Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not just a fad, but it’s a clear social contagion.

You push this crap onto children, normalize it, celebrate it, make it a victim status they can champion, then obviously it will increase.

its not genetics when you see these left wing celebrity types where all their kids are some form of the LGBTQ alphabet rainbow.

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted

At some point in the future, people will look back on our generations as "the ones who convinced little kids to mutilate their genitalia". 

They'll find a shorter, trendier name, but it definitely won't be anything like "The Greatest Generation".

Maybe the "Muta-Gens".

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

Turns out that trans was a fad.

 

Are you unaware that transexuality has a long history with examples found across many ancient and diverse cultures?

Written accounts of transexual folks exist as far back as 1200 BCE Egypt. There are examples from ancient Greece, Thailand, the Indian subcontinent, and 19th-century America, among other places.

The idea that it is a recent "fad" or "social contagion" is a claim that lacks any scientific basis. 

But, foolish red hats are so incredibly gullible they'll swallow any absurdity fox news spews out.

 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

The idea that it is a recent "fad" or "social contagion" is a claim that lacks any scientific basis. 

You folks on the left love yourself a good strawman.

the argument isn’t that the idea of someone being Trans was only just now created, but the recent trend in so many more identifying as such. 
 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Are you unaware that transexuality has a long history with examples found across many ancient and diverse cultures?

Written accounts of transexual folks exist as far back as 1200 BCE Egypt. There are examples from ancient Greece, Thailand, the Indian subcontinent, and 19th-century America, among other places.

The idea that it is a recent "fad" or "social contagion" is a claim that lacks any scientific basis. 

But, foolish red hats are so incredibly gullible they'll swallow any absurdity fox news spews out.

 

It's a fad....liberals made mental disease into a fashionable fad. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, User said:

You folks on the left love yourself a good strawman.

the argument isn’t that the idea of someone being Trans was only just now created, but the recent trend in so many more identifying as such. 
 

When the nazis vilified the jews, they went into hiding. When donald demonized the trans community,  many have gone into hiding (the closet).

You may deny this if you'd like.

It is the way of the red hat.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Haha 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Are you unaware that transexuality has a long history with examples found across many ancient and diverse cultures?

Written accounts of transexual folks exist as far back as 1200 BCE Egypt. There are examples from ancient Greece, Thailand, the Indian subcontinent, and 19th-century America, among other places.

The idea that it is a recent "fad" or "social contagion" is a claim that lacks any scientific basis. 

But, foolish red hats are so incredibly gullible they'll swallow any absurdity fox news spews out.

 

The fact that you had to comment proves the OP's point.

Posted
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

It's a fad....liberals made mental disease into a fashionable fad. 

Liberals didnt "make" trans folk red hat.

They just created an environment of inclusivity which empowered them to publicly be themselves.

Yall red hats policies have driven a lot of them back into the closet.

The rainbow spectrum of human sexuality isnt a "fad".

5 minutes ago, Legato said:

The fact that you had to comment proves the OP's point.

Only in the tiny mind of a red hat.

Posted
12 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

When the nazis vilified the jews, they went into hiding. When donald demonized the trans community,  many have gone into hiding (the closet).

You may deny this if you'd like.

It is the way of the red hat.

Me saying a man who thinks he is a woman isn’t is not even in the same universe as the vilification of Jews under Hitler.

I swear, you probably mumble Hitler in your sleep to yourself. 

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Or maybe non-acceptance and resulting persecution has forced them back into the closet. 🤮

What “persecution?”

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

Me saying a man who thinks he is a woman isn’t is not even in the same universe as the vilification of Jews under Hitler.

I swear, you probably mumble Hitler in your sleep to yourself. 

I see you're plagued with comprehension issues.

Not to worry, I will simplify it so even you will be able to understand. 

When the President of the United States vilifies marginalized groups, those marginalized groups have two routes they can take:

1) They can get loud and protest.

2) They can disappear. Blend into the woodwork.  Slide back into the closet.

