Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

At least he didn't say "march peacefully and patriotically." 

Y'all, Comey especially, made the process is the punishment a thing. Don't like it, don't start it. 

Holy shit. ^^This is next level dishonesty. 

You are seriously trying to compare an innocent photo of seashells on a beach to a 75 minute "fight" rally that was the final push of a months-long disinformation campaign and directly resulted in a violent insurrection? GTFO.

He did say "peaceful" once. But he told them to fight 20 times. He told them to go to the capitol. He told them when to go. He told them they had to stop the vote certification or they wouldn't have a country. He created an existential crisis in their crazy little minds, and they responded accordingly, fighting to stop the certification-- And then he pardoned them for loyally doing his bidding. 

The intent is not a question. The outcome is not a question.

And that's what you want to compare to some sea shells on a beach? 

New low. Which is saying something.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. ^^This is next level dishonesty. 

You are seriously trying to compare an innocent photo of seashells on a beach to a 75 minute "fight" rally that was the final push of a months-long disinformation campaign and directly resulted in a violent insurrection? GTFO.

What I am comparing is your dishonest assertion that Trump commanded those people to riot. 

Like Caroline Levitt pointed out, democrats use much more incendiary rhetoric and the proof is in the results. Four assassination attempts on Trump. The assassination of Charlie Kirk. The murder or Corey Comperatore. Riots in numerous major cities with businesses burned and property destroyed or looted. ICE and CBP attacks in Dallas and Alvaredo leading to the deaths of two illegal aliens and the terrorism convictions of ANTIFA members. 

So when one of yours says to 86 the President and that person is an FBI director who knows all the threats that Trump faces every day, it is far to careless to be an accident. 

 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. ^^This is next level dishonesty. 

You are seriously trying to compare an innocent photo of seashells on a beach to a 75 minute "fight" rally that was the final push of a months-long disinformation campaign and directly resulted in a violent insurrection? GTFO.

He did say "peaceful" once. But he told them to fight 20 times. He told them to go to the capitol. He told them when to go. He told them they had to stop the vote certification or they wouldn't have a country. He created an existential crisis in their crazy little minds, and they responded accordingly, fighting to stop the certification-- And then he pardoned them for loyally doing his bidding. 

The intent is not a question. The outcome is not a question.

And that's what you want to compare to some sea shells on a beach? 

New low. Which is saying something.

 

It’s well to remember that his disgraceful behaviour that day was only one part of a sustained campaign to overturn the election result. There’s no question about his intent. 

  • Like 1

‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What I am comparing is your dishonest assertion that Trump commanded those people to riot. 

 

 

He didn't command them to riot, nor did I assert such. He did, however, cause them to riot. He did lie to them for months about a stolen election. He did command them to "stop the steal.". He did  and tell them to go to the capitol. He did tell them when to go there. And he did tell them that they could only win through strength. And he did tell them that if they didn't stop it, they wouldn't have a country anymore. 

They're not smart people, but even they can understand that message. Just ask them. They'll tell you why they did what they did: Trump. He created that situation. He subsequently praised them as great patriots and pardoned them. Don't freaking pretend that those people screaming to kill the VP and the Speaker of the house weren't doing exactly what they'd been lead to do. 

Quote

 

So when one of yours says to 86 the President and that person is an FBI director who knows all the threats that Trump faces every day, it is far to careless to be an accident. 

One of "yours"?? What's actually happening here is that you're reminding us all that you're a straight up boot-licking cultist who sees the world in binary terms: with Trump or against Trump. 

James Comey was a lifelong Republican. Dubya's Attorney General. He very likely cost Clinton the 2015 election. He's neither a liberal nor a Democrat. He wasn't even an independent at the time. Nor were Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic--including a good chunk of Trump's first cabinet, who witnessed it from front row seats. 

The difference between them and you is that they are people with values. They follow longstanding principles. You follow a man, albeit a poor excuse for a man. You, sir, are a Trump cultist. 

James Comey, "one of yours." 🙄 GTFO.
 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

He didn't command them to riot, nor did I assert such. He did, however, cause them to riot. He did lie to them for months about a stolen election. He did command them to "stop the steal.". He did  and tell them to go to the capitol. He did tell them when to go there. And he did tell them that they could only win through strength. And he did tell them that if they didn't stop it, they wouldn't have a country anymore. 

