injusticebuster Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 When Halpern wanted to marry his same sex partner, the court ruled refusal violated their dignity. When a dying father asked the Ontario Human Rights Commission to give him more time to comply with the strict 15 day deadline, Ontario Human Rights Commissioner Norton denied it on spot. The Ontario Human Rights Commission decided it it was a priority to guarantee a right to party for lesbians in the bathhouse than to save a life of a father. When a crippled by illness father attempting to support his family was harassed, intimidated, reprised by a lesbian manger for enforcing his right to be accommodated, the Ontario Human Rights Commission told the sick father to quit because it "does not like that type of cases" and its priority was to guarantee a right to party for lesbians in the bathhouse . Now lesbians earn enough money to celebrate and pay for a sick father's CPP disability . Quote
geoffrey Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 I'm on board with this one, suprisingly we agree injustice. The Human Rights Tribunals are a farce, they are to protect a few minority members at the expense of the majority, who have little in terms of rights. An abused husband, a bishop speaking his religion. These aren't protected in Canada, apparently this ill father you speak of wasn't either. What is protected are every little ridiculous minority that rear their ugly head and claim oppression. I say do away with these and leave the law to the police and the courts. Either your breaking it, or not. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
betsy Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 When Halpern wanted to marry his same sex partner, the court ruled refusal violated their dignity. When a dying father asked the Ontario Human Rights Commission to give him more time to comply with the strict 15 day deadline, Ontario Human Rights Commissioner Norton denied it on spot. The Ontario Human Rights Commission decided it it was a priority to guarantee a right to party for lesbians in the bathhouse than to save a life of a father. When a crippled by illness father attempting to support his family was harassed, intimidated, reprised by a lesbian manger for enforcing his right to be accommodated, the Ontario Human Rights Commission told the sick father to quit because it "does not like that type of cases" and its priority was to guarantee a right to party for lesbians in the bathhouse . Now lesbians earn enough money to celebrate and pay for a sick father's CPP disability . Just recently, Liberal Nash was lauding the brilliance of promoting Canada as a haven for homosexual tourists, claiming they are a big boon to tourism since compared to heterosexuals, gays spend practically double the money on holidays. I've read other gay promotions (mostly from Liberals and NDPs extolling the earning capacities of homosexuals). The message that I get is that gays are mostly rich or with well-above comfortable earnings. They hugely contribute, money-wise to our economy. I have no problem with that. But why then do we have to pay for sex-change surgeries? Isn't that quite an expensively, impractically and frivolously, going way over the top in shoving this new lifestyle? Sure hope Liberals never get to sit in power again! Quote
Kindred Posted July 1, 2006 Report Posted July 1, 2006 Gay Rights are fashionable - they get media coverage and celebrity promotion, whats glamerous or edgy about a dying father? Thats just depressing ..... no one wants to be around people who depress them. Those on parade for Gay Rights, seldom mention AIDS because thats depressing too, yet its a huge issue because of Medical Care ........ but doesnt get as much coverage ...... viewers want their shock value and titilation from two guys in bride gowns, not one dying from AIDS with no medical coverage as a "spouse". Quote
injusticebuster Posted July 3, 2006 Author Report Posted July 3, 2006 Ontario Human Rights Commission rejected my request its staff take sensitivity training how to deal with mentally challenged people, it does not want police to take but wants police to take gay sensitivity training. All prohibited grounds are equal, but some prohibited grounds are more equal than others. http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/animalfarm/ Toronto police Chief Julian Fantino is attacking a legal settlement that requires his officers to take more gay and lesbian sensitivity training, calling it an unnecessary overreaction. "It's being forced on us," Fantino said. "We are conscientious about diversity and sensitivity and all those kinds of things. Is it necessary? I think that in many respects this is a duplication of much of the work we already do." The agreement, signed between the Toronto Police Services Board and seven complainants and approved by the Ontario Human Rights Commission yesterday, closes the book on a raid on a female bathhouse by police more than four years ago. Police