monty16

Is that your attempt to change the subject when you don't know 'what' Iraqi people the US needs to start killing? let me help you again. The US needs to watch and see which Iraqis cut off the heads of Americans and then try bombing them. It could be any of them because they all hate American and want the occupiers out of their country. You know, the US occupiers that aren't there? LOL

I just don't understand how some people can't come to understand that any attacks on the US are justified as being revenge attacks. I welcome hearing anyone arguing that though. If the US doesn't want another attack that will make 9/11 look like kids playing with fire crackers then it needs to stop killing people over there. It tends to encourage killing over here!

Well maybe I can help you decide by once again telling you that this isn't about me.

Way to go Waldo! Time to cut through all the US apologizing bullsh-t. There's way too much of that going on in Canada and it's not just with health care.

And you have a better idea? No, of course you don't because you don't have the least idea of what you are talking about. All you do is listen to US propaganda and play with your model airplanes and toy boats and think how 'neat' they are when you pretend to fly them around your house and drop pretend bombs on your wife's cat. You have been challenged to either put up or shut up. I would suggest that you stop making a fool of yourself and act like a Canadian. Albeit, an alberta one. Take the time to read the RT link I gave you and you may be able to start to understand the problem. Or if you don't like RT then find us a credible link where the US suggests to you who they should start bombing? Where's Saddam when we need him to save the people? Doesn't he have a surviving wife or even a second cousin?

RT News And you have nothing to lose because you've now proven that you never had it.

You don't understand and my last proof puts it to you to show you do. You can't. Make up your mind and stop wasting my time and maybe let the real forum experts tell us who the US should be bombing. And they are??????? LOL p.s. hahahaha, it's relatively bloodless as the Iraqi army runs away and has no intent of upholding US interests.

Here again we can look to RT news for the right explanation of what is happening. http://rt.com/usa/165960-us-carrier-deploy-iraq/ There's little doubt that all the US can bring itself to considering at the moment is trying to prevent Americans in Iraq from getting the heads hacked off. But let's wait and see if our resident expert bcsapper, knows what the US should do now! Flip a coin, it's only Iraqi lives at stake. The winner gets to choose which side gets bombed! I say let Maliki get his head cut off and then start from the beginning. Too bad they had to kill Saddam!

It will give the US some time to think about what side they are going to bomb. And of course, it's going to help Obama in getting out of the hot seat for a few days anyway. Some of the hawks are screaming for war but they don't know what side to bomb. The most sensible rhetoric coming out of the US is to not take Malaki's side because he's not willing to include all sects in his version of Iraq. They see it as just causing more problems. So, what does the US do now? Let Malaki's government fall and then let the people decide which sect will come to power? Does that mean civil war and a division of Iraq into separate small states? Why would the US care? Before you go running off at the mouth in advocating more slaughter of Iraq's people, maybe you better try considering whether or not you want to see Malaki supported and what that will mean. Or just face the facts if indeed you think Iraq should survive. Saddam had it right all along!

Then take France as an example and try to explain their #1 rating in the world. I'm going to suggest that it's because of their socially responsible attitudes toward their people. You find another reason or maybe try to take it away from them. The best thing France's people have done for themselves is to ignore the rabid right haters. Liberty, Egality, Fraternity. It shows. The US knows nothing about anything other than liberty. Ask one! In fact they hate France for what France is and they don't mind saying so. There's something for you to talk about if you really want to move the conversation away from strictly money.

Your ugly disdain for other people of the world is telling of your attitude. Referring to others as ants says all we need to hear. But always keep in mind, the only thing that is saving those people who you regard as insects is the fact that they are nuclear armed and hence, immune to bullying by people of your persuasion. We all must not let ourselves be persuaded by this ignorant and ugly demonizing of people in other countries. If we do then it just makes it easier for us to be persuaded by the US propaganda that is meant to justify killing them.

In fact, the war on terror has become the war 'for' terror. There is great and increasing likelihood that there will be a terror/freedom fighter attack on the US in the near future. And now, we should all be aware of the fact that it never was a war on terror.

There is absolutely no question that Saddam should have remained in control of Iraq. He was successful in controlling the violence between the various sects with minimal bloodshed. And now, it's even up for question on whether or not he was responsible for gassing 'his own people'. CIA section leader Stephen Pelletiere blew the whistle on that most likely being a US propaganda lie. Evil has been responsible for the slaughter of hundreds of thousnads of Iraqi citizens. Saddam has not been responsible. Only US propagandized lemmings would disagree on the real facts. Now, cooler heads in the US are saying that Iraq needs to be left to it's own devices in order to bring back the stability that the US was responsible for destroying. Now, finally, the US doesn't know who the good guys are!

