Political Smash Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 In recent years liars have begun attempting to spin their factually exposed foundations of lies as what these liars are now call ideology, of course to try and help these sick and pathetic liars get away with continuing to force their factually exposed foundations of lies upon citizens under the guise of ideology. Lies are what lead to war and divide, to violence and chaos yet here we have CSIS standing in the side of compulsive obsessive lying deceiving liberals by claiming such rhetoric as it’s not the liars and deceivers (lgbt) that are the problem, Now CSIS openly lies to you claiming that anti liars / anti lgbt groups are the threat to national security. This is a group of liars lying to you while attempting to deceive you then claiming you getting angry with their factually exposed foundations of lies is what the problem is while they poison and even destroy your children's lives while turning you against them over factually exposed foundations of lies This is like someone punching you in the face then claims you getting angry is what the problem is. This is someone lying to you then claiming you not willing to go along with their lies is what the problem is. This is what the Liberals do, this is what the NDP do, this is what the WEF does and this is what the lgbt does and now this is what CSIS does thus proving to be a threat to Canada’s national security. Furthermore they attempt to carry on like standing with facts (facts are not ideology, facts are not lies, facts are not believed, facts are either recognized or ignored) that expose sick and pathetic lies now being perpetuated under the guise of ideology as a radical right wing ideology which is clearly a lie because standing with fact is not ideology. So here we have the WEF using our officials (MP's etc.) and media to perpetuate National security threatening lies (in this instance lgbt lies) under the guise of ideology which all crumbles when pit vs. fact, and they do it because lies lead to war and divide just like the WEF has done to several Western civilizations around the world simultaneously in recent decades which is factual evidence of not mere theory but actual conspiracy unfolding on international levels which means that the WEF and all of their so called co conspirators such as the officials of Canada posing a direct threat to Canada's National security by conspiring with the WEF and their sick agenda should be behind bars. Instead they have even dumbed down CSIS to go along with their sick and filthy lies and deceptions which reveals CSIS intelligence rating had dropped to the pathetic regressive mentality that the Liberal party of Canada has exemplified over the past ten years. You want to get rid of threats to Canada's National security then criminalize the lies that lead to war, divide, violence and chaos instead of claiming the obvious lie that wanting to get rid of the factually exposed foundations of lies is a threat to national security. Things have gotten so absurd that now CSIS has become insane enough to lower itself to perpetuate lies that quite obviously pose the threat to national security while further lying by claiming that standing with fact against such lies is a mere ideology and is the threat to our national security. Political parties have been infiltrated and conspire with the WEF against the citizens of Canada, Canadian media has been infiltrated and conspire against the citizens of Canada, Institutions like schools and government offices have been infiltrated and conspire against the citizens of Canada under threat of tax dollar funding being cut off by a party that caters to conspiring with the WEF against the citizens of Canada, CSIS has obviously been infiltrated and now works with those conspiring with the WEF against the citizens of Canada. Being all of these have been infiltrated and are being used to conspire against the citizens of Canada, what makes you think that elections Canada hasn't been infiltrated and used to hand the most corrupt political party in Canada's history a so called elected victory?!! Sad to see that the last thing I pinched and flushed has more brain cells then all of CSIS combined. CSIS intellect rating just fell through the toilet and now pose a threat to Canada's National security. Gender identity driven violence is caused by liars and deceivers lying to and deceiving citizens while the government perpetuates such rubbish deliberately. To stop this you criminalize the LGBT, remove all of their lies and deceptions from legislation and policy across the country and thus without the lies and deceptions being used to treat citizens like garbage , while attempting to make a complete mockery of our country as well use such lies and deceptions to try and force oppression upon the general public all of this will be gone and properly resolved, Like I have been sharing for decades, such sick behavior is not acceptable. Think, it is pretty simple. What is the threat to Canada's national security, forcing lies upon the public or standing with fact to remove such lies from being thrust upon the public? Is the threat to Canada's National security destroying our children's ability to reproduce, or is it protecting our children from a sick and disgusting agenda?!! It's a no brainer. love Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist David Jeffrey Spetch Ps. Be good, be strong! Ontario Canada 2 Quote
Political Smash Posted February 19 Author Report Posted February 19 I will add and very important, If you are human and have a physical body then you are binary no matter what liars feed you. 2 Quote
John Johnston Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 Dude. You need to get a job or a hobby or something. 2 Quote
ExFlyer Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 9 minutes ago, John Johnston said: Dude. You need to get a job or a hobby or something. Every once in a while he forgets to put on his tin foil hat LOL 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
John Johnston Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 1 minute ago, ExFlyer said: Every once in a while he forgets to put on his tin foil hat LOL Or maybe not smoke the whole bag in one sitting. 1 Quote
Queenmandy85 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 The OP, in my uneducated opinion, may contain some markers for schizophrenia. 1 1 Quote A Conservative stands for God, King and Country
