Which part of science is most important to you?

[SkyHigh]

7 hours ago, Deluge said:

And I asked you which science is most important to you. 

See, that poll is also a jab at you guys. I know CRT, climate change as you push it, and the rest of that shit isn't science. I just wanted to see where you leftoids stood, and as predicted, none of you voted. 

So once again, what part of science is most important to you? 

 

I clearly answered that question when i said the only important part of science is the methodology that produces objective and reliable results and yes i didn't answer your poll because there was no science in it.

Again all you have is political rhetoric, you agreed on almost every point i made, so if I'm a leftiod so are you 

Now either debunk the 3 scientific statements i made using the scientific method or just admit you don't care about the science and just want to spout your political nonsense 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, SkyHigh said:

I clearly answered that question when i said the only important part of science is the methodology that produces objective and reliable results and yes i didn't answer your poll because there was no science in it.

 

That doesn't sound very true to be honest.  But lets see. 

So - pick a subject that's been a political issue and give an example of 'science' as you've defined it that you care about and informs your decisions. 

I have a funny feeling you won't, but prove me wrong. It would be nice to experience something new  

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

That doesn't sound very true to be honest.  But lets see. 

So - pick a subject that's been a political issue and give an example of 'science' as you've defined it that you care about and informs your decisions. 

I have a funny feeling you won't, but prove me wrong. It would be nice to experience something new  

Read my original post and my 3 scientific claims, debunk if you can 

[Deluge]

5 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

I clearly answered that question when i said the only important part of science is the methodology that produces objective and reliable results and yes i didn't answer your poll because there was no science in it.

Again all you have is political rhetoric, you agreed on almost every point i made, so if I'm a leftiod so are you 

Now either debunk the 3 scientific statements i made using the scientific method or just admit you don't care about the science and just want to spout your political nonsense 

 

Look, I get that you are desperate to make this a teaching moment, but it isn't going to happen. 

I undersand how critical scientific method is to science, so it's safe to conclude that saying scientific method is your favorite part of science is the same as sayiing science is your favorite part of science - it's redundant, therefore it's irrelevant to this poll. 

Judging by your responses, it's fair to say that the last option on this poll is where you reside. 

Edited March 30 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Read my original post and my 3 scientific claims, debunk if you can 

You offered zero examples of science in your original post. You simply made statements and claims most of which aren't actually accurate. 

For example you state that With regards to gender studies, gender is a social construct

That has been found to be false by numerous scientific studies and has been written about in a number of papers. While social or external factors can play a role there's no doubt it's not a 'social construct'

Here's one for example, chosen just because it's got some interesting points but there's real science out there as well. 

Time to Move Beyond "Gender Is Socially Constructed" | Psychology Today Canada

 

So.  Right off the bat you've demonstrated that i WAS correct and you are NOT basing your opinions on science at all. Further, you are not even TRYING to present any science to back up your claims.  You simply decide what you would LIKE to be true and then claim it as science. 

You then go on to climate change as your 'big example'.  

Yet you present NO science. Zero. Not even a scrap. 

what you do is an old debate trick where you ask questions in a manner that suggests anyone who answers no is automatically wrong. There's no actual attempt to seek information, there's no attempt at debate, and there is CERTAINLY no science involved. 

 

So it looks like you're kind of dishonest person that I suspected you were when I mde my original post and you offering your first post as an example simply demonstrates that fact nicely

I will give you one chance to redeem yourself now that you've exposed yourself as being utterly the opposite of science driven.

Going back to climate change, climate change is often presented as being both a crisis and something that we hear in Canada can do something substantial about.

Assuming you agree with these statements please provide the scientific documentation that supports this kind of claim.

And I do mean the science. Not just a website that claims that there's a science that exists somewhere. And you'll note that I very deliberately used language That was open enough that I won't be pinning you down on semantics.

Last chance to prove that you have some interest in science before becoming yet another example of someone who leans left but absolutely does not allow science to impact their thinking at all

Edited March 30 by CdnFox

[User]

23 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

1 Gender studies, gender is a social construct, the complete opposite of Objective,       

Um... gender is not a social construct. "roles" are a social construct and the folks pushing the trans madness want to conflate these things so they can pretend some dude who thinks he is a woman, is a woman, and we should all go along with calling him one too. 

That is what the trans madness folks claim now, so they can reconcile calling some dude a woman. It completely falls apart as soon as you ask them to define what a woman is. 

So, can you define what a woman is in any meaningful way? 

That is objective. Sex is objective. And up until about 5 minutes ago for all of human history sex/gender were objective. 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, User said:

Um... gender is not a social construct. "roles" are a social construct and the folks pushing the trans madness want to conflate these things so they can pretend some dude who thinks he is a woman, is a woman, and we should all go along with calling him one too. 

That is what the trans madness folks claim now, so they can reconcile calling some dude a woman. It completely falls apart as soon as you ask them to define what a woman is. 

So, can you define what a woman is in any meaningful way? 

That is objective. Sex is objective. And up until about 5 minutes ago for all of human history sex/gender were objective. 

 

Quite true, gener isn't a social construct. While external influences can play a role it's without a doubt also due to biology and other internal factors. 

