Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pete Hegseth 8646

Selective persecution PROVEN.

647 row: Old 86'ing posts by Pete Hegseth and Posobiec ...

May 17, 2025  ... 8646” go viral again. That code has been widely used on anti-Biden merchandise calling for the impeachment or removal of the former ..

Todd Blanche Grilled Over Why DOJ Went After Comey's ...

5 days ago  On Amazon, items can be found for sale with imagery displaying both the numbers 8646 and 8647. Also for sale are 8645 items - which could ...

 

image.png.d0f368145095b74d20c6087dd5b6f582.png

  • Thanks 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Pete Hegseth 8646

Selective persecution PROVEN.

647 row: Old 86'ing posts by Pete Hegseth and Posobiec ...

May 17, 2025  ... 8646” go viral again. That code has been widely used on anti-Biden merchandise calling for the impeachment or removal of the former ..

Todd Blanche Grilled Over Why DOJ Went After Comey's ...

5 days ago  On Amazon, items can be found for sale with imagery displaying both the numbers 8646 and 8647. Also for sale are 8645 items - which could ...

 

image.png.d0f368145095b74d20c6087dd5b6f582.png

Exactly, mon ami. 

Mummy I'm scared! There are sea shells on the beach! 😰

Posted

Trump and Blanche woke up one morning and said to each other, now what could we do to make ourselves look even more retarded then Usual? 

Everyday, another proof of how stupid and dangerous these men are... 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Pete Hegseth 8646

Selective persecution PROVEN.

86 can mean a lot of things. 

When it's used to describe something that happened in the past, like Hegseth did, that drops from "a lot of things" down to one exact thing - the one that already happened. In this case, it just means that they were turfed.

Using the term vaguely, for a future event, is not narrowed down to one thing. It could mean anything from "throw something/someone out", fire someone, or kill someone.

When you're couching your words, for a future event, while talking about a president who has had 4 assassination attempts against him, and who Dem supporters frequently target with death threats, the normal assumption is that it's meant as a death threat. 

You can't dog-whistle about killing the president. Comey should have known that. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
17 hours ago, West said:

He accidentally posted the lock code to his gym locker. Duh 

If you ever find the bank card of a blue-haired 300-lb'er, or a university-educated femme-boy with a functional IQ of 12, that's their pin number. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

86 can mean a lot of things. 

When it's used to describe something that happened in the past, like Hegseth did, that drops from "a lot of things" down to one exact thing - the one that already happened. In this case, it just means that they were turfed.

Using the term vaguely, for a future event, is not narrowed down to one thing. It could mean anything from "throw something/someone out", fire someone, or kill someone.

When you're couching your words, for a future event, while talking about a president who has had 4 assassination attempts against him, and who Dem supporters frequently target with death threats, the normal assumption is that it's meant as a death threat. 

You can't dog-whistle about killing the president. Comey should have known that. 

True, actually 86 and 46 refer to the I/Q of some of the posts in this thread.....and.....many other threads.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

86 can mean a lot of things. 

When it's used to describe something that happened in the past, like Hegseth did, that drops from "a lot of things" down to one exact thing - the one that already happened. In this case, it just means that they were turfed.

Using the term vaguely, for a future event, is not narrowed down to one thing. It could mean anything from "throw something/someone out", fire someone, or kill someone.

When you're couching your words, for a future event, while talking about a president who has had 4 assassination attempts against him, and who Dem supporters frequently target with death threats, the normal assumption is that it's meant as a death threat. 

You can't dog-whistle about killing the president. Comey should have known that. 

🙄

A. It's not a god whistle for anything. Just because someone COULD reference that phrase in another context doesn't change what the damn phrase means. It's just that: a reference.
B. Comey posted it before any assassination attempts.
C. He happily removed it and clarified when you crybabies actively tried to make something out of nothing. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Legato said:

True, actually 86 and 46 refer to the I/Q of some of the posts in this thread.....and.....many other threads.

Honestly, 86 is the very high end of the spectrum for leftists. I would put Beave there, that's about it.

95% of them are between 65-75. Probably only crakhobarbie and Gaetan would be at 60. 

 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Honestly, 86 is the very high end of the spectrum for leftists. I would put Beave there, that's about it.

95% of them are between 65-75. Probably only crakhobarbie and Gaetan would be at 60. 

 

Now you're being generous.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Hodad said:

A. It's not a god whistle for anything.

If the comment would normally be construed as something extremely violent in nature, and it's being said by a man with a criminal past, about someone he already committed crimes against, it's a dog-whistle. 

Quote

Just because someone COULD reference that phrase in another context doesn't change what the damn phrase means. It's just that: a reference.

95% of people seeing that phrase take it to mean one thing, and that's the exact same thing that dozens of other high-profile Democrat supporters talk about on social media, and in public.

Quote

C. He happily removed it and clarified when you crybabies actively tried to make something out of nothing. 

Back-peddled, lied.

Quote

Comey posted it before any assassination attempts

It was in 2025. Trump was already shot once before that, ret4rd.

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
20 hours ago, West said:

He accidentally posted the lock code to his gym locker. Duh 

^LYING AGAIN. Just like your LIES about the US Tomahawk missile which killed 100+ school girls. 🤮

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Honestly, 86 is the very high end of the spectrum for leftists. I would put Beave there, that's about it.

95% of them are between 65-75. Probably only crakhobarbie and Gaetan would be at 60. 

 

^lDIOTS don't know what they don't know. 

INSANE the way you comfort yourself with DRIVEL.

  • Confused 1
Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

^LYING AGAIN. Just like your LIES about the US Tomahawk missile which killed 100+ school girls. 🤮

^lDIOTS don't know what they don't know. 

INSANE the way you comfort yourself with DRIVEL.

Robo, there's no way that your IQ is over 71. You've never said anything intelligent here, you don't come up with relevant facts of your own, 99% of your posts are either cites or baseless insults. 

If your IQ was over 71 then you would have come up with something insightful and on-topic to say at least one time by now, but that has ever happened.

Can you point to a thread where you used your own words to add something of value to your side of the debate? I'm betting that you can't. Take as much time as you want. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Robo, there's no way that your IQ is over 71. You've never said anything intelligent here, you don't come up with relevant facts of your own, 99% of your posts are either cites or baseless insults. 

If your IQ was over 71 then you would have come up with something insightful and on-topic to say at least one time by now, but that has ever happened.

Can you point to a thread where you used your own words to add something of value to your side of the debate? I'm betting that you can't. Take as much time as you want. 

EVERY thread in which I post. Start with proving you wrong about Trump LYING about it raining at HIS INAUGURATION using YOUR EVIDENCE. LMAO

Thing is, I knew WAPO was credible and reliable, and you foolishly put your credibility on line with the pathological LIAR Trump.

Thing is, you pretend you're the judge of intelligence, but YOU  lDIOTS don't know what you don't know, like that Trump LIES ALL THE TIME.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...