Trump is not mentally well

[User]

6 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Then admit it. Admit that posting 160 times in five hours is not a sign of a stable mind.

No. That is your absurd obsession with hating Trump so much you don't care about facts and will just make up anything and argue that point to spite Trump. 

What I can agree to is that this behavior is not "Presidential" and I would much prefer Trump not act like this. 

[Radiorum]

4 minutes ago, User said:

so much you don't care about facts and will just make up anything and argue that point to spite Trump. 

Now who is making up things? Yes, you are.

I don't need to make up anything. Trump is a deep well of aberrations. 

[User]

2 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Now who is making up things? Yes, you are.

I don't need to make up anything. Trump is a deep well of aberrations. 

Sitting here trying to argue this is some kind of proof of mental illness is making up crap. 

[Moonbox]

4 hours ago, User said:

Well… context matters. Trump isn’t some random teenager nor is prolific shit posting rants on social media out of the ordinary.

Yeah, for sure.  Context does matter.  The fact that Trump isn't a teenager, and is the President of the United States, makes his 5 hour shitposting sessions all the more ridiculous.  

4 hours ago, User said:

You guys are so pathetically desperate to turn the tables on Trump after defending and ignoring Biden’s clear and obvious mental issues for 4 years. 

No, you're such a pathetic Trump asslicker that you'll defend basically anything he does or says.  🤡

[SpankyMcFarland]

I agree with him on one thing. Football is an odd name for the American (or Canadian) game where the ball is rarely kicked. Even rugby features considerably more kicking as do the Australian and Irish versions, let alone soccer. It’s more handball than football…which gets us into another debate. While we’re at it, touchdown seems a weird thing to call an action that rarely involves same, unlike rugby where it’s obligatory but is called a try.

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/trump-says-america-should-change-footballs-name-it-really-doesnt-make-sense

 

 

 

 

 

Edited December 6, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[User]

59 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yeah, for sure.  Context does matter.  The fact that Trump isn't a teenager, and is the President of the United States, makes his 5 hour shitposting sessions all the more ridiculous.  

The discussion was not about whether they were subjectively deemed ridiculous or not; it was your and others' absurd insistence that this is evidence of some mental issue. 

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

No, you're such a pathetic Trump asslicker that you'll defend basically anything he does or says.  🤡

Nope, try again. You are too stupid or dishonest to comprehend the difference between rejecting the absurd notion that this is not evidence of a mental problem and thinking the behavior is stupid. 

 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Now who is making up things? Yes, you are.

I don't need to make up anything. Trump is a deep well of aberrations. 

You're making up a lot of things. You've started with a conclusion and you're trying to work your way back to a question and that's always results in very bad logic.

 

[John Stone]

16 hours ago, Deluge said:

It was mandatory that Trump be the choice. No one else worthy would have beaten Cackles. 

Cackles had baggage problems.

 

 

[Moonbox]

On 12/5/2025 at 10:37 PM, User said:

The discussion was not about whether they were subjectively deemed ridiculous or not; it was your and others' absurd insistence that this is evidence of some mental issue. 

SToP bEiNg DisHoNEst. 

I didn't say it was evidence.  I said the behavior would raise concerns in a teenager, and thus it's even more concerning in a 79 year old President of the United States who should have better and more and important things to do with his time.  

What part of the 5 hour avalanche of conspiracy theories, insults, grievance-airing etc do you figure points to a good state of mind?  🤡

[User]

16 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

SToP bEiNg DisHoNEst. 

I didn't say it was evidence.  I said the behavior would raise concerns in a teenager, and thus it's even more concerning in a 79 year old President of the United States who should have better and more and important things to do with his time.  

What part of the 5 hour avalanche of conspiracy theories, insults, grievance-airing etc do you figure points to a good state of mind?  🤡

“Evidence of” is a phrase meant to characterize what you are doing… you didn’t have to literally say evidence. 
 

Just like you are continuing to do now as you list out “evidence” to back up your assertion.

