CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 13 minutes ago, eyeball said: Sure we have pharmacare. I simply pointed out Employment Insurance doesn't offer it or dental care for that matter. Oh look who's backpedaling. no, when i pointed out we had these things your reply was 'bullshit'. And once again you're forced to try to go back and rewrite what you said in an effort to cover up your stupidity. Quote You're welcome. Doesn't really affect me. You should really be apologizing to the kids. Your legacy is one of corruption and lost hope. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 Just now, Barquentine said: Desperate nit-picking by you. you "THEY SAY THE SAME THING!!!" me "well no they don't actually. They don't say the same thing at all." you "THATS JUST DESPERATE NITPICKING!!!" LOLOL Sure kid. Quote So much of what they say is so similar that it will hurt the cons in this election. I know this is hard for you to accept. You should just hope that next time the cons pick a good candidat what he says has more in common with carney these days than it does trump. And considering that carney is basically still in his policies you can make the same claim of Carney if you wanted Liberals can't win without lying. This is the kind of lie you choose to tell because you haven't actually got anything substantial to talk about when it comes to Poilievre. His policies are great, so great that the liberals are stealing them. He has tons of experience in federal Canadian politics, he's a family man who's always lived here and cares deeply about Canada and doesn't have three different nationalities. He doesn't have ties to the Chinese government, he doesn't do business with elon and trump already, he has sound economic policies and is a moderate in most things. So you pretend he's trump because you can't actually argue with any of the truth. That's pathetic 2 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Oh look who's backpedaling. no, when i pointed out we had these things your reply was 'bullshit'. Yup. Employment Insurance does not offer dental or pharmacare. You said otherwise. The provinces do. Including the one you live in. EI is federal not provincial. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 4 minutes ago, eyeball said: Yup. Employment Insurance does not offer dental or pharmacare. You said otherwise. LOLOL holy shit, it's only 9 in the morning and i've already broken you to the point where you're desperately lying Lets look at what i said Me: The provinces do. Including the one you live in. In fact the pharmacare is light years better than what the feds offered and the dental care is quite good for low income people. you: Bullshit. I never mentioned employment insurance. I specifically said the provinces have such plans. You said bullshit LOLOLOL And you're so pathetic you make it worse by trying to lie about what was said LOLOL It's always so amusing to crush your little ego to the point where you look this stupid thanks for the laughs! 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I never mentioned employment insurance. That's right Army Guy mentioned it and you just couldn't help but pipe up anyway and said... The provinces do. Including the one you live in. I get it this is the part where you realized you said something stupid and now you have to blame me for it but you know the drill. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, eyeball said: That's right Army Guy mentioned it and you just couldn't help but pipe up anyway Oh look, once again you want your stupidity to be my fault somehow LOL Look, I don't mind that you're a dishonest loser with the IQ of a tennis shoe, but couldn't you switch it up a little bit once in awhile just for variety? Quote The provinces do. Including the one you live in. Oh you mean the part that I already quoted. The part that you said I didn't say. But it turned out I did say it Sigh. Yes Eyeball, that's right, i said the thing i said i said and not the thing you pretended i said LOLOL And I am not responsible for your stupidity. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 9 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Oh look, once again you want your stupidity to be my fault somehow LOL Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 51 minutes ago, eyeball said: LOL go have a cookie and a nap, you'll be fine 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 21 minutes ago, CdnFox said: LOL go have a cookie and a nap, you'll be fine You won't, you'll still be as fùcked up as ever. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
WestCanMan Posted April 16 Author Report Posted April 16 @eyeball Do you think that the Carney gov't has had an alarming number of scandals and lies in just 2 months? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 57 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: @eyeball Do you think that the Carney gov't has had an alarming number of scandals and lies in just 2 months? No. I won't be voting him in any case. I just like laughing at the hyperbolic criticisms you people level at politicians. Plus it virtually guarantees Poilievre won't win. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 2 hours ago, eyeball said: You won't, you'll still be as fùcked up as ever. Awwww little guy I know it hurts you to get your butt handed to you so often Try to cope a little harder though, you're embarrassing yourself 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: @eyeball Do you think that the Carney gov't has had an alarming number of scandals and lies in just 2 months? That's how he prefers his government. 1 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted April 16 Author Report Posted April 16 1 hour ago, eyeball said: No. So you think it's normal, or ok, for a politician to tell so many fabrications to his voters, be receptive to that much foreign influence, have such close ties to an adversarial government, allow the officers of his gov't to threaten opposition members with handing them over to foreign authorities for a bounty, and to allow his followers to show up at opposition rallies and try to sabotage them? Which is it: normal or ok? Quote I won't be voting him in any case. I don't believe you. As a CBC cultist you are powerless to do otherwise. Quote I just like laughing at the hyperbolic criticisms you people level at politicians. Hyperbolic? Is homelessness a joke to you? Are sky-high interest rates a joke to you? Is it a joke when the PM tells us the exact opposite of the truth, over and over? FYI there can be no hyperbolic criticism of Mark Carney's integrity: he has none whatsoever. Quote Plus it virtually guarantees Poilievre won't win. You know that's a complete non-sequitur, right? It doesn't jive with the rest of your drivel at all. If you don't want Poilievre to win, then who would you like to see win? Obviously the Greens won't win, the Bloc can't win, and the NDP have no chance whatsoever... If you don't want PP to win then you must want the Libs to win, yet you say that you're not voting for them... Are you stupid, or lying? If you want the Libs to win, vote for them. If you don't, don't. Are you sticking with "No", as your answer to "do you think that the Carney gov't has had an alarming number of scandals and lies in just 2 months" then? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