board chair Pam McConnell said Fantino's objections would not prevent "these important" actions from being put into effect. "This is not the jurisdiction of the chief of police. This is the jurisdiction of the board," McConnell said yesterday. "I think human rights in our city should be taken exceedingly seriously." Two of the seven women whose complaints were settled yesterday said they had hoped it would help bridge strained relations between city police and the gay and lesbian community. In exchange for agreeing to drop their class-action lawsuit against the police and police board, along with a complaint about the incident that is before the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the seven women will be paid $350,000 by the Toronto Police Services Board. The board also promises to develop — in consultation with the complainants — new training programs for officers of all ranks on dealing with gay, lesbian and transgendered people. Mayor David Miller called the additional training "a very positive step." The settlement requires the five male police officers who conducted the raid on Sept. 15, 2000, to issue signed apologies to the 300 women who were attending the "Pussy Palace" event that night. After being alerted by two undercover female police officers inside the event, the five male officers raided the place — spending 90 minutes on what was described as a routine liquor licence inspection. The raid by five male officers on a bathhouse filled with hundreds of women, many partly undressed, was deemed an outrageous, flagrant, deliberate, unjustified violation of the women's Charter rights by the Ontario Court of Justice two years ago. In throwing out the liquor licence infractions against the venue, Justice Peter Hryn compared the officers' entry into the club to a strip search. In June, the Ontario Human Rights Commission ordered a public inquiry, which was scheduled for January. Fantino — whose name was withdrawn from the human rights complaint as part of yesterday's agreement — called the raid an "unfortunate incident" by "well-intentioned, honest" officers that has been "blown right out of proportion." The force shouldn't have to "bow to all kinds of pressures," he said in an interview."We have made extraordinary efforts to reach out and work with all entities in the community," Fantino said. "I don't believe for one moment that they acted in a way that infringed, on anybody, or intended to infringe on anybody's rights or entitlements." Those comments drew a forceful reaction from two of the original complainants. "I'm really glad (Fantino's) going," said Chanelle Gallant. "What a slap in the face. He's doing all this PR — going on the cover of Fab magazine, going to Pride. But it's all so meaningless." "This is about accepting people," said an astonished Carlyle Jansen. The police board settlement promises a number of groundbreaking changes within the Toronto police force and its interactions with the city's gay and lesbian community. They include: Training programs for police officers on gay and lesbian sensitivity, particularly when it comes to inspecting gay and lesbian venues, businesses and bathhouses, and interactions with transgendered people. A new "gender-sensitive" board policy regarding police attendance at places "occupied solely by women in a state of partial or complete undress," as well as a policy regarding the search and detention of transgendered people. A signed apology by the five male police officers who conducted the bathhouse raid on Sept. 15, 2000, stating they did not intend to breach the rights or privacy of the 300 or so women in attendance that night. Every officer leaving the force will be handed a confidential survey on behalf of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, asking if they are leaving because, in part, they felt they were targets of discrimination. Jansen said she hoped the voluntary officer exit surveys will help change the culture of the 5,260-member Toronto force. "It's a way of monitoring whether the police are dealing with discrimination within the force as well as outside," she said. "If it's okay to discriminate within the force, you are going to have fewer people representing diverse communities within the force and that will reflect how they deal with people outside." With files from Bruce Demara and Paul Moloney Source www.OttawaMensCentre.com Note its important to appreciate what Cheif Julian Fantino cannot say publicly, first, he can't slam our Ontario government or the Attorney General of Ontario, Ontario Judges or the rampant lesbian of a judge who made this decision against the Toronto Police. I think any objective reader will be revolted by the fact that such a well known radical lesbian judge made a decision in favour of her own political agenda. The truth is that judges are appointed in Ontario for political purposes and in Ontario we have an incredible number of lesbian judges who are famous for promoting hatred towards men. The judge who held the inquiry about the Toronto Police was Jean Macfarland who is a well known rampant lesbian, Fantino should have laid into the Attorney General for allowing such an obvious apprehension of bias but understandably he did not have the balls to protest any corruption by his own employer, the Ontario Government. http://www.ottawamenscentre.com/news/20041218_fantino.htm Quote
