Lawsuit says election stolen, voting machines tampered with, outcome questonable.... and this time it's the democrats

[CdnFox]

2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances - Newsweek

Well here we go. After 4 years of democrats screaming to the High Heavens how absolutely horrible it was for trump to question the validity of the election and how childish and conspiratorial it was to question the integrity of the voting machines because there's no possible way anybody could have messed with them, The democrats are now completely 100% reversing their position and their proxy organization is launching a lawsuit which alleges that everything that the democrats said was impossible actually happened and the election was stolen   

If they didn't have dishonestly they'd have no honesty. 

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances - Newsweek

Well here we go. After 4 years of democrats screaming to the High Heavens how absolutely horrible it was for trump to question the validity of the election and how childish and conspiratorial it was to question the integrity of the voting machines because there's no possible way anybody could have messed with them, The democrats are now completely 100% reversing their position and their proxy organization is launching a lawsuit which alleges that everything that the democrats said was impossible actually happened and the election was stolen   

If they didn't have dishonestly they'd have no honesty. 

CdnLIAR ^LIES AGAIN. Trump LOST his DAYS in court 60+ times; that was NOT an ISSUE in 2020. Duh

The ISSUE is what came AFTER those FAILURES and FOS LIES LYING about the voting machines which cost them $800M

Get your FACTS straight and give up or try again without the LIES.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

CdnLIAR ^LIES AGAIN. Trump LOST his DAYS in court 60+ times; that was NOT an ISSUE in 2020. Duh

I never said it was an issue. 

Which means YOU are the liar, claiming i did.     But we all know you're a liar. Thanks for proving it again tho. 

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The ISSUE is what came AFTER those FAILURES and FOS LIES LYING about the voting machines which cost them $800M

The issue is that from the beginning the dems said it was impossible and it was all conspiracy and he was trying to steal the election etc etc... now they're making the same claims they said was impossible 

I know little guy, that makes you so mad    but it's still the truth 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I never said it was an issue. 

Which means YOU are the liar, claiming i did.     But we all know you're a liar. Thanks for proving it again tho. 

The issue is that from the beginning the dems said it was impossible and it was all conspiracy and he was trying to steal the election etc etc... now they're making the same claims they said was impossible 

I know little guy, that makes you so mad    but it's still the truth 

YOU ARE LYING, which is WHY you have QUOTED NO EVIDENCE for ^these claims.

Your cite says NOTHING about the 2020 cases.

HERE is YOUR LIE about 2020

Quote

4 years of democrats screaming to the High Heavens how absolutely horrible it was for trump to question the validity of the election and how childish and conspiratorial it was to question the integrity of the voting machines because there's no possible way anybody could have messed with them

Any "screaming" came AFTER Trump LOST 60+ court challenges and he moved on TO CHEATING and LYING about certified election results.

You're CRYING about one court challenge that doesn't even seek to change the election results. Duh

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

YOU ARE LYING, which is WHY you have QUOTED NO EVIDENCE for ^these claims.

I posted evidence. And you are the one who lied about what I said. And now you're lying again.

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

Quote

Your cite says NOTHING about the 2020 cases.

I never mentioned the  2020 cases. You were the only one that brought that up. So now you are lying about what I said and then pretending to be mad that my cite did not provide evidence of something I never said.

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

Quote

HERE is YOUR LIE about 2020

There was no lie there sorry

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

Quote

Any "screaming" came AFTER Trump LOST 60+ court challenges and he moved on TO CHEATING and LYING about certified election results.

That is an absolute lie, which is why you presented it without any citations. But in addition I never said when the screaming started I just said they spent 4 years doing it

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar. 

 

You may not be very good at presenting proof of anything ELSE you say, but you're great at proving you're a liar   

[robosmith]

42 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I posted evidence. And you are the one who lied about what I said. And now you're lying again.

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

I never mentioned the  2020 cases. You were the only one that brought that up. So now you are lying about what I said and then pretending to be mad that my cite did not provide evidence of something I never said.

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

There was no lie there sorry

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar

That is an absolute lie, which is why you presented it without any citations. But in addition I never said when the screaming started I just said they spent 4 years doing it

But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar. 

