Wise comment. I think most people, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, want to see good jobs on reserves and revenue from resource development flow back to the reserves, as well as careful management of those funds to meet local community needs. I think, though, that for true self-sustainability, the goal has to be self-funding through self-taxation, as is the case in every community. External taxpayer funding should act as a kind of top up to meet a standard. Some reserves that are flourishing would need little or no top-up. Others might require much more funding than they currently receive. A condition of any external funding is financial accountability. This should be a requirement for all IBA and other sources of revenue on reserves, so that it's transparent to the community how such money is used. If there is no plan among residents of a reserve to collect a portion of their non-taxed income for the purpose of building and maintaining infrastructure and services on the reserves, those residents will always be reliant on the help of people who have their own priorities and may not want to contribute much to people who don't pay land or income taxes. I'm not taking a right wing position on this, as I think current levels of funding with rises for inflation are what we signed up for. On the other hand, there is no hope for true self-government and self-empowerment without self-management, which means running reserves internally the way city/town councils run municipalities, including having the band collect a portion of income from residents to pay for services/infrastructure. This is what makes Nunavut successful. I realize that this would have to be transitioned incrementally. I also wouldn't try messing with the reserve system as it stands, with its lack of private title for residents that would allow for the sale of private property in the marketplace. That should be a local decision for bands.