poochy

Which of the Muslim ahh criminals have not been easily linked to actual ahh terrorists? (maybe) With either their own words or through evidence found by the authorities? Some seem to believe that this is an epidemic problem, so which Muslims have been accused of terrorism without any evidence against them that relate to the definition of terrorism? I don't know, maybe someone here does, shed some light on this growing epidemic, it should be easy. Or could this just be another way of defending an ideological hypocrisy without facing up to it? Nah couldn't be.

You believe that women, choose freely to wear a Niqab, how many women who haven't converted for the purpose of marrying a Muslim man are wearing one? Is it going to become the next fashion craze? 'hey ladies, here it is, the first name in subjugation, we all know you want to wear one for no particular reason, the Niqab!' Sure, i wonder how many of you who so fervently protect this practice also had the thought cross their minds that income splitting is just a ploy to put women back in the home . Or maybe not, anyway, i wonder what other types of subjugation you will support if we can come up with a plausible explanation that the subjugated isn't allowing or volunteering simply as being a part of or being indoctrinated into a 'women are lesser beings' culture. I think it's sad when i see say Pentecostal women dressed head to toe in the summer heat, i don't think we should force them to wear shorts, but i won't defend the culture that enforces those other rules upon them, nor will I pretend that it is something other than forced, or learned through the force of cultural subjugation, where the abnormal becomes normal. I don't think i much care either way, but some of you will only be satisfied when the county no longer exists in anything resembling it's original form, liberal guilt i suppose, so you absolutely defend anything you see as different than the predominately western European, Christian Canada, but the hypocrisy some of you show about which rights you need to defend only provide further evidence at the utter brokenness of the ideology you cling to, Anyway, keep telling yourself that you know best, keep telling yourself about these fundamental rights that don't actually exist, you've got it all figured out, there there.

O but climate alarmism, that's all 100% real and necessary.

This is crazy talk, We don't want a child parents denying them care that could have saved them, Parents don't own their children, but for that people are racists? How broken are your ideals exactly? I honestly feel bad for how limited you are.

Perhaps you should use, I'm rubber, you're glue, the next time you can't defend your opinions. Just to mix it up a little.

Yes, because being detained for a day is similar in any way to being held for weeks without ever being charged, split the difference if you like, but Harper didn't out do anyone, nor did he himself specifically arrest anyone or order the police to do so, of course you won't believe that.

It's amzing how often tou resort to this type of rebuttal when you're cornered, yes, yes, we get it, only you really understand what it all means! Wow, isn't it something that we already have exactly the right laws and police powers to capture or prevent all terrorist attacks, it does seems little too convenient that we were so forward thinking and anticipated every situation so well. But unlike you i am not so convinced, i believe that we could have caught all of those we have already caught, and maybe all those yet to come perhaps without any laws of any kind. I believe your complete devotion to the current law is misplaced, you clearly have a fetish for government control and police powers.

It is immoral to pretend that this child decided for herself without any outside influence and completely understood that she could suffer short term and live a long life, or allow herself to die.

The world is so easy when you believe such simplistic nonsense. If the intellect displayed here is any guide it is surely not the left that relies upon the more intelligent voters among us, they apparently rely upon those among us who have been deluded into believing in their own intelligence for simply seeing through their, liberals nice, conservatives mean, ideological lens. But keep patting yourself on the back, it's good for a laugh at least. As some of you prove daily, there are no shortage of stupid liberals.

So if your child is having trouble with a subject should you forgo the use of a private tutor because it somehow doesn't mesh with what is, lets be honest, the Marxist ideals of the op? I mean, if i can afford a tutor and someone else can't, the collective will no longer be equal, we must bring everyone down to the same level, anything else just isn't fair.

Idk what it's like everywhere, but i guess that most parts of the civilized world now use digital, direct reading equipment to measure the temperature, of course this used to be done with thermometers, read by humans, who make mistakes, and there is a right and wrong way t do it. Plus you then have to take into account that no measuring device will give you a correct reading if it isn't calibrated properly, i wonder how well calibrated and read were the thermometers of 100 years ago. I am sure that on average it's warmer, but I do get a kick out of the, it's the warmest year ever, by .02 deg C, we are 38% sure of it! That's just propaganda nonsense, even with satellite measurements that is within the margin of error. So if say we have a group of people who know very well that they don't actually KNOW for sure that the world was exactly .02 deg C warmer, and they don't, why then announce it. It couldn't possibly be some sort of bias that leads them to believe it is getting warmer and then they are willing to impune their own scientific honesty if they can at all prove (but not really) that it is. Scientists are not much different than the rest of us in this regard, so if willing to do that, what other things are being done, even subconsciously, that might be affecting outcomes. O and you can take my absolute 100% no doubt, cuz i know for sure opinion that a lot of the time temperature measurements aren't all that accurate, or they sure as hell weren't, though the inaccuracies are probably irrelevant when looking at an average.

