Slavery- a new old economic model?

[User]

3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Do your own homework. Read the report.

Not my job to figure out how to support your BS assertions. 

3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

It’s believed the KGB had a file on Trump as early as 1977

How does linking to a speculative article from 2017 that was based on the now long-debunked Steel Dossier back up your silly assertion?

You made a statement of fact. If you want to revise your statement and admit you were wrong, to something more along the lines of speculation without objective evidence, be my guest. 

 

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, Radiorum said:

 

I know it’s difficult for MAGA to understand that when others criticize Trump, and explain the very many reasons he is not fit to be president of the USA, that this does not involve hate, but concern over troubling trends.

 

 

Dude you hate the guy and it is obvious. You use emotionally charged language, you make ridiculous prejudicial statements that very clearly show that you're extremely emotional about the guy.

You do not critique him, and the reasons you give for him not being fit all boiled down to you hate him.

Your lies are getting a little tired so, they make you look like a child

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, Radiorum said:

 

It’s believed the KGB had a file on Trump as early as 1977 - the year he married Ivana Zelnickova, a citizen of a communist country, and therefore of interest both to the Czech intelligence service, the StB, and to the FBI and CIA.

 

 

 

In 2016 intelligence community did a thorough and in-depth analysis and concluded that Donald Trump had an almost 0% chance of being a Russian agent or being recruited.

Then President Obama ordered them to issue a report that said the exact opposite

We know with certainty at this point in time that Donald Trump was not a Russian asset. Several dozen agents spent 3 years trying to find any evidence, initially it was believed that he wasn't and wouldn't be until the fake report was ordered, any suspicion of him was based on the fake steel dossier which we know was completely hoax.

 

Flat earthers are more likely to be correct about their beliefs than you are about trump. The only thing that is driving you is your hatred. Rational people look at this and realize that there was nothing there. Yes, one of his people had dealings with the Russians but there's nothing unusual about that and there's no evidence of any kind of conspiracy or coordinated effort.

You don't exactly have a great reputation on this site for being unbiased and factual. But you are hammering it into the ground right now with this other complete nonsense

[robosmith]

On 12/6/2025 at 12:32 PM, Legato said:

 

^Typical TROLL EMPTY brain response.

[robosmith]

17 hours ago, Legato said:

Criticism and obsession are closely linked,  criticism can be a vulnerability factor for developing obsessive beliefs  Both often stem from underlying feelings of insecurity or a need for control. 

TDS in simpler terms.

^Failure to refute in HONEST terms.

[Radiorum]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

being a Russian agent

I never said "agent" - I said "asset" and "confidential contact"

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Then President Obama ordered them to issue a report that said the exact opposite

Who told you that? Tulsi Gabbard? Yeah, I thought so.

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

about their beliefs

I have provided evidence and facts, not beliefs

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The only thing that is driving you is your hatred.

Actually, it is the opposite. It is my love of the USA that makes Trump so disturbing.

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You don't exactly have a great reputation on this site for being unbiased and factual. But you are hammering it into the ground right now with this other complete nonsense

Lol!

[Radiorum]

On 12/6/2025 at 10:31 PM, CdnFox said:

Sorry but none of that is based in fact. Virtually all of that can be chalked up to delusions based on the fact you don't like trump

. The very fact you would lie at the end and claim that you have no feelings with regards to trump when it is painfully obvious and Beyond any doubt from your writing that you in fact do have strong feelings about trump tells us everything we need to know

The evidence isn't even remotely overwhelming that he's on Russia's side. The evidence is overwhelming that he wants the war stop so we can claim a Nobel Prize and that's about all the overwhelming evidence we have.

The rest is just lies and delusion on your part.

And no, the hookers aren't irrelevant. People just like you were saying that it was overwhelmingly evident that the hooker story was true. It wasn't. People like you say it was overwhelmingly obvious that trump colluded with the Russians during the election. We now know that wasn't true with certainty. People like you swore up and down the steel dossier was true, we know it was fabricated entirely

If I had a dollar for every time somebody like you said there was overwhelming evidence for something that turned out to be false about trump I could pay for his next election campaign  

You are so deluded on the subject that you cannot have a rational conversation.

