Long overdue: The FBI launches a criminal investigation into Comey and Brennan over collusion delusion

[Nationalist]

Not only is this delicious...but there's dessert with the meal too.

https://www.eastonspectator.com/2025/07/13/fbi-opens-grand-conspiracy-probe-on-weaponization-opening-door-to-special-prosecutor/

Edited July 15, 2025 by Nationalist

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Not only is this delicious...but there's dessert with the meal too.

https://www.eastonspectator.com/2025/07/13/fbi-opens-grand-conspiracy-probe-on-weaponization-opening-door-to-special-prosecutor/

I don't think he's going to leave a stone unturned when it comes to using lawfare to prosecute those who used it against him. This comes as no surprise

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Not only is this delicious...but there's dessert with the meal too.

https://www.eastonspectator.com/2025/07/13/fbi-opens-grand-conspiracy-probe-on-weaponization-opening-door-to-special-prosecutor/

That investigation was already done. Duh

Why FBI faces uphill battle to investigate Comey and Brennan

Quote

The FBI and Justice Department may face steep obstacles if they pursue prosecutions against former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan over their roles in the Trump-Russia investigation, despite growing scrutiny over the discredited Steele dossier’s influence and allegations of perjury before Congress.

Both Comey and Brennan are under federal criminal investigation for allegedly misusing intelligence and making false statements related to the 2016 election and their investigation of President Donald Trump, Fox News Digital first reported on Tuesday. The investigation reportedly stems from a referral issued by current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who declassified a “lessons learned” tradecraft review on July 2 that criticized Brennan’s handling of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that tied Russia’s election interference efforts to material support for then-candidate Trump.

Ratcliffe’s review casts Brennan’s role in that assessment in a new light, asserting that he “showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness” when he brushed aside concerns from intelligence experts over the reliability of the Steele dossier because its unvetted and salacious claims conformed “with existing theories.” Brennan wrote of the Steele dossier in an email in December 2016 that “my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.”

Despite the new revelations, experts say much of the new interest still relies on old information that has been the subject of multiple congressional inquiries, special counsel investigations, and Inspector General examinations, all of which turned up no evidence that led to criminal charges against the most senior officials.

I'm sure you find CROW delicious cause you're always eating it. LMAO

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That investigation was already done. Duh

Why FBI faces uphill battle to investigate Comey and Brennan

I'm sure you find CROW delicious cause you're always eating it. LMAO

Insider insight on how Brennan is guilty or perjury. 

 

 

[Nationalist]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I don't think he's going to leave a stone unturned when it comes to using lawfare to prosecute those who used it against him. This comes as no surprise

And why should he? 

Spare the rod, spoil the child.

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That investigation was already done. Duh

Why FBI faces uphill battle to investigate Comey and Brennan

I'm sure you find CROW delicious cause you're always eating it. LMAO

Brennan and Comey may never formally pay for what they did. But the effort will destroy their credibility and legacy.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Brennan and Comey may never formally pay for what they did. But the effort will destroy their credibility and legacy.

LMAO. ONLY with the MAGA CULT like ^YOU who believes everything the pathological LIAR says.

Unlike Joe Biden who never said a word about the prosecutions of Trump, Trump has made CLEAR his intent to seek RETRIBUTION through HIS USE OF THE DoJ, JUSTICE BE DAMNED.

[gatomontes99]

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Unlike Joe Biden who never said a word about the prosecutions of Trump, Trump has made CLEAR his intent to seek RETRIBUTION through HIS USE OF THE DoJ, JUSTICE BE DAMNED.

 

Why do you lie when you are so easily proven wrong?

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

Why do you lie when you are so easily proven wrong?

Nothing there about ANY coordination with the DoJ let alone orders to investigate or prosecute ANYONE.

Mentions the Constitution which Trump had violated with IMPUNITY. See Emoluments Clause.

Or impeachment.....

IOW you've PROVEN NOTHING about what I said being wrong.

Making sure Trump not getting elected means BEATING HIM IN THE ELECTION. Duh

Why do YOU LIE when you are so easily proven wrong?

Edited July 15, 2025 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nothing there about ANY coordination with the DoJ let alone orders to investigate or prosecute ANYONE.

Mentions the Constitution which Trump had violated with IMPUNITY. See Emoluments Clause.

Or impeachment.....

IOW you've PROVEN NOTHING about what I said being wrong.

Making sure Trump not getting elected means BEATING HIM IN THE ELECTION. Duh

Why do YOU LIE when you are so easily proven wrong?

