gc1765 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 The US House of Representatives sure thought so....guess who appropriates the money for Iraq? If you want, we can impeach them too Note: The winking smiley denotes that I am only kidding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 If you want, we can impeach them too I don't think so....you can't impeach away American domestic and foreign policy. If we want to blow billions on war, then it shall be so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Max Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Yellow cake from Nigeria? http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/07/abo..._of_yellow.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gc1765 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 I don't think so....you can't impeach away American domestic and foreign policy. If we want to blow billions on war, then it shall be so. See my edited post above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 See my edited post above. See my unedited post above.....I am not "kidding". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Galinda Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Your response is sensible but you try to talk with “naïve” or “wise” opponents such as woody . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Yellow cake from Nigeria? http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/07/abo..._of_yellow.html Oh cause the crap is 10 years old?The fact that the material was under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for more than a decade opens an entirely different line of questioning: Is the entire group of United Nations bureaucrats running the IAEA legally insane? I guess to Bush, 10 yrs is 'recent'. So why did this not hit MSM if it was so important? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottSA Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Ah, the "lied about WMD" meme? Of course a lie is not necessarly a lie is not for sure a lie if it's only about blowjobs, right? And besides, a lie about WMD which wasn't actually a lie is worse than a lie about blowjobs which was in fact a baldfaced lie, because ummmm... The point is...ummmmm.... Ah yes, a lie about a consensual blowjob is much worse than a lie that results in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, and hundreds of billions of dollars Yes, the only minor distinction being that Bush didn't lie but Clinton did. And I might add that your original thesis was that "a lie is a lie is a lie"; presumably meaning that it is the fact of a lie that is important and not the content of a lie. That would seem to negate the value of your second point that one lie is worse than another lie, itself based upon a false premise that there exists a lie at all in the case of Bush. That makes you doubly wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 I dunno, Bush speaking on that aircraft carrier a few years ago for all the world to see saying major combat in Iraq was over (under the huge banner MISSION ACCOMPLISHED) was perhaps the biggest whooper of them all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 I dunno, Bush speaking on that aircraft carrier a few years ago for all the world to see saying major combat in Iraq was over (under the huge banner MISSION ACCOMPLISHED) was perhaps the biggest whooper of them all. Actually, this is what he really said: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/01/...ain551946.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 Decide to delete my response. Some people only believe what they want to even tho facts stare them in the face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 My God, you better read it again. He even talks about the destruction of the taliban. God, what a liar. God doesn't believe in "whoopers" either. Too many Taliban "stiffs" to count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 My God, you better read it again. He even talks about the destruction of the taliban. God, what a liar. God doesn't believe in "whoopers" either. Too many Taliban "stiffs" to count. What in the hell do you know what "God" believes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 What in the hell do you know what "God" believes? That easy to answer if you think about it....and Man created God in his image. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Max Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 I guess to Bush, 10 yrs is 'recent'. So why did this not hit MSM if it was so important? You mean the liberal MSM who have been undermining Bush and the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 I dunno, Bush speaking on that aircraft carrier a few years ago for all the world to see saying major combat in Iraq was over (under the huge banner MISSION ACCOMPLISHED) was perhaps the biggest whooper of them all. He was talking about the AIRCRAFT CARRIER he was standing on at the time.It was almost home from a long deployment overseas. Read up on the USS Abraham Lincoln. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 He was talking about the AIRCRAFT CARRIER he was standing on at the time.It was almost home from a long deployment overseas.Read up on the USS Abraham Lincoln. Ehh....thats a bit of a stretch . I know thats how they spun it after the fact, blaming the navy for "putting it up" , but it was the white house that made the banner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 From the link at post #35: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country. He said MAJOR combat operations have ended. This is true. What we have today are minor terror attacks in a small area of Iraq carried out by those who are fanatics.The Shiite muslim group has a number of scores to settle.That is part of the reason for their attacks against the minority Sunni's who ran the coutry so brutally for decades. There are no major combat opertions going on these days. The Mission Accomplished banner was referring to the Carriers long deployment assignment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 He was talking about the AIRCRAFT CARRIER he was standing on at the time.It was almost home from a long deployment overseas. Read up on the USS Abraham Lincoln. Ehh....thats a bit of a stretch . I know thats how they spun it after the fact, blaming the navy for "putting it up" , but it was the white house that made the banner. It is obvious that you did not read up on the Carrier Abraham Lincoln. Try this: http://www.cvn72.navy.mil/ LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 Meanwhile from post #24: LOL,So far I fail to see a case for starting impeachment proceedings. Why all the scattershot accusations against the president? None of it is high crimes and misdemeanors. Ciao Still no credible post from anyone in the thread about posting valid grounds for impeaching President Bush. