User Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 9 minutes ago, Radiorum said: insurrection an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection OK... and? Quote
Radiorum Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 3 minutes ago, Legato said: Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling record of failed, botched, and/or suspect prosecutions against prominent public figures. https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/issues/fact-sheet-jack-smith-a-record-that-speaks-for-itself Oh man, you're citing a far-right think tank? Yeah, sure, they are unbiased. /s Quote
Legato Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 Just now, Radiorum said: Oh man, you're citing a far-right think tank? Yeah, sure, they are unbiased. /s So attack the source and disregard the content, typical shallow thinking. The information given therein is factual and can't be disputed. It's a well known fact Jack Smith's record is highly suspect and vindictive. Quote
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 4 hours ago, John Stone said: no harm no foul. Conspiracy to commit a crime is still a crime even if it FAILED. Quote
User Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 Just now, robosmith said: Conspiracy to commit a crime is still a crime even if it FAILED. And there was no conspiracy to commit a crime here. Quote
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: 315,000 ballots in Georgia is rather serious. How many other states did similar? 18 other states are being sued for voter registration data. Why does the DoJ have to file law suits? I would think these states would be eager to hand over the information so this can finally be put to bed. I mean...if there was no hanky-panky, why not just hand them all over? Because it's PRIVATE data. DoJ is planning to use that date to SUPPRESS THE VOTE. The Federal government plays no role in managing elections, Canuck. 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Online and mail-in ballots are just bad ideas. You have NO EVIDENCE of ^this. Oregon has had successful sole mail in ballots for decades. Find evidence for your lame claims there. Quote
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 32 minutes ago, Legato said: Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling record of failed, botched, and/or suspect prosecutions against prominent public figures. https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/issues/fact-sheet-jack-smith-a-record-that-speaks-for-itself Thanks for proving you're stupid enough to believe gratuitous documents fabricated by Trump's DoJ at HIS COMMAND. We used to have a firewall between POTUS and DoJ to prevent POLITICAL INTERFERENCE. Trump has destroyed that and you completely missed it, CLOWN 20 minutes ago, Legato said: So attack the source and disregard the content, typical shallow thinking. The information given therein is factual and can't be disputed. It's a well known fact Jack Smith's record is highly suspect and vindictive. It is well known that your sources are RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA. Chief among them is FOS LIES, a PROVEN LIBELER. Quote
Radiorum Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 21 minutes ago, Legato said: disregard the content, typical shallow thinking. Right back at ya. You are the one disregarding the content of the report. You are the one disregarding all the evidence compiled to show that Trump is guilty of the following: THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION ..................................................................... A. Mr. Trump's Pressure on State Officials ................................................................. 8 B. Mr. Trump's Fraudulent Elector Plan .................................................................... 11 C. Mr. Trump's Misuse of Official Power Through the Justice Department.. ........... 16 D. Mr. Trump's Pressure on the Vice President.. ....................................................... 20 E. Mr. Trump's Supporters Attack the United States Capitol.. .................................. 23 II. THE LAW ............................................................................................................. 33 A. Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) ................................ 34 B. Obstruction and Conspiracy to Obstruct (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) and (c)(2)) .......... 45 C. Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241) ...................................................... 49 D. Defenses ................................................................................................................ 53 E. Other Charges ....................................................................................................... 61 Quote
User Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 1 minute ago, Radiorum said: Right back at ya. You are the one disregarding the content of the report. You are the one disregarding all the evidence compiled to show that Trump is guilty of the following: Guilty? Hell, now you think Jack is the Judge, Jury, and Executioner! Meanwhile, you lied about him using insurrection in his report. Quote
Legato Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 16 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Right back at ya. You are the one disregarding the content of the report. You are the one disregarding all the evidence compiled to show that Trump is guilty of the following: THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION ..................................................................... A. Mr. Trump's Pressure on State Officials ................................................................. 8 B. Mr. Trump's Fraudulent Elector Plan .................................................................... 11 C. Mr. Trump's Misuse of Official Power Through the Justice Department.. ........... 16 D. Mr. Trump's Pressure on the Vice President.. ....................................................... 20 E. Mr. Trump's Supporters Attack the United States Capitol.. .................................. 23 II. THE LAW ............................................................................................................. 33 A. Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) ................................ 34 B. Obstruction and Conspiracy to Obstruct (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) and (c)(2)) .......... 45 C. Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241) ...................................................... 49 D. Defenses ................................................................................................................ 53 E. Other Charges ....................................................................................................... 61 All without merit. Just another drumhead list of unproven conjecture. Try harder your TDS is causing confustration. Quote
User Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: We used to have a firewall between POTUS and DoJ to prevent POLITICAL INTERFERENCE. Trump has destroyed that and you completely missed it, CLOWN No such thing has ever existed. The DOJ is literally run by whatever political hack the President wants and reports to him. Quote
