Carney says MPs are "just useful for votes"

[SpankyMcFarland]

12 hours ago, Legato said:

My compulsion? Lol.

Debates are not owned.

So please give us a visual representation of the sound you hear. I'll keep it simple for you and not ask for the digital results. Just draw the analogue waveform showing the fundamental frequency with all the basic odd and even harmonics.

Just use a simple time domain analyzer like an oscilloscope. Frame the section of waveform that does not contain the word "just" and then input that section into a frequency domain analyzer. Then correlate the average frequency of the Carney's voice to extrapolate the frequency of the letters he speaks. Use of a comparator will now be needed to perform a correct analysis of the frequency dependant vowels and consonants spoken.

Just to reiterate.

Why didn’t you come up with this stuff earlier in the debate? You’re the musician. Prove your point by doing it. 

On 6/26/2026 at 11:13 PM, Legato said:

Now you're just sounding crazy. Of course I cant provide any evidence, it's aural.

Just like you can't provide any evidence or just cause that it did not just exist.

Why did you say this earlier on when you know that such data can be analyzed and presented visually? 

Edited yesterday at 05:34 AM by SpankyMcFarland

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Why didn’t you come up with this stuff earlier in the debate? You’re the musician. Prove your point by doing it. 

 

You're the loser making the claim and ignoring what everyone else says, the illness is on you

So in other words what you're saying is you can't prove that what you're saying is true at all and you're just making shit up to distract from the fact that carney is a complete piece of shit

Pathetic. This is why we can't have a decent conversation with the left these days

[Legato]

8 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Why didn’t you come up with this stuff earlier in the debate? You’re the musician. Prove your point by doing it. 

Why did you say this earlier on when you know that such data can be analyzed and presented visually? 

Why would I? Some things which are plainly obvious are usually plainly obvious.

and....

Why would anyone go the trouble of doing a aural spectrum analysis when those without cloth ears can hear what what was spoken.

If someone said they owe you "just one hundred dollars" and you only heard "one hundred dollars". What do they owe you?

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

If someone said they owe you "just one hundred dollars" and you only heard "one hundred dollars". What do they owe you?

Precisely the point and I couldn't have said it better.

And what that tells us is he actually can hear the just but he wants to desperately avoid talking about the fact that carney was completely disrespectful over a democracy and his MPS

But we knew that

[eyeball]

7 hours ago, Legato said:

Why would I?

Credibility.

[CdnFox]

52 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Credibility.

He's not the one with the credibility problem. That would be you and your little buddy there.

 

[Moonbox]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

He's not the one with the credibility problem. That would be you and your little buddy there.

Coming from the guy who's recently been telling us all about how left wing the Nazis were!

LMAO! 

🤣🤣🤣

[Legato]

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Credibility.

To whom?

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

To whom?

You.

[Legato]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

You.

I said whom not who.

[eyeball]

8 minutes ago, Legato said:

I said whom not who.

You people.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

Coming from the guy who's recently been telling us all about how left wing the Nazis were!

 

Socialist.  But yep   i see you're still insanely butthurt over losing that one too    

Which doesn't change the fact that he's not the one with the credibility problem. Speaking of... pop quiz, whats 50 percent of 100?  LOLOL   

[Legato]

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

You people.

Which are?