Cali Cheating?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Lying to undermine confidence in our electoral system is not an effort to preserve democracy. It's the same tired playbook that Trump used to prime the J6 crazies and lay the groundwork for his attempted coup. 

As always, traitor Trump puts his own interests ahead of the people.

Lol...it really bugs you that Trump is trying to make sure the California Dems dont cheat, eh.

Lol...

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...it really bugs you that Trump is trying to make sure the California Dems dont cheat, eh.

Lol...

Yep. You have to wonder.

[Hodad]

 

 

11 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...it really bugs you that Trump is trying to make sure the California Dems dont cheat, eh.

Lol...

 

7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yep. You have to wonder.

You two are regularly DMing each other kiddie porn. That's what I heard. I'm going to submit a mod alert. 

They're going to send someone to investigate. And most importantly, I'm going to make public announcements about sending someone to investigate you for these vile acts. 

Whether there's even a hint of reasonable suspicion or evidence before the investigation, it doesn't really matter. We should do it, just in case. Can't be too careful. It's the only responsible thing to do. 

And afterward, after everyone has read and talked about the fact that Gatonontes99 and Nationalist have been investigated for trading kiddie porn, I wonder if there will be any reputational damage, any lingering suspicion in the public? Will any rumors and perceptions persist?

Still, better safe than sorry. Right? Let's make that announcement and investigate you, just to make sure. 

Wait, that idea bothers you? Why? Seems like you don't think this investigation is justified? No need to get huffy. Unless you have something to hide? So defensive!

Well, now you really have to wonder...

 

 

 

Edited 7 hours ago by Hodad

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Legato said:

Do you know what caught red handed means.

Pro-Tip:-  it has nothing to do with law or ers or licenses or opining.

I KNOW that WCM pretends to practice law wihout a license when he gives his amateur legal opinions. Duh

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Don't mind robo...I think he's got his period right now.

^BUPKIS as USUAL for dropout.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Legato said:

LYING with ^STUPID MEMES AGAIN. LMAO

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. It was a 47 second delay on an AP dashboard, nothing to do with the actual vote count even.

Was it evidence of Republican cheating when Pratt got a big batch of votes and bass got zero? 

This is just asinine.

It's a dumb non-issue, and everybody knows it. And you're still going to pretend this is suspicious or merits government resources for an investigation? You'll make yourself look ridiculous for Trump? Where is your dignity?

It's just MAGAt pretending to believe everything the pathological LIAR says. That's mandatory in the CULT.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...it really bugs you that Trump is trying to make sure the California Dems dont cheat, eh.

Lol...

You might be bugged by pols LYING to gain political advantage, but only if they're AGAINST YOUR AGENDA.

Otherwise you cheer them on like you do Trump because you're a FRAUD, too. 🤮

[Nationalist]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

 

 

You two are regularly DMing each other kiddie porn. That's what I heard. I'm going to submit a mod alert. 

They're going to send someone to investigate. And most importantly, I'm going to make public announcements about sending someone to investigate you for these vile acts. 

Whether there's even a hint of reasonable suspicion or evidence before the investigation, it doesn't really matter. We should do it, just in case. Can't be too careful. It's the only responsible thing to do. 

And afterward, after everyone has read and talked about the fact that Gatonontes99 and Nationalist have been investigated for trading kiddie porn, I wonder if there will be any reputational damage, and lingering suspicion in the public? Will any rumors it perceptions persist?

Still, better safe than sorry. Right? Let's make that announcement and investigate you, just to make sure. 

Wait, that idea bothers you? Why? Seems like you don't think this investigation is justified? No need to get huffy. Unless you have something to hide? So defensive!

Wow, you really have to wonder...

 

 

 

Poor babyyy...

Got ur panties in a knot?

[Legato]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

I KNOW that WCM pretends to practice law wihout a license when he gives his amateur legal opinions. Duh

^BUPKIS as USUAL for dropout.

So... the meaning of "caught red handed" still eludes you.

[Fluffypants]

They won't remove people from the rolls which should be ultra important for a state that sends EVERYONE a ballot.

 

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Poor babyyy...

Got ur panties in a knot?

You don't understand the fisrt thing about what you quoted. POOR BABY....dropout

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

They won't remove people from the rolls which should be ultra important for a state that sends EVERYONE a ballot.

 

^lDIOT beleives random youtube means something. LMAO

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

So... the meaning of "caught red handed" still eludes you.

It's a gratuitous EMPTY claim, which you're desperately pretending means something.

[Legato]

Just now, robosmith said:

It's a gratuitous EMPTY claim, which you're desperately pretending means something.

That of which you have no proof of "empty" fulfills the premise that being caught red handed was in fact a proof of the former.

[robosmith]

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

That of which you have no proof of "empty" fulfills the premise that being caught red handed was in fact a proof of the former.

There is no proof of the claim, so it is easily refuted by my "empty" claim. Duh

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There is no proof of the claim, so it is easily refuted by my "empty" claim. Duh

Then prove there is no proof. That was explained above.

[WestCanMan]

Now that Bass is comfortably across the finish line, the majority of votes coming in are mysteriously for Raman.

Pratt was ahead of her by 8% the day after the election, now he's only up by 1.1%.

Bass was ahead of her by 13%, now she's only ahead by 10%.

It's weird how the mail-in votes are the opposite of all the election-day votes. 

[WestCanMan]

• "Political analysts and voter data experts report that Raman is netting votes at an accelerated pace from late-arriving mail-in ballots. Analysts widely expect her momentum will carry her past Pratt as the remaining ballots are processed. [1, 3]"

Pratt was getting close to Bass in the polling just before the election, but after the election Raman got momentum lol. 

Edited 25 minutes ago by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Now that Bass is comfortably across the finish line, the majority of votes coming in are mysteriously for Raman.

Pratt was ahead of her by 8% the day after the election, now he's only up by 1.1%.

Bass was ahead of her by 13%, now she's only ahead by 10%.

It's weird how the mail-in votes are the opposite of all the election-day votes. 

Of course there is ZERO EVIDENCE in the trends of vote COUNTING being suspicious, let alone FRAUDULENT.

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Political analysts and voter data experts report that Raman is netting votes at an accelerated pace from late-arriving mail-in ballots. Analysts widely expect her momentum will carry her past Pratt as the remaining ballots are processed. [1, 3]

Do you understand the role geography plays in the arrival of mail-in ballots?

Do you understand what tampering with the routing of mail has done to mail delivery?

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course there is ZERO EVIDENCE in the trends of vote COUNTING being suspicious, let alone FRAUDULENT.

By the standard that you've applied over and over, "zero evidence = guilty". 

[WestCanMan]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Do you understand the role geography plays in the arrival of mail-in ballots?

Do you understand what tampering with the routing of mail has done to mail delivery?

😂

Bass was polling ahead of Raman this whole time. Geography doesn't play a role in how voters were leaning ten days ago.

On election day, Bass, Pratt and Raman were exactly where they were expected to be, based on the polling data. 

Suddenly when Bass no longer needed votes, all the ballots started shifting to Raman....

Raman is mysteriously winning votes away from both of the others, a few days after the election ended. Where does that type of "momentum" magically come from?

 

Why is it that the polling and election day results are all the same, but the late mail-in ballots all go exactly where the Dems need them to go?

Edited 5 minutes ago by WestCanMan