 

You may not be very good at presenting proof of anything ELSE you say, but you're great at proving you're a liar   

CdnLIAR back to ignore. 

Your "EVIDENCE" is NOT even Democrats.

SMART Elections

SMART Elections

https://smartelections.us

 

3 days ago — SMART Elections - a non-partisan project transforming elections by improving election security, providing public oversight, and advocating ...

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

CdnLIAR back to ignore. 

 

 

LOL well that didn't take long to scare you   Every time i post facts, you run away like a frightened deer and stick your head in the sand  

Thanks for proving you're a liar AND a coward  

Edited Friday at 07:12 PM by CdnFox

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

CdnLIAR back to ignore. 

Your "EVIDENCE" is NOT even Democrats.

SMART Elections

SMART Elections

https://smartelections.us

 

3 days ago — SMART Elections - a non-partisan project transforming elections by improving election security, providing public oversight, and advocating ...

 

Pretty please, can I be on ignore too, to, two tutu.

[Moonlight Graham]

On 6/13/2025 at 1:07 AM, CdnFox said:

2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances - Newsweek

Well here we go. After 4 years of democrats screaming to the High Heavens how absolutely horrible it was for trump to question the validity of the election and how childish and conspiratorial it was to question the integrity of the voting machines because there's no possible way anybody could have messed with them, The democrats are now completely 100% reversing their position and their proxy organization is launching a lawsuit which alleges that everything that the democrats said was impossible actually happened and the election was stolen   

If they didn't have dishonestly they'd have no honesty. 

They have to prove it in court.  Trump lost every lawsuit.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

They have to prove it in court.  

Well of course. And I strongly suspect they will lose these court cases as well just like trump did. And it won't matter because it's coming so late now that even if it was proven it wouldn't change the results of the election. Although I'm sure we would never hear the end of how trump is the illegitimate president, but we're going to hear that anyway

But what gets me is the hypocrisy. The number of democrats or supporters who adamantly demanded banging fists gnashing teeth and rending garments that the whole rigged voting machine argument was utterly impossible and unthinkable and you had to be the biggest conspiracy theory not to even entertain it was simply staggering.

But now it's basically trump stole the election with voter box fraud. 🙄

I mean honestly   It's only been four years since they were saying you had to be a certified nutjob to believe this kind of thing   

[Barquentine]

On 6/13/2025 at 2:07 AM, CdnFox said:

The democrats are now completely 100% reversing their position and their proxy organization is launching a lawsuit

Any proof of proxy, hmm...? "SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group."

https://freepress.org/profile/lulu-friesdat
Lulu Friesdat: Founder.  "She's had assignments with NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, CBS, Fox News Channel"

FOX NEWS CHANNEL!!!

 

Someone who participates in their seminars:

Laura Pressley
https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2012-05-11/the-gop-friends-of-laura-pressley

All you Cons can do is lie, fabricate, insinuate, and flood social media with misinformation.

 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Any proof of proxy, hmm...?

Sure but not matter what i say you're brain is going to edit out what you don't like  

Quote

 

"SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group."

https://freepress.org/profile/lulu-friesdat
Lulu Friesdat: Founder.  "She's had assignments with NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, CBS, Fox News Channel"

FOX NEWS CHANNEL!!!

 

So..... Ultra left bias media, ultra left bias media, Ultra left bias media, very left bias media, and  one right bias.....  and your conclusion is they MUST be right wingers!!!!! FREAK OUT!!!!  

Fox has TONNES of left bias people on they do that kind of thing all the time.  Gives them something to 'argue' with.  But the vast vast vast majority of lulu's work has a very heavy left wing bias. 

That was an utter fail on your part kiddo  Proving shat 80 percent of her assignments are from the ultra left does NOT strengthen your case  

 

[robosmith]

On 6/13/2025 at 12:14 PM, Legato said:

Pretty please, can I be on ignore too, to, two tutu.

All you have to do is LIE like CdnLIAR or Luser or Gato.

14 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Any proof of proxy, hmm...? "SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group."

https://freepress.org/profile/lulu-friesdat
Lulu Friesdat: Founder.  "She's had assignments with NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, CBS, Fox News Channel"

FOX NEWS CHANNEL!!!

