Conservative Amendment Defeated

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Shady said:

Yes, and it's completely non-binding.  It's just a document of agreed understanding, goals, expectations, with no binding follow through, no timetable of dates, progress, etc.

Hence no point...

[ExFlyer]

25 minutes ago, Legato said:

The most recent significant motion in the Canadian House of Commons was a Conservative motion concerning a pipeline to the B.C. coast, which was defeated by a vote of 196 to 139 on Tuesday evening, December 9, 2025. 

The motion, put forward by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, had the following

And the text is where???

 

[Shady]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Yup. You clearly understand that PP pooched and totally miscalculated Trudeau's departure and Trumps threats.

I hope you also understand that the USA is not Canada and we have never been equal or even close in GDP.

Nope...they voted on a complainative motion, not the MOU.

The MOU is already a done deal between the government and Alberta.

What is it with you trained seals that you canto get that?.....Alberta and the government have an accepted MOU., no need to vot eon the MOU    LOL LOL LOL

I didn't say GDP, I said per capita GDP.  I was on par with the United States when Turdeau took over.  Now it's 40% less, thanks to terrible Liberal economic policies.  Thanks for making everyone poorer.  Thanks for making the Canadian dollar worthless.  Thanks for driving foreign investment out of the country at a record rate.  Thanks for doubling the cost of housing.  Thanks for increasing health care wait times.  You guys have done a great job! LOL

[Legato]

9 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

And the text is where???

 

he most recent significant motion in the Canadian House of Commons was a Conservative motion concerning a pipeline to the B.C. coast, which was defeated by a vote of 196 to 139 on Tuesday evening, December 9, 2025. 

The motion, put forward by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, had the following

 

"That this House urges the Government of Canada to support the construction of one or more oil pipelines from Alberta to the British Columbia coast for export to Asian markets, alongside an adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act." (This is a synthesis of the motion's intent based on the parliamentary debates, not the exact written motion). 

The motion called on the government to act to "unblock investment and expedite construction". 

This motion was a supply day motion introduced by the Leader of the Official Opposition (Conservative Party), Mr. Pierre Poilievre. It was defeated by a vote of 196 to 139, with the Liberals, Bloc Québécois, and NDP voting against it. 

For official and complete records of all motions and parliamentary business, you can refer to the official publications of the House of Commons, such as the Order Paper and Notice Paper or the Debates (Hansard). 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

OW..the LOSER is back.

Once again with nothing.

 

LOL yeah i see that, welcome back  

Carney lost this one kid.  But hey, if lying about it helps you get through the night then so be it  

[ExFlyer]

29 minutes ago, Legato said:

he most recent significant motion in the Canadian House of Commons was a Conservative motion concerning a pipeline to the B.C. coast, which was defeated by a vote of 196 to 139 on Tuesday evening, December 9, 2025. 

The motion, put forward by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, had the following

 

"That this House urges the Government of Canada to support the construction of one or more oil pipelines from Alberta to the British Columbia coast for export to Asian markets, alongside an adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act." (This is a synthesis of the motion's intent based on the parliamentary debates, not the exact written motion). 

The motion called on the government to act to "unblock investment and expedite construction". 

This motion was a supply day motion introduced by the Leader of the Official Opposition (Conservative Party), Mr. Pierre Poilievre. It was defeated by a vote of 196 to 139, with the Liberals, Bloc Québécois, and NDP voting against it. 

For official and complete records of all motions and parliamentary business, you can refer to the official publications of the House of Commons, such as the Order Paper and Notice Paper or the Debates (Hansard). 

Asked for the text of the motion..not for hansard Wednesday, June 5, 2024 (No. 325)

 

Edited December 11, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL yeah i see that, welcome back  

Carney lost this one kid.  But hey, if lying about it helps you get through the night then so be it  

WOW....get on with it LOSER...keep up 

As usual..off topic and so far behind LOL LOSER 

Try and be an adult and move on LOSER

Edited December 11, 2025 by ExFlyer

[Legato]

51 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Asked for the text of the motion..not for hansard Wednesday, June 5, 2024 (No. 325)

 

It's dated December 9 2025. Cant you bloody read.

Here's a link. Try putting on the giglamps before an attempt to read an understand.

 

https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/45/1/55

[ExFlyer]

38 minutes ago, Legato said:

It's dated December 9 2025. Cant you bloody read.

Here's a link. Try putting on the giglamps before an attempt to read an understand.

 

https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/45/1/55

Don't be an ass..your original link, Order Paper and Notice Paper or the Debates (Hansard)  if you even clicked on it  turned out to be  https://www.ourcommons.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-325/order-notice/page-5

 

It's OK, I can disregard your ignorant statement. 

 

[Legato]

19 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Don't be an ass..your original link, Order Paper and Notice Paper or the Debates (Hansard)  if you even clicked on it  turned out to be  https://www.ourcommons.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-325/order-notice/page-5

 

It's OK, I can disregard your ignorant statement. 

