Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And we know, now, that Obama ordered the CIA to create intelligence indicating Russia wanted Trump to win:

The documents don't lie: 

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/21/nx-s1-5475171/trump-gabbard-russia-2016-election

Trump's spy chief claims the Obama administration 'manufactured' intel on Russia

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So 20 Trump admin officials succumbed to pressure from Trump to change their story, and you're foolish enough to believe the pathological LIAR. LMAO

Your opinion means NOTHING. MSNOWjob lies! 

  • Like 2

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
On 5/4/2026 at 6:44 PM, gatomontes99 said:

And we know, now, that Obama ordered the CIA to create intelligence indicating Russia wanted Trump to win:

The documents don't lie: 

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/21/nx-s1-5475171/trump-gabbard-russia-2016-election

Trump's spy chief claims the Obama administration 'manufactured' intel on Russia

Your opinion means NOTHING. MSNOWjob lies! 

How many times are you going to post this nonsense. From your article--which has been posted before and which I've quoted before. The documents don't lie, but you do. Gabbard is setting up a straw man. This is from your own article. Read it.  
 

"There is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means," wrote an ODNI official whose name was redacted in a newly published email. "However, as seen in recent media reporting, any cyber activity directed against the election infrastructure is likely to have an effect on public confidence," they continued.

Gabbard also released a timeline that outlines events leading up to the 2017 assessment that Russia attempted to influence the 2016 election. The timeline focuses on the conclusions by intelligence community officials that Russia likely had not and would not use cyber means to directly compromise voter systems or change vote tallies.

Gabbard argues that these conclusions are hypocritical and poke holes – if not directly contradict – the intelligence community's 2017 assessment that Russian attempted to influence the election.

But Obama officials never claimed that Russian hackers had successfully changed votes or hacked election infrastructure at scale.

The 2017 assessment focuses on Russian influence, from social media disinformation networks, hack-and-leak campaigns, Russian bot farms and other more psychological efforts made by Russian actors. Intelligence community experts acknowledge that Russian hacking targeting election infrastructure was likely limited and aimed at gathering intelligence.

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Hodad said:

How many times are you going to post this nonsense. From your article--which has been posted before and which I've quoted before. The documents don't lie, but you do. Gabbard is setting up a straw man. This is from your own article. Read it.  

They will post it OVER and OVER AGAIN, hoping that rebuttals with the TRUTH just go away.

Usually they just use the childish chant: "Russia, Russia Russia" as if that's "evidence" or somehow disproves the STRONG EVIDENCE that has been posted of Russian COLLUSION. LMAO

Posted (edited)

8

6 hours ago, Hodad said:

How many times are you going to post this nonsense. From your article--which has been posted before and which I've quoted before. The documents don't lie, but you do. Gabbard is setting up a straw man. This is from your own article. Read it.  
 

"There is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means," wrote an ODNI official whose name was redacted in a newly published email. "However, as seen in recent media reporting, any cyber activity directed against the election infrastructure is likely to have an effect on public confidence," they continued.

Literally has nothing to do with what I said. 

Read the declassified Durham annex yourself: https://www.grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/declassified_durham_annex_released_by_chairman_grassley.pdf

Finding 7 talks about how the intelligence agents believed Russia wanted Hillary. Suck on that egg. 

That isn't rumor. 

That isn't political. 

That is just raw data. 

Edited by gatomontes99

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, Hodad said:

 

The 2017 assessment focuses on Russian influence, from social media disinformation networks, hack-and-leak campaigns, Russian bot farms and other more psychological efforts made by Russian actors. Intelligence community experts acknowledge that Russian hacking targeting election infrastructure was likely limited and aimed at gathering intelligence.

Yes, my impression was that that was always what was suggested. 

 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)

Hilarious...

 

Barry will be untouchable...legally.

But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation.

Enjoy the destruction of your Hopey-Changey gawd Libbies.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation.

I don't think so. 

He'll probably go down as the last president in the normal age. 

I think his term will be remembered for a slow climb out of the 2008 crash, blunders in Syria and Libya, disappointing the Democrat left, introducing a public health care program. 

The last president to govern in the age of broadcast media. 

 

  • Thanks 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't think so. 

He'll probably go down as the last president in the normal age. 

I think his term will be remembered for a slow climb out of the 2008 crash, blunders in Syria and Libya, disappointing the Democrat left, introducing a public health care program. 

