Leaderboard

You would be angry as well if someone tried to take your targets away from you.

The baby killing abortion rights lobbies refuse to compromise to a "happy medium". Something like the NRA not willing to compromise at all.... Christian right wing extremists are violent anti-abortion adherents use religious concepts and scripture to justify threats, criminal activity and violence.Most are NRA card carrying gun nuts, spewing hate as they fight women right to abortion.Why would these extremists care about the unborn as they would only shoot them when they were old enough to go to school..

Did you say the same thing about Harper when he visited India in 2012 and wasn’t greeted by Manmohan Singh? Did you note that Harper also dragged his family along on that trip? You can't have forgotten that trip, it was when Harper flew in those armored limos and then made the expenses magically disappear.

It was a good one for the day...

So you won't give up any rights either...got it.

I sure hope so...that's why we pay our NRA membership dues !

Abortions rights were created via Roe v. Wade by the U.S. Supreme Court, the same court that has affirmed gun rights that, unlike abortions, are specifically enumerated by the 2nd Amendment. Drawing parallels to abortion "killing" works for the pure political dynamic that is in play, at least for court rulings. The baby killing abortion rights lobbies refuse to compromise to a "happy medium". I don't know of any group, including the NRA that is claiming unlimited, automatic, military spec gun rights. Long guns and rifles only cause a small portion of gun homicides, regardless of their design. Hand guns cause the majority of gun homicides / suicides, but the media focuses more on high profile "mass shootings". Gun rights should not be infringed because of criminals and the mentally ill.

Explain why. You make assumptions now provide the case law that says the above. Here's a hint there is none. Here's another hint, the words "begins to cause it to become movable means turning on the engine of any motorized vehicle. According to you someone can get in the car, turn on the engine but is not driving the car as long as it has not moved. Bullshit. In law just sitting behind the driver's eat with keys is sufficient to be considered driving it. Yoiu don't even have to start the engine. Yah you knew that. G on then, o look up the case law on drunk drivers before you wax poetic on the criminal code. In this case if you are pretending he did not start the ATV and was not trying to steal it, knock yourself it. The facts contradict your fantasy and your attempt to deny what the person was doing when he got shot. You want to white wash what he was doing to turn the person into a martyr. Spare me. You are nothing more than another after the fact couch potato legal genius with a political agenda. The law is not based on your fantasies or political biases. When you have any proof anyone in the jury did not consider the facts properly get back to me.

You are a racist which is clear from all your comments. You feel its perfectly acceptable to be a racist as long as it suits your prejudices. You also ignore how the law works living in some fantasy racist world that a jury must be of the same appearance as the accused otherwise you can automatically assume this jury is untrustworthy. Nothing you have said makes any sense. You are a classic example of someone who feels because you think you are a leftist, this automatically means you can be a racist and a fascist because if it comes from your mouth you get to define which race or ethnic group it is you spew hatred about. You don't represent anyone but your own hatred.

Who needs a semi automatic or military style automatic firearm? The only people who should have such weapons are military or police. If people want to collect those kind of weapons, they should have their internal workings removed, given to authorities, and be certified as completely unusable and impossible to return a functioning weapon. But maybe just ban them completely. Collectors would be out of that business. They can go collect something more benign .

Beats me as to why anyone would want to own any type of gun other than a six shooter or a hunting rifle is beyond me. What more does the average American or Canadian need to protect themselves from harm or go hunting for food? Just saying.

And then people would shoot kids in malls. So you want armed security in malls? Then they start shooting them at local football/baseball/hockey matches. You want armed guards there too? Here's a simpler idea: Make it hard for crazy people to get assault rifles.

Yes those who CLEANSED other races and religions purely based on their race and religion. Those muderers and rapists who murdered and raped defenseless muslims selectively. They don't have to be followers of Hitler to be nazis. You are saying a lot of garbage about Canada which is not even worth responding.

It is people like you who create hatred for Israel. Very rarely humaine and strong character people would support the brutality and aggressiveness that Israeli army and governments have exhibited since birth. People usually support the underdogs and oppressed (the Palestinians) unless they are some losers enjoying to see thousands (in case of a nuclear retaliation millions) of innocent defenseless women and children die.