TACO Trump Reneges on Mass Deportation Plan: Finally Understands Farms and Hotels Need Immigrant Labor

[robosmith]

What an lDIOT. Just like lDIOT gnat girl here pretends that immigrant laborers are "slaves."  LMAO

[CdnFox]

ummm.... doesn't look like he's reneging at all....

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ummm.... doesn't look like he's reneging at all....

What DOES it mean though?  What's he trying to signal here?  What do you think?

Honest question.

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

What DOES it mean though?  What's he trying to signal here?  What do you think?

Honest question.

Sounds to me like some amnesty deal is coming. That would be a bad idea. But, it is definitely in everyone's best interest to get rid of criminals/gang members first. 

[Michael Hardner]

56 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Sounds to me like some amnesty deal is coming. That would be a bad idea. But, it is definitely in everyone's best interest to get rid of criminals/gang members first. 

My question was for CF but your reply is interesting to me.

Amnesty ?  It's hard to see how he could navigate that politically.  I also don't see how it could be made to work.  I think there was some discussion about so-called 'dreamers' who were brought to America as children but Republicans were cool to the idea of naturalizing them.

If the goal is to get rid of 'gangs' then it's definitely clearer, you would have to just be clear on the message and have control over execution.  But I agree, it would be a bad idea just based on the political and practical challenges there.

I'm asking honestly because it's a pretty unexpected statement, is all.

[Deluge]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

What an lDIOT. Just like lDIOT gnat girl here pretends that immigrant laborers are "slaves."  LMAO

robomarx loves slaves, as it makes sense; his political ancestors also loved slaves - the love for slaving has been hardwired into his DNA. 

But remember, stupid; it's always been about getting rid of the violent criminals and gangbangers first. 

First it's the gangbangers and violent criminals. 

Then it's the dumbass protesters. 

Then it's the welfare leeches. 

Then it's case by case for working individuals. 

Edited 16 hours ago by Deluge

[Matthew]

Mass deportation is purely theatrics for the ignorant. The capacity to aprehend tens of millions of people does not exist. And that's the easiest part.  The logistics of what to do with them next is far more limited and expensive.

Even if it were possible to remove tens of millions of workers, it would destroy the economy and food supply.

So the best they can hope for is emotionally pacifying maggot supporters with aggressive and militarized scenes of raids, even though the scale of what they are doing is still laughably low.

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

What DOES it mean though?  What's he trying to signal here?  What do you think?

Honest question.

It would appear to me that what he's saying is that he hears businesses who say they rely on cheap immigrant labour that doesn't get the benefit of regular workers, but he feels (for some reason) that the criminals who are mixed in with the illegals seek out these jobs themselves , and while we must protect our businesses we also must get rid of the criminals so something is going to happen.

Honestly if anything it sounds like he's going to double down. 

I mean it's trump.  Half the time HE doesn't know what he means. But that'd be how i'd read that based on my many years of deciphering cryptotrump.  (Covfeve!!!) 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Matthew said:

Mass deportation is purely theatrics for the ignorant. The capacity to aprehend tens of millions of people does not exist. And that's the easiest part.  The logistics of what to do with them next is far more limited and expensive.

Even if it were possible to remove tens of millions of workers, it would destroy the economy and food supply.

So the best they can hope for is emotionally pacifying maggot supporters with aggressive and militarized scenes of raids, even though the scale of what they are doing is still laughably low.

A few points.

1, He is mostly targeting people that have been here for less than two years. The total number will be considerably lower than 10 million.

All he really needs to do to get a success out of this is send back 10 thousand or so. People will move about in the countries that they are deported back to and talk about what's happened and it will significantly discourage anyone else from trying to enter the country because they will be afraid that they will be thrown out.

We saw this effect to a degree when Trump blocked immigrants from Mexico from entering the country back during COVID and insisted that they apply on the Mexican side. Suddenly there was a lot less illegal crossing and a lot less attempts.

And it doesnt seem impossible that he would be able to get upwards of 10,000 people deported a year without too much trouble.

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ummm.... doesn't look like he's reneging at all....

"Changes are coming" DJT

Duh

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"Changes are coming" DJT

Duh

Congratulations, that was officially your most useless post this month. And it was up against some pretty stiff competition  

[Moonlight Graham]

22 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

What DOES it mean though?  What's he trying to signal here?  What do you think?

Honest question.

Trump's focus for deportations has largely been criminals, including in LA.  Looks like he's pointing that out and saying he's not going to deport all illegals, which he hasn't been doing anyways.

Maybe this is his way of trying to quell some of the uproar in LA.