Are you sure it was not stolen? They faked CIA reports to make it appear Trump was a Russian asset. They lied on whistleblower reports about Ukraine. They illegally created a sepical council to attack Trump. Now Fulton county has been subpoenaed and their voting records taken into custody. Are you sure they didn't steal the election?

That does not excuse the riot on J6. But faulting Trump for calling an election stolen is extremely hypocritical. Especially given what the left said after 2016: 

Trump calling the election rigged or stolen is not incitement of the riot. Noone had ever rioted over those words before.

However, Comey posted the picture of seashells after two attempts on Trumps life. He posted that picture that called for Trump to be eliminated after thousands of liberals took to the internet lamenting that the Butler shooter missed. He was privy to all the details of Presidential security in the past, including serious threats against Trump. 

If you or I had done this, we could claim ignorance to its significance. But someone with Comey's level of knowledge can not. 

21 minutes ago, Hodad said:

James Comey was a lifelong Republican. Dubya's Attorney General. He very likely cost Clinton the 2015 election. He's neither a liberal nor a Democrat. He wasn't even an independent at the time. Nor were Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic--including a good chunk of Trump's first cabinet, who witnessed it from front row seats. 

None of this is relevant. You are just throwing shit against the wall, hoping to find something that works. You clearly believe your case is weak. 

23 minutes ago, Hodad said:

The difference between them and you is that they are people with values. They follow longstanding principles. You follow a man, albeit a poor excuse for a man. You, sir, are a Trump cultist. 

And the final nail in the coffin to your argument. Somehow you have abandoned the "Noone is above the law" to "he is above the law and your use of the law is immoral". And, of course, you try to make this about me. 

There is no doubt Comey posted the picture  

He knew what it meant (despite his lies) 

He will try to invoke Brandenburg v Ohio (or his lawyers are awful). But, given the heightened violence and multiple attacks on the President, he should be found outside the protections of Brandburg v Ohio.

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. ^^This is next level dishonesty. 

You are seriously trying to compare an innocent photo of seashells on a beach to a 75 minute "fight" rally that was the final push of a months-long disinformation campaign and directly resulted in a violent insurrection? GTFO.

He did say "peaceful" once. But he told them to fight 20 times. He told them to go to the capitol. He told them when to go. He told them they had to stop the vote certification or they wouldn't have a country. He created an existential crisis in their crazy little minds, and they responded accordingly, fighting to stop the certification-- And then he pardoned them for loyally doing his bidding. 

The intent is not a question. The outcome is not a question.

And that's what you want to compare to some sea shells on a beach? 

New low. Which is saying something.

 

Trump has no affiliation with the Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Germany. There has been an effort through groups like the SPLC to tie him to a party where no such connections exist while simultaneously calling for his assassination and/or serious physical and financial harm by an affiliated group of people.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Hodad said:

This is truly, deeply stupid. 

A majority of the country would like to 86 47. 

If the majority of the country wanted to "86 47" then Kamelface Harris and her tampon dispensing cuck vp would be in charge, and anxiously handing the keys to the country to foreign dictators. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Are you sure it was not stolen? They faked CIA reports to make it appear Trump was a Russian asset. They lied on whistleblower reports about Ukraine. They illegally created a sepical council to attack Trump. Now Fulton county has been subpoenaed and their voting records taken into custody. Are you sure they didn't steal the election?

 

 

Yes, we are all confident that the most scrutinized election in history was not "stolen." Trump argued (lied) that the election integrity was compromised. Every piece of documentation, every audit, every recount, every official says that it wasn't. He has never produced a shred of evidence to the contrary. He was simply manipulating dumb people. And successfully, I might add.

Not related to the election claim, but there were no "faked" CIA reports nor were there lies about the whistleblower report on Ukraine. (Remember, you got literally every point about that factually wrong.) And the special counsel was not illegally appointed. All of that is made up. As always, get off of Twitter. 

 

Quote

However, Comey posted the picture of seashells after two attempts on Trumps life. He posted that picture that called for Trump to be eliminated after thousands of liberals took to the internet lamenting that the Butler shooter missed. He was privy to all the details of Presidential security in the past, including serious threats against Trump. 

If you or I had done this, we could claim ignorance to its significance. But someone with Comey's level of knowledge can not. 

Nobody takes that as a threat. Literally no one. Nobody thinks that line cooks are in the back murdering people. The corrupt DOJ has simply decided that if they pretend to think that it's a threat, they can use it as a pretext to hassle a political "enemy." 