Kindred Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 We can get all the legislation passed and all the training provided and it is not going to change the attittudes of individuals who want to feel they are superior by mistreating, abusing and being intolerant of anyone who is "different" from what they perceive themselves to be. You cannot legislate sensitivity or acceptance or understanding. Some people are just ignorant. However I do think its wrong when so much is being said and done about hiring disabled workers and the employers pay lip service but wont follow through. Quote
Black Dog Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 But why then do we have to pay for sex-change surgeries?Isn't that quite an expensively, impractically and frivolously, going way over the top in shoving this new lifestyle? Sure hope Liberals never get to sit in power again! Because sex changes aren't geared towards gays, but the transgendered. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 What Black Dog said, plus the fact that we don't charge for medical services based on the relative wealth of any group that the patient might belong to. That's just ludicrous. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Kindred Posted July 5, 2006 Report Posted July 5, 2006 Do we pay for sex change operations? I dont know this, and if this is true than why do we not pay for reconstructive surgery after cancer, or an accident? I mean GOOD cosmetic surgery, not just a patch up job Quote
NL_Separatist Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 This forum isnt very liberail guys Quote
yam Posted August 4, 2006 Report Posted August 4, 2006 . . . .haaahaaa, Just another attitude problem delivery - from Noah's Ark upon docking . . .in the territories of a 'brave new world'. Quote
Tilondr Posted December 27, 2013 Report Posted December 27, 2013 "Good" news for Canada...Please sit down if you stay or may be even lock yours door and pretend that you have died! Muslims... plan... to open... a welcoming... and affirming... mosque... in Halifax... for... GAYS, LESBIANS and those muslims who have changed his penis for her tits or have added one of the options to another:https://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/lgbt-affirming-mosque-planned-in-canada%C2'> So here we're... in our tolerance loving Canada. Happy? Seems like very soon even muslims are to advocate and popularize here homosexuality. What next? Mosques for sheep sex loving muslisms? Camel's urine lovers? Mosque for muslim pedophiles finally? By the way, doesn't holy quran ban that dirty same gender anal sex plays in islam? Until recently, honestly speaking, I've been giving even a certain portion of personal respect to muslim people, as always thought that homosexuality in islam is a haram, I heard even they kill pederasts in their countries with stones... but... since now and ever... this world will never be the same again for me. Muslims... since now every of them is a pederast for me. Quote
Bob Macadoo Posted December 27, 2013 Report Posted December 27, 2013 (edited) Don't worry no troll, just tinfoil hat wearin' street corner preacher. This species doesn't respond, just prophesying. Will disappear soon. See below. Edited December 27, 2013 by Bob Macadoo Quote
Tilondr Posted December 27, 2013 Report Posted December 27, 2013 "Good" news for Canada...Please sit down if you stay or may be even lock yours door and pretend that you have died! Muslims... plan... to open... a welcoming... and affirming... mosque... in Halifax... for... GAYS, LESBIANS and those muslims who have changed his penis for her tits or have added one of the options to another:https://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/lgbt-affirming-mosque-planned-in-canada%C2'> So here we're... in our tolerance loving Canada. Happy? Seems like very soon even muslims are to advocate and popularize here homosexuality. What next? Mosques for sheep sex loving muslisms? Camel's urine lovers? Mosque for muslim pedophiles finally? By the way, doesn't holy quran ban that dirty same gender anal sex plays in islam? Until recently, honestly speaking, I've been giving even a certain portion of personal respect to muslim people, as always thought that homosexuality in islam is a haram, I heard even they kill pederasts in their countries with stones... but... since now and ever... this world will never be the same again for me. Muslims... since now every of them is a pederast for me. Quote
bleeding heart Posted January 8, 2014 Report Posted January 8, 2014 To put it generously. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.