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 In that case I will say it equally obvious you bought the spin on this one. Fine by me. But as I recall , pretty much every newspaper in the US said the same thing, it aint no mission accomplished. And then the spin came. As for your link, is there something there about the sign, perhaps prior to the utterance of those famous words? I looked but did not see. IF there is., I am all ears....and eyes to read it. By the way, I do not support impeaching Bush. He is gone in a matter of what , 18 months? More important things to do on both sides of the aisle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 He was talking about the AIRCRAFT CARRIER he was standing on at the time.It was almost home from a long deployment overseas. Read up on the USS Abraham Lincoln. Ehh....thats a bit of a stretch . I know thats how they spun it after the fact, blaming the navy for "putting it up" , but it was the white house that made the banner. So does it matter who made the banner? It still refers to the Carrier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 In that case I will say it equally obvious you bought the spin on this one. Fine by me. But as I recall , pretty much every newspaper in the US said the same thing, it aint no mission accomplished. And then the spin came. As for your link, is there something there about the sign, perhaps prior to the utterance of those famous words? I looked but did not see. IF there is., I am all ears....and eyes to read it. By the way, I do not support impeaching Bush. He is gone in a matter of what , 18 months? More important things to do on both sides of the aisle. Yeah the media played fast and loose on it. Why are you so oblivious to the fact that the media played it up and so many fell for it? Here is the relevant section you missed: In April 2001, the ship moved to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard for a scheduled Planned Incremental Availability period. Completing PIA in October, Abraham Lincoln began workups for its next operational cycle. In July 2002, the ship and air wing deployed to support Operations Enduring Freedom and Southern Watch. On the way, Abe visited Sasebo, Japan; Hong Kong, China; Singapore, and Bahrain. The deployment turned out to be anything but routine, as the normal six month rotation became a record-setting, extended 10 months. After providing support to OEF and OSW, the Abraham Lincoln paid a much deserved port visit to Perth, Australia. It was then that the determination was made to return to the northern stretches of the Arabian Gulf where the entire carrier battle group and airwing helped deliver the opening salvos and air strikes in Operation Iraqi Freedom. A total of 16,500 sorties were flown during that 10 months, and 1.6 million pounds of ordnance were used during OIF, on top of 265.118 pounds expended during support of OSW and OEF. Upon arrival in Pearl Harbor, the ship had logged 102,816 nautical miles. Before steaming into San Diego, the deployment was culminated by a visit by the Commander-in-Chief, President George W. Bush, who welcomed the crew home for a job well done. emphasis mineThe deployment was a record. They did a lot of work to meet the assignments.Above and beyond the usual deployment service. The ship was nearly home from a very long deployment assignment and was visited by the President just before entering the San Diego Naval dock area. It was the media and others who made a mountain out of a molehill over a banner. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsettommy Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 Try this article: What Bush did not — and did — sayDon Surber Charleston Daily News That big speech four years ago was enlightening Thursday May 03, 2007 Excerpt: THIS week marked the fourth anniversary of President Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. In just six weeks, America and her allies had swept away one of the most brutal and evil regimes on Earth. Many of us thought the tough part was over. It turned out to be only the beginning. Instead of just saying, "mission accomplished," I wish the commander-in-chief had been more realistic. I wish Bush had said, "We have difficult work to do in Iraq." I wish Bush had said, "We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous." I wish Bush said, "Our mission continues. Al-Qaida is wounded, not destroyed. The scattered cells of the terrorist network still operate in many nations, and we know from daily intelligence that they continue to plot against free people." Of course, that is exactly what President Bush said on May 1, 2003. He did not just say "mission accomplished" and go home. He said one battle had been won. In fact -- and journalists should try to deal with facts -- Bush did not even say, "mission accomplished," at all. That was on a banner behind him. http://www.dailymail.com/display_story.php...5033&format=prn emphasis mineThe President never used that banner in his speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guthrie Posted May 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 Of course, that is exactly what President Bush said on May 1, 2003. He did not just say "mission accomplished" and go home. He said one battle had been won.In fact -- and journalists should try to deal with facts -- Bush did not even say, "mission accomplished," at all. That was on a banner behind him. No, he never said, 'one battle,' he said, 'major military operations' as for the banner, he brought that with him, it was a banner not just MADE BY the White House - but also LIED ABOUT by the White House Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.