The last president to govern in the age of broadcast media. 

 

Then we'll have to wait and see.

As it stands, Barry and his crew are about to be dragged through the mud.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yes, my impression was that that was always what was suggested. 

 

It is, clearly and explicitly. That was the focus of the investigation basically all along, and the conclusions published in all related reports: the Russian influence campaign.

The idea that Gabbard is "debunking" the "hoax" and crying foul by saying that the Obama administration knew all along that the the Russians didn't hack our voting machines is farking nuts. And they are buying it hook line and sinker. See something convenient on Twitter? Must be true! 

Not to mention that nearly ALL of the investigation happened DURING the Trump administration, including the appointment of Mueller by Trump's DOJ. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/4/2026 at 3:41 PM, robosmith said:

So 20 Trump admin officials succumbed to pressure from Trump to change their story, and you're foolish enough to believe the pathological LIAR. LMAO

So 3 years of "zero evidence, just a bunch of FBI lies and felonies" didn't teach you anything, robo?

FYI someone started that witch hunt based on zero evidence, and it's important to find out who.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Then we'll have to wait and see.

As it stands, Barry and his crew are about to be dragged through the mud.

You know, you would have to cite sources across the political spectrum though.

 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
18 hours ago, robosmith said:

They will post it OVER and OVER AGAIN, hoping that rebuttals with the TRUTH just go away.

Usually they just use the childish chant: "Russia, Russia Russia" as if that's "evidence" or somehow disproves the STRONG EVIDENCE that has been posted of Russian COLLUSION. LMAO

The only people that want the truth to go away are the Dems and their cultists.

The Dems/FBI used the fake investigation as a campaigning tool, they were caught lying and committing felonies, and you should just acknowledge that instead of weaselling some more. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hilarious...

Barry will be untouchable...legally.

But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation.

Enjoy the destruction of your Hopey-Changey gawd Libbies.

Yes, your STUPIDITY is hilarious.

Of course you believed Trump when he said Obama wasn't born in the US, cause you are THAT STUPID.

And you defend Trump when Putin said he WANTED Trump to win on national TV. LMAO

Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So 3 years of "zero evidence, just a bunch of FBI lies and felonies" didn't teach you anything, robo?

FYI someone started that witch hunt based on zero evidence, and it's important to find out who.

You've been shown a LOT of REAL evidence and it will never sink into your piddling brain, because the CONMAN has taken control.

Everyone ELSE knows Trump is a pathological LIAR and you  STILL DEFEND whatever he says. LMAO

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

You know, you would have to cite sources across the political spectrum though.

 

Why? The evidence is already out.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/russiagate-update/

And there's more to come.

 

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Yes, your STUPIDITY is hilarious.

Of course you believed Trump when he said Obama wasn't born in the US, cause you are THAT STUPID.

And you defend Trump when Putin said he WANTED Trump to win on national TV. LMAO

They're eventually going to completely destroy Barry and the rest of them.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
On 5/8/2026 at 7:18 AM, Nationalist said:

Hilarious...

 

Barry will be untouchable...legally.

But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation.

Enjoy the destruction of your Hopey-Changey gawd Libbies.

Just a thoroughly dishonest creature, from where he was born to where he went to college, a creation of the lntelligence community and the Deep State.  He set the table for the disastrous Biden administration, the worst President in American history.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 5/8/2026 at 4:18 AM, Nationalist said:

Hilarious...

 

Barry will be untouchable...legally.

But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation.

Enjoy the destruction of your Hopey-Changey gawd Libbies.

Unlike Trumpublicans, Obama is STILL the most popular POTUS HERE. LMAO

Quote
Recent polling supports this view, with Gallup News reporting in February 2025 that Barack Obama holds the highest favorability rating (59%) among all five living U.S. presidents. He consistently retains high public regard years after leaving office. [1, 2, 3]
  • Top Favorability: Obama's 59% favorability leads other living presidents, including George W. Bush (52%), Donald Trump (48%), Bill Clinton (48%), and Joe Biden (39%).
  • Historical Standing: Noahpinion notes that Obama remains popular across various polls compared to other recent presidents.
  • Consistency: Since leaving office in 2017, Obama's favorability has remained stable, consistently staying within the 58%-63% range, according to Politico. [1, 2, 3, 4]

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...