwashing wasn't coming crashing down around the cavern of your mind, but none of those wishes will change the world you actually live in.

I wish people like you would just draw the lines for us then, tell us, how many burning police cars is acceptable during a protest, im going to say 0, lets negotiate.

Well, i suppose the only answer is anarchy, unless you want to tell us exactly the right amount of law we should have, or it couldn't be that like for most of you, concern for this new law is just a red herring.

Im at the point with the leafs that i want them to do things, trade people, leave phaneuf on an ice flow, something, anything, even if it's the wrong thing, sometimes your lawn is infested and you just have to kill it with fire so it can grow anew., and sometimes you just want to watch something burn.

It's pretty clear that because the source is a fringe site it has little to no credibility out here, in the real world, and by extension the people who espouse it as a source have equally little credibility. Should we all post fringe sources for everything that we personally believe in? Wait, let me find the hundreds or who knows how many fringe sites that disagree with you, that will surely get us somewhere.

Yea, because he wouldn't have shot anyone else on the hill if he had been given the chance. There is an obvious reason why most Canadians disagree with you, and it's not because you are smarter than most of them. Again, we have stopped other terrorist plots in this country, i guess they were all mentally ill as well, all kicked out of their mosques for some reason or another, they all would have wanted to kill people for other reasons and not at all were influenced by religious extremism. Sure, anyway i know most people here agree with this, it is not nearly as entertaining shooting down every ridiculous argument you and few others make as it is sad and depressing that anyone could actually believe the nonsense that you seem to believe.

Most people who kill people aren't mentally well, killing people while mentally ill because you were inspired to do so by religious extremists is a different thing, what some of you are basically saying is without this cause to kill for these guys in Canada would have shot or run over someone else, because, it's not possible that their devotion to their beliefs could have pushed them over the edge. Are you really that stupid? Of course this also ignores the fact that we have caught and prevented other terrorist plans, were all of these people mentally ill? Maybe, and it doesn't matter, not for a second does it matter.

Yes, and you have a much greater chance of being struck by lightning than being shot by a legal gun owner, but people who i would place in your ideological camp were almost universally for an ineffective gun registry, funny that, you're right, people are dumb.

I dont always agree with Andrew Coyne, but when i sometimes do he is insulting idiots that don't think terrorism exists. Literally. http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/02/18/andrew-coyne-terrorisms-threat-doesnt-justify-all-special-measures-but-it-does-justify-some/ "Terrorism is not a one-off, a blip of murderous frenzy that appears out of nowhere and as suddenly disappears. It is ongoing, organized, often meticulously planned, a systematic challenge to democratic society. That doesn’t justify any and all measures aimed at preventing it. It does justify some." Worth reading in full for those of us who still manage something approaching reason on the subject.

Keep the tank rolling.

Only exists in one place. http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/10/17/new-brunswick-shale-gas-protesters-pepper-sprayed-police-cars-reportedly-set-on-fire/ Now follow the formula and tell us the police torched their own cars.

Why don't you foster more reasonable debate by accusing anyone who doesn't agree with you of being a racist. If the moderators cared in the slightest about honest debate or personal attacks you wouldn't be here by now.

...