Legato Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: Thanks for proving you're stupid enough to believe gratuitous documents fabricated by Trump's DoJ at HIS COMMAND. We used to have a firewall between POTUS and DoJ to prevent POLITICAL INTERFERENCE. Trump has destroyed that and you completely missed it, CLOWN It is well known that your sources are RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA. Chief among them is FOS LIES, a PROVEN LIBELER. You mean like those gratuitous documents fabricated by the Schiff klan Jan 6th clowns. I've told you before that you need more Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) in your diet. Quote
Radiorum Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 7 minutes ago, Legato said: All without merit. Just another drumhead list of unproven conjecture. But it's not. 7 minutes ago, Legato said: Try harder your TDS is causing confustration. You are the deluded one. Quote
User Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 3 minutes ago, Radiorum said: You are the deluded one. So, where was "insurrection" at in the report as you tried to claim? Quote
CdnFox Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, Radiorum said: Violence must never go without consequence for the perpetrators of it, and so the injustice here is that Trump did let the worst offenders of January 6 get away with it, referring to them as "hostages". Oh you mean like how the democrats did fundraising to get people charged with violence in the floyd riots out on bail. Or how obama pardoned Oscar López Rivera an actual killer. Once again you try to pass off stuff as "Utterly horrible" that others have done and you're fine with. I don't like presidential pardons at the best of times, but trump uses them the same way and for the same things and for the same people that others always have. Edited December 22, 2025 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Legato Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 Just now, Radiorum said: But it's not. You are the deluded one. But it is. It was never proven. Another example of 4th stage TDS. It's all you do, post thread after thread of "Lets Get Trump" drivel. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Because it's PRIVATE data. DoJ is planning to use that date to SUPPRESS THE VOTE. The Federal government plays no role in managing elections, Canuck. Suppress the vote? How so? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 2 hours ago, Legato said: All without merit. Just another drumhead list of unproven conjecture. Try harder your TDS is causing confustration. Your ^ridiculous allegations ONLY demonstrate YOUR DESPERATION. Why do you Canuck CLOWNS pretend you know shit? LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 2 hours ago, Legato said: You mean like those gratuitous documents fabricated by the Schiff klan Jan 6th clowns. ^No evidence of Schiff fabrication. Meanwhile there is tons of evidence that Trump is directing DoJ misinformation. Quote The statement that Donald Trump is directing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to spread misinformation is a central point of concern raised by political and legal experts. Critics argue that his actions and rhetoric indicate an attempt to weaponize the DOJ to pursue political opponents and promote his own narratives, rather than operate as an independent agency. Specific allegations and points of contention include: Targeting Political Rivals: Trump has reportedly used executive orders and public statements to direct the DOJ to investigate former officials who contradicted his claims or otherwise fell out of favor, such as former Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) director Chris Krebs and former White House aide Miles Taylor. Election Interference Allegations: The Trump administration's DOJ, under former Attorney General Pam Bondi, has been accused of abandoning voting rights protections and instead focusing on debunked allegations of mass voter fraud, which critics view as a form of election interference. Controlling the Narrative: Trump has frequently used the terms "fake news" and "disinformation" to attack media outlets and government officials who challenge his claims, particularly regarding the 2020 election results and other issues. Executive Orders: He has signed executive orders aimed at "ending federal censorship" and "restoring freedom of speech," which legal and disinformation experts argue are actually designed to dismantle federal programs that combat foreign influence and identify legitimate misinformation, potentially allowing false narratives to spread unchecked. Internal Investigations: An internal DOJ watchdog report indicated that officials within the Trump administration may have violated federal law by pushing for politically motivated investigations targeting Democratic-governed states and leaking selective information to the media. These actions are seen by many as a break from the post-Watergate tradition of maintaining a separation between the White House's political agenda and the DOJ's independent law enforcement functions. 2 hours ago, Legato said: I've told you before that you need more Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) in your diet. You say A LOT of ^STUPID THINGS like a true CLOWN. Quote
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 50 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Suppress the vote? How so? It is unprecedented. Quote
Nationalist Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: It is unprecedented. This is silly. What possible issue could there be with verifying all the ballots? Unless they weren't validated originally? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Suppress the vote? How so? Because stage one: Underpants and then Stage 3: Profit! 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 19 minutes ago, Nationalist said: This is silly. What possible issue could there be with verifying all the ballots? Unless they weren't validated originally? You are a silly ignoramus. IF you know all details of a voter's history, that makes it much easier to commit voter impersonation fraud. You would know if they rarely vote, thus making it a snap to steal their vote with a forged signature. That is just the tip of the ice berg which you've NEVER SEEN and can't imagine. Quote
Legato Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: You are a silly ignoramus. IF you know all details of a voter's history, that makes it much easier to commit voter impersonation fraud. You would know if they rarely vote, thus making it a snap to steal their vote with a forged signature. That is just the tip of the ice berg which you've NEVER SEEN and can't imagine. That sounds like a excerpt from "A Midsummer Nights Dream". 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted December 22, 2025 Report Posted December 22, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: You are a silly ignoramus. IF you know all details of a voter's history, that makes it much easier to commit voter impersonation fraud. You would know if they rarely vote, thus making it a snap to steal their vote with a forged signature. That is just the tip of the ice berg which you've NEVER SEEN and can't imagine. Interesting...so your little head is just full of ideas how to cheat. A Libbie trait i guess. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.