Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

America’s ship building capacity has been in terminal decline for some decades. This is vital to securing America’s future in a deglobalized world. War is coming. America need to rearm at war time speed. Trump will be ushering in the golden fleet as the first major rebuilding effort. 
IMG_2837.thumb.jpeg.ecbf15a9acb8204bb0f40f2441fee9db.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, John Stone said:

33 KT 'battleship' is NOT the future. 

Basically a larger target. 

In any case - battleships are def very 'old school' in Naval warfare. 

Speed, maneuverability and low RCS is the way to survive at sea. 

 

The navy did a study and realize that in a modern, near peer, conflict they would be out of missiles quickly. This is why they did not retire the Ticonderoga destroyers with the modern Ddg ships. This is the real reason behind a larger missile barge concept. Also America is a blue water navy. We need range and lethality, requiring larger ships/tonnage. 
 

That being said. Don’t forget the lessons of WWII. Planes beat ships. And the US is unmatched in aviation even with the entire world combined Air Forces. Our planes will blot out the sky.

Consequently, our aerospace industrial complex is world class and healthy. In the event we needed to, America can spit out planes like candy on the assembly line. @ExFlyer

Edited by paxamericana
  • Confused 1
Posted
4 hours ago, paxamericana said:

America’s ship building capacity has been in terminal decline for some decades. This is vital to securing America’s future in a deglobalized world. War is coming. America need to rearm at war time speed. Trump will be ushering in the golden fleet as the first major rebuilding effort. 
IMG_2837.thumb.jpeg.ecbf15a9acb8204bb0f40f2441fee9db.jpeg

Trump and "class" never belong in the same sentence. He is a VULGARIAN.

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

More of the dog-and-pony-show - 

  • "They'll be the fastest, the biggest, and by far 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built," Trump said.

Ha, ha, ha

 

Ever the sales CON MAN.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

The navy did a study and realize that in a modern, near peer, conflict they would be out of missiles quickly. This is why they did not retire the Ticonderoga destroyers with the modern Ddg ships. This is the real reason behind a larger missile barge concept. Also America is a blue water navy. We need range and lethality, requiring larger ships/tonnage. 
 

That being said. Don’t forget the lessons of WWII. Planes beat ships. And the US is unmatched in aviation even with the entire world combined Air Forces. Our planes will blot out the sky.

Consequently, our aerospace industrial complex is world class and healthy. In the event we needed to, America can spit out planes like candy on the assembly line. @ExFlyer

 

The USN is considered the most lethal fighting force in the World - right now! 

To maintain that respect the hulls and  weapons system need to be routinely replaced - it never ends -it's happening now. 

The Trump Class has a weapon suite that on paper, is very impressive and def cutting edge technology........... so cutting edge that some of it is still  R&D.............. doable  for sure, but unproven. 

The rail-gun intrigues me .......... ditto the laser,  anti-missile / drone  defensive  system - ditto the soft kill capability. 

Radars are absolutely cutting edge phased array systems. 

Nuc- capable cruise missiles give it  reach.  

The real choke point is getting it built - American  shipyards don't have the capability - this thing is  huge, revolutionary and would require re-tooling existing shipyards - which are chock-o-block and behind deliveries but also lacking  a work force in  terms of numbers. Not an insurmountable problem - international shipyards could take up the slack. 

A leading-tier Nation,  that needs global reach,  needs number of hulls   - well equipped, trained crews, deployable. 

I have my doubts we'll ever see any of these ships - they don't make any sense, foreign  harbor queen display  notwithstanding. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

IMO...Trump's selling conscription. He's trying to convince people to join his military. 

Ever wonder why the majority of the World's Navy's aren't designed with stealth so much in mind? 

It's because they want a hull that looks impressive in a foreign port. 

A stealth design is arguably the ugliest hull you can imagine ........... intimidation factor = zero.  

Image result for Zumwalt-class destroyer

................ akin to a Tesla ............ also ugly!! 

Tesla Cybertruck is HERE! Photos, Info on the Wildest Pickup Ever ...

Posted
8 hours ago, John Stone said:

33 KT 'battleship' is NOT the future. 

But battleships and tariffs go together in a 1930s brain. Golden Everything is another example of a stuck, stubborn unimaginative mind incapable of learning.
He'll probably want to park his Golden Fleet in neat, tidy rows in the same harbour so people can admire it on Sunday morning outings.           For only a one bar of gold plated latinum entry fee.

Posted
5 hours ago, John Stone said:

Ever wonder why the majority of the World's Navy's aren't designed with stealth so much in mind? 

It's because they want a hull that looks impressive in a foreign port. 

A stealth design is arguably the ugliest hull you can imagine ........... intimidation factor = zero.  

Image result for Zumwalt-class destroyer

................ akin to a Tesla ............ also ugly!! 

Tesla Cybertruck is HERE! Photos, Info on the Wildest Pickup Ever ...

Lol...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
11 hours ago, herbie said:

More like he misread Jason and the Argonauts and thought he had a Golden Fleet.
So he dreamt up more of his usual Golden Fleece.

Truly a decision made in ignorance re: modern Naval warfare - rhetoric. 

The funding for this behemoth could be used far more strategically.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...