CdnFox Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 17 hours ago, Hodad said: Unequal behavior--particularly bad behavior--begets unequal coverage. That's normal. Nope. An unbiased media does not determine what is equal and unequal behavior, the report equally on similar events All you've done is proven you're bias Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 27 Author Report Posted January 27 (edited) 4 hours ago, Legato said: A post decrying insults ending with an insult...well done. 10/5=2...Well looky, there's a division sign. So you have zero insight into a divide by zero problem, thought not. And here's a slash zero for your perusal.....ø Mmhumm. In standard mathematics and real number systems, the operation of dividing any number 𝑎 by zero (𝑎/0) is considered undefined. I think, in the mist of your anger, you've forgotten this threads topic. Focus, Einstein. Edited January 27 by CrakHoBarbie Quote
Legato Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 25 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Mmhumm. In standard mathematics and real number systems, the operation of dividing any number 𝑎 by zero (𝑎/0) is considered undefined. I think, in the mist of your anger, you've forgotten this threads topic. Focus, Einstein. Again not angry, just mildly amused by robo's apparent TDS and you inserting your butt. If you had taken the trouble to investigate past the AI you would find the actual answer. This can be either a positive or equal negative value of something which is? Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 27 Author Report Posted January 27 5 minutes ago, Legato said: Again not angry, just mildly amused by robo's apparent TDS and you inserting your butt. If you had taken the trouble to investigate past the AI you would find the actual answer. This can be either a positive or equal negative value of something which is? OK. I concede the point. Now, would you like to get back to the topic at hand? Or, would you like to continue pivoting? Quote
Legato Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 Just now, CrakHoBarbie said: OK. I concede the point. Now, would you like to get back to the topic at hand? Or, would you like to continue pivoting? Ask robo it was his comment. Now as for the pivoting I believe there will be a Maypole winter dance at the local hall, you could try that. 1 Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 27 Author Report Posted January 27 25 minutes ago, Legato said: Ask robo it was his comment. Now as for the pivoting I believe there will be a Maypole winter dance at the local hall, you could try that. Focus Quote
CdnFox Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Mmhumm. Most intelligent thing you've said on this forum Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Hodad Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 9 hours ago, Nationalist said: What nonsense. While it's true that change is harder for most Conservatives, your premise that Conservatives do not want beneficial change is...as I said...nonsense. It was Conservatives that freed the slaves. It was Conservatives that gave women the right to vote. It was a Conservative...Jeannette Rankin...who was the first woman in The House of Representatives. It was a Conservative who put Jackie Robinson on the field. Shall I go on? I can if you want. Please try not lying so blatantly. It only exposes you as a liar...and dishonors your family. ^^This is asinine. You have no knowledge of history. Conservatives did NOT free the slaves. Abolitionists were radically progressive. The entire notion of racial equality--or that Black people were human beings was radical at the time. Conservatives did NOT give women the right to vote. That too was radically progressive. People out on the street protesting for suffrage, were derided by conservatives. The same way you turds deride civil rights protestors today. Jeannette Rankin, a vocal suffragist was in no way a conservative. She was a street-protesting radical and pro-labor advocate. You did get one right though! I think what you really meant to say is "Republican." - Republican's didn't used to be conservative. They were the progressive party. They were literally the party driving reform in the Progressive Era. The parties effectively flipped orientation between the Great Depression and the Civil Rights movement. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, Hodad said: ^^This is asinine. You have no knowledge of history. Conservatives did NOT free the slaves. Abolitionists were radically progressive. The entire notion of racial equality--or that Black people were human beings was radical at the time. Conservatives did NOT give women the right to vote. That too was radically progressive. People out on the street protesting for suffrage, were derided by conservatives. The same way you turds deride civil rights protestors today. Jeannette Rankin, a vocal suffragist was in no way a conservative. She was a street-protesting radical and pro-labor advocate. You did get one right though! I think what you really meant to say is "Republican." - Republican's didn't used to be conservative. They were the progressive party. They were literally the party driving reform in the Progressive Era. The parties effectively flipped orientation between the Great Depression and the Civil Rights movement. Lol...nice try. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 5 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Lol...nice try. Ah, one of your signature "witty" retorts. Jeebus, you're as dumb as they come. Open a book sometime. Also, read it. The Progressive Era Quote
Nationalist Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 10 minutes ago, Hodad said: Ah, one of your signature "witty" retorts. Jeebus, you're as dumb as they come. Open a book sometime. Also, read it. The Progressive Era You were wrong. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: You were wrong. No, you calling radical progressives "conservative" is an oxymoron delivered by a regularmoron. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Hodad said: No, you calling radical progressives "conservative" is an oxymoron delivered by a regularmoron. No. Im call you wrong. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 30 minutes ago, Nationalist said: No. Im call you wrong. Lol. No, you're calling dictionaries and encyclopedias wrong. Jeebus, you know people can see what you post right? Like everyone sees what's happened here? Quote
Nationalist Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 6 minutes ago, Hodad said: Lol. No, you're calling dictionaries and encyclopedias wrong. Jeebus, you know people can see what you post right? Like everyone sees what's happened here? You were wrong. I dont expect you to admit it. Traitors like you are nothing but trash to be swept up and disposed of. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Barquentine Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 20 hours ago, Nationalist said: These people You're gonna have to be way more specific. Quote
User Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 14 hours ago, Hodad said: Lol. No, you're calling dictionaries and encyclopedias wrong. Jeebus, you know people can see what you post right? Like everyone sees what's happened here? Says the coward hiding…. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 17 hours ago, Hodad said: ^^This is asinine. You have no knowledge of history. Conservatives did NOT free the slaves. Abolitionists were radically progressive. They were conservatives. Sorry Quote The entire notion of racial equality--or that Black people were human beings was radical at the time. Raducal for the left in the south. Not conservatives in the north. Quote Conservatives did NOT give women the right to vote. That too was radically progressive. People out on the street protesting for suffrage, were derided by conservatives. The same way you turds deride civil rights protestors today. Nope In canada it was conservative (unionparty) robert borden, in the states many conservatives supported it Quote Jeannette Rankin, a vocal suffragist was in no way a conservative. She was a street-protesting radical and pro-labor advocate. Sorry to break it to you but conservatives do protest. You're wrong across the board as usual Your problem is that if the conservatives do anything you like you claim that they couldn't have possibly done it because you consider it Progressive. And in your mind anything Progressive means it can't possibly be conservative But that's a lie. And it's a lie that twists your mind so badly you cannot even admit the simple truths Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 On 1/26/2026 at 5:35 PM, Nationalist said: I know all I need. You're ANTIFA and eventually the law will catch up to you. There is no law against ANTI-FASCISM, lDIOT. America (and Canada) has been ANTI-FASCIST since Mussolini invented it. Esp after Hitler epitomized it. If you're not ANTI-FASCIST, you're a Hitler sympathizer. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 10 hours ago, robosmith said: There is no law against ANTI-FASCISM, There is when the anti-fascists are actually terrorists in disguise and support fascism which is the case with you. That's why antifa was ruled to be a terrorist organization 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.