Again this is why trump won. Leftists like yourself couldn't speak the truth to save their lives and really that's all you needed to do to win. They lied about Biden, then they spent the entire campaign giggling and lying about trump. They spent the year leading up to the campaign lying about trump. Not to mention lying about trump supporters

Sorry but I just have no patience for this level of stupidity. There are a lot of negative things you can say about trump that are honest, I have no idea why you feel the need to make shit up. I guess you think he's not really that bad and if you don't lie about him he just won't look bad enough to other people. But what the hell does that say about you kiddo?

 

Once again, no rebuttal of substance, just your usual ad hominem attack, which shows the weakness of your position.

Eloquent, but useless.

[Radiorum]

here is a powerful indicator of Trump's support of Russia - military aid to the Ukraine has all but dried up.

On the graph, the orange represents US military aid and dark blue is Europe.

The bars represent monthly averages: 2022-2024, then Jan-June 2025, then July-Aug, 2025

 

https://www.kielinstitut.de/publications/news/ukraine-support-tracker-military-aid-falls-sharply-despite-new-nato-initiative/

 

Edited December 8, 2025 by Radiorum

[Radiorum]

5 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

On the graph, the orange represents US military aid and blue is Europe.

The bars represent monthly averages: 2022-2024, then Jan-June 2025, then July-Aug, 2025

It's the same story with humanitarian aid.

 

Edited December 8, 2025 by Radiorum

[User]

3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

I never said "agent" - I said "asset" and "confidential contact"

Still BS.

3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Once again, no rebuttal of substance, just your usual ad hominem attack, which shows the weakness of your position.

Eloquent, but useless.

Feel free to respond to my comments then… 

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

here is a powerful indicator of Trump's support of Russia - military aid to the Ukraine has all but dried up.

No, this is an illogical deduction, that somehow a lack of new aid packages now = support for Russia. 

This is a measurement of aid packages passed, not the actual support.

The US continues to provide support to Ukraine from previously passed funding packages that were designed to cover this year into 2026.

You are not an honest person with how you selectively present facts like this to try to support your already flawed premise. 

[Radiorum]

8 minutes ago, User said:

support for Russia. 

 

Only a fool would believe that the US supports Ukraine over Russia.

[User]

15 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

 

Only a fool would believe that the US supports Ukraine over Russia.

It’s so predictable watching you act this way. You have no real substance to offer. 

[Radiorum]

4 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Once again, no rebuttal of substance, just your usual ad hominem attack, which shows the weakness of your position.

 

21 minutes ago, User said:

You have no real substance to offer. 

 

Stop copying me

[User]

19 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Stop copying me

What are you, a 3rd grader or something? 

[Radiorum]

1 minute ago, User said:

What are you, a 3rd grader or something? 

Just trying to talk to you on your level

[User]

2 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Just trying to talk to you on your level

No, you are not. I gave you a response to your dishonest post above… you ignored all that.

This behavior is all you have left. 

[WestCanMan]

On 11/4/2025 at 7:11 AM, paxamericana said:

In America, this class of indentured servants are the illegal workers imported by democrat. Instead of outright deportation What I’m proposing here is to benefit America, we change the law entirely to subjugate these illegal. Give them hope of becoming citizen ship through a “lottery” system while enforcing a minimum years of purgatory status say green card where they work at absolute minimum wage and is taxed by various means that the earned income remains effectively zero….

I've been saying that they were like slaves for years:

• they do all the shittiest jobs
• receive ridiculously low wages for them
• they can only afford to live in shitty, cramped homes
• they work for the wealthiest people.
• they don't get voting rights
• they don't get full access to services, etc

If you compare how slaves lived 2,000 years ago to the way illegals live in the US today it's not all that different.