Medical assistance in dying is not always being used for what you think it is.

[blackbird]

The case in the article below involves a woman who had been visiting Canada for many years but had no health care status or health care card.   However, elected members of government bent over backwards and sent Emails to help get her a medical plan card.  Not so she could receive medical care, but so she could receive medical assistance in dying (MAID).  This raises the question.  Is Canada becoming a destination for death tourism?  Secondly, this is not the purpose for which MAID was intended for.  Should these elected members be held accountable for their actions?

quote

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

The Secret MAiD Case That Canada Hoped You’d Never See

This article was published by Kelsi Sheren on her substack on December 2, 2025.

These Leaked Documents Reveal the Plot.

By Kelsi Sheren

Canada keeps insisting MAiD is “carefully regulated,” a “last resort,” and “only for Canadians who truly qualify.”

That story is dead and I’m going to show you how bad this really is.

A Freedom of Information release buried in 269 pages of bureaucratic emails shows something the government never expected anyone to see:

Three elected officials actively tried to secure an MSP health number for a woman who was not a resident, not a citizen, and not eligible under federal law… so she could be euthanized.

This wasn’t a misunderstanding. This wasn’t a clerical error. This was an attempt to turn Canada into a destination for state-sanctioned death.

Let’s walk through exactly what they did. The FOI shows that in July 2021 ->

Further down in the article,

The only reason these politicians wanted MSP issued was to enable a foreign national to be euthanized by the Canadian state. MAiD tourism wasn’t a side effect it was the goal the entire damn time.

This wasn’t an attempt to help someone become a resident. No visa support. No PR application. No documentation pathway. The letters from May, Olsen, and Rankin all revolve around one mission: Get this woman a PHN so she can be killed under MAiD.

In one email, staff even warned: “Unless these provide new PR or citizenship status they unfortunately don’t address the factors.”

Translated: These politicians are trying to do something we legally can’t do. But the pressure kept coming anyway. And for what it’s worth?

This was escalated as “High Importance.” The Ministry scheduled a call with the client for July 23rd at 11:00 am a MAiD-related call.

They were ready to move fast. If this case has succeeded, Canada will have secretly created a new category of MAiD eligibility. Anyone from anywhere in the world can fly here and apply for state-sanctioned death as long as a sympathetic politician writes a letter.

No residency. No citizenship. No ties to Canada.

Just an express lane to death. And the public? Never consulted. Never informed.
Never asked whether they wanted their country turned into the world’s suicide embassy.

And here’s the uncomfortable reality. We don’t know for sure if the MAiD was carried out but if I’m betting, I’m betting it did.

further down,

This is what MUST HAPPEN NEXT.

Investigations. Hearings. Public accountability. Consequences.

Because if a government is willing to kill someone outside the system, it has already abandoned the idea of protecting the people within it.

unquote

For the whole article and other articles and information and to see the letters or Emails on this story, go to:

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Edited December 3, 2025 by blackbird

[blackbird]

MAID is planning to be expanded by the federal government to include the mentally ill as of March 2027.  It is in the works.

Could MAID be expanded to include more people who are considered a cost burden to the public health care system at some point?

Take a look at this article.

"O'Neill further reported:

Schadenberg said that initiating MAiD discussions is already common because euthanasia is widely perceived as a medical treatment for the chronically ill and elderly.

“In fact,” he said, “because the intention of MAiD is to kill the patient, it is the very opposite of medical treatment.”

O'Neill then comments on my experience with doctors coercing people towards euthanasia:

He said he believes every major hospital in Canada now has a MAiD team responsible for informing patients about euthanasia availability. “That’s why I’m getting so many phone calls from patients complaining they are being ‘pestered and pestered’ to succumb to MAiD.

“Some of the MAiD teams are very sales-oriented,” Schadenberg said. “They can’t understand why you don’t want it.”

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Euthanasia Prevention Coalition: Health Canada regulations require doctors to offer euthanasia.

Edited December 3, 2025 by blackbird

[TreeBeard]

@blackbird  Why is it any of your business if someone wants to end their own suffering?  

[blackbird]

6 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

@blackbird  Why is it any of your business if someone wants to end their own suffering?  

