Jump to content

Ann Coulter at it again


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 221
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps you should deal with the issue at hand instead of 10 year old recounts of other events.

Is there anything in his book about that ad???

Again, you are wrong about the symptoms occuring because of medication instead of without it.

No, I am not wrong, you seem to not understand the black and white of your own sources.

maybe you can understand this:

(CBS/AP) Responding to criticism by conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh, actor Michael J. Fox defended his appearance in a political campaign ad, saying he wasn't acting or off his medication.

In fact, at the time he was over-medicated for his Parkinson's disease, Fox said Thursday in an exclusive interview with CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric.

CBS News

Who's wrong now, Charlie???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you should deal with the issue at hand instead of 10 year old recounts of other events.

Is there anything in his book about that ad???

Again, you are wrong about the symptoms occuring because of medication instead of without it.

No, I am not wrong, you seem to not understand the black and white of your own sources.

maybe you can understand this:

(CBS/AP) Responding to criticism by conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh, actor Michael J. Fox defended his appearance in a political campaign ad, saying he wasn't acting or off his medication.

In fact, at the time he was over-medicated for his Parkinson's disease, Fox said Thursday in an exclusive interview with CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric.

CBS News

Who's wrong now, Charlie???

Well now, isn't that something? A celebrity saying two different things about how their disease/medication affects them, depending on whether they are being called on it or not.

When he wasn't being attacked for it, Fox tells how he stopped his meds so his symptoms would have impact, then when he's called on it he claims it happened because he overmedicated.

Either way he was manipulating his symptoms for pity. What's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

Either way he was manipulating his symptoms for pity. What's the difference?

Sorry, Charlie, the truth is, he wasn't. 'manipulating his symptoms' at all. Rush Limbaugh is a liar and a fraud and uses callous, libelous comments as his base line for all other commentary. Those clowns who follow him, are just foolish dupes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

Either way he was manipulating his symptoms for pity. What's the difference?

Sorry, Charlie, the truth is, he wasn't. 'manipulating his symptoms' at all. Rush Limbaugh is a liar and a fraud and uses callous, libelous comments as his base line for all other commentary. Those clowns who follow him, are just foolish dupes.

Either he was overmedicated or undermedicated, but either way he manipulated the appearance. Unless you're going to argue that he was too stupid to take the right amount of medication even though he had been taking it for years. If he was taking the presciption amount, then it's just a bit more than odd that he and his doctor hadn't discovered the right amount years before, eh wot. You've been proven wrong, and although it's not the first time, you helped to prove yourself wrong. On top of that, you've helped expose Fox as a liar to boot! Good going Woody! I bet the left loves having your help. I know the right does...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

Either way he was manipulating his symptoms for pity. What's the difference?

Sorry, Charlie, the truth is, he wasn't. 'manipulating his symptoms' at all. Rush Limbaugh is a liar and a fraud and uses callous, libelous comments as his base line for all other commentary. Those clowns who follow him, are just foolish dupes.

overdose of parkinson's medication is very serious, even causing death in some cases. Medical advice is to seek help immediately. Fox would be well aware of this, and it seems quite odd that he would film a commercial while overmedicated, instead of seeking medical help immediately.

At any rate, Fox freely admitted manipulating his symptoms in his book, Guthrie. Granted it was another occasion, but if he did it in front of senators, its possible he did in for a stem cell commercial.

Either way his claims of overdosing himself seem pretty unlikely given the many years he's been taking medication, and the serious affects of an overdose. Yet if he overdosed accidentally, and then wanted to continue filming, it's obvious he wanted the effects of the overdose on film.

If he went through the filming process without meds, its obvious he did that on purpose too. They don't put anything on film by accident. Its plain to see their strategy was to have his symptoms displayed for effect. And to lie about it afterward when called on it only makes it more obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[Care to describe some of these alleged BBs,

No, not my style . You know where you do/have posted.

Yes I do. I would suggest that if it's your style to spread rumours about folks, it's hardly worse to back it up, don't you think? If you would like to reveal something about me, please do...I give you permission. I'd like to know about these transgressions of mine too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a little moronic to jump to such pathetic conclusions as, "its obvious he did that on purpose too."

It seems, nothing which is obvious to you guys, is ever true. Why is that?

No, what's moronic is if he did it accidentally after having years to practice taking the right dosage of meds. Not everyone is at your level of intellectual functioning Woody, and Fox seems like a fairly bright guy. Plus, he said he manipulated the meds....at least on one occasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I do. I would suggest that if it's your style to spread rumours about folks, it's hardly worse to back it up, don't you think? If you would like to reveal something about me, please do...I give you permission. I'd like to know about these transgressions of mine too.

No sir I will not. Rumours are not my style either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I do. I would suggest that if it's your style to spread rumours about folks, it's hardly worse to back it up, don't you think? If you would like to reveal something about me, please do...I give you permission. I'd like to know about these transgressions of mine too.