If your argument is that he should have better and more important things to do… OK. That isn’t a mental issue argument. 
 

Asking me a question isn’t supporting your case. It’s not my job to disprove the assertion you can’t back up with any real evidence or good argument. 
 

 

[Moonbox]

1 hour ago, User said:

“Evidence of” is a phrase meant to characterize what you are doing… you didn’t have to literally say evidence. 

Nono, we're playing your game now.  

I didn't insist it was evidence of a mental issue.  I said the behavior raises concerns about his mental health.  These are too different things. 

Just admit that you were being dishonest and mischaracterized what I said.  Stop being a coward.  

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Nono, we're playing your game now.  

I didn't insist it was evidence of a mental issue.  I said the behavior raises concerns about his mental health.  These are too different things. 

This is the game you always play. @User Is 100% correct, why would it raise concerns about his mental health if it wasn't in some form or another evidence of a problem with his mental health?  the very fact that you say it raises concerns demonstrates that you are making the claim that it's evidence of possible mental health issues.

That is obvious and straightforward. .  

But once again as soon as your logic is shown to be weak and flawed you try to fall back on playing word games. 

Here, you can clear it all up right now,  do you or do you not think there's any evidence at all for possible mental health issues with trump? If yes then he's right and shut up, if no then what are you even talking about?

[User]

8 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Nono, we're playing your game now.  

I didn't insist it was evidence of a mental issue.  I said the behavior raises concerns about his mental health.  These are too different things. 

Just admit that you were being dishonest and mischaracterized what I said.  Stop being a coward.  

Oh, OK. So you have no point here, you actually agree with me. No mental issues here!

Edited December 9, 2025 by User

[Moonbox]

11 hours ago, User said:

Oh, OK. So you have no point here, you actually agree with me. No mental issues here!

Hardly.  I said concerns about his mental health (or declining thereof) are perfectly reasonable given this sort of ridiculous behavior, especially combined with all of his other equally ridiculous behavior.  

I'd argue, at the very least, that a 79 year old rage-posting for 5 hours straight on social media like a mal-adjusted 14 year old is unworthy behavior for the President of the United States.  It seems you disagree.  🙃

[User]

11 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Hardly.  I said concerns about his mental health (or declining thereof) are perfectly reasonable given this sort of ridiculous behavior, especially combined with all of his other equally ridiculous behavior.  

I'd argue, at the very least, that a 79 year old rage-posting for 5 hours straight on social media like a mal-adjusted 14 year old is unworthy behavior for the President of the United States.  It seems you disagree.  🙃

Oh… so you are back to pushing this silly nonsense. 

[CdnFox]

On 12/3/2025 at 9:08 PM, Radiorum said:

Trump supporters do not read character very well if they believe Trump is no different from those who came before.

Yep, definitely no hatred and anger there LOL 

 

[CdnFox]

On 12/9/2025 at 8:12 AM, Moonbox said:

Hardly.  I said concerns about his mental health (or declining thereof) are perfectly reasonable given this sort of ridiculous behavior, especially combined with all of his other equally ridiculous behavior.  

 

In other words what you're saying is his behavior is evidence of mental decline.

You just lying and trying to dance around the meaning of your words to try and play games and avoid the fact that he caught you out.

"I'm not saying it's EVIDENCE,  i'm just saying it's the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid!!!"Yeah, that's the definition of evidence you twat. 

Edited December 10, 2025 by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

 

On 12/9/2025 at 8:31 AM, User said:

Oh… so you are back to pushing this silly nonsense. 

 

This is about 90 percent of his arguments.  When he paints himself into a corner he'll try to turn the conversation into a debate about the meaning or definition of a word and focus on that, hoping everyone will forget what they were really talking about. 

LIke I said, he'll claim "I never said evidence, what i said was it's apperen from the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Yeah, that's the definition of evidence. 

And he'll argue that for 10 pages because now you're not talking about what he knew he was wrong about before. 