 

Hayzeus man you really are hard work. I provided the text as written 3 time now and you still wander off into some weird interpretation. 

Get real sunshine. You make or say nothing substantial, all your statements have a large degree of ignorance.

Your whole shtick is ignorantly dropping bloodspots everywhere.

Pathetic.

[ExFlyer]

16 minutes ago, Legato said:

Hayzeus man you really are hard work. I provided the text as written 3 time now and you still wander off into some weird interpretation. 

Get real sunshine. You make or say nothing substantial, all your statements have a large degree of ignorance.

Your whole shtick is ignorantly dropping bloodspots everywhere.

Pathetic.

Clearly you did not click on your original link to see where it took you. "All your statements have a large degree of" falsehood.

Yes, it was a pathetic attempt. LOL

Oh and , you like the little down arrows... only the deserving get them LOL

[Legato]

12 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Clearly you did not click on your original link to see where it took you. "All your statements have a large degree of" falsehood.

Yes, it was a pathetic attempt. LOL

Oh and , you like the little down arrows... only the deserving get them LOL

I provided the text of the motion, no link required.

Your observation skills are severely lacking.

Stop behaving like a child.

                                                                                           Bloodspot Here--------->

[CdnFox]

16 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Awww poor LOSER

Carney you mean? Yeah, this really didn't go his way. This is where as inexperience shows

 

16 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

I associate your being a pedophile

I know you do kid but I'm sorry I'm just not interested in adolecents OR males no matter how much you constantly beg or wish it to be different. I'm sure over time you will find a boy that you like in the real world that's closer to your age

 

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Clearly you did not click on your original link to see where it took you. "All your statements have a large degree of" falsehood.

Yes, it was a pathetic attempt. LOL

Oh and , you like the little down arrows... only the deserving get them LOL

He's 100% right and you're 100% wrong. You need to learn to read kid

And every time we see it down arrow everybody knows you're crying a little

[Barquentine]

On 12/10/2025 at 10:54 AM, Legato said:

Poilievre forced the Liberals to vote again their own MOU.

Perfect strategy.

So perfect it lost them another member.

Still think PeePee's the Conservative saviour?

I mean it's ok with me. I could stand to watch him lose another election.

[ExFlyer]

15 hours ago, Legato said:

I provided the text of the motion, no link required.

Your observation skills are severely lacking.

Stop behaving like a child.

                                                                                           Bloodspot Here--------->

Nope

[ExFlyer]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Carney you mean? Yeah, this really didn't go his way. This is where as inexperience shows

 

I know you do kid but I'm sorry I'm just not interested in adolecents OR males no matter how much you constantly beg or wish it to be different. I'm sure over time you will find a boy that you like in the real world that's closer to your age

 

And every time we see it down arrow everybody knows you're crying a little

Awww poor LOSER

Finally you admit your paedophilia...so you are "just not interested in adolecents OR males".... are you going to add to your list of perversions?? LOL LOL LOL   LOSER!!!

Well, I see you don't like the down arrows so..I. will keep on keeping on with them. Not crying a little but certainly getting tears of laughter a lot from you and your buddies whining about them HA. HA HA

[Legato]

55 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

So perfect it lost them another member.

Still think PeePee's the Conservative saviour?

I mean it's ok with me. I could stand to watch him lose another election.

You mean another Liberal who cried wolf...bye bye....

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

You mean another Liberal who cried wolf...bye bye....

Mr Ma was quite eloquent in hos statement for leaving. He saw that the conservatives (nee PP Le Pew) have nothing to offer Canadians.

Get over it.... PP was not even in the house for his own motion and he lost and is complaining.

If his party does not see that he will never win..then the party is doomed for second place for longer than even they anticipate.

[Legato]

31 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Mr Ma was quite eloquent in hos statement for leaving. He saw that the conservatives (nee PP Le Pew) have nothing to offer Canadians.

Get over it.... PP was not even in the house for his own motion and he lost and is complaining.

If his party does not see that he will never win..then the party is doomed for second place for longer than even they anticipate.

Wolf

[ExFlyer]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Wolf

WOW...it took you all this time to come up with that??

LOSER LOL LOL LOL

[Legato]

5 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

WOW...it took you all this time to come up with that??

LOSER LOL LOL LOL

Bad penny

[ExFlyer]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Bad penny

Yeah...OK???

Must mean something in your head...a space most of us do not want to be in LOL LOL LOL

[I am Groot]

You know what other Conservative amendment was defeated on another bill? One that would make people arrested for crimes ineligible to apply for refugee status. The Liberals voted that down.

Every one of the 15 Indians arrested for extortion and arson has now applied for refugee status.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/surrey-mayor-appalled-by-extortion-suspects-refugee-claims-as-police-investigate-another-shooting/

[Legato]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Yeah...OK???

Must mean something in your head...a space most of us do not want to be in LOL LOL LOL

Bad Penny.

[ExFlyer]

7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Bad Penny.

There no such thing as bad money