Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I want reparations for 8 years of woke bullshit. Nobody should have to put up with that shit for even 5 minutes. 

Always with a hand out. 

Woe is me someone 150 years ago was treated badly now give me money wah wah wah

  • Like 2
Posted

Dear Ms. Lee,

Up yours you dumb b1tch. Do you even realize that your trillion would come at the expense of Afro-Americans as well? Your logic and your hair-doo need the immediate attention of sound reconstruction. 

You want money for something nobody alive today had any part in. It is actually quite possible that you have some Caucasian DNA floating about inside you, just waiting to burst forth. Wouldn't that be special...

You and that bald-headed effigy from a horror movie, Ayanna Presley, should both consider new careers that don't involve public exposure. But for now, I'll just laugh at you and your...

Brilliance...

Yours Truly,

N.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Dear Ms. Lee,

Up yours you dumb b1tch. Do you even realize that your trillion would come at the expense of Afro-Americans as well? Your logic and your hair-doo need the immediate attention of sound reconstruction. 

You want money for something nobody alive today had any part in. It is actually quite possible that you have some Caucasian DNA floating about inside you, just waiting to burst forth. Wouldn't that be special...

You and that bald-headed effigy from a horror movie, Ayanna Presley, should both consider new careers that don't involve public exposure. But for now, I'll just laugh at you and your...

Brilliance...

Yours Truly,

N.

Crazy how the average pasty skin is now being forced to pay for lawsuits that they had no part in. 

 

Posted

Typical right wing IGNORANCE who don't understand persecution of blacks did not end with slavery.

"150 years ago" LMAO

Jim Crow continued until the 1960s. Slavery by another name continued well after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Lincoln promised 40 acres and a mule, but that promise didn't survive his assassination.

You Canucks know NOTHING about black history in the US, and DELUGINAL is just parroting the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

 

The film tells how even as chattel slavery came to an end in 1865, thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and ...
Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Typical right wing IGNORANCE who don't understand persecution of blacks did not end with slavery.

"150 years ago" LMAO

Jim Crow continued until the 1960s. Slavery by another name continued well after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Lincoln promised 40 acres and a mule, but that promise didn't survive his assassination.

You Canucks know NOTHING about black history in the US, and DELUGINAL is just parroting the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

 

The film tells how even as chattel slavery came to an end in 1865, thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and ...

Well I expect that, since you have such a guilt complex, you'll be signing your home over to some arbitrary black guy.

Let me know when you've cleansed your conscience. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

Typical right wing IGNORANCE who don't understand persecution of blacks did not end with slavery.

"150 years ago" LMAO

Jim Crow continued until the 1960s. Slavery by another name continued well after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Lincoln promised 40 acres and a mule, but that promise didn't survive his assassination.

You Canucks know NOTHING about black history in the US, and DELUGINAL is just parroting the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

 

The film tells how even as chattel slavery came to an end in 1865, thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and ...

It should be up to the Democrats to pay reparations if any were to be paid out. Republicans didn't want Jim Crow whereas Democrats did. Duh

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

It's part of their ongoing plan to scrub whiteness off the face of the earth and replace it with brownness. 

Demographics is destiny

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
33 minutes ago, West said:

It should be up to the Democrats to pay reparations if any were to be paid out. Republicans didn't want Jim Crow whereas Democrats did. Duh

This is true.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

It should be up to the Democrats to pay reparations if any were to be paid out. Republicans didn't want Jim Crow whereas Democrats did. Duh

^Doubling down on Canuck IGNORANCE. Modern Democrats back reparations while modern RACISTS vote RepubliCON.

That all changed when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and Nixon adopted "the Southern (racist) strategy."

You really should do SOME research before making a fool of yourself all the time.

 

Apr 15, 2025  The Southern strategy is a campaign strategy pursued by the U.S. Republican Party and initially aimed at increasing support from white ...
55 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

This is true.

 

No it's NOT, IGNORAMUS.

 

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Well I expect that, since you have such a guilt complex, you'll be signing your home over to some arbitrary black guy.

Let me know when you've cleansed your conscience. 

Reparations were promised by the US Government, which still exists today. Duh

Posted
15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Doubling down on Canuck IGNORANCE. Modern Democrats back reparations while modern RACISTS vote RepubliCON.

That all changed when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and Nixon adopted "the Southern (racist) strategy."