In short because we live in a civilized society with laws, principles, and requirements for how our fellow man is treated.  That's why we have laws against stealing, murder, spousal abuse, extortion, child abuse, sexual abuse, and countless other things.

Christians are concerned about suffering of people and believe everything reasonable should be done to ease or stop pain and suffering.  

However, mercy killing or suicide is not a humane solution.  Man does not have the right to kill people or take life in order to stop pain.  Once one accepts the idea that man can kill people for whatever reason, it is a slippery slope and anything can become a reason to end life.  Hitler, Stalin, and Chairman Mao thought it was ok to kill millions of people for political reasons or their own selfish reasons.  Think about the fact the God of the Bible sees everything that is happening and there will be a day of accountability.  There is an eternity to consider and a Creator to whom we are accountable, whether one believes it or not.

Our Creator has a say in how we live and how we die.  He is the final authority on life and death.

quote

The King James Bible (KJV) provides several verses that address the issue of euthanasia, emphasizing the sanctity of life and the authority of God over life and death. Here are some key verses that reflect these themes:

Genesis 1:27: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."

Job 12:10: "In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind."

Psalms 31:15: "My times are in thy hand: deliver me from the hand of mine enemies, and from them that persecute me."

Daniel 2:21: "And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding."

Ecclesiastes 3:1: "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven."

Acts 17:26: "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven."

Job 14:5: "Seeing his days are determined, the number of his months are with thee, thou hast appointed his bounds that he cannot pass."
These verses encourage believers to support and care for those who are suffering, bringing comfort through God's love. They also challenge individuals to consider the implications of euthanasia and the importance of living life to the fullest, as God has given us a purpose. 

6 Sources

unquote

If you have a problem with this, then you need help.  You are looking at life and everything in a completely wrong way.  I don't really know what I can do for you except to suggest you consider talking to some good Bible-believing Christians or pastors.  Perhaps you have been reading or talking to the wrong kind of people in your life.  You know the kind I'm talking about, maybe boozers, pot smokers, sex or porn addicts and maybe the kind that hang out in bars. 

Or maybe none of those kind of people.  The kind of things we read and what we do can influence our life.   There are many people who seem to live very straight lives, but are atheists and still follow the reasoning and ways of the world.  That is still bad.  It leads nowhere good, just hopelessness and depression.  It can cause alcoholism or dug addiction or family breakups. 

One's life can be influenced by many factors.  The world is a fallen corrupt place.  It is very likely leading many people to hell.   That's not something one should go with.  You need to find some Christian Bible believers and get out of the downward spiral.  You need a total change of life.  A good place to start is reading the King James Bible and believing it. 

Edited December 4, 2025 by blackbird

[Army Guy]

5 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

@blackbird  Why is it any of your business if someone wants to end their own suffering?  

Is Maid being used just to end suffering ? , and who determines what is suffering ? would you say a women with severe allergies ,whom could not find a suitable apartment would this be considered suffering, she was approved for maid and is no longer with us...

I agree 100 % that if some one is suffering physical pain , should be looked at....but we seem to be including mental illness, or lesser aliments as well. when and where do we draw the line...

[CdnFox]

5% of all deaths in Canada, and I mean all deaths, we're from maid last year

We've heard the stories of veterans being told to consider made rather than other treatments.

I firmly believe people should have the right to die with dignity at their decision. But I do have to wonder sometimes if there isn't a problem

[Radiorum]

Whether a person chooses MAID is entirely their own decision. full stop.

[CdnFox]

51 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Whether a person chooses MAID is entirely their own decision. full stop.

That's not necessarily true. Well I generally agree with the sentiment the fact is people who are considering made are often doing so had a. Of extreme emotional distress in their life. They can be highly susceptible to the influence or persuasion of others at that time.

If you take a veteran who has bad ptds And you can't sleep and is emotionally distressed and physically injured or ailing due to wounds he received years ago and you are telling him that you can't treat him and the government won't pay for it, And as he sits there emotionally crippled and unable to decide what to do in an unable to cope with his emotional state and the prospect of continued suffering and you say to him "By the way there is an option, have you considered maid? it might be for the best..."

At that point you have significantly colored that person's thinking and they may not be necessarily making that decision on their own.

I still believe in maid, but I do have concerns