Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, herbie said:

Why would you assume anyone asking that question would be a leftist?
Why aren't you snivelling about NASA and their DEI politics as per usual?

Because as a general rule, Libbies "use" race as a weapon. For example, voter ID. Or DEI. Both are so obviously racist in nature.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, herbie said:

Why would you assume anyone asking that question would be a leftist?
Why aren't you snivelling about NASA and their DEI politics as per usual?

I didn't say the reporter was a leftist. 

I don't believe NASA said they HAVE to have a minority on the team. It seems to me that these astronauts have been with NASA for decades. They've earned their positions. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I didn't say the reporter was a leftist. 

I don't believe NASA said they HAVE to have a minority on the team. It seems to me that these astronauts have been with NASA for decades. They've earned their positions. 

They're just warping reality to suit their hatred.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

They're just warping reality to suit their hatred.

Ain't that the truth.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, herbie said:

Why would you assume anyone asking that question would be a leftist?
Why aren't you snivelling about NASA and their DEI politics as per usual?

Wait for it... 

Posted
1 hour ago, John Stone said:

........... curious about what it's like playing 'hide the weiner' in zero gravity! 

Rumor is 'it' is on the list, 'to do'. 

Pay Bezos for the chance. 

1 hour ago, Barquentine said:

Tell Pete Hegseth that.

He already knows it.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Because as a general rule, Libbies "use" race as a weapon. For example, voter ID. Or DEI. Both are so obviously racist in nature.

You mean as a general rule, you SAY that they do.
But enough let's drop the left/right BS in regards to space science/ Even if Trump wants to cut $4.5 billion next year from NASA's budget it's not a left/right issue it's just a shitty decision.

Discuss the science.
Like leaving out a couple lunar orbits done because they were so far behind schedule the had to go with what they had just to DO something to show some progress to the public?
Would including dropping off a far side lander and relay satellite have added to the value of the mission?

Posted
15 hours ago, herbie said:

Why would you assume anyone asking that question would be a leftist?
Why aren't you snivelling about NASA and their DEI politics as per usual?

Because folks like you are the racists obsessed with race.

6 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Tell Pete Hegseth that.

Why? 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

Because folks like you are the racists obsessed with race.

The forum imbecile insists on polluting every single thread with his ad hominem blabber. If you can't address the subject at hand because you don't know shit about it then STFU and let the frown ups talk.

What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? 🤣

Posted
21 minutes ago, herbie said:

You mean as a general rule, you SAY that they do.
But enough let's drop the left/right BS in regards to space science/ Even if Trump wants to cut $4.5 billion next year from NASA's budget it's not a left/right issue it's just a shitty decision.

Discuss the science.
Like leaving out a couple lunar orbits done because they were so far behind schedule the had to go with what they had just to DO something to show some progress to the public?
Would including dropping off a far side lander and relay satellite have added to the value of the mission?

The science? Ok.

I would say the approach is appropriate because they are test-flying a new capsule. New rockets too.

Check it out...report on things like response...life support...you know...the details.

That's how science works best. Call it "babysteps " if you must but...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
19 minutes ago, herbie said:

The forum imbecile insists on polluting every single thread with his ad hominem blabber. If you can't address the subject at hand because you don't know shit about it then STFU and let the frown ups talk.

What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? 🤣

Um, the day you start caring about personal attacks, staying on topic, or general decorum, let me know, because you need to start with your own behavior on here.

My comment was on the subject. You asked an ignorant question, I gave you the answer.

 

 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Call it "babysteps " if you must

True 'nuff. After 50+ years waiting, one forgets it took 8 Apollo shots to get to the same place.....

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 4/3/2026 at 12:53 AM, herbie said:

Why aren't you snivelling about NASA and their DEI politics as per usual?

This is why Herb.

16 hours ago, herbie said:

But enough let's drop the left/right BS in regards to space science

Now ya got the idea...

16 hours ago, herbie said:

STFU and let the frown ups talk.

Shhhhh. The "frown ups" have the floor and they can't quite see your equity card. Go stand on the roof with it.

Posted
On 4/2/2026 at 9:53 PM, herbie said:

Why would you assume anyone asking that question would be a leftist?

Because leftists are race baiting racists. I'd have thought this was obvious, even to a race hustler like you. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It's only obvious to someone so stubborn they simply refuse to observe the world they live in and learn different.
Anyone could ask how the choice of a crew was made. Usually by needed skills and seniority in the program, often to stir public interest.

Posted
3 hours ago, herbie said:

It's only obvious to someone so stubborn they simply refuse to observe the world they live in and learn different.
Anyone could ask how the choice of a crew was made. Usually by needed skills and seniority in the program, often to stir public interest.

Except that was not the question asked. 

 

 

 

Posted
On 4/3/2026 at 3:54 PM, User said:
On 4/3/2026 at 9:21 AM, Barquentine said:

Tell Pete Hegseth that.

Why? 

 

 

Because he's an unqualified, racist, sexist dumbass

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-intervened-military-promotions-dozen-senior-officers-rcna266062

Hegseth blocked three Marine officers who were expected to be promoted or appointed to new roles — two women and a Black man — according to five of the U.S. officials familiar with the decision. None of the Marines were the subjects of internal investigations that might raise concerns about moving forward with their promotions,

Posted
5 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Because he's an unqualified, racist, sexist dumbass

Nothing you posted backs up calling him a racist or sexist. 
 

What are the qualifications for his position he doesn’t meet? 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Barquentine said:

 

 

Because he's an unqualified, racist, sexist dumbass

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-intervened-military-promotions-dozen-senior-officers-rcna266062

Hegseth blocked three Marine officers who were expected to be promoted or appointed to new roles — two women and a Black man — according to five of the U.S. officials familiar with the decision. None of the Marines were the subjects of internal investigations that might raise concerns about moving forward with their promotions,

Reality:

Pete Hegseth has intervened in military promotions for more than a dozen senior officers

He is targeting people that were Biden era policy defenders as well. Over 12 (12 is a dozen) and because 3 might be in a class you want to cry about does not make his actions racist or sexist. It just makes you a dumbasṣ for not checking for the whole story and believing the liberal lies that the legacy media give you. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Reality:

Pete Hegseth has intervened in military promotions for more than a dozen senior officers

He is targeting people that were Biden era policy defenders as well. Over 12 (12 is a dozen) and because 3 might be in a class you want to cry about does not make his actions racist or sexist. It just makes you a dumbasṣ for not checking for the whole story and believing the liberal lies that the legacy media give you. 

It is amazing how they never give us the full statistics. There are tons of promotions going on for women and black people... did Hegseth stop them all? No. Of course not. Yet, he is a racist or sexist because he intervened in whatever small percentage he did?

Was he a racist or sexist for firing the white member of the Joint Chiefs this last week?! OOPS, guess not, he was white! There goes the narrative. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...