It's a scientific fact that humans come in 2 varieties, but ONLY for those IGNORANT of ALL the biological variations.

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, Legato said:

Does that mean you're genuous, in that case I'll have a bakers dozen.

^DRIVEL AKA not a word.

28 minutes ago, Legato said:

How many instances are there of women beating (not playing against) men in sports?

I'm sure it happens all the time. Are you keeping track? 

I'm sure any female pro-tennis player could beat me. Long time ago, I played against a non-pro woman tennis player and she beat me easily because she was a regular player and I hadn't played tennis for months.

28 minutes ago, Legato said:

Goalposts.

^DRIVEL. I wasn't talking to ^TROLL.

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^DRIVEL AKA not a word.

I'm sure it happens all the time. Are you keeping track? 

I'm sure any female pro-tennis player could beat me. Long time ago, I played against a non-pro woman tennis player and she beat me easily because she was a regular player and I hadn't played tennis for months.

^DRIVEL. I wasn't talking to ^TROLL.

So you can't answer his legitimate questions or comments?

I guess that's your way of admitting you lose then

[Legato]

43 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure it happens all the time. Are you keeping track? 

 

How many instances are there of women beating (not playing against) men in sports?

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, User said:

Again, you are conflating people with genetic disorders with the whole trans madness.

I'm not conflating them, I'm simply pointing out that you're taking the bait anyway.

3 hours ago, User said:

I am not familiar with your charter or the nuances in it... but again, to the point here, if it is being used to force the trans madness onto children, in schools, into women's locker rooms, into their sports... then yeah, no kidding, folks are going to have issues with this. 

I have no doubt some people would like to amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms so it can do that but it's not happening and won't. Nor will it be used to protect  snowflakes from feeling icky.

You're having an issue with ghosts. There are so few cases of what you're talking about, more than might stem from the 1 % or so some trans activists for sure, but no where near the millions one gets the sense is the case from listening to you people.

The real fad is blowing things out of proportion - the sign of the time.

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'm not conflating them, I'm simply pointing out that you're taking the bait anyway.

I have no doubt some people would like to amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms so it can do that but it's not happening and won't.

Right! That's what the notwithstanding clause is for   

[eyeball]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Right! That's what the notwithstanding clause is for   

And it works both ways...for five years one way then the other.

[Legato]

[User]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

No one is telling anyone what they have to say. Many designations today include "non-binary."

False. In left wing controlled school districts teachers are being forced to use the pronouns students want or to "affirm" children with their being trans and it is being built into the student code of conduct that it is bullying if students do not also use these things. 

The previous administration was pushing this BS into all federal agencies to have to change the definitions of woman and play the pronoun games. 

So yes, in fact, this garbage is being forced onto people. 

 

[User]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I'm not conflating them, I'm simply pointing out that you're taking the bait anyway.

Yes, you were in fact conflating them. The only bait here is if you are admitting you say stupid ignorant crap just to be called out for saying stupid ignorant crap. 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I have no doubt some people would like to amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms so it can do that but it's not happening and won't. Nor will it be used to protect  snowflakes from feeling icky.

You're having an issue with ghosts. There are so few cases of what you're talking about, more than might stem from the 1 % or so some trans activists for sure, but no where near the millions one gets the sense is the case from listening to you people.

The real fad is blowing things out of proportion - the sign of the time.

I don't trust your interpretation of the charter... and you are damn right it is disgusting that people like you want to push this madness onto children and shit all over women. 

 

[User]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure it happens all the time. Are you keeping track? 

I'm sure any female pro-tennis player could beat me. Long time ago, I played against a non-pro woman tennis player and she beat me easily because she was a regular player and I hadn't played tennis for months.

You are so dishonest. 

Comparing yourself, untrained, to a pro female tennis player is meaningless. You are not comparing strength, you are comparing the amount of time, training, someone has to their skill level to yours. 

The point here is that the absolute best Pro-Female Tennis player would rank somewhere in the 1,000's of pro-men tennis players. 

 

[robosmith]

29 minutes ago, User said:

You are so dishonest. 

Not AT ALL. Just not conforming to YOUR DISHONEST FRAMING.

29 minutes ago, User said:

Comparing yourself, untrained, to a pro female tennis player is meaningless. 

You are not comparing strength, you are comparing the amount of time, training, someone has to their skill level to yours. 

The point is, skill is far more important than physical strength. 

29 minutes ago, User said:

The point here is that the absolute best Pro-Female Tennis player would rank somewhere in the 1,000's of pro-men tennis players. 

You're wrong. Do you even play tennis or watch the pros?

Serena Williams played a male pro ranked between 100 and 200, and while he beat her, it was very close.

No way she is going to lose to challenger level men.

[User]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The point is, skill is far more important than physical strength. 

No, its not. If you take a man and woman who both devote the same time to a physical sport, the man is going to be stronger on average and there is no competition. 

