Leaderboard

Your talking like there are only a few trees left, in case you have not noticed, this nation including BC have an enormous amount of trees tress as far as the eyes can see, and for the most part is logged to sustain it for generations to come...before i go where is Justin new 1 billion tree he claimed he was going to plant...no where, just like his climate change plans...

Was a west coast logger for 43 years. Forest management is real and it's effective if done right. You are a delusional fraud.

As reported Ottawa Senators NHL team is going through a Covid outbreak. At least five members of the organization have been isolated and practices have been cancelled. It's interesting (don't you just adore our "free media"?) that vaccination question isn't mentioned anywhere in the piece but you can guess and it isn't even hard. Entry rules in the US do not allow non-vaccinated. And there's nothing groundbreaking here too. As earlier published research showed, vaccinated transmit Covid at home just as easily as non vaccinated ones. And this reminds of an interesting question. Parallels with common vaccines have been used to explain this and justify that, but is it really one of them, and can it be formally called that? There are at least two essential differences with common vaccines: it does not suppress transmission; and it does not last. Do you know another "vaccine" that needs to be boosted every six months? So are the legal and legalistic arguments and precedents really valid here? Can it be called a vaccine or what if it's more like "a preventative treatment with limited effect"?

This nation was built by selling off it's natural resources and not one is conducive with climate change, go figure...then again Nothing is conducive with climate change...

If you were a logger for 43 years you would have known what I say is the truth. But you've been somewhere else instead. Who was "managing" the trees 500-1000 years ago, which accidentally led to the creation of the magnificent forests that are now being destroyed by "forest management" ? Take a red chilly pepper the colour of your font and you know where to put it...

Well it all comes down to, “What have you done for me lately?” I can’t think of anything Trudeau has done in recent years that makes me proud. I guess our Covid numbers weren’t as catastrophic as in the US, UK, or most western developed countries, but our freedoms have suffered, I believe. We’re over-taxed, over-indebted, and overly generous to special interests.

Canada punched above it's weight in WWI and WWII and yet Canadians think they are better than everyone else that have far greater accomplishments than that their self-esteem vastly outstrips it's actual accomplishments by several orders of magnitude it's levels of national pride are not justified meanwhile it's traditions that it shares with other nations which should inspire pride are swept under the rug Canadians are so annoying and delusional yet think their shit doesn't stink

using the environmentalist cause to sell their communist bullshit green on the outside red on the inside watermelon to the watermelons it's all about tearing down capitalism not about protecting the environment the latter is simply a fraudulent excuse to justify the former because the label of environmentalist has less baggage than communist they simply changed the branding, but their ideology is the same they just hijacked a movement with better PR to fool the rubes

? You know what a "real environmentalist" who believes in forest management is called? a capitalist bribed bitch

you are the fakest environmentalist forest management is absolutely a thing any real environmentalist worth their salt is aware of that and is aware of how helpful and it is for both preserving and growing forests

I wouldn't call it insight. You have ridiculous and pathetic opinions passed on to you by someone with an agenda. There is no such thing as FOREST MANAGEMENT. Forests do not need to be managed as they can look after themselves. The "management" you refer to is the devastation of forests that have never seen human presence in their multi-century history. They are doing just fine. What the forestry does is, it builds a road, destroying the slope, clear cuts the forest, undermining the soil stability, the water flow cycles, destroying the ecosystem - birds, wildlife, plants, insects, fish - all goes to hell. They do it by burning tonnes of diesel and gasoline, dumping old engine oil in excavator dug pits, and then leave all logging debris to dry up and become fuel for a forest fire started by a lightning or by the next idiot who uses a quad on a hot day to fart up in the alpine. But because you have zero idea what you are talking about you may even believe what you are posting has credibility. As I said before, go and hide where the sun don't shine.

wrong you stopped listening to my type of insight and the result is where it's gotten you fake environmentalists prevent proper forest management and have been doing so since the 1970's they started listening to you and the environment is now far worse off as a result you're a fake environmentalist who turns down any suggestions that would help the environment if it helps humans or the economy as well the only "solutions" you accept, are more government central planning, even if that hurts your stated cause your priority is coming up with a rubric to justify more central planning you don't actually care about the environment at all, just controlling the behavior of others and punishing people you don't like anti-human not pro-environment

wrong we've been listening to your type of nonsense far too long and look where it has taken us. Next time go on Bezos' rocket and join him into space. I want to send all of you pro-growth and pro-jobs guys right there on Mars with no option to return.

You get 395,500 immigrants next year and your fucking problem gets solved. The forest fires are a result of climate change which is caused by removing the forests in addition to excessive burning of fossil fuels. Continue logging and you will be looking at more fires, not less and a quicker end for all of us.

no I say there are 400,000 new immigrants and you still want to kill jobs it is bad for old growth forests to ban logging because removing trees in strategic areas reduces the damage done by forests fires to old growth forests this is basic forest management that fake environmentalists naturally know nothing about if all logging stopped more old growth forest would be lost to fires as well more homes and lives will be lost to those fires which is already happening thanks to fake environmentalists naively out to save all the trees from logging y'all care more about killing jobs you don't like than protecting the environment your agenda is not pro-environment, it's anti-human as proven by siding against humans even when it hurts the environment your priorities are clear

When you get the 400,000 new immigrants and refugees do you say, we got 400,000 jobs less? How is it bad for the old growth trees or us, for that matter to leave them alone? Opinions and attitudes on this board defy any logic and belief!

I'm pretty sure there were plenty of abortions , gay marriages etc during Trump's term. No real impediments to the right to vote either. Special bathrooms? Male washrooms, female washrooms. How many different kinds do you guys want? How about the right to free speech and the right to bear arms? Are you capable of making your point without hurling insults?

If you removed all the petroleum based products and components from your 'green' car, you couldn't even push it into your garage.

the forests aren't saved by killing logging in fact strategic logging helps protect forests from forest fires this will result in more tree loss, not less thanks fake environmentalists undermining the environment they claim to champion