No sir I will not. Rumours are not my style either.

No but I'm sure you look swell in a nice inuendo suit.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I do. I would suggest that if it's your style to spread rumours about folks, it's hardly worse to back it up, don't you think? If you would like to reveal something about me, please do...I give you permission. I'd like to know about these transgressions of mine too.

No sir I will not. Rumours are not my style either.

But you're already starting rumours...specifically making claims about me. If you have something to say, please continue. If not, please apologize for starting silly rumours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you're already starting rumours...specifically making claims about me. If you have something to say, please continue. If not, please apologize for starting silly rumours.

Apologize? No I dont think so. Nothing to apologize for.

Here is what I wrote..."Come on scottsa , you are on plenty of BB's and frankly your shtick is unwelcome and other BB's have put you in your place (not speaking of MLW). Plenty of Homophobic and racist posts, although you seem to have toned that down recently with the exception being the Rosie thread.

"

Where is the rumour? Innuendo? ahhh....nope.

You know of what I speak, I am in no way about to engage others in this nor will I mention who what where or why. scottsa you know exactly where I am coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you're already starting rumours...specifically making claims about me. If you have something to say, please continue. If not, please apologize for starting silly rumours.

Apologize? No I dont think so. Nothing to apologize for.

Here is what I wrote..."Come on scottsa , you are on plenty of BB's and frankly your shtick is unwelcome and other BB's have put you in your place (not speaking of MLW). Plenty of Homophobic and racist posts, although you seem to have toned that down recently with the exception being the Rosie thread.

"

Where is the rumour? Innuendo? ahhh....nope.

You know of what I speak, I am in no way about to engage others in this nor will I mention who what where or why. scottsa you know exactly where I am coming from.

Personally I think you should put up or shut up. Bringing up bullshit from some other place(s) only shows what a prick you probably are. Had you a shred of credibility, you would have either conveyed that message privately or conveyed it not at all. Instead you have chosen to be public for anyone and everyone to see and know you dance around the issue like coy asshole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think you should put up or shut up. Bringing up bullshit from some other place(s) only shows what a prick you probably are. Had you a shred of credibility, you would have either conveyed that message privately or conveyed it not at all. Instead you have chosen to be public for anyone and everyone to see and know you dance around the issue like coy asshole.

Sorry you feel that way , unfounded as it is. Why the anger and the language?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He rightly pointed out that his Parkinsons symptoms was enhanced by his willfully not taking medication. This was a valid observation, not humor. The purpose of the enhancement was promoting stem cell, also rightfully noted.

Again, Limbaugh could have you for lunch x 10.

I'm sure Limbaugh could literally eat me for lunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Limbaugh and Coulter are shills for the fascist right.

Blanket statements makes fools of people.

I am mildly conservative.

However I DO NOT listen to Rush Limbaugh,Mike Savage,or ANY other conservatives.Who are on the air.

I rarely read anything from either Coulter and Limbaugh.I never paid my way onto Limbaughs website membership.

I object to your divisive pigeonholing of a political group.It is hateful.

Why not drop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Limbaugh and Coulter are shills for the fascist right.

Blanket statements makes fools of people.

I am mildly conservative.

However I DO NOT listen to Rush Limbaugh,Mike Savage,or ANY other conservatives.Who are on the air.

I rarely read anything from either Coulter and Limbaugh.I never paid my way onto Limbaughs website membership.

I object to your divisive pigeonholing of a political group.It is hateful.

Why not drop it.

Woody starts by dropping his foot in his mouth and then spends the rest of the debate trying to ram it in further. It's when he gets out the mallet and pounding on it that things really get funny.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am mildly conservative.

However I DO NOT listen to Rush Limbaugh,Mike Savage,or ANY other conservatives.Who are on the air.

I rarely read anything from either Coulter and Limbaugh.I never paid my way onto Limbaughs website membership.

What does calling Limbaugh and Coulter shills for the fascist right have anything to do with your "mild" conservativism? You point out yourself that you don't subscribe to their principles, so unless you feel he's unfairly denigrating the fascist right by associating it with those clowns, I don't see why you have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think you should put up or shut up. Bringing up bullshit from some other place(s) only shows what a prick you probably are. Had you a shred of credibility, you would have either conveyed that message privately or conveyed it not at all. Instead you have chosen to be public for anyone and everyone to see and know you dance around the issue like coy asshole.

Sorry you feel that way , unfounded as it is. Why the anger and the language?

Because your ad hominem attack added nothing. It was hamfisted and without style. On top of that, you are a pussy, who when confronted choses to run. I have contempt for that kind of a person.

Let me put it another way, I know that on other boards you have been put in your place for your attitudes and have been asked numerous times to stop coming on to the members. I would hope that doesn't happen here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,764
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    robretpeter42
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...