 

Someone who participates in their seminars:

Laura Pressley
https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2012-05-11/the-gop-friends-of-laura-pressley

All you Cons can do is lie, fabricate, insinuate, and flood social media with misinformation.

 

 

Bolded is why CdnLIAR is on ignore.

[User]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

All you have to do is LIE like CdnLIAR or Luser or Gato.

Except... you are the liar and you hide from me because I call you out over and over again. 

[robosmith]

Just now, User said:

Except... you are the liar and you hide from me because I call you out over and over again. 

You're so IGNORANT you don't even know what your LIES are; like ^this one.

[User]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're so IGNORANT you don't even know what your LIES are; like ^this one.

No lie. You have run away from me many times. When I first got here you started so many threads based on crap, you got sick and tired of being called out so you hide. 

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

All you have to do is LIE like CdnLIAR or Luser or Gato.

Bolded is why CdnLIAR is on ignore.

Aww muffin,  still so scared of me you're afraid to talk to me directly    LOL I swear i didn't mean to scare you so bad, you're just so fragile!  

And i've already shown why is post was an error  

[Legato]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

All you have to do is LIE like CdnLIAR or Luser or Gato.

Bolded is why CdnLIAR is on ignore.

Lying like these people you mentioned would in fact be the only truth that you would hear in any given time period.

What's more they tell it as it is without Capitalising every other word in a vain attempt to add emphasis......and......without any Duh's or LMAO's.

So.......given that information, any truth from me must, by example, be a lie. Therefore the ignore function is beckoning like the Sirens to Odysseus, you must submit, or forfeit the Zucchini.

 

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Legato said:

Lying like these people you mentioned would in fact be the only truth that you would hear in any given time period.

Ok you're getting a lot closer with LIES LIKE ^THIS.

Your TROLLING means you're A NOT SERIOUS PERSON and have NO RESPECT for TRUTH. 🤮

6 hours ago, Legato said:

What's more they tell it as it is without Capitalising every other word in a vain attempt to add emphasis......and......without any Duh's or LMAO's.

The fact that ^it bothers you means the EMPHASIS was NOT IN VAIN. Duh

6 hours ago, Legato said:

So.......given that information, any truth from me must, by example, be a lie. Therefore the ignore function is beckoning like the Sirens to Odysseus, you must submit, or forfeit the Zucchini.

You are JUST a TROLL and not serious enough to be taken as a LIAR. AKA just a CLOWN.

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You are JUST a TROLL and not serious enough to be taken as a LIAR. AKA just a CLOWN.

That means I'd fit right in with your crowd.

[robosmith]

15 minutes ago, Legato said:

That means I'd fit right in with your crowd.

You're OBVIOUSLY a complete OUTLIER, TROLL.

[CdnFox]

47 minutes ago, Legato said:

That means I'd fit right in with your crowd.

Probably not. I'm told they can smell brains and it upsets them. 

32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're OBVIOUSLY a complete OUTLIER, TROLL.

LOLOL  an outlier troll     I take it outlier is another word you don't understand but thought sounded cool? How very dunning kruger of you  

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Probably not. I'm told they can smell brains and it upsets them. 

LOLOL  an outlier troll     I take it outlier is another word you don't understand but thought sounded cool? How very dunning kruger of you  

Nope, outlier fits perfectly. Apparently it's YOU who doesn't understand the meaning.

Quote

out·li·er

/ˈoutˌlī(ə)r/

noun

 

1. a person or thing situated away or detached from the main body or system.

   "less accessible islands and outliers"

   • a person or thing differing from all other members of a particular group or set.

     "an outlier in Faulkner's body of work"
   • Geology

What did you believe it means? LMAO

[CdnFox]

53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope, outlier fits perfectly. Apparently it's YOU who doesn't understand the meaning.

 

LOLOLOL it does not   HAAHAAHAHAAHAAAHA - holy shit you're always good for a laugh  

hey hey... maybe he's not trolling, maybe it's just "cognitive dissionence"!  LOLOLOL!   

God there's so many words you just don't understand that you always get wrong   I'll add this one to the list LOL

[Nationalist]

Hypocrites. Democrats are blatant hypocrites...and by their own definition...are a real threat to Democracy.