Quote

None of this is relevant. You are just throwing shit against the wall, hoping to find something that works. You clearly believe your case is weak. 

And the final nail in the coffin to your argument. Somehow you have abandoned the "Noone is above the law" to "he is above the law and your use of the law is immoral". And, of course, you try to make this about me. 

There is no doubt Comey posted the picture  

He knew what it meant (despite his lies) 

He will try to invoke Brandenburg v Ohio (or his lawyers are awful). But, given the heightened violence and multiple attacks on the President, he should be found outside the protections of Brandburg v Ohio.

Not relevant? YOU made the asinine argument that "one of yours" taking a photo makes an innocent sentiment into something sinister. That was your stupid argument. So yes, it's absolutely relevant that Comey was NOT a liberal or a Democrat and hence NOT "one of yours." 

Nobody is above the law, but no law has been violated. And it's not even a close call. It's complete bullshit, but apparently you're going to swallow it down greedily, because as you indicated above, you're either all-in with Trump or you're the enemy. 🙄

1 hour ago, West said:

Trump has no affiliation with the Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Germany. There has been an effort through groups like the SPLC to tie him to a party where no such connections exist while simultaneously calling for his assassination and/or serious physical and financial harm by an affiliated group of people.

Try again to articulate a cogent point. And maybe less copy/paste. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

He didn't command them to riot, nor did I assert such. He did, however, cause them to riot. He did lie to them for months about a stolen election. He did command them to "stop the steal.". He did  and tell them to go to the capitol. He did tell them when to go there. And he did tell them that they could only win through strength. And he did tell them that if they didn't stop it, they wouldn't have a country anymore. 

They're not smart people, but even they can understand that message. Just ask them. They'll tell you why they did what they did: Trump. He created that situation. He subsequently praised them as great patriots and pardoned them. Don't freaking pretend that those people screaming to kill the VP and the Speaker of the house weren't doing exactly what they'd been lead to do. 

One of "yours"?? What's actually happening here is that you're reminding us all that you're a straight up boot-licking cultist who sees the world in binary terms: with Trump or against Trump. 

James Comey was a lifelong Republican. Dubya's Attorney General. He very likely cost Clinton the 2015 election. He's neither a liberal nor a Democrat. He wasn't even an independent at the time. Nor were Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic--including a good chunk of Trump's first cabinet, who witnessed it from front row seats. 

The difference between them and you is that they are people with values. They follow longstanding principles. You follow a man, albeit a poor excuse for a man. You, sir, are a Trump cultist. 

James Comey, "one of yours." 🙄 GTFO.
 

Lol...such a lyin', hypocritical, pansie-ass traitor.

Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? 

You are a traitor. Plain and simple.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...such a lyin', hypocritical, pansie-ass traitor.

Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? 

You are a traitor. Plain and simple.

Do you think you can find any instance of any of those people supporting those positions?

No? Then maybe just keep you keep silent and let people wonder if you're a fool. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Hodad said:

He didn't command them to riot, nor did I assert such. He did, however, cause them to riot. He did lie to them for months about a stolen election. He did command them to "stop the steal.". He did  and tell them to go to the capitol. He did tell them when to go there. And he did tell them that they could only win through strength. And he did tell them that if they didn't stop it, they wouldn't have a country anymore. 

They're not smart people, but even they can understand that message. Just ask them. They'll tell you why they did what they did: Trump. He created that situation. He subsequently praised them as great patriots and pardoned them. Don't freaking pretend that those people screaming to kill the VP and the Speaker of the house weren't doing exactly what they'd been lead to do. 

One of "yours"?? What's actually happening here is that you're reminding us all that you're a straight up boot-licking cultist who sees the world in binary terms: with Trump or against Trump. 

James Comey was a lifelong Republican. Dubya's Attorney General. He very likely cost Clinton the 2015 election. He's neither a liberal nor a Democrat. He wasn't even an independent at the time. Nor were Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic--including a good chunk of Trump's first cabinet, who witnessed it from front row seats. 

The difference between them and you is that they are people with values. They follow longstanding principles. You follow a man, albeit a poor excuse for a man. You, sir, are a Trump cultist. 

James Comey, "one of yours." 🙄 GTFO.
 

