Hal 9000

I guess I should have stipulated the difference between words and actions - I thought it was implied, sorry!

My bad, left out one word - "not", i'm not surprised by your confusion. Disagreeing, being angry or frustrated is not being a "snowflake". People on the right are rarely offended by differing opinions and when they are, they don't require councelling or safe spaces

Disagreeing, being angry or frustrated is being a "snowflake". People on the right are rarely offended by differing opinions and when they are, they don't require councelling or safe spaces.

The media likes to point out how race and religion play a role in current events, but did anyone else notice (not the MSM) that most of those rescuers could be described as god and gun lovin', Trump supporting rednecks who used their duck hunting boats and jacked up trucks to save African Americans?

As far as the idea of paid protesters goes, why not? Why is so unthinkable? I would surmise that dollar for dollar it would be an extremely good tactic - especially against people who are looked at to be on the fringe or even radical. If an election, cause or movement means so much to "regular" people that they are willing to riot and cause violence, doesn't it make sense that those same issues are even more important to richer/ more influential people? I would use this tactic in a heartbeat. I don't think you could get any more "bang for the buck" than to invest a couple hundreds of thousand of dollars to go out and stir up shit - especially if the media is sympathetic to the cause.

The actual story: Trump acts preemptively with the governor to declare state of emergency, they organize money and provisions before storm even arrives, rescue efforts (from everybody) are going off as well as can be expected and with minimal deaths. Citizens are helping other citizens (in "racist" Texas) regardless or political leanings, race, gender, age or sexuality. Trump visits area as soon as possible, gives inspiration to Texans and promises immediate and unwavering support for Texans. Praises efforts of all involved. CNN/MSNBC's version of the story: "Look at Melania's shoes, she's so out of touch"...."Look at Trump's hat, he's obviously just here to sell his brand".

If you and Dialamah are going to parrot CNN, at least try and shake up the wording just a little. I know you have no independant thoughts, but just try a little harder - so sad!

What's bizarre is you're bringing in policy and other things. That is not at all what my post is about. The post is about unifying...and unifying cannot be done by one person when there is extreme radicalization coming from the other side. There is literally nothing Trump can do that will please the left - nothing! If the media cut him some slack (yes, why should they - I get it!) over anything, there might be a chance - but they wont. Forget that Trump acted sooner than anyone to give Texas disaster status - a decision that might save several lives, he'll get lambasted for not going before the storm, then he is blasted for going too soon afterward. I haven't seen the news today, so I can't even guess what they are slagging him for right now, but it's likely something inconsequential.

Trump can't unify as long as the leftist politicians and media don't want unification. The way they came unwound at the mere thought that Antifa should take some accountability for the eruption of violence in Charlottesville should indicate as much. Antifa are fighting the proxy war that the dems and media want, they have to call in the dogs, if that's even possible at this point.

I think your right, it will get worse. I have posted on here a long time ago, that very sentiment. Right now, the Trump people have the upper hand politically, and the left is lashing out. Until recently, the left has been laughed at by the right wing people, however, there is a limit to how much people will take and sooner or later the right will fight back...and when they do, it'll get serious. I hate to think what would happen if Trump was actually usurped.

So, we know for a fact that there was violence from both sides, Trump says he condemns violence and bigotry of both sides - and is getting flack for that comment, are we then to assume that the left wants him to support or accept violence from the left?

It wouldn't take too many paid protesters to start a fight...or outright riot, just a couple idiots who may be a little unstable. The left is so volatile right now, they just need a small spark.

You know how they say "you cant defeat radical Islam with convention war, you must convince them to accept and join our belief system"? Has anyone realized that Radical Islam is actually doing that exact same thing to the west - and winning?

Mmmm....sounds delish!

I didn't say I wont ever post. I'll post what I want and if that's calling out a someone , then that's what I'll do.

Yeah,

Well, seriously! Do you not know the story of binLaden and Clinton?

Why don't you F-O and troll someone else...troll!

Oh, you're definitely missing something.

No, I would but it's pretty obvious.

Did I mention 9/11 was a Clinton caused incident. Imagine where we , not the USA, but all of us be had Clinton allowed his military to kill bin Laden in the mid 90's? And, where would we be if Clinton hadn't decided that intelligence on the ground in foreign nations was no longer required after the end of the cold war? Yeah, there are many decisions that Clinton made (or didn't make), that have had extreme and negative life changing effects to people all over the world.

This is the extent of the WN's in Boston. Did there really have to be 12-15,000 demonstrators, 33 arrests and countless tax dollars spent to quiet this group? Who cares, let them have their rally and go home - they are not a threat to anyone. The Antifa group, however, could become a major problem.

I grew up being fed the fear of overpopulation and how irresponsible it was to have more than 2 kids, now we're told that we need more people, so bring in the muslims who are squeezing out 7-10 kids. Thanks Trudeau (both of you).