You should read the link in my reply to him. It's got a very interesting point,  "If gender is a social construct then it CANNOT be said to be inherent or unique to the individual, and therefore is a choice" essentially.  That's why they argue it can't be that way and that really shoots that arguemnt down: if it's true it's a social construct then it's got nothing to do with the individual (so why would we treat it as an individual right)

Edited March 30 by CdnFox

[LinkSoul60]

On 3/27/2026 at 10:49 AM, Deluge said:

Don't be a dishonest piece of shit, comrade. The question you need to be asking is "Isn't peace and quiet the last thing you've had since the democrats opened the borders, shoved DEI down America's throat, and spent the last decade trying to wreck your choice for President?" To which my reply would be "Why yes, LS60, you seem to truly understand the plight of good Americans."

 

You have, and will have a lot more important things to deal with than DEI thanks to your guy.  Incredible what one guy can do in such a short amount of time.  You're slowly imploding while cheering him on along the way... 

[Nationalist]

34 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You have, and will have a lot more important things to deal with than DEI thanks to your guy.  Incredible what one guy can do in such a short amount of time.  You're slowly imploding while cheering him on along the way... 

And this blank comment has...what to do with the subject of this thread?

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You have, and will have a lot more important things to deal with than DEI thanks to your guy.  Incredible what one guy can do in such a short amount of time.  You're slowly imploding while cheering him on along the way... 

DEI is a civilization wrecking belief system, so it's stupid of you to say such a thing. Besides, it's not just DEI - it's also open borders (which would end this country even faster than DEI), and it's open season on influential conservatives like Charlie Kirk. You're into climate scare, abortion, high taxes, burgeoning government... the list would go on and on until everyone killed each other. 

Leftism is cancer, period. 

Edited March 30 by Deluge

[Deluge]

Oh, and this is what it looks like when you have a president trying to reverse all the filth and corruption of the previous administration. It's not pretty, but it's necessary. 

Edited March 30 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

39 minutes ago, Deluge said:

DEI is a civilization wrecking belief system, so it's stupid of you to say such a thing. Besides, it's not just DEI - it's also open borders (which would end this country even faster than DEI), and it's open season on influential conservatives like Charlie Kirk. You're into climate scare, abortion, high taxes, burgeoning government... the list would go on and on until everyone killed each other. 

Leftism is cancer, period. 

The idea of DEI is that it will somehow 'level the playing field' 

But it does not. It drags everyone down to the lowest common denominator. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The idea of DEI is that it will somehow 'level the playing field' 

But it does not. It drags everyone down to the lowest common denominator. 

It's a trojan horse.

These cultists want to spread the third world over the rest of the planet. 

[Deluge]

You don't want to be a racist, do you? So find a spot in the street and plant your white a$$ in it. Pushers will be along shortly to get you high. 

-- The left

[Legato]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The idea of DEI is that it will somehow 'level the playing field' 

But it does not. It drags everyone down to the lowest common denominator. 

Welcome to the current Union mentality, the hive mentality and any other mentality the left tries to force.

For evidence take a gander at the current NDP.

[LinkSoul60]

On 3/29/2026 at 8:26 AM, Nationalist said:

Do you really think that @Deluge, or anyone for that matter, is somehow bound psychologically to Trump?

Yes, I think that's fairly obvious.

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And this blank comment has...what to do with the subject of this thread?

It had to do with replying to Delugional.   Why so defensive when Trump is mentioned... 

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

DEI is a civilization wrecking belief system, so it's stupid of you to say such a thing. Besides, it's not just DEI - it's also open borders (which would end this country even faster than DEI), and it's open season on influential conservatives like Charlie Kirk. You're into climate scare, abortion, high taxes, burgeoning government... the list would go on and on until everyone killed each other. 

Leftism is cancer, period. 

This is why the phycological science of how some minds work is interesting... 

[CdnFox]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

This is why the phycological science of how some minds work is interesting... 

The psychological science of how your mind doesn't work is absolutely fascinating in my opinion  

[Deluge]

22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, I think that's fairly obvious.

Easy, comrade, I've been making the same observations about you degenerates since before Trump got into politics. You're talking out of the left's ass.  

Edited March 30 by Deluge

[Deluge]

20 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It had to do with replying to Delugional.   Why so defensive when Trump is mentioned... 

Why pounce like an addict the second you see a Trump thread....

We know the answer of course. 

Trump. Derangement. Syndrome.  

14 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

This is why the phycological science of how some minds work is interesting... 

TDS has you cultists saying the stupidest things... 

Edited March 30 by Deluge

[LinkSoul60]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The psychological science of how your mind doesn't work is absolutely fascinating in my opinion  

I've given up on trying to figure out yours...  

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I've given up on trying to figure out yours...  

That's because you're missing 60 links, maybe more.  

[LinkSoul60]

On 3/27/2026 at 12:52 PM, User said:

Well, you are certainly a prisoner of your spiteful hatred of Trump. 

You mean my strong dislike for....   Appears that there are a lot more joining the team day by day.

[Deluge]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

You mean my strong dislike for....   Appears that there are a lot more joining the team day by day.

Millions and millions are joining, every second! 

-- The Overlords.