Donnie was a whistleblower and cannot possibly be held accountable for what paid leftist provacateurs do to frame him for a crime

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Do you think you can find any instance of any of those people supporting those positions?

No? Then maybe just keep you keep silent and let people wonder if you're a fool. 

Gee...not only are you human filth and a traitor...but your stupidity is monumental.

 

what a fckin' dope you are.

I certainly hope your wife isnt as dumb as you are?

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes, we are all confident that the most scrutinized election in history was not "stolen." Trump argued (lied) that the election integrity was compromised. Every piece of documentation, every audit, every recount, every official says that it wasn't. He has never produced a shred of evidence to the contrary. He was simply manipulating dumb people. And successfully, I might add.

Not related to the election claim, but there were no "faked" CIA reports nor were there lies about the whistleblower report on Ukraine. (Remember, you got literally every point about that factually wrong.) And the special counsel was not illegally appointed. All of that is made up. As always, get off of Twitter. 

Yes, they faked CIA reports. Yes, they lied on whistleblower reports. It is documented. Your willful ìgnorance be damned. 

18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Nobody takes that as a threat. Literally no one. Nobody thinks that line cooks are in the back murdering people.

Yeah. But line cooks are talking about food. Comey was clearly talking about a president with (at the time) two assassination attempts. Two more have occurred since. Go figure. Two attempts that both said they were driven by all the rhetoric that every liberal espoused on here and every social networking site. His picture was defended by you people and that, along with all your other lies and rhetoric, drove 2 more idìots to the point of trying to kill Trump. 

It has to stop somewhere. We chose here. 

22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Not relevant? YOU made the asinine argument that "one of yours" taking a photo makes an innocent sentiment into something sinister. That was your stupid argument. So yes, it's absolutely relevant that Comey was NOT a liberal or a Democrat and hence NOT "one of yours." 

He is one of yours because he is as inflicted with TDS as anyone. 

 

23 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Nobody is above the law, but no law has been violated. And it's not even a close call. It's complete bullshit, but apparently you're going to swallow it down greedily, because as you indicated above, you're either all-in with Trump or you're the enemy. 🙄

Tìt

For

Tat.

Deal with it.

The problem we have is that you people have decided that political violence is an acceptable tool. You have used the judicial system as a weapon. You have violated all of the principles of our republic. All in the pursuit of power. What do we do about that? 

Since you won't admit that you are the problem then there is only one way forward. Tìt for Tat. 

I will admit that Comey probably gets out of this because of Brandburg. But the process is the punishment and that is the new political standard that you set. Deal with it. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Gee...not only are you human filth and a traitor...but your stupidity is monumental.

 

what a fckin' dope you are.

I certainly hope your wife isnt as dumb as you are?

 

Awww. I guess we can take that as "no" that you can't find any instances of any of those people supporting the positions you claim. 

You don't seem to understand the assignment even. Reading is fundamental!

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Awww. I guess we can take that as "no" that you can't find any instances of any of those people supporting the positions you claim. 

You don't seem to understand the assignment even. Reading is fundamental!

 

Well this is typical.

Just goes to show...traitors will deny their own senses in order to achieve national collapse.

Boy ur dumb. Is it a genetic oddity that you suffer from? Or does it run in the family?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Awww. I guess we can take that as "no" that you can't find any instances of any of those people supporting the positions you claim. 

You don't seem to understand the assignment even. Reading is fundamental!

 

He was talking about you. Before you make such claims you should be aware of the assignment and read for comprehension. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yes, they faked CIA reports. Yes, they lied on whistleblower reports. It is documented. Your willful ìgnorance be damned. 

Those are false claims. You've been proven wrong multiple times, but you just memory-hole that and keep repeating your Twitter "facts." 

 

Quote

Yeah. But line cooks are talking about food. Comey was clearly talking about a president with (at the time) two assassination attempts. Two more have occurred since. Go figure. Two attempts that both said they were driven by all the rhetoric that every liberal espoused on here and every social networking site. His picture was defended by you people and that, along with all your other lies and rhetoric, drove 2 more idìots to the point of trying to kill Trump. I


And two impeachments. And a growing case for the 25th amendment. Which is exactly the sentiment. 

It's not the rhetoric driving people to extremes with Trump. It's Trumps extremity driving people to extremes. Extremism begets extremism. The crazies get triggered. 

