WestCoastRunner
-
Posts
6,607 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by WestCoastRunner
-
Your past posts speak for themselves. No need for me to justify it. -
Oh right, the poster with the numerous IP addresses weighs in. Good on ya! You add credibility. And I'm sure BC welcomes your support.
-
Right, so that explains your obsession with his posts and your obsession with other members responses to his posts. Got it
-
BC's posts infiltrate almost every thread on this forum with his trolling poisonious bs. I have complained many times how his posts seem to drive this forum and the mods don't seem to notice. How many times do the mods need to receive complaints before they take action? 1000, 2000, 10,000?
-
Heh, you respond with your honest no bs thoughts.
-
Good call.
-
Sounds more like you are obsessed with OGFT and anyone who responds to him. Kinda like when you wanted to report him to the RCMP. Are you monitoring the responses to his posts? It seems like you have issues with OGFT. Why don't you ignore posts between you and OGFT?
-
Then perhaps there should have been a sarcastic tag around the post. Given some of his past posts regarding gays, it's understandable to miscomprehend his post.
-
Really, you are making excuses for their comments? Have you checked Shady's past posts when it comes to the LGBT community? Your post is full of crap too.
-
Exactly. We should all save our breath.
-
I can see you responded to the best of your ability. If you honestly can't respond with an intelligent or empathetic response, why bother responding? Shady is targeting the LGBT community with derogatory comments and you choose to make light of it. I suppose both you and Shady would have no problem if one of your gay relatives were thrown off a roof to their death or stoned to death or thrown in prison for the rest of their natural lives, simply because they had no choice being gay and chose to live their life with authenticity.
-
What a despicable comment to make especially with the atrocities around the world that are happening to LGBT people. Have a look at what ISIS, Russia, and other populations are doing to these people 'who are not in their right mind'. You should be doing and saying everything you can to support them instead of making statements like this. I suppose because they are not in their right mind, they should all be under psychiatric care?
-
That's not what I asked.
-
Do you have any self awareness of the insults you throw out here at other members?
-
You are correct.
-
I was actually being sarcastic. Sorry. I have indeed suggested ideas to entice women to post here, that have largely been ignored.
-
You keep missing the point. Why would we ignore the person that we don't think is a troll and in the meantime, other members here have already realized this member is a troll. It is a frustrating experience to discover that a member is a troll under different personas and we are carrying on discussions with them. It leaves a terrible experience for the member who is honestly just trying to debate with a 'real' 'honest' member. If a moderator thinks we have a troll and other members have indicated the same thoughts, why is this 'troll' allowed to poison the forum. Why do we need to 'ignore' someone who is suspected of having multiple accounts. Why are they even allowed to belong to this forum, even if they are conversing civilly? Don't these trolls diminish the reputation of this forum?
-
This study had 80 women. Not really a comprehensive study.
-
You were agreeing with me? For some reason, I didn't see that.
-
You are correct that this thread is about a court decision. However, as women (2 women) and men weighing in on this decision from an emotional perspective, it will be significantly different than from a legal point of view.
-
Hmmm, I wonder how we could get more women posting here? Has anyone suggested ideas?
-
I don't entirely agree with this statement. It's great to say that these women have won the right to wear their choice of 'face gear'. The problem is that these women have not really 'chosen' to wear this 'face gear'. A lot of folks jump on the band wagon of letting them exercise their religious rights, blah, blah, blah. The fact remains, that these women are being held to a servant role of hiding their face to please the men of their religion. In most cases, this isn't their choice. It is the choice of the men of the household. When they come to Canada, we should do everything we can to demonstrate to these women that they do actually have .a choice. They don't need to cover their face.
-
I get they aren't paid. But if folks are going to volunteer, than at least take the position with the utmost respect.
-
Of course it's her job. I am not denying that. Wilbur, come on. Pik's attack was on her credentials because she married a celebrity. Pik chose to not investigate her credentials before discrediting her as a woman married to a celebrity.
-
Amal Ramzi Alamuddin is an international player in the human rights field of law. She certainly doesn't need George Clooney's name to add to her credentials. Did you actually research her accomplishments or are you just spouting off bs because she is a woman married to a celebrity?