[Legato]

On 12/9/2025 at 11:12 AM, Moonbox said:

Hardly.  I said concerns about his mental health (or declining thereof) are perfectly reasonable given this sort of ridiculous behavior, especially combined with all of his other equally ridiculous behavior.  

I'd argue, at the very least, that a 79 year old rage-posting for 5 hours straight on social media like a mal-adjusted 14 year old is unworthy behavior for the President of the United States.  It seems you disagree.  🙃

You and others demonstrate the well known symptoms of TDS.

Would you agree that the said symptoms demonstrate a degree of mental instability?

[Moonbox]

36 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

In other words what you're saying is his behavior is evidence of mental decline.

I'm saying it could be, just like saying a blister could be evidence of a skin allergy, or a radiation burn. 

I know this sort of nuance is beyond your ability to process, so let me simplify the argument for you:

Whatever the underlying cause or motivation, this sort of behavior is troubling. 

Edited December 10, 2025 by Moonbox

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm saying it could be, just like saying a blister could be evidence of a skin allergy, or a radiation burn. 

So evidence but not proof. 

I mean, that's fair enough and not an outrageous thing to say but i don't know why you want to pick a fight over the term 'evidence' when you clearly believe it's evidence.  Evidence isn't "proof", it's just an indication. 

I know that dictionary definitions of words confound and upset you   

19 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Whatever the underlying cause or motivation, this sort of behavior is troubling. 

Well you'd have to make an argument as to why it's troubling in your opinion then. 

It seems like it's a little out of the usual for a president, is that the troubling part?  I feel like trump is definitely outside the usual mold for a president whether you approve of him or don't.  I think that was kind of his appeal to people, especially in his first term. 

I could see if you felt it was evidence of cognative decline that this would be concerning but you seem to be saying that's not the case? Maybe? 

I don't know, it's weird but trump is weird, i think you'd need to make a clearer argument as to why someone should be particularly concerned about it if that's your position. 

[User]

7 hours ago, Moonbox said:

I'm saying it could be, just like saying a blister could be evidence of a skin allergy, or a radiation burn. 

I know this sort of nuance is beyond your ability to process, so let me simplify the argument for you:

Whatever the underlying cause or motivation, this sort of behavior is troubling. 

Right... just like your post here "could be" evidence of your mental decline... 

Although earlier you were saying it raises concerns, then you said concerns were reasonable, and now you have reduced yourself to saying "could"

ROFL

Clearly, this raises concerns about your mental health. 

[Radiorum]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Yep, definitely no hatred and anger there

This is so condescending. It reminds me of the 19th century diagnosis of "female hysteria" - a catchall phrase for women daring to express themselves in passionate terms. And so while people sound the alarm about the very grave danger that Trump is foisting upon the USA, they are termed "hysterical" - it's only their hatred and anger speaking - rather than validating their very real concerns. You sir, have something in common with the misogynists of the 19th century.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

This is so condescending.

Yes   Which is precisely what you deserved    Want respect, be respectable, 

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

It reminds me of the 19th century diagnosis of "female hysteria" -

No it doesn't. THat's just a stupid thing to say. This is why nobody respects you, 

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

And so while people sound the alarm about the very grave danger that Trump is foisting upon the USA,

Kid.... you're not sounding any alarms.  You're spreading hatred and bigotry, and that's it. 

Make.  Good.  Arguments.  Gain respect, have people take you seriously 

The nonsense you've been spouting won't work on anyone outside your echo chamber.  Think for yourself and do better. 

[gatomontes99]

9 hours ago, Radiorum said:

This is so condescending. It reminds me of the 19th century diagnosis of "female hysteria" - a catchall phrase for women daring to express themselves in passionate terms. And so while people sound the alarm about the very grave danger that Trump is foisting upon the USA, they are termed "hysterical" - it's only their hatred and anger speaking - rather than validating their very real concerns. You sir, have something in common with the misogynists of the 19th century.

Did you play hockey as a goalie?