 

That should clarify the issue for you.

If not, let me know. I'll dumb it down some more.

Im here for you Red hat!

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:
9 minutes ago, User said:

 

I see you're plagued with comprehension issues.

I’m not the one who thinks a man who thinks he is a woman… is one.

I am firmly grounded in reality here.

You are the one screaming: OMG Hitler! because others don’t accept your fantasy and delusions. 

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, User said:

 

What “persecution?”

Policies and rhetoric from donald and his merry band of halfwitted sycophants (MAGA) have targeted transgender people through legislation, executive orders, political advertising, and public rhetoric

 These actions are viewed by critics as discriminatory and have led to rollbacks of protections and rights for transgender individuals.

By God, do you ever watch anything but NewsMax?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, User said:

I’m not the one who thinks a man who thinks he is a woman… is one.

I am firmly grounded in reality here.

You are the one screaming: OMG Hitler! because others don’t accept your fantasy and delusions. 

A woman is a woman.

A trans woman is a trans woman.

How is it that you're so confused about this?

Let me ask, do you secretly watch transexual porn?

Posted
2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
Policies and rhetoric from donald and his merry band of halfwitted sycophants (MAGA) have targeted transgender people through legislation, executive orders, political advertising, and public rhetoric

 These actions are viewed by critics as discriminatory and have led to rollbacks of protections and rights for transgender individuals.

By God, do you ever watch anything but NewsMax?

You still didn’t answer the question. Give me the specific “persecution” you think is happening.

Once again, telling some grown ass man that just because he thinks he is a woman doesn’t mean he gets to shower with the women and beat them up in physical competition isn’t “persecution”

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

You still didn’t answer the question. Give me the specific “persecution” you think is happening.

Once again, telling some grown ass man that just because he thinks he is a woman doesn’t mean he gets to shower with the women and beat them up in physical competition isn’t “persecution”

 

More comprehension issues.

Again: 

Policies and rhetoric from donald and his merry band of halfwitted sycophants (MAGA) have targeted transgender people through legislation, executive orders, political advertising, and public rhetoric

 These actions are viewed by critics as discriminatory and have led to rollbacks of protections and rights for transgender individuals.

Do you need the definition of persecution?

You appear to be like a helpless child.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

A woman is a woman.

A trans woman is a trans woman.

How is it that you're so confused about this?

Let me ask, do you secretly watch transexual porn?

LOL, you are defining a term with the term.

You can’t actually defend your stupid positions here logically so you resort to petty crap about porn. 
 

You people are so predictably pathetic. 

3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
6 minutes ago, User said:

More comprehension issues

You are the one who can’t comprehend. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES 

Not vague generalized baseless assertions

I mean, you can’t even define woman in any meaningful way, so I’m not surprised you can’t figure this out either.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, User said:

LOL, you are defining a term with the term.

You can’t actually defend your stupid positions here logically so you resort to petty crap about porn. 
 

You people are so predictably pathetic. 

Hold on....

Youre saying you dont know the difference between a Woman and a trans Woman?

No wonder you're having problems.

Have you run into some "dangling" issues that scared you?

You poor dear.

Let me help you out: if there's an Adam's Apple, steer clear..... Unless you're into such things!

Don't forget,  im here to help all you red hats move past your lack of erudite competency. 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Youre saying you dont know the difference between a Woman and a trans Woman?

I do, I was pointing out your stupidity in trying to define a term with the term. 

Which, you were too stupid to grasp. 
 

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, User said:

I do, I was pointing out your stupidity in trying to define a term with the term. 

Which, you were too stupid to grasp. 
 

1) Woman

2) Trans Woman

 

These are two separate things.

Do you notice a difference between these two?

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted
10 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Elementary School much?

You tell me. 
 

This was you:

DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

The definition of a woman is a woman. 

DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Hell, you should write a dictionary! It would just be every word, followed by that word. 
 

Apple. Definition: Apple.

LOL

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...