You want people to stop calling Trump a fascist, how about you convince Trump to stop behaving as a fascist? -- The criticism of his bad behavior is not the problem. 

 

Quote

t has to stop somewhere. We chose here. 

He is one of yours because he is as inflicted with TDS as anyone. 

 

Tìt

For

Tat.

Deal with it.

Keep your tits and tats to yourself. This is not a "both sides" issue. There is only one party trying to prosecute people for jokes and photos of seashells. Only one party corrupting the justice system to stifle political speech. 

Quote

The problem we have is that you people have decided that political violence is an acceptable tool. You have used the judicial system as a weapon. You have violated all of the principles of our republic. All in the pursuit of power. 

You're projecting. Pure nonsense. Trump's behavior is unprecedented because it's unprecedented. 

Quote

I will admit that Comey probably gets out of this because of Brandburg. But the process is the punishment and that is the new political standard that you set. Deal with it. 

They will not need Brandenburg. They will not need to defend a right to "hate speech." Nobody believes it's a threat in the first place. It's overwhelming likely that it will be dismissed as vindictive prosecution. No self respecting judge will take this seriously. 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

He was talking about you. Before you make such claims you should be aware of the assignment and read for comprehension. 



I said persons XYZ are operating on principles and values. 
He replied, "values such as." 

So, if he was talking about me that's quite the non-sequitur. He also did not offer any instance of me supporting such positions. I suspect he's just a little senile. 

Try to keep up. 

Edited by Hodad
Posted
14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Well this is typical.

Just goes to show...traitors will deny their own senses in order to achieve national collapse.

Boy ur dumb. Is it a genetic oddity that you suffer from? Or does it run in the family?

I think you've just given up on trying to make sense. Really leaning into the word-salad approach, eh? 
 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? 

*sigh* Which great American University did you learn reading comprehension at?

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Awww. I guess we can take that as "no" that you can't find any instances of any of those people supporting the positions you claim. 

You don't seem to understand the assignment even. Reading is fundamental!

Hilarious...well congarats there Libbie. Once again, you aim...fire...and realize your powder's all wet.

46 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I said persons XYZ are operating on principles and values. 
He replied, "values such as." 

So, if he was talking about me that's quite the non-sequitur. 

Try to keep up. 

You remind me of a time in Jr. High when I asked a buddy why he kept inviting this rather odd person, fishing with us. His answer was, "Someone has to be his friend."

Yes...Dingaling...I was talking about you and Libbies in general. You dont have "principles"...unless you classify wanton destruction a "principle"...

But now...I gotta go help a friend with something and then watch the Blue Jays and Red Sox play ball.

Do have a warm and fuzzy day...

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Those are false claims. You've been proven wrong multiple times, but you just memory-hole that and keep repeating your Twitter "facts." 

Proven wrong? There is a flipping email that says "Hey Mr. CIA director, you should write that report the way the President said. -Love Chief of staff" 

 

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

And two impeachments. And a growing case for the 25th amendment. Which is exactly the sentiment. 

It's not the rhetoric driving people to extremes with Trump. It's Trumps extremity driving people to extremes. Extremism begets extremism. The crazies get triggered. 

And you believe that js true because of the rhetoric. 

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Keep your tits and tats to yourself. This is not a "both sides" issue. There is only one party trying to prosecute people for jokes and photos of seashells. Only one party corrupting the justice system to stifle political speech. 

Oh bullshit. Then why is Fanny Willis running away from her role? 

 

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

You're projecting. Pure nonsense. Trump's behavior is unprecedented because it's unprecedented. 

It's a reaction. It is all a reaction. We voted for Trump because you people have been making false claims of racism et. al. We need someone to fight back. And we got it. Now, you people are escalating. So we will do the same. You wanted a war. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, West said:

Trump has no affiliation with the Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiterpartei in Germany. There has been an effort through groups like the SPLC to tie him to a party where no such connections exist while simultaneously calling for his assassination and/or serious physical and financial harm by an affiliated group of people.

No REASON to believe ^THIS OPIONION. Esp NOT if you heard it on FOS LIES.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...such a lyin', hypocritical, pansie-ass traitor.

Yes YOU ARE dropout.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? 

All ^LIES. You have ZERO EVIDENCE of "inviting" ANYONE. No DEM OFFICIAL "defunding and attacking law enforcement"

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You are a traitor. Plain and simple.

You don't know the meaning of the word HERE, dropout.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...