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're wrong. Do you even play tennis or watch the pros?

Serena Williams played a male pro ranked between 100 and 200, and while he beat her, it was very close.

No way she is going to lose to challenger level men.

Not only am I not wrong, Serena Williams even admitted it. 

Serena Williams at her best would still only be in the top 700 of men. 

 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, User said:

No, its not. If you take a man and woman who both devote the same time to a physical sport, the man is going to be stronger on average and there is no competition. 

Not only am I not wrong, Serena Williams even admitted it. 

Serena Williams at her best would still only be in the top 700 of men. 

 

So you admit you were wrong cause you said 1000s 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

And it works both ways...for five years one way then the other.

Not if you use it right  

[WestCanMan]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Because you never heard about priests abusing children? LMAO

Yes I did. But that's completely beside the point and you know it. 

So why don't you have a comment for what I wrote about this topic?

Am I to assume that you disagree with it all? 

Do you think that guidance counsellors should be allowed to have private conversations with children about gender transitioning, and that the parents can be kept completely out of the loop, even at the point where children start taking puberty blockers, and schedule surgeries? 

Why do you think that eyeball? Can you make your case? 

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

No one is telling anyone what they have to say. Many designations today include "non-binary."

You spelled "My designation is non-brainy" wrong. 

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

DRIVEL

DRIVEL

Edited to the point of accuracy. No need to thank me. 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

You're having an issue with ghosts. There are so few cases of what you're talking about,

Is it ghosts, or are there "so few cases"? 

Which one is it? Because it can't be both. It's either real or it's not. 

If your son went to Mr. Robosmith's office with some questions about their sexuality/gender, and Mr Robosmith started telling your son that "men can get pregnant", and he offered to get your son started on the road to transitioning in utter secrecy, and you found out about it all, what would you do, right after you tried to get pregnant? 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

So you admit you were wrong cause you said 1000s 

The fact that you hold other people to a far higher standard for honesty, integrity and accuracy than you do for your own leadership candidates is very telling. 

[WestCanMan]

Geez. After looking back at this thread, I have to admit that I was punching down pretty hard on the ret4rds. 

Sorry guys. Please don't take it personally. 

[eyeball]

On 4/24/2025 at 5:10 PM, User said:

Anomalies do not change the fact that sex is binary. 

No but politics guarantees facts will become anomalous.

5 hours ago, User said:

Yes, you were in fact conflating them.

I liken it to comparing.

These anomalies have probably always caused curiosity of a sexual nature, mostly amongst men, that can all too often be exploitive, deviant and of course incriminating to exploiters who might not want their exploitativeness, amongst other things, known. This explains the heavy ick factor connected to this issue. The conflating and comparing of things just naturally follows the moral, ethical and political confusion that's been a big aspect of human sexuality for thousands of years.

That said, human beings are by nature sexual beings and if history hasn't taught us anything it's certainly taught us that many human beings explore sexuality, their own and others, like explorers exploring new horizons. 

In any case you seem to have me confused with someone who gives a shit about how you feel. AFAIC the issue you have is easier to conflate with something everyone used to laugh at on All In The Family when Archie Bunker got his bigoted nose out of joint over something.

Of course if All In The Family was something new on TV today you people would be calling it hate speech that unfairly mis characterizes right wing conservatives as backward and rude.

Edited yesterday at 02:48 AM by eyeball

[User]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you admit you were wrong cause you said 1000s 

I love how you completely ignore your ignorance.

i didn’t say Serena was in the 1,000’s, I said the best female tennis player. Serena hasn’t been the best in a decade now.

but yeah, sure, your big point now is that 700 vs 1000 somehow proves anything?

 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Edited to the point of accuracy. No need to thank me. 

Geez i think you broke him. 

You have to go easy dude, please remember that encountering truth is to Robo Smith as stepping on a piece of Lego in the middle of the night barefoot is to us   

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Yes I did. But that's completely beside the point and you know it. 

So why don't you have a comment for what I wrote about this topic?

Am I to assume that you disagree with it all? 

Do you think that guidance counsellors should be allowed to have private conversations with children about gender transitioning, and that the parents can be kept completely out of the loop, even at the point where children start taking puberty blockers, and schedule surgeries? 

Why do you think that eyeball? Can you make your case? 

I'm not "eyeball."

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You spelled "My designation is non-brainy" wrong. 

No, you spelled it wrong, lDIOT.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Edited to the point of accuracy. No need to thank me. 

No thanks deserved.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The fact that you hold other people to a far higher standard for honesty, integrity and accuracy than you do for your own leadership candidates is very telling. 

IDK what you're talking about and I doubt you do either.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Geez. After looking back at this thread, I have to admit that I was punching down pretty hard on the ret4rds. 

Sorry guys. Please don't take it personally. 

You're "punching" feather weight.

[User]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're "punching" feather weight.

Says the guy who has once again run away from his ignorant comments.