You really should do SOME research before making a fool of yourself all the time.

 

Apr 15, 2025  The Southern strategy is a campaign strategy pursued by the U.S. Republican Party and initially aimed at increasing support from white ...

 

No it's NOT, IGNORAMUS.

 

Reparations were promised by the US Government, which still exists today. Duh

Well, your source is showing major signs of bias. For example, your source claims:

Quote

The major Democratic-sponsored national civil rights legislation of the 1960s, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, were vehemently opposed by Southern Democrats and are frequently cited as the immediate cause of the South’s shift of allegiance from the Democratic to the Republican Party.

However, the truth is that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was overwhelmingly supported by Republicans. To say that the shift from Democrat to Republican is because Democrats supported the act is completely asinine. The Republicans supported the act in much greater numbers than the Democrats. Fact Check

What you did have, is Nixon trying to exploit disenfranchised voters. In reality, he was chasing the voters that saw the violence the Democrats used against blacks:

Quote

Many loyal Democratic voters at home, shocked by the violence they saw on television, turned away from their party, which seemed to have attracted dangerous “radicals,” and began to consider Nixon’s promises of law and order. As the Democratic Party was a house divided, Nixon successfully campaigned for the votes of both working and middle-class White Americans, winning the 1968 election.

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-ushistory2/chapter/nixons-policies/

The thing about you (and the rest of the left) is that you've built your entire belief system on lies and emotion. The only racist party, in this country, is the Democrat party. Anyone that believes other wise has fallen for the Democrat party lies.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, your source is showing major signs of bias. For example, your source claims:

However, the truth is that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was overwhelmingly supported by Republicans. To say that the shift from Democrat to Republican is because Democrats supported the act is completely asinine. The Republicans supported the act in much greater numbers than the Democrats. Fact Check

What you did have, is Nixon trying to exploit disenfranchised voters. In reality, he was chasing the voters that saw the violence the Democrats used against blacks:

The thing about you (and the rest of the left) is that you've built your entire belief system on lies and emotion. The only racist party, in this country, is the Democrat party. Anyone that believes other wise has fallen for the Democrat party lies.

The FACT is, after the CRA, ALL the Southern states turned red. Do you understand what that means? LMAO

Nixon's "Southern strategy" worked. Duh

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The FACT is, after the CRA, ALL the Southern states turned red. Do you understand what that means? LMAO

Nixon's "Southern strategy" worked. Duh

Yes. Per the links above, the southern whites rejected the racism and violence of the Democratic party.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, your source is showing major signs of bias. For example, your source claims:

However, the truth is that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was overwhelmingly supported by Republicans. To say that the shift from Democrat to Republican is because Democrats supported the act is completely asinine. The Republicans supported the act in much greater numbers than the Democrats. Fact Check

What you did have, is Nixon trying to exploit disenfranchised voters. In reality, he was chasing the voters that saw the violence the Democrats used against blacks:

The thing about you (and the rest of the left) is that you've built your entire belief system on lies and emotion. The only racist party, in this country, is the Democrat party. Anyone that believes other wise has fallen for the Democrat party lies.

Exactly. 

And the Civil Rights Act would've been implemented many years earlier but the Democrats didn't allow it. Including by LBJ's opposition. 

LBJ was also likely involved in the set up of MLKJr and his assassination. We will find that out with the release of the MLK files

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Doubling down on Canuck IGNORANCE. Modern Democrats back reparations while modern RACISTS vote RepubliCON.

That all changed when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and Nixon adopted "the Southern (racist) strategy."

You really should do SOME research before making a fool of yourself all the time.

 

Apr 15, 2025  The Southern strategy is a campaign strategy pursued by the U.S. Republican Party and initially aimed at increasing support from white ...

 

No it's NOT, IGNORAMUS.

 

Reparations were promised by the US Government, which still exists today. Duh

This isn't true. Nixon was one of the first to look at implementing affirmative action

Any opposition to the CRA was due to philosophical beliefs opposing too much centralized power to Washington, not keeping Democrats racist policies going. Duh 

Edited by West
Posted
13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yes. Per the links above, the southern whites rejected the racism and violence of the Democratic party.

The Democrats always try to whitewash history. Sad. 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, West said:

The Democrats always try to whitewash history. Sad. 