I never failed to be impressed at the left for believing that a law can and should be over turned, that even the supreme courts decisions or interpretations of the constitution can be over turned or tweaked, but that those things should only happen in their favor, and once they do, that's it, now the REAL decision has been made. The infallible supreme court, except when they are correcting their own mistakes...lol, anyway, in this particular case I mostly agree with them, but it is a complicated can of earth dwelling invertebrates.

That'ts pretty much all you can say to something so incredibly stupid.

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/3-ottawa-men-with-alleged-isis-ties-face-terrorism-related-charges-1.2943313 I guess we these guys might be afraid now? Not that it matters, seeing as they have been caught.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/3-ottawa-men-with-alleged-isis-ties-face-terrorism-related-charges-1.2943313 See, that also isnt real, it's not happening, live and let live.

In the real world it is difficult to make all of those judgement calls at once, and the police are not paid to put their lives at risk, strange but true.

They may not be afraid, that doesn't mean that they shouldn't be, obviously. Or do you feel that because they are too stupid to be afraid, or that they might kill people anyway, that we should just not bother to try to stop them? Or are you trying to make some other, less obvious point here?

Honestly..

Right, who exactly is arguing that?

How many people need to be shot or run over before we consider this a problem? Do you think we are immune to the much worse attacks that have happened elsewhere? Are you going to completely ignore the other people who have been caught and stopped before they followed through on their plans? The Toronto 18 wasn't real? It isn't also true that after being released one of those men went to fight in Syria and died there? Was it all imaginary? Are all of those things simply not real for you, or is it that you have other boogeymen or countries to blame for the roots causes? Other conspiracy theories to believe in? Do you think the mass shooting in France can't happen here? Or if that it did, it simply wouldn't be impressive enough for you to think that we maybe should try to prevent it from happening again? What is the personal level of terrorism that you are willing to accept? Of course if we had this discussion say about our defunct gun registry most of you against new terrorism laws would happily cheer for the registry's return, but then the main target of that law was legal middle aged white male gun owners, Christians most of them, those scum, who statistically harm people with those firearms very, very rarely. Aw @#$% them, and their freedoms. The thought that we just shouldn't get involved and pretend the world outside this country doesn't exist is so silly and immoral that it isn't worth addressing, ask Japan how that worked out for them As for seeing jihadists in the tree tops, well that's just another ridiculous comment made by someone attempting to diminish real issues at hand and also not worth addressing, it's simply not a serious opinion or statement.

So, two Canadians killed by people inspired by ISIS, or islamic terorism, but it isn't possible that two Canadians could be killed by ISIS or it's followers, in a more gruesome fashion. Yea, that's impossible. You need a lame mind to make that jump

Yea, that's obviously the reason, you're just full of reasonable and knowledgeable posts.

Yea, that sounds like a really feasible and great idea! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sbFhOeqTzY

So fighter pilots have the names of all of the people they drop bombs on..? This is too stupid to even call stupid.

O of course that's it, it has to be, anyway, a mentally ill person can be a dangerous person, that's reality, you can't always fix the world with sunshine and lollipops, of course expressing that obvious reality to you means that i'm an evil conservative, and i don't care about people, but you aren't anything approaching a reasonable person so i don't care what you think. Your opinions are almost universally outrageous, the sensibilities about people with mental issues at that time were very much those of most everyone, to think it was some sort of specifically right wing plan is ludicrous, we, as in all of us, or mostly, simply did not know what else to do with them. Thankfully we have gotten better, not nearly good enough, but that doesn't mean that in every case we can fix people, and sometimes those people will do bad things and sometimes when protecting the public those people will need to be stopped. I understand that, i wish it weren't true, but it is, do you think a man that kills his wife and children and himself isn't ill? If a police officer shot this man before he managed to kill his entire family would you be ok with it, or would you rather risk the horrific outcome to possibly save the ill and dangerous man?