eyeball Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: So you think it's normal, or ok, for a politician to tell so many fabrications to his voters, It's certainly normal enough, what isn't normal is your over the top reaction to it. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 16 Report Posted April 16 1 minute ago, eyeball said: It's certainly normal enough, what isn't normal is your over the top reaction to it. So you suggest that we should be accepting of and tolerant of politicians telling so many fabrications to their voters. Perhaps even welcoming This certainly explains why you vote liberal Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 The electoral mood has switched from angry to frightened. Have the Tories really addressed that? Quote
Legato Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 20 hours ago, eyeball said: It's certainly normal enough, what isn't normal is your over the top reaction to it. Like your insistence on body cams is that normal? 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 17 Author Report Posted April 17 14 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: The electoral mood has switched from angry to frightened. Have the Tories really addressed that? Leftists are frightened. They are controlled/dominated by fear, just like during covid. Conservatives are primarily hopeful. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 11 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: The electoral mood has switched from angry to frightened. Have the Tories really addressed that? But it has but it hasn't. People are still wrestling with the idea that they can't afford food and housing and that's not fear-based However the problem is that what fear there is has prompted NDP and block voters to jump to the liberals. The conservatives are actually doing quite well, it's just that those individuals are streaming to the liberals because they absolutely hate and detest the conservatives and they hope that Carney is the answer because they know that jagmeet is not but their hatred and bigotry won't allow them to consider the CPC. The Conservatives really CAN'T address that effectively. They can pull younger ndp because those people want food and housing and they've already taken much of them before this started. but they really can't appeal to the others who are older left wingers. They have to chip away at the blue libs and they've had some success there. However this feels like a time of crisis and in a time of crisis people tend to stay with what they know, and it's hard to beat that. It's worth mentioning again that at any other point in our history, 39 percent in the polls is a majority gov't. It's not like the cpc are doing badly. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted April 17 Author Report Posted April 17 20 hours ago, eyeball said: It's certainly normal enough, It's not normal. Quote what isn't normal is your over the top reaction to it. I react strongly to significant lies. Leftist react strongly to imaginary lies, or immaterial statements that are incorrect like "It didn't rain during my 17-minute inauguration speech"... The left "23 droplets just called..." 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: They have to chip away at the blue libs and they've had some success there. However this feels like a time of crisis and in a time of crisis people tend to stay with what they know, and it's hard to beat that. It's worth mentioning again that at any other point in our history, 39 percent in the polls is a majority gov't. It's not like the cpc are doing badly. The lesson so far is that they haven’t been prepared to go beyond their tribal base. It’s not exactly news that 40% wouldn’t be enough this time. Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 17 Author Report Posted April 17 (edited) 34 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: The lesson so far is that they haven’t been prepared to go beyond their tribal base. It’s not exactly news that 40% wouldn’t be enough this time. The lesson so far is that Canadians are suckers for disingenuous slitherers like Carney and the LPOC. For 9 years they've been the champions of carbon taxes and then a month before the election he says "LOOK, We're saving you money by axing the tax!" "YAY! CARNEY LOVES US!" 😂 It's so embarrassing to be a Canadian sometimes that I wanna scream. Poilievre is sticking to his campaign guns because his base isn't as cozy with liars as the leftists are. Centrists know what they're getting with the CPC and that's a lower cost of living, stronger economy, more personal freedoms, and less DEI/special-interest-group drivel. Edited April 17 by WestCanMan Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: The lesson so far is that they haven’t been prepared to go beyond their tribal base. It’s not exactly news that 40% wouldn’t be enough this time. It is absolutely news. Until this election started 40% would have easily won the election hands down. Even during the leadership run the polling indicated that it would be no problem. This became news when trump decided to put tariffs on and that happened like yesterday. I know it feels like it was a long time ago but it wasn't So get real. This is absolutely shocking to everybody including the liberals. Absolutely nobody was predicting this even in January. Don't let your hatred blind your objectivity Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 (edited) 3 hours ago, Legato said: Like your insistence on body cams is that normal? Not at all, it's definitely out there LOL. And I don't insist in the sense of using force, I suggest it be voluntary, for the same reasons some police feel wearing a camera helps build trust in the communities they serve. Edited April 17 by eyeball Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: It's not normal. I react strongly to significant lies. Well sure and so we should if they're significant lies, ie they verge on being criminal in nature and where there's actual evidence for authorities to act on. Like in the case of Kilmar Ábrego García for example. That's the sort of case that gets my goat. And I sure don't see much if any outrage from you people over the lies being told by politicians about him. Do you even know who I'm talking about never mind why in my reply? 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Leftist react strongly to imaginary lies, or immaterial statements that are incorrect like "It didn't rain during my 17-minute inauguration speech"... The left "23 droplets just called..." Speaking of strong reactions and droplets, I suppose a few lefties might have peed themselves from laughing so hard at the effort you guys put into defending those immaterial incorrect statements. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.