Oh I get it. Biden says he will do any thing he can to stop Trump and then sends the #3 in the DOJ to lead a sham investigation in NY, coordinates with the AG in Georgia on 3 occasions, illegally raids Maralago, coordinates with Maryland and Colorado to get Trump off the ballot and your response is "but did he admit to it?". Even though the answer is yes, you still don't believe it. What would it actually take for you to come back to reality? 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh I get it. Biden says he will do any thing he can to stop Trump and then

1. sends the #3 in the DOJ to lead a sham investigation in NY,

2. coordinates with the AG in Georgia on 3 occasions,

3. illegally raids Maralago,

4. coordinates with Maryland and Colorado to get Trump off the ballot and your response is "but did he admit to it?". Even though the answer is yes, you still don't believe it. What would it actually take for you to come back to reality? 

What would it take YOU? You have NO EVIDENCE of Biden's involvement in ANY of ^this.

1. a guy changed jobs. ZERO EVIDENCE Biden was involved

2. "coordinates" on WHAT? 

You mean this:? Biden NOT involved

Quote

The Georgia special prosecutor seeking to convict former President Donald Trump for election interference met with Biden White House officials on the same day Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as special counsel to probe similar federal charges against Mr. Trump, according to court records.

Special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who allegedly is having an improper personal relationship with Democratic Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, met with White House officials in May and November 2022, submitting invoices to Ms. Willis’ office of $2,000 for each meeting.

3. Nothing Illegal about grabbing the classified documents stolen by Trump. NO EVIDENCE of Biden's involvement

4. The CO lawsuit to get Trump off the ballot was filed by Republicans. NO EVIDENCE of Biden's involvement

 

[Radiorum]

Anybody with a lick of sense knows Trump was in bed with Putin. Now, he's acting like a spurned lover when Putin did not stop when Trump told him, "VLADIMIR, STOP!"

it's all so gross.

 

[User]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

Anybody with a lick of sense knows Trump was in bed with Putin. Now, he's acting like a spurned lover when Putin did not stop when Trump told him, "VLADIMIR, STOP!"

it's all so gross.

 

Oh, OK. So, what is your most compelling evidence of Trump being in bed with Putin?

 

 

[Radiorum]

23 minutes ago, User said:

Oh, OK. So, what is your most compelling evidence of Trump being in bed with Putin?

OMG, are you really that sheltered? Are you really that captured in your little bubble?

[User]

18 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

OMG, are you really that sheltered? Are you really that captured in your little bubble?

So... this is all in your head. 

 

[CdnFox]

Just now, User said:

So... this is all in your head. 

 

Which is where it's always been.

Report after report after report showing that there's really no evidence connecting the two of themdozens of operatives working 24 hours a day for 3 years couldn't come up with evidence and it's basically been completely shot down.... but here's this guy.

But if you dare suggest Biden did anything appropriate with his son despite emails and testimony then you're just completely a conspiracy nut   

[gatomontes99]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

1. a guy changed jobs. ZERO EVIDENCE Biden was involved

The guy didnt change jobs. The guy left the #3 spot in all of law enforcement to become an entry level prosecutor and then just happened to work on a case that could potentially harm his former boss' political rival and he only did that after said rival announced his plans to run. That's an awful lot of coincidences.

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

2. "coordinates" on WHAT? 

Presumably the charges against Trump. You don't think Wade took those meetings with the WH and then just conveniently forgot what they were about, do you? If I ever took a meeting with a staffer at the White House, I would remember every freaking detail. And this guy just forgets? He doesn't even know the topic? And he billed them for it? That doesn't fit with reality.

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

3. Nothing Illegal about grabbing the classified documents stolen by Trump. NO EVIDENCE of Biden's involvement

Yeah. The guy that did it was known for his reckless and lawless persecution of political rivals. He wasn't hired to plant daisies or be fair. He was hired to be a hit man. 

 

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

4. The CO lawsuit to get Trump off the ballot was filed by Republicans. NO EVIDENCE of Biden's involvement

Bullshìt! They weren't Republicans. Republican Krista Kafer, for example, campaigned for Biden and voted for Harris. But im sure you think there was no influence there. 

Look at all the coincidences above. One or two might just be coincidences. But we have like what? 10? More? All these coincidences to say Joe didnt do it?

Maybe Joe was to far gone to do it. We know he had no clue about most of the auto pen uses. But someone at that White House was coordinating all of it.