Moonbox Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 He's literally a homeless guy pointing on the keyboard and blaming everyone else for his problems. I suspect drugs have been involved at one point or another. To him, he's living in tents and on benches because of his political martyrdom. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
herbie Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 (edited) Just cuz he's schizoid doesn't mean the WEF isn't really out to GET him.... Edited February 19 by herbie Quote
John Johnston Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 4 hours ago, herbie said: Just cuz he's schizoid doesn't mean the WEF isn't really out to GET him.... Lol. Thanks for the visual. :( Quote
Political Smash Posted February 19 Author Report Posted February 19 7 hours ago, John Johnston said: Dude. You need to get a job or a hobby or something. 7 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Every once in a while he forgets to put on his tin foil hat LOL 7 hours ago, John Johnston said: Or maybe not smoke the whole bag in one sitting. 5 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said: The OP, in my uneducated opinion, may contain some markers for schizophrenia. 5 hours ago, Moonbox said: He's literally a homeless guy pointing on the keyboard and blaming everyone else for his problems. I suspect drugs have been involved at one point or another. To him, he's living in tents and on benches because of his political martyrdom. 4 hours ago, herbie said: Just cuz he's schizoid doesn't mean the WEF isn't really out to GET him.... 17 minutes ago, John Johnston said: Lol. Thanks for the visual. :( Notice not one of these WEF sock puppets has anything relevant to share to do with the foundation of this issue, instead they desperately scramble to try and make their pathetic delusions of me the issue. This is like shooting blind fish in a barrel with a nuclear bomb. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 Governments choosing to ignore warnings from CSIS, such as Chinese interference , is certainly a threat to our national security. 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
Political Smash Posted February 20 Author Report Posted February 20 (edited) 4 hours ago, ironstone said: Governments choosing to ignore warnings from CSIS, such as Chinese interference , is certainly a threat to our national security. and now they control CSIS and yeah separate issue. These LGBT and Liberals are sick and Canadian citizens haters, even innocent little children are placed in danger while these sickos remain free to roam thanks to Liberal and NDP scum primarily check this: Edited February 20 by Political Smash Quote
Political Smash Posted February 20 Author Report Posted February 20 4 hours ago, ironstone said: Governments choosing to ignore warnings from CSIS, such as Chinese interference , is certainly a threat to our national security. and yes, anyone who conspires with the WEF against the citizens of Canada (Liberals & NDP) are a threat to Canada's National Security. Quote
herbie Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 4 hours ago, Political Smash said: Notice not one of these WEF sock puppets has anything relevant to share Sock puppets not losing sleep over WEF "controlling" our $1500 stock portfolios.... more concerned there's no one making ppl like you take your meds.... 1 Quote
Queenmandy85 Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 13 hours ago, Political Smash said: and yes, anyone who conspires with the WEF against the citizens of Canada (Liberals & NDP) are a threat to Canada's National Security. What is your issue with the WEF, an international organization working to maintain international economic stability? You also referred to the LGBT community but you did not specify what the problem is. 1 Quote A Conservative stands for God, King and Country
Moonbox Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 19 hours ago, Political Smash said: Notice not one of these WEF sock puppets has anything relevant to share to do with the foundation of this issue Nobody's interested in engaging with you. It's the same reason nobody wants to talk to the homeless guys screaming on the street. If you want to rant into empty air, go start a blog or something. I'm sure you'll get at least zero followers. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ExFlyer Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 Months after Canada’s federal election, the funding sources for some prominent third-party advertisers remain a mystery. Experts say the political influencers are increasingly finding ways to sidestep election advertising regulations, and in some cases strategically choosing non-compliance. “Between the comparatively low penalties, the lengthiness of the process, it doesn't necessarily encourage compliance, especially if you're a third party that is already antagonistic to this approach that we have to regulating third party finance,” said Andrea Lawlor, an associate professor in the political science department at McMaster University. In the week before the 2025 federal election was called, third-party advertiser Canada Strong and Proud, also known as Proud to be Canadian, spent between $185,000 and $267,000 on 584 Facebook and Instagram ads promoting Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre and opposing Prime Minister Mark Carney, according to data from the Meta Ad Library. When Parliament was dissolved on March 23, officially kicking off the campaign period during which partisan ads are regulated as political activities, Canada Strong and Proud suspended its campaign. Elections Canada requires registered third-party advertisers to report information on expenses and contributions for three periods during an election: 21 days before the election, a week before the election and a final return due within four months after election day. Canada Strong and Proud filed only the second interim financial return, which reports a total of $750 received from two named contributors and just over $2,000 in expenses, primarily for unspecified partisan activities carried out by its network of regional groups, including Alberta Proud, Quebec Fier and Ontario Strong. The group also received $3,175 from anonymous contributors who gave $200 or less. Heading into the final two weeks of the election campaign, Canada Strong and Proud restarted its online ad blitz, spending between $212,600 and $290,782 on hundreds of Facebook and Instagram ads. Meta logs information about ads related to social issues, elections and politics, providing a record of Canada Strong and Proud’s activity on Meta platforms. It is not known whether the group engaged in other types of advertising or spending on other platforms. Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch, said the example of Canada Strong and Proud highlights several loopholes third parties can use to maximize their influence and minimize transparency. “One of the problems is not having to report donors under $200. You could say it's a small problem, but if you have a corporation wanting to funnel money to a third party and not ever have it disclosed, you funnel it through your employees, each giving $199,” he said. There is also no legislative requirement for third parties to identify the sources of funds for their contributors, he said. During the 2019 federal election, the Manning Centre, now known as the Canada Strong and Free Network, raised and donated more than $300,000 to Canada Strong and Proud and its affiliates, which in turn “only disclosed the Manning Centre as the sole source of the funds.” Disclosures from the 2021 federal election show that Canada Strong and Proud received more than $78,000 from the oil and gas industry advocacy group the Modern Miracle Network. Along with getting financial support from the Canada Strong and Free Network and the Modern Miracle Network, previous reporting from the IJF found overlap between the members of all three organizations. ‘DARK MONEY PROBLEM IN CANADA’ Though many third parties are active year-round, Elections Canada’s financial disclosure requirements only apply during an election period, which lasts between 37 days and 51 days, when an election doesn’t take place on a fixed date. “There's no pre-election disclosure or registration,” Conacher said. “So, we actually have a worse dark money problem in Canada than they do in the U.S.” “We don't regulate spending in between elections and have any disclosures. “Whereas in the U.S. during election year, they do actually have that disclosure,” he said. Canada Strong and Proud spent up to $581,044 on political ads placed on Meta platforms in 2025. Only about $290,000 was spent during the official federal campaign period and is subject to reporting requirements. To date, the sources of just $750 in contributions have been disclosed to Elections Canada. Elections Canada told the IJF that Canada Strong and Proud was granted an extension for its final campaign return, but the return was not received by the Sept. 29 due date. “When a third party or other political entity isn’t compliant with their reporting obligations under the Canada Elections Act, Elections Canada can refer the case to the Commissioner of Canada Elections, who is responsible for ensuring that the Act is complied with and enforced,” a spokesperson for Elections Canada said. The Commissioner has the power to investigate whether the Act was contravened and use enforcement measures like administrative monetary penalties or compliance agreements. Elections Canada said it does not comment on specific referrals, but added that where an entity's non-compliance is clear, such as reporting obligations not being met, it is “very likely that the case would be referred.” Canada Strong and Proud did not respond to requests for comment. ALBERTA PROUD’S GONDEK CAMPAIGN In the Calgary municipal election campaign in October, Alberta Proud registered with Elections Calgary as a third-party advertiser and spent up to $21,410 on 90 Facebook and Instagram ads opposing former mayor Jyoti Gondek. The group has yet to file any contribution or spending disclosures for its activities during the local election. The first disclosure covering the period between May 1 and July 31 was due Oct. 1. Third parties that fail to file a required report by the deadline must pay a $500 fine, according to Alberta’s laws governing local elections. Additional penalties may apply if the Election Commissioner finds they are guilty of an offence. Records from Calgary’s 2021 election show the group received $40,000 from just six corporate donors, all development or construction companies. ‘A PRETTY LOW COST TO PAY FOR INFLUENCING AN ELECTION’ Most non-criminal violations of federal elections rules are enforced through compliance agreements and administrative monetary penalties. On the low end, this might mean agreeing to turn over missing financial documents and pledging to not repeat the offence. Other violations, including those related to third parties and political financing, may come with baseline administrative monetary penalties ranging from $50 to a maximum of $1,500 for individuals and $5,000 for a corporation or an entity. Lawlor said that for someone opposed to the limits on political activity imposed by Elections Canada, the perceived benefit of non-compliance may outweigh the repercussions. “The respective penalties are not very onerous. And perhaps even more to the point, the process of having Elections Canada or an elections management body review these files and give the party a chance to respond and a chance to comply, these are actually quite lengthy processes, so you can really draw it out,” she said. The Commissioner of Canada Elections has published 16 administrative monetary penalties in 2026, all for violations committed in 2023 or earlier. Several were for violations that occurred during the 2021 federal election. Conacher suggested that introducing a sliding scale of penalties based on income would be one way to deter abuses of political financing and influence regulations. “You're not going to discourage the multi-billion-dollar corporation with a $5,000 fine,” or an individual billionaire with a maximum fine of $1,500, he said. “That's a pretty low cost to pay for influencing an election. Because the upside is getting the party in power that you want in power, which is a huge benefit.” Brett McKay, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Edmonton-based reporter specializing in investigative and data-driven stories. His work has appeared in The Tyee, APTN, The Breach, CTV News and Great West Media. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.