Whitewash....I see what you did there ;)

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
39 minutes ago, West said:

Exactly. 

And the Civil Rights Act would've been implemented many years earlier but the Democrats didn't allow it. Including by LBJ's opposition. 

LBJ was also likely involved in the set up of MLKJr and his assassination. We will find that out with the release of the MLK files

Your conspiracy theories are famously BULLSHIT here. LBJ SIGNED the CRA. Duh

39 minutes ago, West said:

This isn't true. Nixon was one of the first to look at implementing affirmative action

"Look at"? LMAO

What did he DO?

AbstractThe GOP's Southern Strategy initiated the realignment of the South with the Republican Party by exploiting white racial anxiety about social change.
Sep 5, 2020  Republican politicians of the 1960s exploited white voters' fears and prejudices – and Trump is stoking the fire for November.
39 minutes ago, West said:

Any opposition to the CRA was due to philosophical beliefs opposing too much centralized power to Washington, not keeping Democrats racist policies going. Duh 

Sure. And that's what Southern right wingers have been CLAIMING for years about the Civil War, but that FACTS stated in the secession documents say it was about slavery. Later it was about "slavery by another name." AKA Jim Crow.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

The thing about you (and the rest of the left) is that you've built your entire belief system on lies and emotion. The only racist party, in this country, is the Democrat party. Anyone that believes other wise has fallen for the Democrat party lies.

Dumbest take yet. Who did white supremacists, white nationalists and neo nazis vote for? Who did David Duke endorse? Who's droning on about replacement theory and white genocide? Who has dinner with Nick Fuentes. If you see a swastika or a confederate flag, do you know how that person votes? Of course you do. 

Jeebus. You don't even believe what you're saying. You just say it anyway.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Dumbest take yet. Who did white supremacists, white nationalists and neo nazis vote for? Who did David Duke endorse? Who's droning on about replacement theory and white genocide? Who has dinner with Nick Fuentes. If you see a swastika or a confederate flag, do you know how that person votes? Of course you do. 

Jeebus. You don't even believe what you're saying. You just say it anyway.

The Klan were all Democrats. Duh

Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your conspiracy theories are famously BULLSHIT here. LBJ SIGNED the CRA. Duh

"Look at"? LMAO

What did he DO?

AbstractThe GOP's Southern Strategy initiated the realignment of the South with the Republican Party by exploiting white racial anxiety about social change.
Sep 5, 2020  Republican politicians of the 1960s exploited white voters' fears and prejudices – and Trump is stoking the fire for November.

Sure. And that's what Southern right wingers have been CLAIMING for years about the Civil War, but that FACTS stated in the secession documents say it was about slavery. Later it was about "slavery by another name." AKA Jim Crow.

The guardian is propaganda for the Democrats. Marxists try to rewrite history to make the good guys look like the bad guys. 

Democrats are still the party of racism it's just directed at white people now 

And back to the original threat, no 30 something year old white people should not be paying for the crimes of the Democrats as they weren't even alive at that time. 

Sick stuff but what do you expect from the Democrats? Just more vile racist bs

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Typical right wing IGNORANCE who don't understand persecution of blacks did not end with slavery.

"150 years ago" LMAO

Jim Crow continued until the 1960s. Slavery by another name continued well after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Lincoln promised 40 acres and a mule, but that promise didn't survive his assassination.

You Canucks know NOTHING about black history in the US, and DELUGINAL is just parroting the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

 

The film tells how even as chattel slavery came to an end in 1865, thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and ...

robowoke thinks he's a black cisgender trapped in a white cisgender's body. 

Such is the crisis of a race baiting pronoun slut...

Edited by Deluge
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Dumbest take yet. Who did white supremacists, white nationalists and neo nazis vote for?

The people your idols told them to vote for, because they are stupid enough to believe your lies.

 

13 minutes ago, West said:

Who did David Duke endorse?

Jill Stein.

13 minutes ago, West said:

Who's droning on about replacement theory and white genocide?

The NYTs: We Can Replace Them

29 minutes ago, Hodad said:

If you see a swastika or a confederate flag, do you know how that person votes? Of course you do. 

Do I? White Nationalist Richard Spencer Votes for Joe Biden

I mean, that's two prominent Neonazi/white supremacists voting for the socialist green party and democratic party. Maybe your bigoted mind has made conclusions, but that's your sin, not mine.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...