It's no reason to just ignore the problem. Wars have been prevented through diplomacy and through the UN's efforts on behalf of the world and against the most powerful warring nation or nations. In the present case it's the US and their propaganda efforts that are always centered around humanitarian excuses must not be accepted. But in today's world with nuclear weapons it's absolutely essential that we don't ignore the bully and write it off the way you seem to want to. Eventually, it's inevitable that the US victims will exact revenge because today's weapons are powerful and significant enough to be able to do that in a meaningful way. The US will suffer but we too will most likely suffer because we have been complicit in joining with the bully and bringing harm to others on the US's behalf. And so, you've initiated the discussion on the fact that we are a warlike people. I've just carried it a little further to it's obvious conclusion.

Had the US not started the wars with Iraq for it's oil resources, Iraq would have likely continued to prosper with minimal loss of life as Saddam held it together. Sunnis, Shiites, Christians, and all other sky fairy believers lives together in relative peace and women even worked beside men as their equals in Iraq. Now, the US has succeeded in slaughtering millions of Iraqis to free up that country's oil for the world market. On the bright side, the US may still find those missing WMD's! p.s. They're under Obama's desk in the WH.

You would be creating a worse situation for the US than the present. The UN's mission is to prevent wars and the Security Council has been successful in not giving the US licence to start wars in many instances. If Americans were aware of that fact then maybe they would be more supportive of the UN? Think of situations where the UN decline the US permission to start a war and the US did anyway by pretending to get the go-ahead through Nato. The purpose of the UN was partially served in that the US was exposed. And being exposed many times has now convinced at least part of the world that the US is the pariah nation.

millions of bullets are sent down a range every year and only thousands are sent through American bodies every year. The obvious solution is to stop sending millions of bullets down ranges and send more through American bodies. No wait,.............. that can't be righ... How about targets at both ends of shooting ranges in the US? There's little doubt that for every dead gungoon who loves his gunnns, there will be less gungoons who shoot people. Caust they're the same people! Got it!

Stop hurting his feelings. If he wants to pretend then we should be able to pretend with him. And so, there's no problem with the US health care system and it's not bandrupting their country as well as it's not bankrupting hundreds of thousands of it's citizens. The Republicans and the Democrats don't really both agree that the system needs to be fixed. That's just a big commie lie. God has it under control and will fix it in his own time. God decides everything in the US and if the heatlh care system is failing in any way, which it obviously isn't, it is god's will. God kills little children and poor people by withholding health care from them for his own reasons. But he doesn't really because he loves you, yes I know, for the bible tells them so, etc.

The reason why the comparison is made between the US and Canada's health care system is because the rabid right think that the US has a wonderful, peachy good system. In fact they usually claim it's the best in the world. And Canada's rabid right are willing to go along with it because they hate their fellow Canadians and want to not have to support them. Argus makes up stories to suit his agenda. Country A, the US spends about twice as much as Canada, country B, and gets lesser quality than Canada. And country C's in Europe spend about the same as Canada and get about the same, except in very socially responsible countries such as France and that's because they ignore the rantings of the rabid right who they understand are just haters. The best way to improve health care and heatlh care costs in a country is to ignore or sideline the rabid right. Their agenda is to destroy any social responsibility people show toward their fellow citizens. Look to the US for an example!

No, Canadians don't pay more in taxes overall. The jury's still out but there are many sources that are claiming that Canadians are paying less. And then when benefits are taken into consideration, there's little doubt you're better off in Canada. http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0411/do-canadians-really-pay-more-taxes-than-americans.aspx

He's still not talking about the kind of handguns that are designed exclusively for killing people. But there's no doubt that some people who shoot at targets will go on to kill somebody with their gun. They're for killing by cowards and they see their guns as an extension of their manhood. They won't get picked on by big black guys if they have their guns.

Anything where the US is weakened period. The US is responsible for nearly all of our global unrest and wars. Certainly all of them in the ME. Did you think that Russia was somehow responsible for a war in the Crimea?

Let's also not forget that as Iraq and Iran fought each other the US was involved in making sure the war was kept going. That's historical fact. The rhetoric against Obama's standing for more wars gets a little scary at times if we take them seriously. Fortunately, they aren't as serious as they sound and it's mostly just opposition to Obama for their own domestic political reasons. If there's one thing that's honest about a teabagger it's that they are concerned about their money and so if a war costs them money they might oppose. It could keep the war party under control?

I don't mind at all. It's an admission of guilt and so he needs to spread the guilt to the British empire. That is totally correct. It's when there's a denial of his country's crimes against humanity that a debate sometimes becomes necessary to correct him. He's smart like a tractor!

You're right, most handguns are designed for killing people. Sometimes they're just used for other purposes. No serious target shooter plays around with that kind of gun unless he'/she's practicing to kill a person. But what the hell, if they restrict it to killing themselves then we shouldn't worry about it. It's when the guns get over our border that they cause a problem.